This is the slyest, and therefore smartest, assessment of Islamic fundamentalism currentlyavailable. The author, a prolific Lebanese political theorist, has offered in this, his fourthmonograph on the subject, a well-argued, highly original thesis. Moussalli asks one basicquestion: does Islamic fundamentalism have a philosophical basis? “Yes, it does,”he replies, “but it is not the same basis for all Islamic fundamentalists.” He thenproceeds to demonstrate how particular Islamic fundamentalist theorists have addressed issuessuch as ideology and knowledge, society and politics, from their own philosophical perspective.The argument is markedly tilted toward politics, as each of the six chapters examines either a facetof political philosophy or the discourse of a particular theorist on the Islamic state. The first threechapters are framed as general overviews, first of the fundamentalism–modernism dyad,then of the epistemological divide between divine revelation and human reason, and finally of thediscursive dichotomy between the Islamic state and democratic pluralism. The next three chaptersshift to dominant theorists, the three “heroes” of Islamist ideology. Chapter 4examines Hasan al-Banna on the Islamic state; Chapter 5, Sayyid Qutb. Chapter 6 takes up themost prominent current Islamist: Hasan al-Turabi. Not since Hamid Enayat's ModernIslamic Political Thought (Texas, 1982) has any scholar made such a comprehensive effortto trace the patterns of similarity—and the evidence of conflict anddisagreement—among the major ideologues of Islamic fundamentalism.