Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-64p75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T13:19:14.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Manganese in health and disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2025

Yingchen Wang
Affiliation:
Huzhou Central Hospital, Fifth School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Zhejiang-France United Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine in Colorectal Cancer, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
Jinyou Li
Affiliation:
Huzhou Central Hospital, Fifth School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Zhejiang-France United Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine in Colorectal Cancer, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
Jing Zhuang
Affiliation:
Huzhou Central Hospital, Fifth School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Zhejiang-France United Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine in Colorectal Cancer, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
Yinhang Wu
Affiliation:
Huzhou Central Hospital, Fifth School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Zhejiang-France United Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine in Colorectal Cancer, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
Jiang Liu
Affiliation:
Huzhou Central Hospital, Fifth School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Zhejiang-France United Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine in Colorectal Cancer, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
Shuwen Han*
Affiliation:
Huzhou Central Hospital, Fifth School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China Zhejiang-France United Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine in Colorectal Cancer, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China ASIR (Institute - Association of intelligent systems and robotics), 14B rue Henri Sainte Claire Deville, 92500, Rueil-Malmaison, France
*
Corresponding author: Shuwen Han; Email: shuwenhan985@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Manganese (Mn) is a crucial trace element that actively participates in a diverse array of physiological processes. Mn is maintained at appropriate levels in the body by absorption and excretion by the body. Dysregulation of Mn homeostasis can lead to a variety of diseases, especially the accumulation of Mn in the brain, resulting in toxic side effects. We reviewed the metabolism and distribution of Mn at multiple levels, including organ, cellular and sub-cell levels. Mitochondria are the main sites of Mn metabolism and energy conversion in cells. Enhanced Mn superoxide dismutase activity reduces mitochondrial oxidative stress and inhibits cancer development. In addition, Mn enhances anti-cancer immune responses through the cGAS–STING pathway. We introduced various delivery vectors for Mn delivery to cancer sites for Mn supplementation and anti-cancer immunity. This review aims to provide new research perspectives for the application of Mn in the prevention and treatment of human diseases, especially by enhancing anti-cancer immune responses to inhibit cancer progression.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Introduction

Manganese (Mn) is the third most abundant transition metal in the Earth’s crust(Reference Wang, Lineweaver and Ireland1). It is widely present in soil (450–4000 mg/kg(Reference Wang, Wang and Zhang2)), where it is involved in the processing and recycling of soil organic carbon(Reference Zhuang, Zhu and Shi3), and is used as a raw material in industrial fields, including mining, welding and battery manufacturing(Reference Parmalee and Aschner4). For all living organisms, Mn is an essential trace and nutrient element for cellular metabolism(Reference Chen, Bornhorst and Aschner5,Reference Kawahara, Kato-negishi and Tanaka6) . Plants need Mn for the synthesis of chlorophyll, the promotion of photosynthesis and maintenance of the normal colour of the blade(Reference Schmidt, Jensen and Husted7). Mn widely exists in animals and functions as an enzyme component and activator(Reference Spears8). As an active cofactor, it participates in a series of biological reactions of a variety of key metalloenzymes, including arginase, pyruvate carboxylase, acetylcholinesterase, glutamine synthetase (GS) and manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD/SOD2),(Reference Chen, Bornhorst and Aschner5) to support the normal physiological activities of cells. In the human body, it is involved in fat metabolism, bone growth and the development and normal operation of the nervous system(Reference Tarnacka, Jopowicz and Maślińska9Reference Xia, Wang and Zhang11).

Normal Mn levels range from 4 to 12 μg/l in whole blood, from 1 to 8 μg/l in urine, and from 0·4 to 0·85 μg/l in serum(Reference Martins, Ruella Oliveira and Barbosa12). To maintain the balance of Mn in the human body, the human body absorbs Mn from the environment and diet(Reference Miah, Ijomone and Okoh13). The majority of Mn intake comes from water and foods (for example, beans, rice, nuts, whole grains, seafood, seeds, chocolate, tea, etc.(Reference Peres, Schettinger and Chen14)), with rice (>42%) as the main food source of Mn(Reference Zhou, Su and Su15). Mn intake from environmental exposure or other external sources, such as air pollution or occupational exposure, is relatively rare. Dietary intake of Mn is mainly absorbed in the intestine(Reference Einhorn, Haase and Maares16). Excess Mn is delivered to the liver through the portal vein and excreted with bile through the faeces, while a small amount can be reabsorbed by the intestine. Urinary excretion of Mn is less than 10% of total excretion(Reference Myers, Thompson and Naik17). In certain populations, such as those with abnormally elevated Mn consumption or gastrointestinal absorption disorders, obtaining sufficient Mn from dietary sources or the environment may be challenging. In such cases, intravenous supplementation of Mn may be necessary to meet the body’s requirements. In mice, intravenous administration of Mn has been shown to produce higher concentrations of Mn in most organ tissues compared with inhalation(Reference Wooten, Aweda and Lewis18). The disruption of Mn homeostasis leads to a variety of diseases in humans(Reference Parmalee and Aschner4). Mn is needed for the biosynthesis of mucopolysaccharides in bone matrix formation and is a cofactor for enzymes in bone tissue(Reference Palacios19). Long-term dietary Mn deficiency can cause osteoporosis, and its mechanism is related to the increase of serum calcium and phosphorus levels and the decrease of bone calcium levels(Reference Strause, Hegenauer and Saltman20). Despite its importance for human health (it is a cofactor for normal cellular functioning enzymes), Mn is also toxic to human organs in excess. High levels of Mn are most likely to accumulate in the brain, especially in the basal ganglia, leading to neurotoxicity(Reference Wang, Li and Zheng21Reference Dobson, Erikson and Aschner23). The main mechanisms of neurotoxicity in the human brain include oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, transporter dysregulation, metal imbalances, neuroinflammation and protein trafficking pathway dysregulation(Reference Harischandra, Ghaisas and Zenitsky24). Specifically, Mn destroys DOPA decarboxylase in central nerve cells, resulting in a decrease in L-DOPA content. The balance of L-DOPA and acetylcholine (ACH) is disrupted, and the content of ACH is temporarily increased, resulting in conduction dysfunction in the central nervous system(Reference Finkelstein, Milatovic and Aschner25). Excess Mn induces oxidative stress response and causes dopaminergic (DA) neuron degeneration, leading to a series of neuropsychiatric symptoms and signs(Reference Santos, Milatovic and Andrade26). The main symptoms are psychological and emotional disturbances, as well as many motor symptoms, including gait disturbance, tremor, stiffness and bradykinesia(Reference Bouabid, Tinakoua and Lakhdar-Ghazal27).

In addition, changes in Mn content are one of the characteristic markers of cancer progression and metastasis. Mn increases in a time-dependent manner during the development of carcinoma in situ within 3–5 weeks, and a Mn-rich niche is formed in distant metastatic carcinomas(Reference Stelling, Soares and Cardoso28). Mn mainly impacts cancer by affecting the body’s anti-cancer immune response. Mn can promote the survival and proliferation of immune T cells and effectively promote the cancer killing ability of natural killer T cells (NKT) (Reference Golara, Kozłowski and Guzik29Reference Zhang, Qi and Cai32). In summary, Mn plays an important role in anti-cancer immunity in the body. Clarifying the role and mechanism of Mn in cancer is expected to provide new directions for cancer treatment in the future.

