Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-xmf2s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-30T10:44:27.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2025

Peter Kelly
Peter Kelly
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Ovid and Plato
Disturbing Realities
 , pp. 163 - 187
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. 2002. ‘Rereading Callimachus’ “Aetia” Fragment 1’, CPh 97.3, 238–255.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. 1985. Metaformations: Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets (New York).Google Scholar
Allen, D. S. 2012. Why Plato Wrote (Hoboken, NJ).10.1002/9781118556696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, G. 2000. Intertextuality (London).10.4324/9780203131039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. E. 1993. The Dialogues of Plato, Volume 2: Symposium (New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
Altieri, C. 1973. ‘Ovid and the New Mythologists’, Novel 7.1, 31–40.10.2307/1345051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, W. 2016a. ‘Plato’s Phaedo and “the Art of Glaucus”: Transcending the Distortions of Developmentalism’, Archai 31, 1–23.Google Scholar
Altman, W. 2016b. The Revival of Platonism in Cicero’s Late Philosophy (Lanham, MD).10.5771/9781498527125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alton, E. H., Wormell, D. E., and Courtney, E. (eds.) 1978. Ovidius, Fasti, Teubner (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1972. Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Books 6–10 (Norman, OK).Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1977. P. Ovidii Nasonis Metamorphoses (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1989. ‘The Artist’s Limits in Ovid: Orpheus, Pygmalion and Daedalus’, Syllecta Classica 1, 1–11.10.1353/syl.1989.0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1997. Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Books 1–5 (Norman, OK).Google Scholar
Annes Brown, S. 1999. The Metamorphosis of Ovid: From Chaucer to Ted Hughes (London).Google Scholar
Annes Brown, S. 2005. Ovid: Myth and Metamorphosis (London).Google Scholar
Arieti, J. A. and Barrus, R. M. 2010. Plato’s Protagoras: Translation, Commentary and Appendices (Lanham, MD).10.5771/9781442204935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. 1933. Metaphysics, Vol. I: Books 1–9. Translated by Hugh Tredennick. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Arkins, B. 1990. ‘The Anxiety of Influence: Ovid’s Amores as κἐνωσις’, Latomis 49.4, 826–832.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. 1969. Plotinus: Porphyry on Plotinus. Ennead I (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1995. ‘The Impossibility of Metathesis: Philodemus and Lucretius on Form and Content in Poetry’, in Obbink, D. (ed.), Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Philodemus, Lucretius and Horace (Oxford), 210–232.10.1093/oso/9780195088151.003.0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aruz, J. 2003. The Art of the First Cities (New York).Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. 2007. ‘Rhetoric and Ovid’, in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds.), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric (Malden, MA), 413–424.10.1002/9780470996485.ch30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C. 1922. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura, Oxford Classical Texts (Oxford).Google Scholar
Bailey, C. 1986. Titi Lvcreti Cari: De Rerum Natura: Libri Sex, Vol. 1: Prolegomena, Text and Critical Apparatus; Translation (Oxford).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (Austin, TX).Google Scholar
Baltzly, D. 2013. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Vol. 5 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1993. ‘Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’, HSPh 95, 333–365.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1997. ‘Endgames: Ovid’s Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6’, in Roberts, D., Dunn, F., and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature (Princeton, NJ), 181–208.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2001. Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets (London).Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2005. Ovidio Metamorfosi, vol. 1 (Rome).Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2006. ‘Music for Monsters: Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Bucolic Evolution, and Bucolic Criticism’, in Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral (Leiden), 403–425.10.1163/9789047408536_017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, L. 1986. The Gods Made Flesh: Metamorphosis and the Pursuit of Paganism (New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.) 1997. Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780198150565.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barolski, P. 2014. Ovid and the Metamorphoses of Modern Art (New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1977. Image Music Text (London).Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 2016. The Mirror of the Self (Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
Bate, M. S. 2004. ‘Tempestuous Poetry: Storms in Ovid’s “Metamorphoses”, “Heroides” and “Tristia”’, Mnemosyne 57.3, 295–310.10.1163/1568525041317994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beavis, I. C. 1988. Insects and Other Invertebrates in the Classical World (Exeter).Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2007. ‘Ecphrasis, Interpretation and Audience in Aeneid 1 and Odyssey 8’, AJPh 128.4, 533–549.Google Scholar
Bell, J. and Naas, M. (eds.) 2015. Plato’s Animals: Gadflies, Horses, Swans, and Other Philosophical Beasts (Bloomington, IN).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernadete, S. 1984. The Being of the Beautiful: Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman (Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. 2011. ‘Locus Amoenus and Locus Horridus in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Wenshan Review of Literature and Culture 5.1, 67–98.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. 1973 [1997]. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (Oxford).Google Scholar
Bloom, H. 1975. A Map of Misreading (Oxford).Google Scholar
Böckerman, R. W. 2020. The Bavarian Commentary and Ovid: Clm 4610, the Earliest Documented Commentary on the Metamorphoses (Cambridge).10.11647/OBP.0154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bömer, F. 1969–86. P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen: Kommentar (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Bonner, S. 1977 [2022]. Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny (Oakland, CA).10.1525/9780520347762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, E. and Elsner, J. (eds.) 2009. Philostratus (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Boyd, B. W. (ed.) 2002. Brill’s Companion to Ovid (Leiden).10.1163/9789047400950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. H. 2008. Lucan: Civil War (Oxford).Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. 2008. Greek Religion and Culture, the Bible and the Ancient Near East (Leiden).10.1163/ej.9789004164734.i-426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, L. 2002. Sexual Ambivalence: Androgyny and Hermaphroditism in Graeco-Roman Antiquity (Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2012. ‘Why Is the Timaeus Called an Eikos Muthos and an Eikos Logos?’, in Collobert, C., Destree, P., and Gonzalez, F. (eds.), Plato and Myth (Leiden), 369–391.10.1163/9789004224360_020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittain, C. 2006. Cicero: On Academic Scepticism (Indianapolis, IN).Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2012. Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Brown, M. P. 1997. Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura 3 (Warminster).Google Scholar
Burden, M. 1998. A Woman Scorn’d: Responses to the Dido Myth (London).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1959. ‘ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΟΝ Eine Semasiologische Studie’, Philologus 103, 167–197.10.1524/phil.1959.103.12.167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Burnet, J. 1911. Plato’s Phaedo; Edited with Introduction and Notes (Oxford).Google Scholar
Burnet, J. 1963. Plato: Opera, vol. 2 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Burnet, J. 1978. Plato: Opera, vol. 4 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 1978. ‘The Upside-Down Back-to-Front Sceptic of Lucretius IV 472’, Philologus 122.1, 197–206.10.1524/phil.1978.122.12.197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, A. 1972. Diodorus Siculus Book 1: A Commentary (Leiden).10.1163/9789004296312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bury, R. G. 1966. Plato in Twelve Volumes, vol. 7 (London).Google Scholar
Buxton, R. 2009. Forms of Astonishment: Greek Myths of Metamorphosis (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780199245499.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahoon, L. 1984. ‘The Parrot and the Poet: The Function of Ovid’s Funeral Elegies’, CJ 80.1, 27–35.Google Scholar
Cahoon, L. 1991. ‘In Response to Barbra Weiden Boyd, “The Death of Corinna’s Parrot Reconsidered”’, CJ 86.4, 368–376.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. 2014. ‘Ψυχή, Θυμός, and Metaphor in Homer and Plato’, Études platoniciennes 11, 1–41.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1995. Callimachus and His Critics (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 2004. Greek Mythography in the Roman World (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780195171211.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. 1990. Greek Lyric 1: Sappho and Alcaeus, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Campbell, G. 2000. ‘Zoogony and Evolution in Plato’s Timaeus, the Presocratics, Lucretius and Darwin’, in Wright, M. R. (ed.), Reason and Necessity: Essays on Plato’s Timaeus (London), 145–180.10.2307/j.ctv1n35804.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, G. 2003. Lucretius on Creation and Evolution (Oxford).Google Scholar
Caplan, H. 1954. Cicero: Rhetorica ad Herennium, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Capra, A. 2015. Plato’s Four Muses: The Phaedrus and the Poetics of Philosophy. Hellenic Studies Series 67 (Washington, DC).Google Scholar
Carr, D. M. 2005. Writing on the Tablet of the Heart: Origins of Scripture and Literature (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780195172973.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casali, S. 1997. ‘Quaerenti plura legendum: On the Necessity of “Reading More” in Ovid’s Exile Poetry’, Ramus 26, 80–112.10.1017/S0048671X00002071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casali, S. 2007. ‘Correcting Aeneas’ Voyage: Ovid’s Commentary on “Aeneid” 3’, TAPhA 137.1, 181–210.Google Scholar
Casali, S. 2009. ‘Ovidian Intertextuality’, in Knox, P. (ed.), A Companion to Ovid (Oxford), 341–354.10.1002/9781444310627.ch24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, D. 2006. Beckett’s Dantes: Intertextuality in the Fiction and Criticism (Manchester).Google Scholar
