Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-pzzxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T11:39:16.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are online workers amenable to digital interventions? Results of a fully-remote nationwide trial of behavioral activation in 804 depressed adults in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

L. Lorenzo-Luaces*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
A. Peipert
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Online workers are individuals who participate in crowdsourced work. They experience a higher rate of internalizing symptoms than the general population, a phenomenon dubbed the “Turker blues.” Three large trials of online single-session interventions (SSIs) failed to find statistical or clinically significant treatment effects in this population. Because these trials tested SSIs, it is unclear if online workers are unresponsive to SSIs in general or online interventions specifically. Moreover, participants in these studies were not selected based on their desire to learn skills online, raising the possibility that intervention effects would be present in treatment-seeking individuals.

Objectives

We conducted a nationwide, fully remote two-arm randomized (1:1) controlled trial to test the efficacy of a 4-week self-guided online behavioral activation treatment for depression in online workers in the United States (N=804). The intervention was designed as an extension of the Common Element Toolbox (COMET), an SSI previously found ineffective in online workers.

Methods

804 online workers were randomized to COMET-BA or a waitlist control (WLC). Self-report measures of depression, anxiety, subjective well-being, behavioral activation, psychosocial function, and emotion regulation were collected weekly for 4 weeks, 1-week post-intervention, then at a 1-month follow-up.

Results

There was a significant time-by-treatment interaction during the intervention phase on the study, suggesting those in the COMET-BA arm improved significantly more than those in the WLC, with a small-medium effect on depression symptoms (SMD=-0.32; 95% CI: -0.47, -0.17). All but two outcomes, suppression and functioning, demonstrated significant improvement. Improvements were maintained during the 1-month follow-up period but did not grow during this period. Attrition was comparable between the treatments and the results were sensitive to missing data imputation.

Conclusions

COMET-BA may be effectively delivered as an unguided online intervention for depression in online workers. Crucially, intervention effects were evident after the second iBA session, suggesting that SSIs may not be effective in adult online workers.

Disclosure of Interest

L. Lorenzo-Luaces Consultant of: I have consulted with Syra Health, Inc. who had no involvement in the current research, A. Peipert: None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.