As an important nutritional element, appropriate amounts of Mn help to maintain human health and resist diseases, but the imbalance of Mn homeostasis can lead to the development of diseases. Therefore, it is necessary to study its physiological function in human body. We will further review the anti-cancer mechanism of Mn and the precise delivery method of Mn to explore new options for the treatment of tumours.

Pathways of Mn uptake, excretion and distribution

Pathways of Mn uptake

Mn is an important dietary element, and plant foods such as whole grains, nuts and vegetables are rich in Mn, with the most abundant content in tea(Reference Martins, Krum and Queirós33). Although the content of Mn in animal food (meat, fish and milk) is not high, its absorption and retention are both high, and it is a good source of Mn intake for humans. The efficiency of Mn absorption by the small intestine is affected by many factors, including intestinal pH, divalent metal transporter-1 (DMT1), competition from divalent metals (such as iron, copper, zinc or calcium) and chelators such as phytic acid(Reference Teeguarden, Gearhart and Clewell34). Mn is absorbed by intestinal cells in the form of Mn3+ through its binding to transferrin. Subsequently, endocytosis internalises the formed complex (Mn3+–transferrin) and facilitates the dissociation of Mn3+ into Mn2+(Reference Gunter, Gerstner and Gunter35). Mn2+ is then transported into the cytosol by DMT-1(Reference Gruenheid, Canonne-Hergaux and Gauthier36). Mn absorbed from the small intestine enters the blood through small intestinal epithelial cells. Most Mn is bound to Mn-transporting proteins in the plasma for transport, and a small part of the Mn directly enters erythrocytes.

Exposure of the body to the intake of Mn in the occupational environment is the main cause of the toxic side effects of Mn. With the rapid development of modern society, most industrial production involves the metal field, and large amounts of Mn are applied in industrial production. We found that Mn levels were higher in most workers than in the general population,(Reference Martins, Krum and Queirós33,Reference Leavens, Rao and Andersen37) and inhalation exposure to airborne Mn was common in welders and smelters(Reference Bowler, Beseler and Gocheva38). In the occupational environment, humans absorb Mn mainly through the lungs, and only particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 5 μm can reach the alveoli. Then, Mn is absorbed in the form of ions.

After people ingest Mn from the external environment, a portion of Mn enters the blood for transport to different tissues(Reference Bouabid, Tinakoua and Lakhdar-Ghazal27), and part is transported from the nose to the brain along the olfactory nerve, from which it can bypass the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and enter the central nervous system through the brain(Reference Lucchini, Dorman and Elder39). Many ways have been identified for Mn to enter the brain, including the following three main routes: the capillary endothelial cells of the BBB, the choroid plexus of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, and through the olfactory nerve in the nasal cavity directly to the brain(Reference Crossgrove and Zheng40). When the plasma concentration of Mn is within the physiological range (0·076–78 μM), Mn is mainly transported into the brain through saturation of cerebral capillaries. Beyond this range, however, the unsaturated transport of Mn into the brain through cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) occurs more rapidly(Reference Murphy, Wadhwani and Smith41). The third route is more important because most reports of the toxic side effects of Mn have occurred through inhalation exposure.

Pathways of Mn excretion

The pathways of Mn excretion from the body are as follows: the main pathway is excretion from the liver and gallbladder in the form of faeces, followed by excretion in the form of urine(Reference Klaassen42). In addition, a small amount of Mn can be excreted through sweat(Reference Omokhodion and Howard43). Regardless of the level of Mn absorption, adults can maintain the balance of Mn concentrations in tissues by regularly regulating the absorption rate and excretion rate of Mn. In the liver, Mn is separated from the blood and bound to bile before being re-secreted into the intestine. A small fraction of Mn is reabsorbed in the intestine, forming the hepato-enteric circulation. In the brain parenchyma, rapid accumulation of Mn occurs in brain structures such as the amygdala, end grain, hippocampus and pale sphere structure, and Mn has a half-life of approximately 5–7 d. However, Mn has the longest retention time in the periaqueductal grey matter, amygdala and endothelium(Reference Omokhodion and Howard43).

Content and distribution of Mn

Mn exists in the human body in the form of a variety of proteins and enzymes such as manganese superoxide dismutase, GS and arginase(Reference Wang, Guan and Lv44), and acts as a coenzyme in a variety of biological processes such as skeletal system development, energy metabolism, enzyme activation, and functions of the nervous system, immune system and reproductive hormones(Reference Kawahara, Kato-negishi and Tanaka6). Mn is involved in a variety of biological processes such as nutrient metabolism, bone formation, the free radical defence system, ammonia clearance and neurotransmitter synthesis in the brain. Mn is most commonly stored in mitochondria after uptake, and therefore the highest concentration is found in mitochondria-rich organs such as liver, kidney and pancreas(Reference Aschner and Erikson45). The normal concentration of manganese varies in different human tissues: 1 mg/kg in bone, 1·04 mg/kg in the pancreas(Reference Barceloux46), 0·98 mg/kg in the renal cortex, 1·2–1·3 mg/kg in the liver and 0·15–0·46 mg/kg in the brain(Reference Chen, Bornhorst and Aschner5) (Fig. 1). We summarise the normal range of Mn content in various organs of the human body in Table 1. Excessive Mn can easily accumulate in the brain, leading to the onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms. In the brain, Mn preferentially accumulates in the caudoputamen, globus pallidus, substantia nigra and subthalamic nucleus(Reference Chakraborty and Aschner47). Under normal conditions, intracellular Mn mainly accumulates in mitochondria and participates in the process of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in mitochondria. Chronic excessive exposure to Mn has been confirmed to induce mitochondrial dysfunction, which is related to oxidative damage(Reference Liu, Jing and Liu48). In fact, high concentrations of Mn can cause neurotoxicity and lead to psychiatric diseases(Reference Khan, Wasserman and Liu49,Reference Oulhote, Mergler and Barbeau50) , such as Parkinson’s disease and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system-related diseases(Reference Martins, Ruella Oliveira and Barbosa12). The daily intake of Mn per adult should be approximately 2–6 mg/d(Reference Freeland-Graves and Mousa51), and the World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization (WHO/FAO) of the United Nations recommends Mn levels in drinking water <400 μg/l(Reference Martins, Krum and Queirós33).

Fig. 1. Mn in the human body. Mn contents in various tissues of the human body and the pathways of Mn intake and excretion.

Table 1. Mn homeostasis. The concentration of Mn in human organs and body tissues ranked from lowest to highest

The effects of Mn homeostasis on microbial survival

The number of bacteria present in the human body is almost equal to the ratio of human cells (1·3:1). The intestinal flora (99%) is the most important group of bacteria in human body, and erythrocytes (84%) are the most important cells(Reference Sender, Fuchs and Milo52). As a metabolic ‘organ’ in the human body, the interaction between bacterial communities is a key factor affecting human health. Mn is not only an indispensable catalytic centre and structural core for various enzymes but also involved in a variety of biological processes, including OXPHOS, glycosylation and signal transduction. It is also an essential metal element for pathogenic microorganisms to maintain basic biochemical activity and virulence. Hosts can utilise Mn to participate in the process of nutritional immunity to prevent pathogen invasion(Reference Wu, Mu and Xia53).