Chandler, D. 2002. Semiotics: The Basics (London).Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, P. 2014. The War with God: Theomachy in Roman Imperial Poetry (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199993383.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. A. 2009. ‘Tears in Lucretius’, in Fögen, T. (ed.), Tears in the Graeco-Roman World (Berlin), 161–178.10.1515/9783110214024.161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. J. 2003. ‘The Cerberus-Like Function of the Gorgons in Virgil’s Underworld (Aen. 6.273–94)’, CQ 53.1, 308–309.10.1093/cq/53.1.308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. 1999. Flesh and Spirit in the Songs of Homer (Oxford).Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2004. ‘An Ox-Fronted River-God: Sophocles, Trachiniae 12–13’, HSPh 102, 97–112.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. 1991. ‘Three Notes on Lucretius’, CQ 41.2, 544–546.10.1017/S0009838800004742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, W. 1994. A Commentary on Virgil: Eclogues (Oxford).Google Scholar
Clay, D. 1985. ‘The Art of Glaukos (Plato Phaedo 108d4–9)’, AJPh 106.2, 230–236.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 1993. ‘The Generation of Monsters in Hesiod’, CPh 88.2, 105–116.Google ScholarPubMed
Clayman, D. L. 2009. Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonism into Poetry (Berlin).10.1515/9783110220810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, J. and Rothstein, E. (eds.) 1991. Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History (Madison, WI).Google Scholar
Coates, C. F. 2018. ‘Cosmic Democracy or Cosmic Monarchy? Empedocles in Plato’s Statesman’. Polis 35.2, 418–446.10.1163/20512996-12340174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, T. 2004. ‘Ovid, Varro and Castor of Rhodes: The Chronological Architecture of the “Metamorphoses”’, HSPh 102, 355–422.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. 2008. Virgil: Eclogues (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Collard, C. 2008a. Aeschylus: Persians and Other Plays (Oxford).Google Scholar
Collard, C. 2008b. Euripides: Fragments, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Colonna, G. 1984. ‘La Dea Etrusca Cel e i Santuari Del Trasimeno’, Revista storica dell’antichità 6–7, 45–62.Google Scholar
Colvin, M. 2007. ‘Heraclitean Flux and the Unity of Opposites in Plato’s “Theaetetus” and “Cratylus”’, CQ 57.2, 759–769.10.1017/S0009838807000705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, S. 2000. Dumbstruck: A Cultural History of Ventriloquism (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198184331.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets (Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 2017. Stealing the Club from Hercules (Berlin).10.1515/9783110475838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornford, F. 1935a/1997. Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato (Indianapolis, IN).Google Scholar
Cornford, F. 1935b. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge: Theaetetus and Sophist (London).Google Scholar
Craik, E. M. 2001. ‘Plato and Medical Texts: Symposium 185c–193d’, CQ 51.1, 109–114.10.1093/cq/51.1.109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowfoot, G. M. 1936. ‘Of the Warp-Weighted Loom’, ABSA 37, 36–47.Google Scholar
Crowley, T. J. 2005. ‘On the Use of Stoicheion in the Sense of “Element”’, OSAPh 29, 367–394.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. 2005. Theories of Mythology (Malden, MA).Google Scholar
Cummings, K. 2002. A History of Glassforming (London).Google Scholar
Dalley, S. 2000. Myths from Mesopotamia (Oxford).Google Scholar
Dalzell, A. 1987. ‘Language and Atomic Theory in Lucretius’, Hermathena 143, 19–28.Google Scholar
Davies, J. 2011. Horace: Satires and Epistles (Oxford).Google Scholar
de Callataÿ, G. 1996. A Study of World Cycles in Greek, Latin, and Arabic Sources (Leuven).Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. 2008. Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature (Leiden).10.1163/ej.9789004166776.i-456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, C. 2015. ‘Grammatical Theory and Rhetorical Teaching’, in Montonari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship (Leiden), 981–1011.Google Scholar
Delany, S. 1968. ‘Chaucer’s House of Fame and the Ovide Moralisé’, Comparative Literature 20.3, 254–264.10.2307/1769444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delany, S. 1994. Chaucer’s House of Fame: The Poetics of Sceptical Fideism (Gainesville, FL).Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1980. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Minneapolis, MN).Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1981. Dissemination (London).10.7208/chicago/9780226816340.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, E. 2007. Ancient Greek Scholarship (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780195312928.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, E. 1903. Procli Diadochi in Platonis Timaeum Commentaria (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1899. Elementum, eine Vorarbeit zum griechischen und Lateinischen Thesaurus (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Dietrich, J. S. 2002. ‘Dead Parrots Society’, AJPh 123.1, 95–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Diggle, J. 1970. Euripides Phaethon: Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 12 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J. 1987. Archimedes (Princeton, NJ).10.1515/9781400858613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. 1994. ‘A Platonist Ars Amatoria’, CQ 44.2, 387–392.10.1017/S0009838800043846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. 2019. ‘Hermias as Transmitter of Iamblichus’ Exegesis of the Dialogue’, in Finamore, J., Manolea, C., and Wear, S. (eds.), Studies in Hermias’ Commentary on Plato’s Phaedrus (Leiden), 25–34.10.1163/9789004414310_004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. and Gergel, T. (eds.) 2003. The Greek Sophists (London).Google Scholar
Di Pasquale, G. 2016. ‘Vitruvius’ Image of the Universe: Architecture and Mechanics’, in Sanvito, P. (ed.), Vitruvianism: Origins and Transformations (Berlin), 46–64.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 2013. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511843440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, A. E. 1985. Cicero: Tusculan Disputations I (Warminster).Google Scholar
Drinkwater, M. O. 2007. ‘Which Letter? Text and Subtext in Ovid’s “Heroides”’, AJPh 128.3, 267–387.Google Scholar
Dronke, P. 1968. Medieval Latin and the Rise of European Love-Lyric, vol. 2 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Dronke, P. 2009. ‘Metamorphoses: Allegory in Early Medieval Commentaries on Ovid and Apuleius’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 72, 21–39.10.1086/JWCI40593763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dué, C. 2010. ‘Learning Lessons from the Trojan War: Briseis and the Theme of Force’, in Myrsiades, K. (ed.), Approaches to Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey (New York), 93–126.Google Scholar
Duke, E. A., Hicken, W. F., Nicoll, W. S. M. et al. 1995. Plato: Opera 1, OCT (Oxford).Google Scholar
Dutton, P. E. 1991. Bernard of Chartres: Glosae super Platonem (Toronto).Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. 2003. Cicero: De Natura Deorum Book 1 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Dyer, R. R. 1989. ‘Vergil’s Fama: A New Interpretation of “Aeneid” 4.173ff’, Greece & Rome, Second Series, 36.1, 28–32.10.1017/S0017383500029302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, T. 1993. ‘A Pre-Socratic Philosopher behind the “Phaedrus”: Empedocles’, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 11.2, 211–227.Google Scholar
Ebert, T. 2007. ‘The Theory of Recollection in Plato’s Meno: Against a Myth of Platonic Scholarship’, in Brisson, L. and Erler, M. (eds.), Gorgias – Menon. Selected Papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum (Sankt Augustin), 184–198.Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1979. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts (Bloomington, IN).10.2979/2846.0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, U. 1989. Opera Aperta: ‘The Open Work’ (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry (Baltimore, MD).Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 2005. ‘Epistolography’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), A Companion to Latin Literature (Hoboken, NJ), 270–283.10.1002/9780470996683.ch20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, R. B. 1985. ‘Λειριόεις κτλ in Homer and Elsewhere’, Glotta 63, 14–24.Google Scholar
Egan, R. B. 1995. ‘Cicadas in Ancient Greece: Ventures in Classical Tettigology’, Cultural Entomology Digest 3, 21–26.Google Scholar
Egan, R. B. 2004a. ‘Narcissus Transformed: Rationalized Myth in Plato’s Phaedrus’, in Zimmerman, M. and Van Der Paardt, R. (eds.), Metamorphic Reflections: Essays Presented to Ben Hijmans at His 75th Birthday (Leuven), 143–159.Google Scholar
Egan, R. B. 2004b. ‘Eros, Eloquence and Entomo-psychology’, in Egan, R., Joyal, M., and Berry, E. G. (eds.), Daimonopylai: Essays in Classics and the Classical Tradition Presented to Edmund G. Berry (Winnipeg), 65–87.Google Scholar
Egan, R. B. 2014. ‘Insects and Smaller Invertebrates’, in Campbell, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life (Oxford), 180–190.Google Scholar
Einarson, B. and Link, K. K. 1976. De Causis Plantarum: Books III–IV, Loeb (London).Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1995. Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2007. ‘Viewing Ariadne: From Ekphrasis to Wall Painting in the Roman World’, CPh 102.1, 20–44.Google Scholar
Emlyn-Jones, C. and Preddy, W. 2022. Plato: Lysis. Symposium. Phaedrus (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Engberg-Pederson, T. 2017. From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy 100 bce–100 ce (Cambridge).10.1017/9781316694459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enterline, L. 1995. The Tears of Narcissus: Melancholia and Masculinity in Early Modern Writing (Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
Enterline, L. 2000. The Rhetoric of the Body from Ovid to Shakespeare (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511483561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettinger, B. 1999. ‘Trauma and Beauty: Trans-Subjectivity in Art’, N.Paradoxa International Feminist Art Journal 3, 15–23.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, A. 1931. Philostratus: Imagines; Callistratus: Descriptions, Loeb (London).Google Scholar
Falconer, W. A. 1923. Cicero: On Old Age. On Friendship. On Divination (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 2004. Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780195154092.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergils’ Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History (New York).Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 1992. ‘Dialogue of Genres in Ovid’s “Lovesong of Polyphemus” (Metamorphoses 13.719–897)’, AJPh 113.2, 235–268.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 1999. ‘The Ovidian Corpus: Poetic Body and Poetic Text’, in Hardie, P. R., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. (eds.), Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Its Reception (Cambridge), 127–141.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2004. ‘Ovid’s Virgilian Career’, MD 52, 41–55.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2009. ‘Ovid’s Generic Transformations’, in Knox, P. (ed.), A Companion to Ovid (Oxford), 370–380.10.1002/9781444310627.ch26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1986. ‘History and Revelation in Vergil’s Underworld’, PCPhS 32, 1–24.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780198140559.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. and Nelis, D. 2005. ‘Two Vergilian Acrostics: Certissima Signa?’, CQ 55.2, 644–646.10.1093/cq/bmi067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. 2010. Playing Gods: Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Politics of Fiction (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 2016. ‘Nothing Like the Sun: Repetition and Representation in Ovid’s Phaethon Narrative’, in Fulkerson, L. and Stover, T. (eds.), Repeat Performances: Ovidian Repetition and the Metamorphoses (Madison WI), 24–46.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 2020. ‘Writ in Water: Seeing Time in Ovid’s Narcissus Episode’, Dictynna 17, 1–34.Google Scholar
