IntroductionObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has an estimated prevalence of 1-2% and causes a significative reduction in functionality and quality of life with a high socioeconomic impact.
First and second line treatment includes serotonin reuptake inhibitors, clomipramine, antipsychotics augmentation strategy and cognitive behavioural therapy. It is ineffective in 20-60% of patients whose approach may include transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to assess the effect of treatment with TMS on obsessive-compulsive, anxious, and depressive symptoms in patients with OCD.
MethodsA prospective observational study was conducted including all patients diagnosed with OCD who underwent TMS in our department since March 2023.
Our protocol targets the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and includes a total of 25 sessions using the Food and Drug Administration approved parameters (20 Hz, 100% of the leg resting motor threshold, 50 trains of 2s duration, inter-train interval 20s, 2000 pulses per session). Before each session, symptom provocation is performed. TMS was performed using the Cool D-B80 coil and a MagPro stimulator.
Symptoms before and after treatment were assessed using the Yale Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D).
ResultsAs of 01/09/2024, 21 individuals with OCD completed TMS treatment, 57% male, with a median age of 37 years (interquartile range (IQR) 17). The median duration of illness was 25 years (IQR 15), with 24% of patients having very severe OCD, 52% severe, and 19% moderate—all refractory to psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatment.
There was a statistically significant reduction in Y-BOCS scores (pre-TMS median score 29 (IQR 6), post-TMS 21 (IQR 13), p=0.003), with 32% of patients achieving a complete response (Y-BOCS reduction ≥35%) and 5% a partial response (Y-BOCS reduction ≥25%). No correlation was found between the change in Y-BOCS scores and other variables such as age, duration of illness, and pre-TMS scores on Y-BOCS, HAM-A, and HAM-D.
Additionally, a statistically significant reduction was observed in HAM-A scores (pre-TMS median 20 (IQR 18), post-TMS 16 (IQR 11), p=0.026) and HAM-D scores (pre-TMS median 19 (IQR 17), post-TMS 15 (IQR 14), p=0.029).
No severe adverse effects were reported.
ConclusionsThis study shows significant reductions in Y-BOCS, HAM-A, and HAM-D scores after TMS treatment, with many patients achieving complete or partial response. These findings align with previous research, suggesting TMS is an effective option for treatment-refractory OCD. The absence of severe adverse effects supports its safety.
In conclusion, this study adds to real-world evidence by demonstrating the efficacy and safety of TMS in a clinical setting. Continued data collection is crucial to identify predictors of response.
Disclosure of InterestNone Declared