Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T20:25:22.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integration of These Methods into the Treatment Programme as a Whole

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

T.C.N. Gibbens
T.C.N. Gibbens*
Affiliation:
Mandsley Hospital, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The integration of the various methods of treatment within the treatment programme as a whole is perhaps the most important, and certainly the most difficult, problem in penology. All penologists have seen cases in which successful treatment has subsequently proved ineffective because aftercare has been inadequate. Although many of the difficulties can be overcome by goodwill, and especially by increasing the degree of communication between individuals, it is useless to deny that those who deal with offenders include professions who have very different roles to play in society, and that one must look for the best compromise between these roles rather than the abolition of all tension between them.

Information

Type
III. — Rapports Généraux General Reports: Deuxième Section — Second Section: Méthodes de Traitement; Methods of Treatment
Information
International Annals of Criminology , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Le Traitement des Delinquants , 1969 , pp. 397 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 International Society for Criminology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bartholomew, (A.) (1964). Some problems of post-conviction-pre-sentence—Reports with particular reference to subsequent psychiatric treatment and rehabilitation.Google Scholar
Connell, (P. D.) (1965). Brit J. of Criminol. 5, p. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criminal law review (1962). The Psychiatric Report for the Court, p. 19.Google Scholar
Dushkind, (D. S.) (1964). Attitudes toward Probation and their Perception.Google Scholar
Gelder, (M. G.) (1965). Can behaviour therapy contribute to the treatment of delinquency? Brit. J. Criminol. (In the press).Google Scholar
Gibbens, (T. C. N.) and Ahrenfeldt, (R. H.) (1965). Cultural Factors in Delinquency. Tavistock Publications, London.Google Scholar
Keve, (P. E.), (1960), The Probation Officer Investigates. A guide to the pre-sentence Report. Minnesota U.P. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, (A.M.) (1963), «Confidentiality in the Correctional Services», Canad. J. Corrections, 5/2, 114.Google Scholar
Marnell, (G.) (1960), «Penology», Report to the Fourth International Criminological Congress.Google Scholar
McCorkle, (L.) and Korn, (R.) (1954), Amer. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci., 293, 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radaelli, (Uberto) (1964), Esperienze di Rieducazione, N° 11.Google Scholar
Rosenhahl, (L. A.) (1964), «The Probation Service's Recommendation to the Courts», Excerpfa Criminologica, 4, 1. Abstract N° 244.Google Scholar
Sachs, (1960), see Marnell.Google Scholar
Scott, (P. D.) (1953), «Psychiatric Report for Magistrate's Court», Brit. J. Delinq., 4, p. 1.Google Scholar
Sentence of the Court (1964), «A Handbook for courts on the Treatment of Offenders», H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Streatfeild Committee Report (1961) «Report of the Interdepartmental Committee on the business of the Criminal Courts», H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Tappan, (P. W.) (1960), Crime, Justice and Correction, McGraw-Hill Co., p. 557–559.Google Scholar