Finucci, V. and Schwartz, R. 1994. Desire in the Renaissance: Psychoanalysis and Literature (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Fischer, E. 2011. ‘Ovid’s Metempsychosis: The Greek East’, in Clark, J. G., Coulson, F. T., and McKinley, K. L. (eds.), Ovid in the Middle Ages (Cambridge), 26–47.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 2016. ‘Resonance: The Sonic Environment of Vergil’s Eclogues’, Dictynna 13, 1–28.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. 2005. ‘Or Such as Ovid’s Metamorphoses …’, in Hunter, R. (ed.), The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions (Cambridge), 299–319.10.1017/CBO9780511482243.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, E. 1995. ‘Il Poeta Manilio, Ultimo Degli Augustei, e Ovidio’, in Gallo, I. and Nicastri, L. (eds.), Aetates Ovidianae: Lettori di Ovidio dall’antichita` al rinascimento (Naples), 27–38.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. 2009a. Tears in the Graeco-Roman World (Berlin).10.1515/9783110214024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fögen, T. 2009b. Bodies and Boundaries in Graeco-Roman Antiquity (Berlin).10.1515/9783110212532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W., Huby, P., Sharples, R., and Gutas, D. 1992. Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought, and Influence, Part 1 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Fossheim, H. J. 2010. ‘Method in the Philebus’, in Brisson, L. and Dillon, J. (eds.), Plato’s Philebus: Selected Papers from the Eighth Symposium Platonicum (Sankt Augustin), 31–35.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2002. The Archaeology of Knowledge (New York).Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 1997. ‘On the Shoulder of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies’, MD 39, 13–34.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 2000. Roman Constructions (Cambridge).10.1093/oso/9780198153092.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. 2002. Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura Book 2 Lines 1–332 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 2005. ‘Writing with Style: The Prologue to Apuleius’ Metamorphoses between fingierte Mündlichkeit and Textuality’, in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses (Oxford), 225–230.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 2008. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura (Oxford).Google Scholar
Fowler, H. N. 1921. Plato: Theaetetus; Sophist (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. 1931/1996. Ovid: Fasti, 2nd ed., revised by Goold, G. P., Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. 1941. ‘Pattern of Sound and Atomistic Theory in Lucretius’, AJPh 62.1, 16–34.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. 2002. ‘Writing Yourself to Death: Strategies of (Mis)reading in Heroides 2’, MD 48, 145–165.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. 2003. ‘Chain(ed) Mail: Hypermestra and the Dual Readership of Heroides 14’, TAPhA 133.1, 123–145.Google Scholar
Gale, M. 1994. Myth and Poetry in Lucretius (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gale, M. 2000. Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511482182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. 2001. ‘Etymological Wordplay and Poetic Succession in Lucretius’, CP 96, 168–172.Google Scholar
Gale, M. 2007. ‘Lucretius and Previous Poetic Traditions’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius (Cambridge), 59–75.10.1017/CCOL9780521848015.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. 2009. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura 5 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1975. Ovid’s Metamorphoses: An Introduction to the Basic Aspects (Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1997. ‘The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Papers of the Leeds International Seminar, 313–336.Google Scholar
Gallop, D. 1984. Parmenides of Elea: Fragments (Toronto).Google Scholar
Garani, M. 2007. Empedocles REDIVIVUS: Poetry and Analogy in Lucretius (New York).10.4324/9780203929285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garani, M. 2011. ‘Revisiting Tarpeia’s Myth in Propertius (IV, 4)’, LICS 10.3, 1–22.Google Scholar
Garani, M. 2013. ‘Lucretius and Ovid on Empedoclean Cows and Sheep’, in Lehoux, D., Morison, A. D., and Sharrock, A. (eds.), Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science (Oxford), 233–259.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199605408.003.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garani, M. 2020. ‘Seneca on Pythagoras’ mirabilia aquarum (NQ 3.20–1, 25–6; Ovid Met. 15.270– 336)’, in Garani, M., Michalopoulos, A., and Papaioannou, S. (eds.), Intertextuality in Seneca’s Philosophical Writings (London), 198–253.Google Scholar
Garani, M. 2023. ‘Seneca’s Platonism Revisited: Myth and the Sublime in Plato, Ovid, and Seneca (QNat. 3)’, Lucius Annaeus Seneca 3, 191–224.Google Scholar
Garani, M. and Konstan, D. 2014. The Philosophizing Muse: The Influence of Greek Philosophy on Roman Poetry (Newcastle upon Tyne).Google Scholar
Garani, M., Michalopoulos, A., and Papaioannou, S. (eds.) 2020. Intertextuality in Seneca’s Philosophical Writings (London).10.4324/9780429318153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcea, A. 2019. ‘Nigidius Figulus’ Naturalism’, in Pezzini, G. and Taylor, B. (eds.), Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World (Cambridge), 79–102.10.1017/9781108671972.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, E. P. 1995. Groaning Tears: Ethical and Dramatic Aspects of Suicide in Greek Tragedy (Leiden).10.1163/9789004329522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, H. W. and Wickham, E. C. 1963. Horace: Opera, OCT (Oxford).Google Scholar
Gee, E. 2009. Ovid, Aratus and Augustus: Astronomy in Ovid’s Fasti (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gee, E. 2013. Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199781683.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, E. 2020a. Mapping the Afterlife: From Homer to Dante (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780190670481.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, E. 2020b. ‘The Rising and Setting Soul in Lucretius, DRN 3’, in O’Rourke, D. (ed.), Approaches to Lucretius (Cambridge), 195–216.10.1017/9781108379854.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, L. 1988. Le Metamorfosi della Tradizione: Mutamenti de Significato e Neologismi nel Peri Physeos di Empedocle (Bari).Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, L. 2003. ‘Empedocles’ Zoogony and Embryology’, in Pierris, A. L. (ed.), The Empedoclean Kosmos: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity (Patras), 373–404.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511549373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentilcore, R. M. 2010. ‘The Transformation of Grief in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, SyllClass 21, 93–118.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. 2003. Ovid: Ars Amatoria Book 3, Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 40 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2000. ‘Ovid’s Narcissus (Met. 3.339–510): Echoes of Oedipus’, AJPh 121.1, 129–147.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2004. ‘Ovid’s “Hecale”: Deconstructing Athens in the Metamorphoses’, JRS 94, 47–92.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2007. ‘Barbarian Variations: Tereus, Procne and Philomela in Ovid (Met. 6.412–674) and Beyond’, Dictynna 4, 1–25.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. 2000. ‘Inspirational Fictions: Autobiography and Generic Reflexivity in Ovid’s Proems’, G&R 47.1, 67–79.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. 2013. Transformative Change in Western Thought: A History of Metamorphosis from Homer to Hollywood (Leeds).Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 2010. ‘The Divine Method in Plato’s Philebus’, in Brisson, L. and Dillon, J. (eds.), Plato’s Philebus: Selected Papers from the Eighth Symposium Platonicum (Sankt Augustin), 36–46.Google Scholar
Gladhill, B. 2013. ‘The Domus of Fama and Republican Space in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Farrell, J. and Nelis, D. (eds.), Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic (Oxford), 297–318.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.003.0016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucker, J. 1999. ‘A Platonic Cento in Cicero’, Phronesis 44, 30–44.10.1163/156852899762447629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, J. 1986. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura 4 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. 2013. Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681297.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goold, G. P. 1977. Manilius: Astronomica, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Gordon, C. 1992. ‘Poetry of Maledictions: A Commentary on the Ibis of Ovid’. McMaster University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. 1980. Heraclides of Pontus (Oxford).Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 2005a. ‘Virgil’s Sibyl and the “Many Mouth” Cliché (Aen. 6.625–7)’, CQ 55.1, 170–182.10.1093/cq/bmi012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. 2005b. ‘Talking Trees: Philemon and Baucis Revisited’, Arethusa 38.3, 331–365.10.1353/are.2005.0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasso, E. 2012. ‘Myth, Image and Likeness in Plato’s Timaeus’, in Collobert, C., Destree, P., and Gonzalez, F. (eds.), Plato and Myth (Leiden), 343–367.10.1163/9789004224360_019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graverini, L. 2007. Literature and Identity in The Golden Ass of Apuleius (Columbus, OH).Google Scholar
Green, C. M. C. 1996. ‘Terms of Venery: Ars Amatoria I’. TAPA 126, 221–263.Google Scholar
Green, S. J. 2004. Ovid Fasti 1: A Commentary (Leiden).10.1163/9789047414179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guichard, L. A. 2006. ‘Simias’ Pattern Poems: The Margins of the Canon’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Beyond the Canon (Leuven), 83–103.Google Scholar
Gundel, W. 1977. ‘Weltperioden und Planetenlauf’, in Boll, F., Bezold, C., and Gundel, W. (eds.), Sternglaube und Sterndeutung; die Geschichte und das Wesen der Astrologie (Darmstadt), 200–205.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. 2010. Theophrastus: On First Principles (Known as His Metaphysics) (Leiden).10.1163/ej.9789004179035.i-508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. 1974. ‘Flux and Logos in Heraclitus’, in Mourelatos, A. P. D. (ed.), The Presocratics (Princeton, NJ), 197–213.Google Scholar
Ham, C. 2013. ‘Empedoclean Elegy: Love, Strife and the Four Elements in Ovid’s “Amores”, “Ars Amatoria” and “Fasti”’, Penn State University dissertation.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. 1987. Homer’s Iliad (London).Google Scholar
