from PART II - Accessory liability in private law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016
Introduction
Overview
This chapter considers rules imposing accessory, and accessory-like, liability to remedy infringements of intellectual property (IP) rights. We have already considered accessory liability for IP infringements via the application of generic tort accessory principles in Chapter 5. However, persons may also be liable on the basis of specific statutory provisions. This chapter considers such provisions under the following three headings:
(1) Authorisation of infringements. Copyright and design law in the UK and Australia, and patents and trademarks law in Australia, provide that right holders have the rights to do the acts or exploit the rights contained within the relevant IP, and that these rights include the right to ‘authorise’ such use or exploitation [9.2]. Any ‘authorisation’ by a person, A, of a primary infringement by another, primary wrongdoer (PW), without the consent of the right holder therefore itself infringes those rights. The general concept of ‘authorisation’ is therefore central to establishing accessory liability.
(2) Other accessory liability rules. This chapter briefly notes some minor and specifically targeted statutory doctrines that create accessory liability [9.3].
(3) Non-accessorial ‘indirect’ infringements. A number of different, specifically targeted, statutory provisions create precise sources of liability, variously labelled in the legislation and commentary as ‘secondary’, ‘contributory’ or ‘indirect’ infringement. Even though some of these labels suggest accessory liability, for the most part, these provisions do not impose what is conceptually accessory liability (excepting those just noted in (2)), despite having considerable affinity with accessory liability [9.4].
Competing policies in IP accessory law
Accessory liability based on a party's wrongful involvement in another's primary wrong is a narrowly confined basis for liability. The goals of deterring primary infringement and vindicating rights face serious challenges in IP law if third parties are only liable on the basis of such narrowly confined liability rules. In part, these challenges come from technological innovations, particularly on the internet, that enable widespread and repeated infringements of rights by numerous individual infringers. Examples include mass copying of copyrighted materials or worldwide marketing by persons selling goods that infringe trademarks. It may be practically impossible to deter such infringements or remedy their consequences by pursuing individual primary infringers, and this has the potential to significantly diminish the value of IP proprietary interests.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.