To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Leibniz, this study argues, is the genuine initiator of German Idealism. His analysis of freedom as spontaneity and the relations he establishes among freedom, justice, and progress underlie Kant's ideas of rightful interaction and his critiques of Enlightened absolutism. Freedom and Perfection offers a historical examination of perfectionism, its political implications and transformations in German thought between 1650 and 1850. Douglas Moggach demonstrates how Kant's followers elaborated a new ethical-political approach, 'post-Kantian perfectionism', which, in the context of the French Revolution, promoted the conditions for free activity rather than state-directed happiness. Hegel, the Hegelian School, and Marx developed this approach further with reference to the historical process as the history of freedom. Highlighting the decisive importance of Leibniz for subsequent theorists of the state, society, and economy, Freedom and Perfection offers a new interpretation of important schools of modern thought and a vantage point for contemporary political debates.
A network of Enlightenment-era intellectuals debated processes still with us, such as industrialization. The endurance of their ideas reflects their status as mostly privileged white European men. They debated the big questions. Some saw socio-environmental relationships as subject to natural laws. Malthus and Liangji argued that human populations will outstrip food supplies, Ricardo that population growth will increase land rents, and Jevons that efficiency will increase natural resource use. Marx favored historical explanations, considering food poverty and soil degradation to be alterable and functions of linked social and environmental systems. Romanticism vied with materialism. Von Humboldt glorified nature as being in harmony which humans could disrupt. His voyages inspired Darwin, who viewed nature as instead emerging from Malthusian logic, with organisms evolving in conflict over resources. Though inspired by Humboldt, Marsh rejected a view of nature as all-powerful given the environmental destruction he documented. Ultimately, these authors debated whether a better world is possible, a topic still timely as climate change, extinction, and disease threaten us.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.