Hannah, R. 1997. ‘Is It a Bird? Is It a Star? Ovid’s Kite – And the First Swallow of Spring’, Latomus 56.2, 327–342.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. V. 1971. The Attalids of Pergamon (Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
Harder, A. 2012. Callimachus: Aetia (Oxford).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1985. ‘Imago Mundi Cosmological and Ideological Aspects of the Shield of Achilles’, JHS 105, 11–31.10.2307/631519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium (Oxford).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1988. ‘Lucretius and the Delusions of Narcissus’, MD 20/21, 71–89.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1990. ‘Ovid’s Theban History: The First “Anti-Aeneid”?’, CQ 40.1, 224–235.10.1017/S0009838800026938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1991. ‘The Janus Episode in Ovid’s Fasti’, MD 26, 47–64.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1995. ‘The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos’, CQ 45.1, 204–214.10.1017/S000983880004180XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1997. ‘Closure in Latin Epic’, in Roberts, D., Dunn, F., and Dowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature (Princeton, NJ), 139–62.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1999. ‘Metamorphosis, Metaphor, and Allegory in Latin Epic’, in Bessinger, M. (ed.), Epic Traditions in the Contemporary World: The Poetics of Community (Berkeley, CA), 89–108.10.1525/9780520919730-007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2002a. Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2002b. The Cambridge Companion to Ovid (Cambridge).10.1017/CCOL0521772818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2002c. ‘The Historian in Ovid: The Roman History of Metamorphoses 14–15’, in Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography (Leiden), 191–209.10.1163/9789047400493_011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2005. ‘The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women and Latin Literature’, in Hunter, R. (ed.), The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions (Cambridge), 287–298.10.1017/CBO9780511482243.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2009a. Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780199231249.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2009b. Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2013. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2024. A Commentary on Ovid’s Metamorphoses, vol. 3, Books 13–15 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. and Chiarini, G. 2015. Ovidio: Metamorfosi. Volume VI: Libri XIII–XV (Milan).Google Scholar
Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. 1999. Ovidian Transformations: Essays on the Metamorphoses and Its Reception, CPhS Suppl. 23 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Harries, B. 1990. ‘The Spinner and the Poet: Arachne in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, PCPhS 36, 64–82.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. 2013. Greece and Mesopotamia: Dialogues in Literature (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511863240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawking, S. and Mlodinow, L. 2010. The Grand Design (New York).Google Scholar
Hawkins, T. 2014. Iambic Poetics in the Roman Empire (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511997822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. 1971. Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Communications (New York).Google Scholar
Hejduk, J. 2015a. The Offense of Love: Ars Amatoria, Remedia Amoris, and Tristia 2 (Madison, WI).Google Scholar
Hejduk, J. 2015b. ‘Red-Handed Apollo: What Martial Might Have Done with “Know Thyself” in Ars Amatoria 2.493–502’, CQ 65.2, 714–718.10.1017/S000983881500018XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmbold, W. C. 1939. Plutarch: Moralia, vol. vi (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1999. ‘Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes’, in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. (eds.), Ovidian Transformations, PCPhS Suppl. 23, 301–323.Google Scholar
Hendren, G. 2012. ‘Woven Alliteration in De Rerum Natura’, CJ 107.4, 409–422.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. P. 1974. ‘Empedoclean Influences on the Timaeus’, Phoenix 28.2, 145–166.10.2307/1087415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, R. D. 1925. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Loeb (London).Google Scholar
Hill, D.E. 1985–2000. Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Oxford).10.3828/liverpool/9780856687334.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S. 1985. ‘Booking the Return Trip: Ovid and Tristia 1’, PCPhS 31, 13–32.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1987. The Metamorphosis of Persephone (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 2007. ‘Martial’s Ovid / Ovid’s Martial’, JRS 97, 11–54.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. 1997. Sotades: Symbols of Immortality on Greek Vases (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780198150619.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, J. 1981. The Figure of Echo: A Mode of Allusion in Milton and After (London).10.1525/9780520377691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. 2016a. ‘Cosmopoiesis in the Field of “The Classical”’, in Butler, S. (ed.), Deep Classics: Rethinking Classical Reception (London), 269–289.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2016b. ‘Michel Serres’ Nonmodern Lucretius: Manifold Reason and the Temporality of Reception’, in Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.), Lucretius and Modernity (New York), 21–36.10.1007/978-1-137-56657-7_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. and Marta, K. (eds.) 2017. Liquid Antiquity (Geneva).Google Scholar
Holtz, L. 1981. Donat et la Tradition de l’Enseignement Grammatical (Paris).Google Scholar
Hopkinson, N. 2001. Ovid: Metamorphoses Book XIII (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2015. Lykophron: Alexandra (Oxford).10.1093/actrade/9780199576708.book.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. 2014. Virgil, ‘Aeneid’ 6: A Commentary (Berlin).Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. 2000. ‘Ovid’s Dead Parrot Sketch: “Amores” 2.6’, Mnemosyne 53.6, 718–720.Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. 1927. M. Annaei Lucani: Belli Civilis Libri Decem (Oxford).Google Scholar
Huffman, C. 2018. ‘Pythagoras’, in Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Stanford, CA), https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pythagoras.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1989. ‘Winged Callimachus’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 76, 1–2.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1993. The Argonautica of Apollonius (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511552502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. 2008. Apollonius Rhodius: Argonautica Book 3 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2012. Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9781139003377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. 2018. The Measure of Homer: The Ancient Reception of the ‘Iliad’ and the ‘Odyssey’ (Cambridge).10.1017/9781108604277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, K. 1996. The Gothic Body: Sexuality, Materialism, and Degeneration at the Fin de Siècle (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511519161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwit, J. M. 1999. The Athenian Acropolis: History, Mythology and Archaeology from the Neolithic Era to the Present (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Huskey, S. 2006. ‘Ovid’s Metamorphoses in Tristia I, 1’, Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 13, 335–357.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2001. ‘The Date of the De Rerum Natura’, CQ 51.1, 150–162.10.1093/cq/51.1.150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2013. Greek to Latin Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670703.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. 2001. The Poems of Empedocles: A Text and Translation with an Introduction, Revised Edition (Toronto).Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. 1990. ‘Presentation and Assent: A Physical and Cognitive Problem in Early Stoicism’, CQ 40.2, 433–449.10.1017/S0009838800043007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, F. 1992. Metamorphosis in Greek Myths (Oxford).Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. H. 2005. The Living Image in Renaissance Art (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Jacobson, H. 2004. ‘The Date of the “Culex”’, Phoenix 58.3, 345–347.10.2307/4135173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, M. 2008. Archimedes and the Roman Imagination (Ann Arbor, MI).10.3998/mpub.300517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäkel, S. 1973. ‘The 14th Heroid Letter and the Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus’, Mnemosyne 26.3, 239–248.10.1163/156852573X00765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, P. 2001. ‘From Prologue to Story: Metaphor and Narrative Construction in the Opening of the Metamorphoses’, in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses (Oxford), 256–266.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 2000. Philodemus: On Poems Book 1 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Janko, R. 2017. ‘Tithonus, Eos and the Cicada in the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite and Sappho fr. 58’, in Tsagalis, C. and Markantonatos, A. (eds.), The Winnowing Oar: New Perspectives in Homeric Studies (Berlin), 267–295.10.1515/9783110559873-014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. 1996. ‘Constructions of Venus in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 5’, Arethusa 29.1, 125–149.10.1353/are.1996.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. and Malamud, M. 1988. ‘Ovid’s “Musomachia”’, Pacific Coast Philology 23.1, 30–38.10.2307/1316682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ju, A. E. 2013. ‘Posidonius as Historian of Philosophy: An Interpretation of Plutarch, de Animae Procreatione in Timaeo 22, 1023b–c’, in Schofield, M. (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC (Cambridge), 95–117.10.1017/CBO9781139096713.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.) 2001. A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780198152385.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1960. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology (New York).10.7312/kahn90334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2001. Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: A Brief History (Indianapolis, IN).Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2010. ‘Dialectic, Cosmology, and Ontology in the Philebus’, in Brisson, L. and Dillon, J. (eds.), Plato’s Philebus: Selected Papers from the Eighth Symposium Platonicum (Sankt Augustin), 56–67.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 1991. ‘Etymological Play on Ingens in Ovid, Vergil, and Octavia’, AJPh 112.1, 73–76.Google Scholar
