To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Department of Agriculture allowed all US schools to offer meals at no cost regardless of family income, a policy known as Universal Free Meals (UFM). Despite the recognized benefits of UFM, the policy expired in June 2022. The goal of this study was to gather perceptions of school staff in Arizona about school meals, UFM, and the discontinuation of UFM.
Design:
This mixed-method study collected data using an online survey. Open-ended survey questions were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis, and closed-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive analysis.
Setting:
The survey was distributed to school staff in the two major metropolitan areas in Arizona between September and October 2022, soon after the UFM policy expired.
Participants:
Survey responses were received from 1,255 school staff, including teachers, cafeteria staff, administrators, and other staff.
Results:
Most school staff (93%) were supportive of UFM, and the support was consistent across all staff categories and across different political leanings. Thematic analysis demonstrated that staff felt UFM helped to meet students basic needs, reduced stigma, and lessened the burden on teachers to use their own resources to provide food to students. Despite strong support, some staff reported concerns about food quality, program waste, and time available for lunch.
Conclusions:
UFM policies were strongly supported by school staff, despite some concerns about program implementation. Understanding these views is important to the discussion of expanding UFM policies in the US and globally.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.