Role of Mn in pathogenic microbes

Usually, the survival environment of pathogenic microorganisms in the host body is brutal, and they need the participation of metal ions to maintain survival. The oxidative defence system of human body can kill pathogenic bacteria, but manganese can improve the tolerance of pathogenic bacteria to reactive oxygen intermediates (ROIs). In addition, Mn is involved in the adaptation process of pathogens to the human body by acting as a cofactor for enzymes involved in intermediary metabolism and cell signalling pathways, maintaining the expression of virulence related genes and other pathways(Reference Zaharik and Finlay54). A defence strategy called ‘nutritional immunity’ is employed by host cells invaded by pathogenic microorganisms. It aims to prevent invading pathogens from acquiring metal ions, such as Mn, from the host(Reference Hood and Skaar55). In brief, during an inflammatory episode, Mn binds to calprotectin to compete for or strip the metal from pathogen metalloproteins, inactivating them and weakening their defence against the host immune response. In some cases, pathogens have developed the ability to compete with calprotectin-mediated metal starvation in the gut(Reference Zackular, Chazin and Skaar56). In patients with various types of infection, it can be observed that their serum and tissue Mn levels are significantly reduced(Reference Domej, Krachler and Goessler57). A series of experiments have shown that once host cells have phagocytosed pathogens, Mn transporters, including natural resist-associated macrophage protein 1 (NRAMP1) encoded by the human SLC11A1 gene, and other metal transporters, limit the intracellular utilisation of Mn by pathogens(Reference Sheldon and Skaar58,Reference Cellier, Courville and Campion59) .

To prevent themselves from being killed, pathogenic microorganisms have evolved a complicated system to obtain metal ions from the host for improved survival(Reference Sheldon and Skaar58,Reference Martínez, Delgado-Iribarren and Baquero60) . Among a variety of pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus (Reference Horsburgh, Wharton and Cox61), Staphylococcus pneumoniae (Reference Marra, Lawson and Asundi62), Salmonella typhimurium (Reference Kehres, Zaharik and Finlay63,Reference Kehres, Janakiraman and Slauch64) and Yersinia pestis (Reference Perry, Craig and Abney65,Reference Bearden and Perry66) , two manganese transport systems have been identified that are closely related to host pathogenesis and involve intracellular transporters such as MntABC, MntH, NRAMP, BmtA and MntX(Reference Green, Todd and Johnston67Reference Ouyang, He and Oman70). They control the uptake of Mn and thus the virulence of pathogens. For example, the S. aureus proteins MntABC and MntH compete with the host manganese-binding protein calprotectin for Mn acquisition, thereby enabling the pathogen to proliferate and maintain its SOD activity(Reference Kehl-Fie, Zhang and Moore71) (Fig. 2). The functions of different transport proteins in pathogen microbes/cells are described in Table 2.

Fig. 2. Pathogen microbes and nutritional immunity. Host cells and pathogenic microorganisms compete for Mn. Calprotectin in host cells compete for the Mn in pathogen metalloproteins, inactivating them and impairing their defence against host immune responses. Pathogenic microorganisms, however, compete with the host calprotectin to obtain Mn, thereby allowing the pathogen to proliferate and maintain its SOD activity.

Table 2. Transport proteins. The functions of different transport proteins in pathogenic microbes/cells

Excessive Mn may be harmful to bacteria

Various Mn efflux proteins, such as MntE, MntP and MntX (which have the same names as the proteins listed above but represent different proteins), control the export of excess Mn from bacteria to prevent toxicity caused by excessive Mn(Reference Zeinert, Martinez and Schmitz72). For example, in Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), the Mn export protein MntE is necessary for the pathogen to exert its full virulence during infection, indicating the presence of Mn toxicity in the pathogen, whereas a mutant strain of S. aureus lacking the MntE has reduced resistance to oxidative stress and lower oxidative stress levels(Reference Grunenwald, Choby and Juttukonda73).

In addition, Mn plays a role in regulating the activity of viral enzymes at the host–virus interface, and the most important finding is that Mn contributes to the assembly and integration of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (Reference Wolfe, Felock and Hastings74). Mn has been shown to increase the number of DNA nucleotide triphosphate errors in pathogens and retroviruses in vitro (Reference Vartanian, Sala and Henry75). Thus, in the presence of excess Mn, the mutation rate of HIV increases significantly. In the DNA-based herpes simplex virus, for example, Mn ions seem to act as DNA polymerase super catalysts to promote DNA replication(Reference Villani, Tanguy Le Gac and Wasungu76).

In conclusion, pathogens such as bacteria and fungi have robust self-protection systems to regulate Mn homeostasis, thereby maintaining virulence and evading Mn toxicity. Impaired Mn metabolism impairs pathogen proliferation and virulence, and this process could be a potential research target for the prevention of pathogen invasion in the host.

Mn regulates mitochondrial function

At the subcellular level, most of the metabolism of manganese occurs in mitochondria. It enters the mitochondria via DMT1 present in the outer mitochondrial membrane, while efflux is very slow(Reference Wolff, Garrick and Zhao77). In addition to high storage concentrations, Mn enters mitochondria more rapidly, with intracellular mitochondria increasing Mn at a higher rate than nuclei after chronic Mn treatment(Reference Morello, Canini and Mattioli78). Mitochondria are the site of manganese metabolism and energy conversion in cells. Its main function is OXPHOS to synthesise ATP and supply life activities. In addition to being a key organelle for intracellular energy generation, mitochondria are also involved in metabolic processes such as apoptosis, lipid metabolism and free radical production. The inhibitory effects of excess Mn on the respiratory chain and calcium efflux in cellular mitochondria, and the anti-cancer effects of the antioxidant enzyme MnSOD, are summarised in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Role of Mn in mitochondria in human cells. Mn is involved in the regulation of mitochondrial function by regulating SOD2 activity. A disruption of Mn homeostasis in mitochondria impairs the composition and function of mitochondrial RNA particles, leading to a disruption of mitochondrial transcriptional processes that results in impaired assembly and function of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. If Mn accumulates in mitochondria, it inhibits calcium efflux and triggers mitochondrial dysfunction.

Excessive accumulation of Mn can inhibit calcium efflux

Excess Mn is detrimental to mitochondrial function both in vivo and in vitro, leading to dysfunction. Mn is involved in the antioxidant system of mitochondria and can interfere with calcium metabolism in mitochondria(Reference Zhang, Zhou and Fu79). Experimental studies have shown that Mn exposure in the brain, especially in the striatum and hypothalamus, leads to Mn accumulation while simultaneously affecting Ca2+ metabolism in mitochondria. It inhibits the outflow of Ca2+ from mitochondria such that Ca2+ gradually accumulates in mitochondria, affecting the transmission of excitation in mitochondria and causing a series of dysfunctions(Reference Ijomone, Aluko and Okoh80). Elevated calcium levels lead to reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and to the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP). This process leads to a loss of the inner membrane potential, mitochondrial swelling, impaired OXPHOS and inhibition of ATP synthesis. All of these processes further generate ROS associated with Mn neurotoxicity and aggravate mitochondrial dysfunction(Reference Miah, Ijomone and Okoh13).

Dysregulation of Mn homeostasis impairs the assembly and function of the respiratory chain

Mn can be harmful to human health when it is present in excess or deficient in the body. Mn exposure impaired the composition and function of the mitochondrial ribosomal proteins DHX30 and MRPS18B, and the mitochondrial RNA particle FASTKD2, disrupting the mitochondrial transcription process. FASTKD2 is a component of the mitochondrial RNA granule required for the processing of polycistronic mitochondrial RNA, a step necessary for mitochondrial protein synthesis. Notably, genetic disruption of the mitochondrial RNA granule or pharmacological inhibition of mitochondrial transcription–translation in cells is protective against acute Mn exposure in vitro (Reference Werner, Gokhale and Ackert81Reference Antonicka and Shoubridge83). FASTKD2 and other mitochondrial RNA binding proteins (including DHX30, GRSF1 and the mitochondrial ribosomal subunit) participate in protein complexes, such as MRPS18B(Reference Antonicka and Shoubridge83,Reference Antonicka, Lin and Janer84) .