Kellert, S. 1993. In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems (Chicago, IL).10.7208/chicago/9780226429823.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. 2014. ‘Voices within Ovid’s House of Fama’, Mnemosyne 67, 65–92.10.1163/1568525X-12341100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. 2018. ‘Compounding Compound Creatures: The Catalogue of Hybrids in Tristia 4.7 and Empedocles’, Mnemosyne 71.4, 667–687.10.1163/1568525X-12342399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. 2019. ‘The Wax and River Metaphors: Flux and Memory in Ovid’s Speech of Pythagoras and Plato’s Theaetetus’, Philologus 163.2, 274–297.10.1515/phil-2018-0034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. 2020a. ‘A Patchwork of Passages: On the Nature of Imitation in Galileo’s Alphabet and Painting Metaphors’, Ciceroniana On Line 4.1, 185–204.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. 2020b. ‘Intersexuality and Intertextuality: Hermaphroditus and the Early Universe in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Surtees, A. and Dyer, J. (eds.), Exploring Gender Diversity in the Ancient World (Edinburgh), 95–105.10.1515/9781474447065-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. 2021a. ‘Crafting Chaos: Intelligent Design in Ovid, Metamorphoses Book 1 and Plato’s Timaeus’, Classical Quarterly 70.2, 734–748.10.1017/S0009838821000094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. 2021b. ‘Tears and Liquefaction: Corporeal Permeability in Ovid and Lucretius’, in Bradley, M., Leonard, V, and Totelin, L. (eds.), Bodily Fluids in Antiquity (London), 259–271.10.4324/9780429438974-22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. 2022. ‘Cosmic Artistry in Ovid and Plato’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.), Philosophy in Ovid, Ovid as Philosopher (Oxford).Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 2005. Rethinking Reality: Lucretius and the Textualization of Nature (Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. 1994. A New History of Classical Rhetoric (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 1961. P. Ovidi Nasonis Amores, Medicamina faciei femineae, Ars Amatoria, Remedia Amoris, OCT (Oxford).Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 1976. ‘Ovidius Prooemians’, PCPhS 22, 46–53.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 2002. ‘Ovid’s Language and Style’, in Weiden Boyd, B. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ovid (Leiden), 27–89.10.1163/9789047400950_003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. 1997. Aratus: Phaenomena (Cambridge).Google Scholar
King, H. 1986. ‘Tithonos and the Tettix’, Arethusa 19.1, 15–35.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. 1995a. Ancient Philosophy, Mystery and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780198149880.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsley, P. 1995b. ‘Notes on Air: Four Questions of Meaning in Empedocles and Anaxagoras’, CQ 45.1, 26–29.10.1017/S0009838800041653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1954. Heraclitus: The Cosmic Fragments (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts (2nd ed.) (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511813375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klooster, J. 2011. Poetry as Window and Mirror: Positioning the Poet in Hellenistic Poetry (Leiden).10.1163/ej.9789004202290.i-282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, P. 1986. Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Traditions of Augustan Poetry (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Knox, P. 1988. ‘Phaeton in Ovid and Nonnos’, CQ 38.2, 536–551.10.1017/S0009838800037149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, P. 1995. Ovid: Heroides: Select Epistles (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Koenen, M. 2004. ‘“Loca loquuntur”: Lucretius’ Explanation of the Echo and Other Acoustical Phenomena in “DRN” 4.563–614’, Mnemosyne 57, 698–724.10.1163/1568525043083532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kofman, S. 1988. ‘Beyond Aporia?’, in Benjamin, A. (ed.), Post-Structuralist Classics. (Abingdon), 7–44.Google Scholar
Koning, H. 2010. The Other Poet: The Ancient Reception of Hesiod (Leiden University Online Repository), subsequently published as 2010. Hesiod: The Other Poet: Ancient Reception of a Cultural Icon, Mnemosyne Suppl. 325 (Leiden).10.1163/ej.9789004186163.i-440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, D. 1987. ‘Ovid, Metamorphoses 1.2’, CQ 37.2, 458–465.10.1017/S0009838800030664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasne, D. 2012. ‘The Pedant’s Curse: Obscurity and Identity in Ovid’s Ibis’, Dictynna 9, 1–52.Google Scholar
Kraye, J. 1990. ‘Aristotle’s God and the Authenticity of De Mundo: An Early Modern Controversy’, JHPh 23.3, 339–358.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. 1981. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (Oxford).Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection (New York).Google Scholar
Kyriakidis, S. 2010. ‘Heroides 20 and 21: Motion and Emotion’, LICS 9.2, 1–13.Google Scholar
Kyriakou, P. 1994. ‘Empedoclean Echoes in Apollonius Rhodius’ “Argonautica”’, Hermes 122.3, 309–319.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, , 2013. ‘Mutata Corpora: Ovid’s Changing Forms and the Metamorphic Bodies of Pantomime Dancing’, TAPhA 143, 105–152.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 1999. Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power, Speech Presentation and Latin Literature (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780198152767.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, A. 2017. ‘Fashioning the Poet: Biography, Pseudepigraphy and Textual Criticism’, in Hardie, P. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Ancient Lives of Virgil: Literary and Historical Studies (Swansea), 29–50.10.2307/j.ctt1z27gqg.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, W. R. M. 1924. Plato: Laches. Protagoras. Meno. Euthydemus (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Lanham, R. 2004. The Motives of Eloquence: Literary Rhetoric in the Renaissance (Eugene, OR).Google Scholar
La Penna, A. 1957. P. Ovidi Nasonis: Ibis. Prolegomeni, testo, apparatio crticio e commento (Florence).Google Scholar
Lapidge, M. 2010. ‘Lucan’s Imagery of Cosmic Dissolution’, in Tesoriero, C. (ed.), Lucan, Oxford Readings in Classical Studies (Oxford), 289–323.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. 1978. ‘Ovid’s Homage to Callimachus and Alexandrian Poetic Theory (AM. 2, 19)’, Hermes 106, 188–196.Google Scholar
Lawson-Tancred, H. 1998. Aristotle: Metaphysics (London).Google Scholar
Lee, G. 1990. Catullus: The Complete Poems (Oxford).Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2002. Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals (Oxford).Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 1992. Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments (Toronto).10.3138/9781442627826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1962. The Savage Mind (London).Google Scholar
Levy, H. L. 1969. ‘To Hexes in Homeric Scholia and Servius’ Ordo’, TAPhA 100, 237–254.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. 2014. ‘In Further Defence of Ovid’s Astronomical Accuracy in the Fasti’, AJPh 135.3, 411–449.Google Scholar
Lindheim, S. H. 2003. Mail and Female: Epistolary Narrative and Desire in Ovid’s Heroides (Madison, WI).Google Scholar
Littlewood, R. J. 2006. A Commentary on Ovid’s Fasti: Book 6 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Liveley, G. 2002. ‘Cleopatra’s Nose: Naso and the Science of Chaos’, G&R Second Series 49.1, 27–43.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1964. ‘The Hot and the Cold, the Dry and the Wet in Greek Philosophy’, JHS 84, 92–106.10.2307/627697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1996. Sophocles Fragments, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2006. From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279128.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. 2009. ‘Cosmic Craftsmanship in Plato and Stoicism’, in Mohr, R. D. and Sattler, B. M. (eds.), One Book: The Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today (Las Vegas, NV).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2015. Greek Models of Mind and Self (Cambridge, MA).10.4159/harvard.9780674735910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Loos, J. 2008. ‘How Ovid Remythologizes Greek Astronomy in Metamorphoses 1.747–2.400’, Mnemosyne 61.2, 257–289.10.1163/156852507X195439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovatt, H. 2022. ‘Nonnus’ Phaethon, Ovid, and Flavian Intertextuality’, in Carvounis, K., Papaioannou, S., and Scafoglio, G. (eds.), Later Greek Epic and the Latin Literary Tradition: Further Explorations (Berlin), 179–206.10.1515/9783110791907-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowell, E. 2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry (Baltimore, MD).Google Scholar
Lowenstam, S. 1993. ‘The Pictures on Juno’s Temple in the Aeneid’, CW 87.2, 37–49.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. E. 2020. Musonius Rufus: That One Should Disdain Hardships. The Teachings of a Roman Stoic (New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
Maehler, H. 2003. Bacchylides: Carmina cum Fragmentis, Teubner (Munich).Google Scholar
Maguinness, W. S. 1958. ‘Bimillennial Reflections on Ovid’, G&R 5.1, 2–12.Google Scholar
Marchant, J. 2015. ‘Archimedes’ Legendary Sphere Brought to Life’, Nature (news) 526.7571.10.1038/nature.2015.18431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcovich, M. 2001. Heraclitus: Greek Text with a Short Commentary (Sankt Augustin).Google Scholar
Martelli, F. 2013. Ovid’s Revisions: The Editor as Author (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9781139794800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martelli, F. and Sissa, G. (eds.) 2023. Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Environmental Imagination (London).10.5040/9781350268975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. 1988. Ovid Renewed: Ovidian Influences on Literature and Art from the Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Martindale, C. 1993. Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and Hermeneutics of Reception (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Martindale, C. and Thomas, R. F. 2006. Classics and the Uses of Reception (Oxford).10.1002/9780470774007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, M. 2019. ‘Plato’s Timaeus and Time’, in Reid, H. L. and Ralkowski, M. (eds.), Plato at Syracuse: Essays on Plato in Western Greece with a New Translation of the Seventh Letter by Jonah Radding (London), 167–184.10.2307/j.ctvcmxptk.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, J. C. 1989. Ovid Amores: Text, Prolegomena and Commentary, vol. 2 (Chippenham).Google Scholar
McKim, R. 1984. ‘Myth against Philosophy in Ovid’s Account of Creation’, CAMWS 80.2, 97–108.Google Scholar
Mendenhall, M. 2013. ‘The Music of the Spheres: Musical Theory and Alchemical Image’, Mythological Studies Journal 4, 1–11.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 2014. ‘Democritus, Aristotle and the Problemata’, in Mayhew, R. (ed.), The Aristotelian Problemata Physica (Leiden), 10–35.Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, A. 2001. Ancient Etymologies in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Leeds).Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. and Newlands, C. E. 2014. A Handbook to the Reception of Ovid (Chichester).10.1002/9781118876169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondi, R. 1989. ‘Χαοσ and the Hesiodic Cosmogony’, HSPh 92, 1–41.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. 2000. Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511482540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, T. 2010. ‘Ecology as Text, Text as Ecology’, Oxford Literary Review 32.1, Deconstruction, Environmentalism, and Climate Change, 1–17.10.3366/olr.2010.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motta, A. 2018. ‘The Philosophy of Artistic Creation: Phidias, the Ideas, and Cicero’, Apeiron 51.3, 325–344.10.1515/apeiron-2016-0068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozley, J. H. 1929/1979. Ovid: The Art of Love and Other Poems, 2nd ed., revised by Goold, G. P., Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Mueller, I. 2005. Simplicius on Aristotle’s “On the Heavens 2.10–14” (Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
