Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-hp6zs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T16:40:28.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

School Staff Perspectives on Universal Free Meals in the US

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2025

Sarah Martinelli*
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, College of Health Solutions, 550 N. 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ 85004
Emily M. Melnick
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, College of Health Solutions, 550 N. 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ 85004
Francesco Acciai
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, College of Health Solutions, 550 N. 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ 85004
Ashley St. Thomas
Affiliation:
Arizona Foodbank Network, 340 E Coronado Road, Ste 400, Phoenix, AZ, 85004-1524
Punam Ohri-Vachaspati
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, College of Health Solutions, 550 N. 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ 85004
*
Corresponding author: Sarah Martinelli, 550 N. 3rd St, Phoenix, AZ 85004, ABC 127, Email: Sarah.Martinelli@asu.edu, 602-827-2874
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Department of Agriculture allowed all US schools to offer meals at no cost regardless of family income, a policy known as Universal Free Meals (UFM). Despite the recognized benefits of UFM, the policy expired in June 2022. The goal of this study was to gather perceptions of school staff in Arizona about school meals, UFM, and the discontinuation of UFM.

Design:

This mixed-method study collected data using an online survey. Open-ended survey questions were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis, and closed-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive analysis.

Setting:

The survey was distributed to school staff in the two major metropolitan areas in Arizona between September and October 2022, soon after the UFM policy expired.

Participants:

Survey responses were received from 1,255 school staff, including teachers, cafeteria staff, administrators, and other staff.

Results:

Most school staff (93%) were supportive of UFM, and the support was consistent across all staff categories and across different political leanings. Thematic analysis demonstrated that staff felt UFM helped to meet students basic needs, reduced stigma, and lessened the burden on teachers to use their own resources to provide food to students. Despite strong support, some staff reported concerns about food quality, program waste, and time available for lunch.

Conclusions:

UFM policies were strongly supported by school staff, despite some concerns about program implementation. Understanding these views is important to the discussion of expanding UFM policies in the US and globally.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society