The disruption of Mn homeostasis results in interference with RNA particles within mitochondria. RNA particles are important intermediates for protein synthesis in mitochondria. They are responsible for the transcription of genetic information from DNA into RNA and further direct protein synthesis. The disruption of Mn homeostasis interferes with the formation and stability of RNA particles, thereby affecting protein synthesis within mitochondria. Werner et al. tested whether Mn exposure could induce these RNA granule phenotypes in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived human astrocytes and glutamatergic neurons and reported that iPSC-derived neurons presented reduced levels of DHX30, GRSF1 and MRPS18B when exposed to low Mn concentrations. These results suggested that a disruption of Mn homeostasis could reduce the composition of mitochondrial RNA particles and thus affect mitochondrial protein synthesis(Reference Werner, Gokhale and Ackert81).

Effect of MnSOD activity on mitochondrial redox balance

Active MnSOD is a mature antioxidant enzyme in mitochondria. MnSOD activity is essential for maintaining the redox balance in mitochondria and can protect cells from oxidative stress damage caused by excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS)(Reference Liu, Liu and Liu85,Reference Suski, Lebiedzinska and Bonora86) . In normal cells, MnSOD can maintain mitochondrial integrity and promote cell regeneration. In cancer cells, MnSOD attenuates the deleterious effects of ROS stimulation, including the promotion of cancer development and maintenance.

Specifically, hypoxia and hypermetabolism are the common characteristics of cancer cells, and their daily energy requirements are far higher than normal cells. This means that cancer cells need to produce more mitochondria to meet their energy demand. However, the mitochondria produced by cancer cells often have abnormal phenomena such as wrinkled outer membranes, membrane structural integrity defects, mitochondrial distribution around the nucleus, and hollow mitochondria. An important cause of abnormal mitochondrial structure and morphology is the frequent mutation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in cancer cells(Reference Cannino, Ciscato and Masgras87). mtDNA mutations not only cause changes in mitochondrial appearance but also directly cause dysfunction, increase ROS production and redox imbalance in mitochondria, and stimulate the proliferation and invasion of cancer cells(Reference Polyak, Li and Zhu88Reference Hochhauser90). During carcinogenesis, tumour cells typically exhibit increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production(Reference Thiagalingam and Nelkin91,Reference Sundaresan, Yu and Ferrans92) , increased ROS accumulation and dysregulation of antioxidant enzymes(Reference Nie, Chen and He93). ROS derived from the electron transport chain in mitochondria can activate signalling pathways related to carcinogenesis. For example, H2O2 (a form of ROS) can activate receptor tyrosine kinase(Reference Kamata and Hirata94,Reference Sundaresan, Yu and Ferrans95) , Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase (Ras-MAPK)(Reference Guyton, Liu and Gorospe96,Reference Rao97) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways(Reference Kamata and Hirata94). As an antioxidant enzyme, MnSOD can convert superoxide into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and oxygen, and further convert it into harmless water and oxygen during cancer progression, thereby reducing oxidative damage to cells and playing a protective antioxidant role(Reference Ekoue, He and Diamond98). Animal experiments have revealed that mice with a monoallelic knockout of MnSOD (SOD2+/−) exhibit increased superoxide levels, which leads to the occurrence of cancer(Reference Zhang, Zhang and Shi99). Compared with wild-type control, SOD2+/− mice are more likely to develop cancer and have a shortened lifespan, suggesting that the loss of MnSOD activity promotes carcinogenesis. In addition, an analysis of mitochondrial DNA from patients with breast cancer has shown a common deletion of MnSOD in the blood, resulting in impaired MnSOD activity and increased oxidative damage(Reference Nie, Chen and He93).

In general, enhanced MnSOD activity reduces mitochondrial oxidative stress and inhibits cancer development. Taking advantage of the antioxidant effects of manganese in mitochondria, it has also been used in cancer therapy in some cases. For example, single-atom manganese anchored on carbon dots can effectively concentrate in mitochondria, interfere with their oxidation–reduction balance, and exhibit excellent anti-cancer performance and good magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal responsiveness under visible light irradiation, showing its application potential in the integration of tumour diagnosis and treatment(Reference Wang, Ma and Liang100).

Mn enhances anti-tumour immunity through the cGAS–STING pathway

Mn, an indispensable trace element in the human body, is not only an important cornerstone for maintaining health but also plays a non-negligible role in the anti-cancer process. We summarise the key pathways and mechanisms through which Mn exerts its anti-cancer effects by enhancing immune responses (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4 cGAS-STING signalling pathway. Mn increases the sensitivity of cGAS to dsDNA in cancer cells and regulates the cGAS–STING pathway to promote the anti-cancer immunity of immune cells. Mn binds to cGAS and enhances its anti-cancer effect by inhibiting the binding of immune receptors such as PD-1 and CTLA-4 on the surface of immune cells to ligands such as PDL-1 and BT on the surface of cancer cells. In the STING pathway, Mn stimulates IRF-3 in tumour cells to produce IFN, thereby activating the anti-cancer effect of immune cells such as NKT and CTL.

Increased dsDNA sensitivity

Further studies showed that Mn-mediated anti-tumour immune responses were dependent on the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS–STING) pathway. Mn can directly interact with cGAS, increase the sensitivity of dsDNA, significantly stimulate the expression of interferon (IFN) regulatory factor (RF3/IRF7) and type I IFN(Reference Wang, Guan and Lv44), and then stimulate T cells to exert immune function. cGAS activity is affected by a variety of factors, of which the sensitivity of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is a key factor. As an important immune antigen, dsDNA can stimulate the activity of cGAS and trigger a strong immune response. The sensitivity of dsDNA may be insufficient, resulting in a weakened immune response and thus affecting the efficacy of disease treatment. Mn can act on cancer cells, directly bind to cGAS, stabilise cGAS activity, increase its sensitivity to dsDNA(Reference Lv, Chen and Zhang101) and thus stimulate the cGAS–STING pathway to participate in human immune responses. This implies that, in the presence of manganese, even low concentrations of dsDNA are effective in stimulating cGAS activity to elicit a strong immune response.