Myers, S. 1990. ‘Ovid’s Tecta Ars: Amores 6, “Programmatics and the Parrot”’, EMC 9, 367–374.Google Scholar
Myers, S. 1994. Ovid’s Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses (Ann Arbor, MI).10.3998/mpub.14320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S. 2012. ‘Catullan Contexts in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Du Quesnay, I. M. and Woodman, T. (eds.), Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers (Cambridge), 239–254.10.1017/CBO9780511733154.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S. 2014. ‘Ovid Ex Ponto 4.8 and The Fasti’, CQ 64.2, 725–734.10.1017/S0009838814000329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. 1963. Catullus: Carmina, OCT (Oxford).Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. 1969. P. Vergili Maronis: Opera (Oxford).Google Scholar
Nelis, D. 2001. Vergil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius (Leeds).Google Scholar
Nelis, D. 2004. ‘Georgics 2.458–542: Virgil, Aratus and Empedocles’, Dictynna 1, 1–32.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. 2006. ‘Wordplay in Vergil and Claudian’, Dictynna 3, 1–10.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. 2009. ‘Ovid, Metamorphoses 1.416–51: Noua Monstra and the Foedera Naturae’, in Hardie, P. (ed.), Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture (Oxford), 248–67.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2009. ‘Absorption and Erudition’, in Bowie, E. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Philostratus (Cambridge), 322–342.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. 1995. Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti (Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. 2005. ‘“Plato alone was not there …”: Platonic Presences in Lucian’, Hermathena 179, 89–103.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. 1987. ‘The Oak and the Axe: Symbolism and Seneca, Hercules Oetaeus 1618 ff.’, in Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.), Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble (Bristol), 243–252.Google Scholar
Nisetich, F. J. 2001. The Poems of Callimachus (Oxford).10.1093/actrade/9780198147602.book.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norwood, F. 1964. Unity in the Diversity of Ovid’s Metamorphoses, CJ 59.4, 170–174.Google Scholar
Nosch, M. 2014. ‘Voicing the Loom: Women, Weaving and Plotting’, in Nakassis, D., Gulizio, J., and James, S. (eds.), Ke-Ra-Me-Ja: Studies Presented to Cynthia W. Shelmerdine (Philadelphia, PA), 91–102.10.2307/j.ctt1287gx6.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, S. G. 1990. ‘This Sex which Is Not One: De-constructing Ovid’s Hermaphrodite’, Differences 2, 160–185.10.1215/10407391-2-1-160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, S. G. 1994. ‘Mater Matters: The Female in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’, Colby Quarterly 30.3, 179–205.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. 2009. ‘Sappho Fragments 58–59: Text, Apparatus Criticus, and Translation’, in Greene, E. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.), The New Sappho on Old Age: Textual and Philosophical Issues (London), 7–16.Google Scholar
Oberhelman, S. and Armstrong, D. 1995. ‘Satire as Poetry and the Impossibility of Metathesis in Horace’s Satires, 233’, in Obbink, D. (ed.), Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Philodemus, Lucretius and Horace (Oxford), 233–255.10.1093/oso/9780195088151.003.0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, D. 2013. Drakon: Dragon Myth and Serpent Cult in the Greek and Roman Worlds (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557325.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogle, M. B. 1924. ‘Dame Gossip’s Role in Epic Drama’, TAPhA, 55, 90–119.Google Scholar
Oikonomides, D. V. 1957–1958. ‘Ναξιακαὶ παραδόσεις’, Laogr. 17, 30–70.Google Scholar
Oldfather, C. H. 1933. Diodorus Siculus, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 2004a. ‘Sibylline Syllables: The Intratextual Aeneid’, PCPS 50, 29–45.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 2004b. ‘The Power of Image-Makers: Representation and Revenge in Ovid Metamorphoses 6 and Tristia 4’, CA 23, 281–321.Google Scholar
Olson, D. S. 2012. The ‘Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite’ and Related Texts: Text, Translation and Commentary (Berlin).10.1515/9783110260748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ondine Pache, C. 2011. A Moment’s Ornament: The Poetics of Nympholepsy in Ancient Greece (Oxford).Google Scholar
Onians, R. B. 1951 The Origins of European Thought about the Body, the Mind, the Soul, the World, Time and Fate (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Overduin, F. 2014. Nicander of Colophon’s Theriaca: A Literary Commentary (Leiden).Google Scholar
Page, D. 1972. Aeschylus: Tragoediae (Oxford).Google Scholar
Panoussi, V. 2002. ‘Review of Nelis, Vergil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius’, BMCR (n.p.).Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. 2004. ‘“Ut non [forma] cygnorum, sic albis proxima cygnis”: Poetology, Epic Definition and Swan Imagery in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Phoenix 58.1, 49–61.10.2307/4135196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, A. 2013. ‘The Treachery of Verbal Images: Viewing the Greek Technopaegnia’, in Kwapisz, J., Petrain, D., and Szymanski, M. (eds.), The Muse at Play: Riddles and Wordplay in Greek and Latin Poetry (Berlin), 199–222.Google Scholar
Park, A. 2009. ‘Two Types of Ovidian Personification’, CJ 104.3, 225–240.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M. 2001. ‘The Interplay of Science and Myth in the Song of Silenus’, AJPh 122.2, 201–222.Google Scholar
Pavlock, B. 2009. The Image of the Poet in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Madison, WI).Google Scholar
Pease, A. S. 1958. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Natura Deorum: Libri Secundus et Tertius (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Peck, A. L. 1937/1961. Aristotle: Parts of Animals, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Peck, A. L. 1943. Aristotle: Generation of Animals, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Peek, P. 2004. ‘Cephalus’ Incredible Narration: Metamorphoses 7, 661–865’, Latomus 63.3, 605–614.Google Scholar
Pendergraft, M. L. 1991. ‘Eros Ludens: Apollonius’ Argonautica 3, 132–41’, MD 26, 95–102.Google Scholar
Perkins, C. A. 1993. ‘Love’s Arrows Lost: Tibullan Parody in “Amores 3.9”’, CW 86.6, 459–466.Google Scholar
Perutelli, A. 1985. ‘I “bracchia” degli alberi. Designazione tecnica e immagine poetica’, MD 15, 9–48.Google Scholar
Petropoulos, J. C. B. 1994. Heat and Lust: Hesiod’s Midsummer Festival Scene Revisited (Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. and Taylor, B. (eds.) 2019. Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World (Cambridge).10.1017/9781108671972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierris, A. L. 2003. The Empedoclean Κόσμος: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity (Patras).Google Scholar
Pillinger, E. 2019. Cassandra and the Poetics of Prophecy in Greek and Latin Literature (Cambridge).10.1017/9781108564007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platnauer, M. 1922. Claudian, Volume 2 (London).Google Scholar
Plett, H. F. 1991. Intertextuality (Berlin).Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. 1995. ‘Content and Form in Philodemus: The History of an Evasion’, in Obbink, D. (ed.), Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace (New York), 97–147.10.1093/oso/9780195088151.003.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pucci, J. M. 1998. The Full-Knowing Reader: Allusion and the Power of the Reader in the Western Literary Tradition (New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1995. Virgil’s ‘Aeneid’: Interpretation and Influence (Chapel Hill, NC).Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1998. Virgil’s Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the ‘Aeneid’ (New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
Race, W. H. 1997. Pindar 1: Olympian Odes. Pythian Odes, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Raval, S. 2001. ‘“A Lover’s Discourse”: Byblis in Metamorphoses 9’, Arethusa 24.3, 285–311.10.1353/are.2001.0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1998. Plato: Cratylus (Indianapolis, IN).Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1912. ‘Hekataios von Abdera und Demokrit’, Hermes 47.4, 492–513.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. 2000. Hellenistic Sculpture II (Madison, WI).Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2006. Ovid’s Lovers: Desire, Difference and the Poetic Imagination (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511719981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimell, V. 2019. ‘After Ovid, after Theory’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 26.4, 446–469.10.1007/s12138-019-00523-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, F. E. 1913. ‘The Creation Story in Ovid Met. i’, Classical Philology 8.4, 401–414.10.1086/359823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. 1989. The Jeweled Style: Poetry and Poetics in Late Antiquity (Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
Roberts, M. 2002. ‘Creation in Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Latin Poets of Late Antiquity’, Arethusa 35.3, 403–415.10.1353/are.2002.0025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, F. C. 1973. ‘Syntactical Glosses in Latin Manuscripts of Anglo-Saxon Provenance’, Speculum 48.3, 443–475.10.2307/2854443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. M. 1968. ‘Ovid and the Timaeus’, Athenaeum 56, 254–260.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. 1999. ‘Salmacis and Hermaphroditus: When Two Become One’, CQ 49.1, 212–223.10.1093/cq/49.1.212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, A. J. 2011. ‘Callimachus and Contemporary Criticism’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L., and Stephens, S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Callimachus (Leiden), 289–308.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 1979. ‘L’esistenza letteraria. Ovidio e l’autocoscienza della poesia’, MD 2, 101–136.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 1999. ‘Form in Motion: Weaving the Text in the Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. (eds.), Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Its Reception (Cambridge), 240–253.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 2002. ‘Narrative Techniques and Narrative Structures in the Metamorphoses’, in Weiden Boyd, B. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ovid (Leiden), 271–304.10.1163/9789047400950_010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosati, G. 2006. ‘Form in Motion: Weaving the Text in the Metamorphoses’, in Knox, P. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Ovid (Oxford), 334–350.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 2021. Narcissus and Pygmalion: Illusion and Spectacle in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780198852438.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1986. Plato: Phaedrus, with Translation and Commentary (Warminster).Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1995. Plato: Statesman (Oxford).Google Scholar
