The philosophical foundations of international wildlife law

Michael Bowman; Peter Davies; Catherine Redgwell

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511975301.005

3 - The philosophical foundations of international wildlife law

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2011

Michael Bowman ,

Peter Davies and

Catherine Redgwell

Show author details

Michael Bowman: Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Peter Davies: Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Catherine Redgwell: Affiliation:
University College London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Although it would be unrealistic to claim that international wildlife law has evolved in accordance with any grand philosophical strategy, all legislative initiatives are plainly intended to advance some significant underlying policy, and over time the sheer proliferation of treaty regimes has highlighted the need to establish some broader, overall direction and coherence in the system, based upon the developing aspirations and values of the international community. As it happens, wildlife law is nourished by a particularly rich tradition of theorising about the relationship between humankind and ‘nature’, and in recent decades environmental ethics have become a central concern of moral philosophy. Underpinning these deliberations is the recognition that the natural world embodies significant value, and should therefore be protected.

This chapter accordingly explores the question of natural value, first examining the various forms of value that have been identified within the natural world, before seeking to identify more precisely the specific entities in which such value resides. It concludes by analysing the mechanisms through which these various values may be quantified and compared. In each case, attention is given to the extent to which philosophical concepts and arguments have exerted any practical influence upon the evolution of international wildlife law.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Lyster's International Wildlife Law , pp. 61 - 91

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975301.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Attfield, R., The Ethics of Environmental Concern (University of Georgia Press, 2nd ed., 1991)Google Scholar

Bowman, M. J. and Boyle, A. E. (eds.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2002)

Gillespie, A., International Environmental Law, Policy and Ethics (Clarendon, 1997)Google Scholar

Light, A. and Rolston, H. III (eds.), Environmental Ethics: An Anthology (Blackwell, 2003)

Mathews, F., The Ecological Self (Routledge, 1991)Google Scholar

Nash, R., The Rights of Nature (University of Wisconsin Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Pearce, D. and Moran, D., The Economic Value of Biodiversity (Earthscan, 1994)Google Scholar

Rolston, H. III, Conserving Natural Value (Columbia University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Sarkar, S., Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRef Google Scholar

Hargrove, E. C. (ed.), The Animal Rights/Environmental Ethics Debate (SUNY Press, 1992)

Fox, W., Towards a Transpersonal Ecology (SUNY Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Varner, G. E., In Nature's Interests? (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Norton, B. G., ‘Commodity, Amenity and Morality: The Limits of Quantification in Valuing Biodiversity’, in Wilson, E. O. (ed.), Biodiversity (National Academy Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O., The Diversity of Life (Penguin, 1992)Google Scholar

Frazer, J., The Golden Bough (1922; Wordsworth ed., 1993)Google Scholar

Daston, L. and Mitman, G. (eds.), Thinking with Animals (Columbia University Press, 2005)

Agar, N., Life's Intrinsic Value (Columbia University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Goodpaster, K., ‘On Being Morally Considerable’ (1978) 75 Journal of Philosophy308.CrossRef Google Scholar

Margulis, L. and Sagan, D., What Is Life? (Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1995)Google Scholar

Rose, S., Lifelines (Penguin, 1997)Google Scholar

Eckersley, R., Environmentalism and Political Theory (UCL Press, 1992), p. 60.Google Scholar

Callicott, J. B., ‘Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair’ (1980) 2 Envtl. Ethics311CrossRef Google Scholar

Ronnow-Rasmussen, T. and Zimmerman, M. J. (eds.), Recent Work on Intrinsic Value (Springer, 2005)CrossRef

Beversluis, J. (ed.), Sourcebook of the World's Religions (New World Library, 3rd ed., 2000)

Morgan, P. and Braybrooke, M. (eds.), Testing the Global Ethic (CoNexus Press, 1998)

(1987) 17 Environmental Policy and Law47, 87.

Peterson, A. L., Being Human (University of California Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Glenn, H. P., Legal Traditions of the World (Oxford, 2000), pp. 68–73Google Scholar

,World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (Oxford, 1987), pp. 147, 155.Google Scholar

Sohn, L. B., ‘The Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment’ (1973) 14 Harv ILJ423, p. 459Google Scholar

,IUCN/UNEP/WWF, Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, 1991)Google Scholar

Birnie, P. W., Boyle, A. E. and Redgwell, C. J., International Law and the Environment (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2009), p. 618.Google Scholar

Drengson, A. and Inoue, Y. (eds.), The Deep Ecology Movement (North Atlantic Books, 1995)

Vrijenhoek, R., ‘Natural Processes, Individuals and Units of Conservation’, in Norton, B. G. et al., Ethics on the Ark (Smithsonian Institution Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Dawkins, R., The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press, rev. ed., 1989), Preface

Dover, G., ‘Anti-Dawkins’, in Rose, H. and Rose, S. (eds.), Alas Poor Darwin (Vintage, 2001)

Gould, S. J., ‘Evolution of Organisms’, in Boyd, C. A. R. and Noble, D. (eds.), The Logic of Life (Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Moss, L., What Genes Can't Do (MIT Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Tudge, C., The Engineer in the Garden (Pimlico, 1993), at p. 111.Google Scholar

Sloan, P. R. (ed.), Controlling Our Destinies (University of Notre Dame Press, 2000)

Woolfson, A., An Intelligent Person's Guide to Genetics (Duckworth Overlook, 2004), p. 18.Google Scholar

Woolfson, A., Life without Genes (HarperCollins, 2000)Google Scholar

Wills, C. and Bada, J., The Spark of Life (Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 130.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R., The Extended Phenotype (Oxford University Press, 1982), p. 250.Google Scholar

Cavalieri, P. and Singer, P. (ed.), The Great Ape Project (Fourth Estate, 1993)

Attfield, R. and Belsey, A. (eds.), Philosophy and the Natural Environment (Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRef

Whitehead, A. N., The Function of Reason (1929; Beacon Press ed., 1971)Google Scholar

Naess, A., ‘The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement’ (1973) 16 Inquiry95CrossRef Google Scholar

Devall, W. and Sessions, G., Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered (Gibbs Smith, 1985)Google Scholar

Wilson, R. A., Genes and the Agents of Life (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M. J., Evolution in Four Dimensions (MIT Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Hall, M. and Halliday, T., Behaviour and Evolution (Open University, 1992), pp. 72, 117Google Scholar

Burhenne, W. E. and Irwin, W. A., World Charter for Nature (Erich Schmidt, 2nd rev. ed., 1986), p. 136.Google Scholar

Hayward, T., Ecological Thought (Polity, 1994), p. 65.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R., The Blind Watchmaker (Penguin, 1988), p. 261.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J., Life's Grandeur (Jonathan Cape, 1996)Google Scholar

Smith, J. Maynard and Szathmary, E., The Major Transitions in Evolution (W. H. Freeman, 1995), p. 4.Google Scholar

Andel, J. and Aronson, J. (eds.), Restoration Ecology (Blackwell, 2006)Google Scholar

Sands, P., Principles of International Environmental Law (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2003), pp. 877–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Crawford, J., The ILC's Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge, 2002)Google Scholar

(2005) 35 Environmental Policy and Law244.

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.