Inhibition of immunosuppressive molecules

More importantly, Mn could directly bind to cGAS and reduce surface programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) protein concentrations. PD-1 and CTLA-4 are two important immunosuppressive molecules(Reference Yang, Li and Gu102), and their elevated expression inhibits T-cell function. By activating the cGAS–STING pathway, manganese ions can reduce the expression of these inhibitory molecules, thereby relieving immunosuppression and enhancing anti-tumour immune responses(Reference Yang, Li and Gu102Reference Buchbinder and Desai106). At present, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have been successfully used to treat various types of cancer(Reference Herbst, Giaccone and De Marinis107Reference Qiu, Chen and Zhang114). However, due to individual differences, most patients cannot benefit from this therapy(Reference Yi, Jiao and Xu115,Reference Niu, Yi and Li116) . Divalent manganese, as a natural STING agonist, can cooperate with anti-PD-1 /PD-L1 antibodies in cancer immunotherapy(Reference Ghaffari, Peterson and Khalaj117). Even in low immunogenic tumour models such as B16, the combination of STING agonists with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatment significantly prolonged the survival of mice compared with the corresponding monotherapy(Reference Pan, Perera and Piesvaux118). Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that Mn supplementation, when administered as Mn chloride via intranasal (0·05–0·1 mg/kg/d) or inhalation (0·1–0·4 mg/kg/d) routes in combination with subsequent intravenous chemotherapy (day 2) and anti-PD-1 antibody (2–4 mg/kg, day 3) on a 3-week cycle, demonstrates promising efficacy in treatment-refractory advanced metastatic solid tumours. The observed objective response rate reached 45·5% with a disease control rate of 90·9% in patients who had failed standard anti-cancer therapies including chemoradiotherapy and prior PD-1 blockade(Reference Lv, Chen and Zhang101). These findings need further confirmation in randomised controlled trials. In addition, Mn could significantly increase the expression of CD80 and CD86 in Dendritic cells (DCs) by activating the cGAS–STING pathway. CD80 and CD86 are costimulatory molecules that bind to their respective receptors on the surface of T cells and induce T-cell activation, thereby enhancing the adaptive immune response.

Amplify the activities of cGAS and STING

Mn can also amplify the activation of cGAS and STING by increasing cyclic guanosine monophosphate–adenosine monophosphate (cGAMP) production and increasing the binding affinity of cGAMP-STING. STING proteins trigger downstream signals on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) surface by activating and recruiting interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3), TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK-1) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), followed by the expression and secretion of IFNs. Type I IFNs stimulate adaptive and innate immunity to cancer by promoting DC maturation and antigen presentation to stimulate T cells(Reference Li, Li and Niu119). IFNs can also promote NKT recruitment and CTL infiltration(Reference Cheng, Zhang and Liu120) to exert anti-cancer effects. One study showed that STING knockout (Sting gt/gt) mice had a faster growth rate of tumour cells (such as RMA-S lymphoma and B16-BL6 melanoma) than wild-type mice, indicating that STING plays an important role in anti-tumour response. In Rag2 knockout (Rag2−/−) mice lacking both T and B cells, when STING was knocked out (Rag2−/− Sting gt/gt), these mice were significantly more sensitive to RMA-S and B16-BL6 tumours. This suggests that STING also plays a key role in NK cell-mediated anti-tumour responses. Knockout of cGAS gene (Cgas−/−) in tumour cells by CRISPR/Cas9 technology can reduce the activation of NK cells, further confirming the importance of the cGAS–STING pathway in NKT activation. These experimental results suggest that cGAS in cancer cells recognise their own DNA to produce cGAMP molecules. The cGAMP molecule is recognised by the STING protein of the host cell and activates STING. Activated STING proteins trigger an interferon response and produce cytokines such as IFN-β. These cytokines can activate NK cells to enhance anti-cancer immune responses and improve the ability to recognise and kill cancer cells(Reference Marcus, Mao and Lensink-Vasan121).

On the basis of the mechanism that Mn promotes anti-tumour effects in a cGAS–STING-dependent manner, a bovine serum albumin/ferritin-based nanoagonist incorporating Mn ions (Mn2+) and β-lapachone has been developed. This protein-based cGAS–STING nanoagonist was able to efficiently activate T-cell mediated anti-cancer immune responses in in vitro cell experiments and inhibit cancer growth and also showed significant therapeutic effects in animal models(Reference Wang, Liu and Xue122).

Mn delivery strategies

Mn, as an essential trace element, plays an essential role in anti-cancer immunity under physiological conditions. Studies have demonstrated that the growth of cancer cells and lung metastasis are significantly accelerated in Mn-deficient mice. Exogenous Mn2+ effectively activates the cGAS–STING pathway, significantly promotes the ability of host antigen-presenting cells to present cancer antigens, promotes the infiltration of cytotoxic T cells into tumour tissues, and enhances the specific killing of tumour cells(Reference Lv, Chen and Zhang101). Given these findings, targeted delivery of Mn to cancer sites represents a promising therapeutic strategy for supporting anti-cancer immunity and enhancing the efficacy of cancer treatments. Consequently, the development of efficient Mn delivery systems has become the focus of current research.

Intelligent responsive delivery systems

Due to the immunosuppressive microenvironment (ISME) in cancer tissues(Reference Hayes, Donohoe and Davern123), the clinical efficacy of cancer immunotherapy often falls short of expectations. As a result, responsive nanocarriers for Mn delivery have emerged, particularly targeting the low pH conditions of the tumour microenvironment (TME). The Warburg effect indicates that cancer cells predominantly rely on aerobic glycolysis for energy, resulting in the accumulation of lactate and creating an acidic environment within cancer tissues(Reference Ippolito, Morandi and Giannoni124). In contrast to the pH of approximately 7·4 in normal tissues, the extracellular environment of cancer cells typically exhibits a pH of 6·8, with even lower pH values in endosomes and lysosomes, around 5·0–5·5(Reference Lee, Gao and Bae125). MnO x nanomaterials remain stable in a neutral environment (pH 7·4)(Reference Zhang, Xu and Mu126) but can effectively catalyse endogenous H2O2 to generate O2 in the acidic TME(Reference Luo, Yang and Chen127), alleviating cancer hypoxia. The catalytic reaction is as follows: MnO2 + 2H+ → Mn2+ + 2H2O + ½O2.

MnO2 nanomaterials are unique TME-responsive nanomaterials that have garnered considerable attention due to their high biocompatibility, structural stability and easily modifiable surfaces(Reference Ning, Yang and Yan128). Nanoshells constructed from MnO2 can rapidly decompose in acidic TME, releasing Mn2+ and the anti-cancer drugs loaded within the shell(Reference Zhou, Liang and Zhao129). Polydopamine (PDA), a novel polymer inspired by mussels, offers natural advantages such as good biocompatibility, adhesion and multiple drug response releases. The PDA shell remains stable at pH 7·4 but ruptures upon reaching the cancer site (pH 6·8) due to acidic conditions(Reference Zheng, Zhang and Wang130). Therefore, coating an additional layer of polydopamine (PDA) on the MnO2 nanoshell can serve as a ‘gate’ to control drug release, reducing premature drug release in the bloodstream(Reference Liu, Guo and Li131).

Targeted delivery of Mn

In addition to utilising TME characteristics for Mn delivery, targeting the biological characteristics of cancer cells has also become a significant strategy. Hyaluronic acid (HA), recognised for its excellent biocompatibility and CD44 receptor-mediated cancer-targeting capability, has become a widely used delivery vehicle(Reference Wang, Wang and Jiang132,Reference Catania, Rodella and Vanvarenberg133) . Research indicates that modifying HA on the surface of MnO2 nanosheets enables successful targeting of Mn2+ to cancer sites and its release into the cancer microenvironment(Reference Liang, Wang and Zhao134). Research also found that decorating MnO2 surfaces with gene-engineered exosomes carrying CD47 exhibits good cancer-targeting capabilities(Reference Cheng, Zhang and Liu120). Another common targeted delivery strategy involves loading MnO2 onto nanoparticles coated with the same kind of cancer cell membrane, where the cell membrane coating ensures active cancer targeting, resulting in efficient endocytosis and high accumulation(Reference Luo, Li and Lin135). Furthermore, a study has proposed targeting Mn delivery to the ER, since STING signalling activation and subsequent immune responses are primarily associated with the ER. It reported the design of ER-targeted Mn-based nanocomplexes (NC) by complexing Mn2+ with a zwitterionic polymer, poly(2-(N-oxide-N,N-dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate) (OPDMA). In mouse models of colon and hepatocellular carcinoma, intravenously injected Mn/OPDMA NC delayed cancer growth rates by 2·4–5 times compared with free-Mn2+-treated mice and extended the survival period of the mice(Reference Zhu, Xu and Geng136).