Royle, N. 2003. The Uncanny (New York).Google Scholar
Rubincam, C. 2009. ‘Review of Ambaglio, D. Landucci, F. Gattinoni, Bravi, L. (eds.), Diodoro Siculo: Biblioteca Storica’, BMCR (n.p.).Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. 1986. Philo of Alexandria and the Timaeus of Plato (Leiden).10.1163/9789004320666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupp, W. L. 2006. ‘Shape of the Beast: The Theriomorphic and Therianthropic Deities and Demons of Ancient Italy’. Florida State University dissertation.Google Scholar
Rupp, W. L. 2007. ‘The Vegetal Goddess in the Tomb of the Typhon’, Etruscan Studies 10, 211–219.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 2001. Quintilian: The Orator’s Education, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Sacks, K. S. 1990. Diodorus Siculus and the First Century (Princeton, NJ).10.1515/9781400861286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, K. S. 1994. ‘Diodorus Siculus: Conformity and Creativity’, in Hornblower, S. (ed.), Greek Historiography (Oxford), 213–232.Google Scholar
Sampson, M. C. 2012. ‘Callimachean Tradition and the Muse’s Hymn to Ceres’, TAPhA 142.1, 83–103.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 1994. ‘The Palingenesis of De Rerum Natura’, PCPhS 40, 81–107.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2011. ‘Ibis redibis’, MD 67, 79–150.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2021. ‘Intimations of Mortality: Ovid and the End(s) of the World’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.), Philosophy in Ovid, Ovid as Philosopher (Oxford), 287–307.Google Scholar
Schindel, U. 1993. ‘Enargia, Metathesis, Metastasis: Figurendefinitionen bei Isidor und Quintilian’, Glotta 71, 112–119.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. 1954/2014. Nature and the Greeks (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. 1995. The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Dublin Seminars 1949–1955 and Other Unpublished Texts) (Woodbridge, CT).Google Scholar
Scott, W. 1966. ‘Wind Imagery in the Oresteia’, TAPhA 97, 459–471.Google Scholar
Seaton, R. C. 1990. Apollonius Rhodius: Argonautica, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1976. Epicurus and the Mathematicians of Cyzicus (Naples).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1990. ‘Teleology and Myth in the Phaedo’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 5, 359–384.10.1163/2213441789X00234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 1996. ‘Three Platonist Interpretations of the Theaetetus’, in Gill, C. and McCabe, M. (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato (Oxford), 79–103.10.1093/oso/9780198240129.003.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 1998. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511482380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 2003a. Plato’s Cratylus (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511482649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 2003b. ‘Lucretius and the New Empedocles’, LICS 2.4, 1–12.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2004a. The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus (Oxford).10.1093/0199267030.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 2004b. ‘On Generation and Corruption 1.2’, in De Haas, F. and Mansfield, J. (eds.), On Generation and Corruption Book 1 (Oxford), 65–89.10.1093/oso/9780199242924.003.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 2007. ‘Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity’. Sather Classical Lectures 66 (Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2013. ‘Cicero and the Timaeus’, in Schofield, M. (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century bc (Cambridge), 187–205.10.1017/CBO9781139096713.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. and Long, A. 2010. Plato: Meno and Phaedo (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511780653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. 1965. ‘Aeternum Per Saecula Nomen: The Golden Bough and the Tragedy of History Part 1’, Arion 4.1, 617–657.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1966. ‘Aeternum Per Saecula Nomen: The Golden Bough and the Tragedy of History Part 2’, Arion 5.1, 34–72.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1968. ‘The Hesitation of the Golden Bough: A Reexamination’, Hermes 96, 74–79.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1969a. Landscape in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1969b. ‘Myth and Philosophy in the Metamorphoses: Ovid’s Augustanism and the Augustan Conclusion of Book XV’, AJPh 90.3, 257–292.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1971a. ‘Narrative Art in the “Metamorphoses”’, CJ 66.4, 331–337.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1971b. ‘Ovid’s “Metamorphoses”: Greek Myth in Augustan Rome’, SPh 68.4, 371–394.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1972. ‘Ovid’s Orpheus and Augustan Ideology’, TAPhA 103, 473–494.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1984. ‘Senecan Baroque: The Death of Hippolytus in Seneca, Ovid and Euripides’, TAPhA 114, 311–325.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1990. Lucretius on Death and Anxiety (Princeton, NJ).10.1515/9781400861293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. 1998. ‘Ovid’s Metamorphic Bodies: Art, Gender and Violence in the “Metamorphoses”’, Arion 5.3, 9–41.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 2001a. ‘Jupiter in Ovid’s “Metamorphoses”’, Arion 9.1, 78–99.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 2001b. ‘Intertextuality and Immortality: Ovid, Pythagoras and Lucretius in Metamorphoses 15’, MD 46, 63–101.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 2002. ‘Black and White Magic in Ovid’s “Metamorphoses”: Passion, Love and Art’, Arion 9.3, 1–34.Google Scholar
Serres, M. 2000. The Birth of Physics, translated by Jack Hawkes (Manchester).Google Scholar
Sharples, B. 1999. ‘More on Anamnesis in the Meno’, Phronesis 44, 353–357.10.1163/15685289960464647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharrock, A. 2008. ‘The Philosopher and the Mother Cow: Towards a Feminist Reading of Lucretius’, in Leonard, M. and Zanko, V. (eds.), Laughing with Medusa (Oxford), 254–274.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 2016. ‘The Don Fowler Lecture 2016: Interpretation and the Metaphor of Authority’ (University of Oxford Podcasts).Google Scholar
Sheridan, B. 2010. ‘Diodorus’ Reading of Polybius’ Universalism’, in Liddell, P. and Fear, A. (eds.), Historiae Mundi: Studies in Universal History (London), 41–55.Google Scholar
Showerman, G. 1914/1977. Ovid: Heroides, Amores, 2nd ed., revised by Goold, G. P., Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Sider, D. 2015. ‘Review of Thom, J. C. (ed.), Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, “On the Cosmos” ’, BMCR (n.p.).Google Scholar
Simon, E. 1975. Pergamon und Hesiod (Mainz).Google Scholar
Sissa, G. 2010. ‘Amor Mora Metamorphosis Roma’, in De Poli, M. (ed.), Maschile e Femminile: Genere ed Eros nel Mondo Greco (Padua), 7–38.Google Scholar
Sissa, G. 2021. ‘Rustic Skepticism and Slow Sensuality: Ovid’s Ars amatoria and Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe’, in Solá, C. M., Muñoz, M. J. and Roca, F. M. (eds.), Aπoina = àpoina estudis de literatura grega dedicats a Carles Miralles (La Rioja), 469–502.Google Scholar
Sissa, G. 2023. ‘The Fluidity of Life in Ovid’s Metamorphic World’, in Martelli, F. and Sissa, G. (eds.), Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Environmental Imagination (London), 35–54.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Ennius (Oxford).Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. 2001. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura (Indianapolis, IN).Google Scholar
Snyder, J. 1980. Puns and Poetry in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Snyder, J. 1981. ‘The Web of Song: Weaving Imagery in Homer and the Lyric Poets’, CJ 76.3, 193–196.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. 1983. ‘The Warp and Woof of the Universe in Lucretius’ “De Rerum Natura”’, ICS 8.1, 37–43.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F., Merkelbach, R., and West, M. L. 1990. Hesiod: Theogonia, Opera et Dies (Oxford).Google Scholar
Spaas, L. 2000. Echoes of Narcissus: Cultural Diversities and Intersections Volume 2 (New York).Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. 2009. ‘Theorizing Ovid’, in Knox, P. (ed.), A Companion to Ovid (Oxford), 381–393.10.1002/9781444310627.ch27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spentzou, E. 2019. ‘Orpheus, Byblis, Myrrha: Towards a Matrixial Ethics of Encounter in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 26.4, 417–432.10.1007/s12138-019-00512-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steingräber, S. 2000. ‘Pergamene Influences on Etruscan and Hellenistic Art’, in de Grummond, N. T. and Ridgway, B. S. (eds.), From Pergamon to Sperlonga (Berkeley, CA), 60–79.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 2015. Callimachus: The Hymns (Oxford).Google Scholar
Stray, C. 2010. Classical Dictionaries: Past, Present and Future (London).Google Scholar
Strong, D. 1995. Roman Art (New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
Sutton, D. F. 1983. ‘The Date of Prometheus Bound’, GRBS 24.2, 289–294.Google Scholar
Taran, L. 2001. Collected Papers (1962–1999) (Leiden).10.1163/9789004453289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, H. 1993. Thrasyllan Platonism (Ithaca, NY).10.7591/9781501737947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 2002. ‘Chaos in Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Its Neronian Influence’, Arethusa 35.3, 349–360.10.1353/are.2002.0026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 2004. P. Ovidi Nasonis Metamorphoses, OCT (Oxford).Google Scholar
Tarver, T. 1997. ‘Varro and the Antiquarianism of Philosophy’, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.), Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome (Oxford), 130–164.10.1093/oso/9780198150565.003.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1999. The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus (Toronto).10.1017/CCOL0521441226.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thein, K. 2008. ‘War, Gods and Mankind in the Timaeus–Critias’, Rhizai 1, 49–107.Google Scholar
Thein, K. 2021. Ecphrastic Shields in Graeco-Roman Literature (London).10.4324/9781003154051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thein, K. 2022. ‘Connecting the End to the Beginning’, Eirene: Studia Graeca et Latina 58, 1–5.Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. 2014. Cosmic Order and Divine Power: Pseudo-Aristotle, on the Cosmos (Tübingen).10.1628/978-3-16-156432-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1986. ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the Art of Reference’, HSPh 90, 171–198.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 1999. Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality (Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2001. Virgil and the Augustan Reception (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9780511482403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. 2009. ‘Ovid’s Reception of Virgil’, in Knox, P. (ed.), A Companion to Ovid (Oxford), 294–307.10.1002/9781444310627.ch21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurn, I. 2000. Ioannis Malalae Chronographia (Berlin).Google Scholar
