To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) framework is an evidence-based approach to treating individuals with suicidality. It involves collaboration between patients and clinicians to assess, plan and treat suicidal risk, using the Suicide Status Form. This study applies the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to explore the experiences of Irish higher education counselling staff in implementing CAMS, providing insight into the factors that influence its successful integration into student mental health services.
Methods:
A mixed-methods approach was adopted, via an online survey and follow-up interviews with student counselling staff to explore the implementation of the CAMS framework. Sixty-four staff members from student counselling services in Irish higher education institutions completed the online survey. Ten participants engaged in follow-up interviews to further explore survey findings. Data on reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance were gathered through the RE-AIM framework.
Results:
Survey respondents report treating approximately 44% of individuals presenting with suicidal risk using the CAMS framework. The majority (88.1%) of respondents reported positive outcomes for suicidal patients. Most respondents (91%) found the training beneficial and had ‘definitely’ or ‘somewhat’ incorporated CAMS into their management of suicidal patients. There were three main themes identified from interview data: diverse approaches to implementation, the value of CAMS in practice and challenges in implementing CAMS.
Conclusions:
CAMS has provided a strong toolkit for improving suicide-specific skills, communication and collaboration, but fidelity varies due to resource and support limitations. Additional resourcing, increased staff buy-in and further research could lead to smoother implementation in student counselling services.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.