In recent years, a variety of delivery methods have been developed to precisely deliver Mn to cancer sites, including intelligent responsive delivery systems and targeted delivery systems. These strategies are expected to provide novel therapeutic approaches for patients with cancer. By exploiting the low pH properties of the tumour microenvironment and targeted delivery strategies, scientists are designing vectors that can deliver manganese precisely to the cancer site. These innovative delivery systems not only enhance treatment precision but may also lead to new breakthroughs in cancer treatment in future clinical applications.

Conclusions

In conclusion, Mn is an indispensable trace element in the human body, and an imbalance of Mn homeostasis can lead to changes in human physiological states and many diseases. Mn positively regulates host immunity, mitochondria and microbes to exert anti-cancer effects. In recent years, a variety of delivery methods have been developed to precisely supplement manganese nutrition to cancer sites, including intelligent responsive delivery systems and targeted delivery systems. This is expected to provide new therapeutic strategies for cancer patients. However, the specific mechanism of manganese inhibition of tumours is still unclear, and further studies are needed in the future to explore the therapeutic strategies that manganese can be applied to the clinical treatment of cancer. It is hoped that this review can provide new ideas and programmes for scholars to conduct more in-depth research on Mn.

Availability of data and material

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Authors Contributions

Conceived and drafted the manuscript: Han Shuwen and Liu Jiang. Wrote the paper: Zhuang Jing and Wang Yingchen. Reviewed and compiled the literature: Li Jinyou and Wu Yinhang. Designed and drew figures: Li Jinyou. All authors read and approved the paper.

Financial support

This work was supported by Public Welfare Technology Application Research Program of Huzhou (no. 2022GZB04), Zhejiang Medical and Health Technology Project (nos. 2025KY1531 and 2025KY327) and Zhejiang Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Project (no. 2024ZL1018).

Competing Interests

The authors declare that no potential conflicts of interest exist.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