Tissol, G. 1997. The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Tissol, G. 2009. ‘The House of Fame: Roman History and Augustan Politics in Metamorphoses 11–15’, in Weiden Boyd, B. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ovid (Leiden), 305–336.Google Scholar
Toscano, A. 2012. ‘Review of Geymonat, M. 2012. The Great Archimedes’, BMCR (n.p.).Google Scholar
Trapp, M. 2005. ‘On Tickling the Ears: Apuleius’ Prologue and the Anxieties of Philosophers’, in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses (Oxford), 39–46.Google Scholar
Tredennick, H. 1933. Aristotle: Metaphysics, vol. 1, books 1–9 (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Trepanier, S. 2004. Empedocles: An Interpretation (New York).Google Scholar
Trepanier, S. 2017. ‘From Hades to the Stars: Empedocles on the Cosmic Habitats of the Soul’, CA 36.1, 130–182.Google Scholar
Trypanis, C. A. 1958/1975. Callimachus: Aetia, Iambi, Hecale and Other Fragments, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Van der Sluijs, M. A. 2006. ‘Phaethon and the Great Year’, Aperion 39, 57–90.Google Scholar
Van Tress, H. 2004. Poetic Memory: Allusion in the Poetry of Callimachus and the Metamorphoses of Ovid (Leiden).10.1163/9789047406624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verlinsky, A. 2019. ‘Posidonius’ Linguistic Naturalism and Its Philosophical Pedigree’, in Pezzini, G. and Taylor, B. (eds.), Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World (Cambridge), 15–45.10.1017/9781108671972.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vioque, G. G. 2012. ‘On a Forgotten Manuscript Fragment of Calcidius’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus’, Mnemosyne 65.4/5, 737–740.10.1163/156852511X585044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1955. ‘On Heraclitus’, AJPh 76.4, 337–368.Google Scholar
Vogel, F. 1985. Diodori Bibliotheca Historica (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Volk, K. 1997. ‘Cum carmine crescit et annus: Ovid’s Fasti and the Poetics of Simultaneity’, TAPhA 127, 287–313.Google Scholar
Volk, K. 2009. Manilius and His Intellectual Background (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265220.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, K. 2012. ‘Letters in the Sky: Reading the Signs in Aratus’ Phaenomena’, AJPh 133, 209–240.Google Scholar
Volk, K. 2021. ‘Ovid’s Art of Life’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.), Philosophy in Ovid, Ovid as Philosopher (Oxford), 124–142.Google Scholar
Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.) 2021. Philosophy in Ovid, Ovid as Philosopher (Oxford).Google Scholar
Von Glinski, M. L. 2012. Simile and Identity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9781139032315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, F. 1999. ‘Annus platonicus (Book Review)’, ISIS: Journal of the History of Science in Society 90.2, 354–355.10.1086/384345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, P. G. 1998. Cicero: The Nature of the Gods (Oxford).Google Scholar
Warmington, E. H. 1935. Remains of Old Latin 1, Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2004. ‘Ancient Atomists on the Plurality of Worlds’, CQ 54.2, 254–365.10.1093/clquaj/bmh044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterfield, R. 2003. Plato: Phaedrus (Oxford).Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. and Annas, J. 1995. Plato: Statesman (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Watson, P. A. 2001. ‘Martial’s Snake in Amber: Ekphrasis or Poetic Fantasy’, Latomus 60.4, 938–943.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. 1969. Hieronymus von Rhodos, Kritolaos und seine Schüler (Basel).Google Scholar
Weiden Boyd, B. 1987. ‘The Death of Corinna’s Parrot Reconsidered’, CJ 82.3, 199–207.Google Scholar
Weiden Boyd, B. 2006. ‘Two Rivers and the Reader in Ovid “Metamorphoses” 8’, TAPhA 136.1, 171–206.Google Scholar
Werner, D. 2012. Myth and Philosophy in Plato’s Phaedrus (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9781139108737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, D. 1997. Horace: The Complete Odes and Epodes (Oxford).Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1963. ‘Three Presocratic Cosmologies’, CQ 13.2, 154–176.10.1017/S0009838800001750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. L. 1966. Hesiod: Theogony (Oxford).Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1969. ‘An Atomist Illustration in Aristotle’, Philologus 113.1, 150–151.10.1524/phil.1969.113.12.150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. L. 1983. The Orphic Poems (London).Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1988. Hesiod: Theogony and Works and Days (Oxford).Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1997. The East Face of Helicon (Oxford).10.1093/oso/9780198150428.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. L. 2007. Indo-European Poetry and Myth (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280759.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. L. 2013. Hellenica: Selected Papers on Greek Thought Volume 3 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. L. 1924/1996. Ovid: Tristia, Ex Ponto, 2nd ed., revised by Goold, G. P., Loeb (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 1995a. ‘Ovid’s Use of Lucretius in Metamorphoses 1.67–8’, CQ 45.1, 200–203.10.1017/S0009838800041793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 1995b. ‘Imago Mundi: Another View of the Creation in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, AJPh 116.1, 95–121.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 1997. ‘Changing Names: The Miracle of Iphis in Ovid “Metamorphoses” 9’, Phoenix 51.2, 190–202.10.2307/1088494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 1999. A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Philadelphia, PA).Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 2000. Narrative Dynamics in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 2002. ‘Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Universal History’, in Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography (Leiden), 163–189.10.1163/9789047400493_010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 2009. ‘Into New Bodies: The Incipit of Ovid’s Metamorphoses as Intertext in Imperial Latin Literature’, MD 61, 147–160.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2010. ‘Greece Is the World: Exile and Identity in the Second Sophistic’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.), Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire (Cambridge), 269–305.Google Scholar
Wigodsky, M. 2007. ‘“Homoiotetes, Stoicheia” and “Homoiomereiai” in Epicurus’, CQ 57.2, 521–542.10.1017/S0009838807000547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. R. 1996. Virgil’s Aeneid (Oxford).Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 1992. ‘On Ovid’s Ibis: A Poem in Context’, PCPhS 38, 171–189.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 1994. Banished Voices: Readings in Ovid’s Exile Poetry (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 1995. ‘Cleombrotus of Ambracia: Interpretations of a Suicide from Callimachus to Agathias’, CQ 45.1, 154–169.10.1017/S0009838800041768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. D. 1996. The Curse of Exile: A Study of Ovid’s Ibis (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 2008. ‘Introduction to Robinson Ellis’s Ibis’, in Ellis, L. R. (ed.), Ovid: Ibis (Reissue), VII–XXVI (Exeter).Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 2009. ‘The Metamorphoses: Politics and Narrative’, in Knox, P. (ed.), A Companion to Ovid (Oxford), 154–169.10.1002/9781444310627.ch11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, A. 2013. Ovid: Fasti (Oxford).Google Scholar
Woolerton, E. 2010. ‘The Roots of Lucretius’ Tree-Men, De Rerum Natura 2.702–3’, CQ 60.1, 255–257.10.1017/S0009838809990607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worton, M. and Still, J. 1990. Intertextuality: Theories and Practice (Manchester).Google Scholar
Wright, M. R. 1995. Empedocles: Extant Fragments (London).Google Scholar
Wright, M. T. 2012. ‘The Planetarium of Archimedes’ (http://hist.science.online.fr).Google Scholar
Yonge, C. D. 1877. Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations (New York).Google Scholar
Young, E. M. 2008. ‘Inscribing Orpheus: Ovid and the Invention of a Greco-Roman Corpus’, Representations 101.1, 1–31.10.1525/rep.2008.101.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yunis, H. 2011. Plato: Phaedrus (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Zajko, V. 2009. ‘“Listening with” Ovid: Intersexuality, Queer Theory, and the Myth of Hermaphroditus and Salmacis’, Helios 36.2, 175–202.10.1353/hel.0.0023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamir, T. 2008. ‘Wooden Subjects’, New Literary History 38.2, 277–300.10.1353/nlh.0.0027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamir, T. 2011. ‘Talking Trees’, New Literary History 42.3, 439–453.10.1353/nlh.2011.0026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J. 1999. Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On Laws (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Zhmud, L. 2012. Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans (Oxford).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289318.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziogas, I. 2011. ‘Ovid as a Hesiodic Poet: Atalanta in the “Catalogue of Women” (fr. 72–6 M-W) and the “Metamorphoses” (10.560–707)’, Mnemosyne 64.2, 249–270.10.1163/156852511X505051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziogas, I. 2013. Ovid and Hesiod: The Metamorphosis of the Catalogue of Women (Cambridge).10.1017/CBO9781139021944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zissos, A. 1999. ‘The Rape of Proserpina in Ovid “Met.” 5.341–661: Internal Audience and Narrative Distortion’, Phoenix 53, 97–113.10.2307/1088125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zissos, A. and Gildenhard, I. 1999. ‘Problems of Time in Metamorphoses 2’, in Hardie, P. R., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. (eds.), Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Its Reception (Cambridge), 31–47.Google Scholar
Zumwalt, N. 1977. ‘Fama Subversa: Theme and Structure in Ovid Metamorphoses 12’, California Studies of Classical Antiquity 10, 209–222.10.2307/25010720CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA

The PDF of this book complies with version 2.1 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved user experiences and achieves the intermediate (AA) level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Kelly, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Ovid and Plato
  • Online publication: 19 June 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009601504.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Kelly, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Ovid and Plato
  • Online publication: 19 June 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009601504.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Kelly, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Ovid and Plato
  • Online publication: 19 June 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009601504.011
Available formats
×