To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To evaluate anesthesiologists’ preparedness and training needs during a mass casualty event in a resource-limited setting, focusing on hospital disaster planning and response effectiveness.
Methods
This study utilized an exploratory mixed-methods design, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to assess the experiences of anesthesiologists during a catastrophic disaster. Data were collected through interviews and a survey of anesthesiologists who were directly involved in emergency response.
Results
The findings highlight significant gaps in disaster preparedness among hospitals, influenced by factors such as physical infrastructure damage, resource shortages, and limited personnel involvement in disaster planning. Anesthesiologists demonstrated adaptability and commitment despite inadequate training and limited disaster management frameworks. The study underscores the urgent need for standardized disaster preparedness plans, multidisciplinary training, and enhanced psychological support for health care professionals.
Conclusions
This study reveals critical deficiencies in hospital disaster preparedness and anesthesiologists’ training in emergency response. Addressing these gaps through robust disaster planning, simulation-based education, and institutional support is essential to enhance health care systems’ resilience in resource-limited and conflict-affected regions.
The two most commonly used techniques in clinical use are the loss of resistance to air and to normal saline. The term loss of resistance refers to the subjective feel of a change in resistance while the epidural needle penetrates the interspinous ligament, the ligamentum flavum, and subsequently into the epidural space. This chapter evaluates whether, during the loss of resistance technique, air or saline used during epidural anesthesia influences either the efficacy of regional blockade or the incidence of complications such as accidental dural puncture rate and postdural puncture headache (PDPH). There are few prospective, controlled, randomized double-blind trials comparing the complications of air vs. saline in identifying the epidural space. Using saline as part of a loss of resistance technique to identify the epidural space is probably the most widely accepted practice worldwide among anesthesiologists.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.