References

Wang, H S, Lineweaver, C H, Ireland, T R. (2018) The elemental abundances (with uncertainties) of the most Earth-like planet. Icarus 299, 460474.Google Scholar
Wang, X, Wang, Q, Zhang, D, et al. (2024) Fumigation alters the manganese-oxidizing microbial communities to enhance soil manganese availability and increase tomato yield. Sci Total Environ 919, 170882.Google Scholar
Zhuang, Y, Zhu, J, Shi, L, et al. (2022) Influence mechanisms of iron, aluminum and manganese oxides on the mineralization of organic matter in paddy soil. J Environ Manage 301, 113916.Google Scholar
Parmalee, N L, Aschner, M. (2016) Manganese and aging. Neurotoxicology 56, 262268.Google Scholar
Chen, P, Bornhorst, J, Aschner, M. (2018) Manganese metabolism in humans. Front Biosci 23, 16551679.Google Scholar
Kawahara, M, Kato-negishi, M, Tanaka, K I. (2023) Dietary trace elements and the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. Nutrients 15, 2067.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S B, Jensen, P E, Husted, S. (2016) Manganese deficiency in plants: the impact on photosystem II. Trends Plant Sci 21, 622632.Google Scholar
Spears, J W. (2019) Boron, chromium, manganese, and nickel in agricultural animal production. Biol Trace Elem Res 188, 3544.Google Scholar
Tarnacka, B, Jopowicz, A, Maślińska, M. (2021) Copper, iron, and manganese toxicity in neuropsychiatric conditions. Int J Mol Sci 22, 7820.Google Scholar
Viegas, M N, Salgado, M A, Aguiar, C, et al. (2021) Effect of dietary manganese and zinc levels on growth and bone status of Senegalese Sole (Solea senegalensis) post-larvae. Biol Trace Elem Res 199, 20122021.Google Scholar
Xia, Y, Wang, C, Zhang, X, et al. (2023) Combined effects of lead and manganese on locomotor activity and microbiota in zebrafish. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 263, 115260.Google Scholar
Martins, A C JR., Ruella Oliveira, S, Barbosa, F JR., et al. (2021) Evaluating the risk of manganese-induced neurotoxicity of parenteral nutrition: review of the current literature. Expert Opin on Drug Metab & Toxicol 17, 581593.Google Scholar
Miah, M R, Ijomone, O M, Okoh, C O A, et al. (2020) The effects of manganese overexposure on brain health. Neurochem Int 135, 104688.Google Scholar
Peres, T V, Schettinger, M R, Chen, P, et al. (2016) Manganese-induced neurotoxicity: a review of its behavioral consequences and neuroprotective strategies. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 17, 57.Google Scholar
Zhou, B, Su, X, Su, D, et al. (2016) Dietary intake of manganese and the risk of the metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population. Br J Nutr 116, 853863.Google Scholar
Einhorn, V, Haase, H, Maares, M. (2024) Interaction and competition for intestinal absorption by zinc, iron, copper, and manganese at the intestinal mucus layer. J Trace Elem Med Biol 84, 127459.Google Scholar
Myers, J E, Thompson, M L, Naik, I, et al. (2003) The utility of biological monitoring for manganese in ferroalloy smelter workers in South Africa. Neurotoxicology 24, 875883.Google Scholar
Wooten, A L, Aweda, T A, Lewis, B C, et al. (2017) Biodistribution and PET imaging of pharmacokinetics of manganese in mice using Manganese-52. PLoS One 12, e0174351.Google Scholar
Palacios, C. (2006) The role of nutrients in bone health, from A to Z. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 46, 621628.Google Scholar
Strause, L G, Hegenauer, J, Saltman, P, et al. (1986) Effects of long-term dietary manganese and copper deficiency on rat skeleton. J Nutr 116, 135141.Google Scholar
Wang, X, Li, G J, Zheng, W. (2006) Upregulation of DMT1 expression in choroidal epithelia of the blood-CSF barrier following manganese exposure in vitro . Brain Res 1097, 110.Google Scholar
Kwakye, G F, Paoliello, M M, Mukhopadhyay, S, et al. (2015) Manganese-induced Parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease: shared and distinguishable features. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12, 75197540.Google Scholar
Dobson, A W, Erikson, K M, Aschner, M. (2004) Manganese neurotoxicity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1012, 115128.Google Scholar
Harischandra, D S, Ghaisas, S, Zenitsky, G, et al. (2019) Manganese-induced neurotoxicity: new insights into the triad of protein misfolding, mitochondrial impairment, and neuroinflammation. Front Neurosci 13, 654.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Y, Milatovic, D, Aschner, M. (2007) Modulation of cholinergic systems by manganese. Neurotoxicology 28, 10031014.Google Scholar
Santos, D, Milatovic, D, Andrade, V, et al. (2012) The inhibitory effect of manganese on acetylcholinesterase activity enhances oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in the rat brain. Toxicology, 292, 9098.Google Scholar
Bouabid, S, Tinakoua, A, Lakhdar-Ghazal, N, et al. (2016) Manganese neurotoxicity: behavioral disorders associated with dysfunctions in the basal ganglia and neurochemical transmission. J Neurochem 136, 677691.Google Scholar
Stelling, M P, Soares, M A, Cardoso, S C, et al. (2021) Manganese systemic distribution is modulated in vivo during tumor progression and affects tumor cell migration and invasion in vitro . Sci Rep 11, 15833.Google Scholar
Golara, A, Kozłowski, M, Guzik, P, et al. (2023) The role of selenium and manganese in the formation, diagnosis and treatment of cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer. Int J Mol Sci 24, 10887.Google Scholar
Sun, X, Zhang, Y, Li, J, et al. (2021) Amplifying STING activation by cyclic dinucleotide-manganese particles for local and systemic cancer metalloimmunotherapy. Nat Nanotechnol 16, 12601270.Google Scholar
Yi, M, Niu, M, Zhang, J, et al. (2021) Combine and conquer: manganese synergizing anti-TGF-β/PD-L1 bispecific antibody YM101 to overcome immunotherapy resistance in non-inflamed cancers. J Hematol Oncol 14, 146.Google Scholar
Zhang, K, Qi, C, Cai, K. (2023) Manganese-based tumor immunotherapy. Adv Mater 35, e2205409.Google Scholar
Martins, A C, Krum, B N Queirós, L, et al. (2020) Manganese in the diet: bioaccessibility, adequate intake, and neurotoxicological effects. J Agric and Food Chem 68, 1289312903.Google Scholar
Teeguarden, J G, Gearhart, J, Clewell, H J, et al. (2007) Pharmacokinetic modeling of manganese. III. Physiological approaches accounting for background and tracer kinetics. J of Toxicol and Environ Health Part A 70, 15151526.Google Scholar
Gunter, T E, Gerstner, B, Gunter, K K, et al. (2013) Manganese transport via the transferrin mechanism. Neurotoxicology 34, 118127.Google Scholar
Gruenheid, S, Canonne-Hergaux, F, Gauthier, S, et al. (1999) The iron transport protein NRAMP2 is an integral membrane glycoprotein that colocalizes with transferrin in recycling endosomes. J Exp Med 189, 831841.Google Scholar
Leavens, T L, Rao, D, Andersen, M E, et al. (2007) Evaluating transport of manganese from olfactory mucosa to striatum by pharmacokinetic modeling. Toxicol Sci : an Official J SocToxicol 97, 265278.Google Scholar
Bowler, R M, Beseler, C L, Gocheva, V V, et al. (2016) Environmental exposure to manganese in air: associations with tremor and motor function. The Sc Total Environ 541, 646654.Google Scholar
Lucchini, R G, Dorman, D C, Elder, A, et al. (2012) Neurological impacts from inhalation of pollutants and the nose-brain connection. Neurotoxicology 33, 838841.Google Scholar
Crossgrove, J, Zheng, W. (2004) Manganese toxicity upon overexposure. NMR in Biomedicine 17, 544553.Google Scholar
Murphy, V A, Wadhwani, K C, Smith, Q R, et al. (1991) Saturable transport of manganese(II) across the rat blood-brain barrier. J Neurochem 57, 948954.Google Scholar
Klaassen, C D. (1976) Biliary excretion of metals. Drug Metab Rev 5, 165196.Google Scholar
Omokhodion, F O, Howard, J M. (1994) Trace elements in the sweat of acclimatized persons. Clinica Chimica Acta; Int J Clin Chem 231, 2328.Google Scholar
Wang, C, Guan, Y, Lv, M, et al. (2018) Manganese increases the sensitivity of the cGAS-STING pathway for double-stranded DNA and is required for the host defense against DNA viruses. Immunity 48 675687.Google Scholar
Aschner, M, Erikson, K. (2017) Manganese. Adv Nutr 8, 520521.Google Scholar
Barceloux, D G. (1999) Manganese. J toxicol Clin toxicol 37, 293307.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, S, Aschner, M. (2012) Altered manganese homeostasis: implications for BLI-3-dependent dopaminergic neurodegeneration and SKN-1 protection in C. elegans . Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS) 26, 183187.Google Scholar
Liu, K, Jing, M J, Liu, C, et al. (2019) Effect of trehalose on manganese-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal cell damage in mice. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 125, 536547.Google Scholar
Khan, K, Wasserman, G A, Liu, X, et al. (2012) Manganese exposure from drinking water and children’s academic achievement. Neurotoxicology, 33, 9197.Google Scholar
Oulhote, Y, Mergler, D, Barbeau, B, et al. (2014) Neurobehavioral function in school-age children exposed to manganese in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect 122, 13431350.Google Scholar
Freeland-Graves, J H, Mousa, T Y, KIM S. (2016) International variability in diet and requirements of manganese: causes and consequences. J Trace Elem Med Biol 38, 2432.Google Scholar
Sender, R, Fuchs, S, Milo, R. (2016) Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol 14, e1002533.Google Scholar
Wu, Q, Mu, Q, Xia, Z, et al. (2021) Manganese homeostasis at the host-pathogen interface and in the host immune system. Semin Cell Dev Biol 115, 4553.Google Scholar
Zaharik, M L, Finlay, B B. (2004) Mn2+ and bacterial pathogenesis. Front Biosci 9, 10351042.Google Scholar
Hood, M I, Skaar, E P. (2012) Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nat Rev Microbiol 10, 525537.Google Scholar
Zackular, J P, Chazin, W J, Skaar, E P. (2015) Nutritional immunity: S100 proteins at the host–pathogen interface. J Biol Chem 290, 1899118998.Google Scholar
Domej, W, Krachler, M, Goessler, W, et al. (2000) Concentrations of copper, zinc, manganese, rubidium, and magnesium in thoracic empyemata and corresponding sera. Biol Trace Elem Res 78, 5366.Google Scholar
Sheldon, J R, Skaar, E P. (2019) Metals as phagocyte antimicrobial effectors. Curr Opin Immunol, 60, 19.Google Scholar
Cellier, M F, Courville, P, Campion, C. (2007) Nramp1 phagocyte intracellular metal withdrawal defense. Microbes Infect 9, 16621670.Google Scholar
Martínez, J L, Delgado-Iribarren, A, Baquero, F. (1990) Mechanisms of iron acquisition and bacterial virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev 6, 4556.Google Scholar
Horsburgh, M J, Wharton, S J, Cox, A G, et al. (2002) MntR modulates expression of the PerR regulon and superoxide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus through control of manganese uptake. Mol Microbiol 44, 12691286.Google Scholar
Marra, A, Lawson, S, Asundi, J S, et al. (2002) In vivo characterization of the PSA genes from Streptococcus pneumoniae in multiple models of infection. Microbiology (Reading ) 148, 14831491.Google Scholar
Kehres, D G, Zaharik, M L, Finlay, B B, et al. (2000) The NRAMP proteins of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli are selective manganese transporters involved in the response to reactive oxygen. Mol Microbiol 36, 10851100.Google Scholar
Kehres, D G, Janakiraman, A, Slauch, J M, et al. (2002) SitABCD is the alkaline Mn(2+) transporter of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol 184, 31593166.Google Scholar
Perry, R D, Craig, S K, Abney, J, et al. (2012) Manganese transporters Yfe and MntH are Fur-regulated and important for the virulence of Yersinia pestis. Microbiology (Reading ) 158, 804815.Google Scholar
Bearden, S W, Perry, R D. (1999) The Yfe system of Yersinia pestis transports iron and manganese and is required for full virulence of plague. Mol Microbiol 32, 403414.Google Scholar
Green, R T, Todd, J D, Johnston, A W. (2013) Manganese uptake in marine bacteria; the novel MntX transporter is widespread in Roseobacters, Vibrios, Alteromonadales and the SAR11 and SAR116 clades. Isme j 7, 581591.Google Scholar
Cellier, M F, Bergevin, I, Boyer, E, et al. (2001) Polyphyletic origins of bacterial Nramp transporters. Trends Genet 17, 365370.Google Scholar
Courville, P, Chaloupka, R, Cellier, M F. (2006) Recent progress in structure-function analyses of Nramp proton-dependent metal-ion transporters. Biochem Cell Biol 84, 960978.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Z, He, M, Oman, T, et al. (2009) A manganese transporter, BB0219 (BmtA), is required for virulence by the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 34493454.Google Scholar
Kehl-Fie, T E, Zhang, Y, Moore, J L, et al. (2013) MntABC and MntH contribute to systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection by competing with calprotectin for nutrient manganese. Infect Immun 81, 33953405.Google Scholar
Zeinert, R, Martinez, E, Schmitz, J, et al. (2018) Structure-function analysis of manganese exporter proteins across bacteria. J Biol Chem 293, 57155730.Google Scholar
Grunenwald, C M, Choby, J E, Juttukonda, L J, et al. (2019) Manganese detoxification by MntE is critical for resistance to oxidative stress and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus . mBio 10, e02915-18.Google Scholar
Wolfe, A L, Felock, P J, Hastings, J C, et al. (1996) The role of manganese in promoting multimerization and assembly of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase as a catalytically active complex on immobilized long terminal repeat substrates. J Virol 70, 14241432.Google Scholar
Vartanian, J P, Sala, M, Henry, M, et al. (1999) Manganese cations increase the mutation rate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 ex vivo. J Gen Virol 80, 19831986.Google Scholar
Villani, G, Tanguy Le Gac, N, Wasungu, L, et al. (2002) Effect of manganese on in vitro replication of damaged DNA catalyzed by the herpes simplex virus type-1 DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 33233332.Google Scholar
Wolff, N A, Garrick, M D, Zhao, L, et al. (2018) A role for divalent metal transporter (DMT1) in mitochondrial uptake of iron and manganese. Sci Rep 8, 211.Google Scholar
Morello, M, Canini, A, Mattioli, P, et al. (2008) Sub-cellular localization of manganese in the basal ganglia of normal and manganese-treated rats an electron spectroscopy imaging and electron energy-loss spectroscopy study. Neurotoxicology 29, 6072.Google Scholar
Zhang, S, Zhou, Z, Fu, J. (2003) Effect of manganese chloride exposure on liver and brain mitochondria function in rats. Environ Res 93, 149157.Google Scholar
Ijomone, O M, Aluko, O M, Okoh, C O A, et al. (2019) Role for calcium signaling in manganese neurotoxicity. J Trace Elem Med Biol 56, 146155.Google Scholar
Werner, E, Gokhale, A, Ackert, M, et al. (2022) The mitochondrial RNA granule modulates manganese-dependent cell toxicity. Mol Biol Cell 33, ar108.Google Scholar
Popow, J, Alleaume, A M, Curk, T, et al. (2015) FASTKD2 is an RNA-binding protein required for mitochondrial RNA processing and translation. Rna 21, 18731884.Google Scholar
Antonicka, H, Shoubridge, E A. (2015) Mitochondrial RNA granules are centers for posttranscriptional rna processing and ribosome biogenesis. Cell Rep 10, 920932.Google Scholar
Antonicka, H, Lin, Z Y, Janer, A, et al. (2020) A high-density human mitochondrial proximity interaction network. Cell Metab 32, 479497.Google Scholar
Liu, Z Q, Liu, K, Liu, Z F, et al. (2021) Manganese-induced alpha-synuclein overexpression aggravates mitochondrial damage by repressing PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy. Food Chem Toxicol 152, 112213.Google Scholar
Suski, J M, Lebiedzinska, M, Bonora, M, et al. (2012) Relation between mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS formation. Methods Mol Biol 810, 183205.Google Scholar
Cannino, G, Ciscato, F, Masgras, I, et al. (2018) Metabolic plasticity of tumor cell mitochondria. Front Oncol 8, 333.Google Scholar
Polyak, K, Li, Y, Zhu, H, et al. (1998) Somatic mutations of the mitochondrial genome in human colorectal tumours. Nat Genet 20, 291293.Google Scholar
Penta, J S, Johnson, F M, Wachsman, J T, et al. (2001) Mitochondrial DNA in human malignancy. Mutat Res 488, 119133.Google Scholar
Hochhauser, D. (2000) Relevance of mitochondrial DNA in cancer. Lancet 356, 181182.Google Scholar
HA H C, Thiagalingam, A, Nelkin, B D, et al. (2000) Reactive oxygen species are critical for the growth and differentiation of medullary thyroid carcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res 6, 37833787.Google Scholar
Sundaresan, M, Yu, Z X, Ferrans, V J, et al. (1996) Regulation of reactive-oxygen-species generation in fibroblasts by Rac1. Biochem J 318, 379382.Google Scholar
Nie, H, Chen, G, He, J, et al. (2016) Mitochondrial common deletion is elevated in blood of breast cancer patients mediated by oxidative stress. Mitochondrion 26, 104112.Google Scholar
Kamata, H, Hirata, H. (1999) Redox regulation of cellular signalling. Cell Signal 11, 114.Google Scholar
Sundaresan, M, Yu, Z X, Ferrans, V J, et al. (1995) Requirement for generation of H2O2 for platelet-derived growth factor signal transduction. Science 270, 296299.Google Scholar
Guyton, K Z, Liu, Y, Gorospe, M, et al. (1996) Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by H2O2. Role in cell survival following oxidant injury. J Biol Chem 271, 41384142.Google Scholar
Rao, G N. (1996) Hydrogen peroxide induces complex formation of SHC-Grb2-SOS with receptor tyrosine kinase and activates Ras and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases group of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Oncogene 13, 713719.Google Scholar
Ekoue, D N, He, C, Diamond, A M, et al. (2017) Manganese superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase-1 contribute to the rise and fall of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species which drive oncogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1858, 628632.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y, Zhang, H M, Shi, Y, et al. (2010) Loss of manganese superoxide dismutase leads to abnormal growth and signal transduction in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Free Radic Biol Med 49, 12551262.Google Scholar
Wang, S, Ma, M, Liang, Q, et al. (2022) Single-atom manganese anchored on carbon dots for promoting mitochondrial targeting and photodynamic effect in cancer treatment. ACS Applied Nano Materials 5, 66796690.Google Scholar
Lv, M, Chen, M, Zhang, R, et al. (2020) Manganese is critical for antitumor immune responses via cGAS-STING and improves the efficacy of clinical immunotherapy. Cell Res 30, 966979.Google Scholar
Yang, M, Li, J, Gu, P, et al. (2021) The application of nanoparticles in cancer immunotherapy: targeting tumor microenvironment. Bioact Mater 6, 19731987.Google Scholar
Han, Y, Liu, D, Li, L. (2020) PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: current researches in cancer. Am J Cancer Res 10, 727742.Google Scholar
Salmaninejad, A, Valilou, S F, Shabgah, A G, et al. (2019) PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: basic biology and role in cancer immunotherapy. J Cell Physiol 234, 1682416837.Google Scholar
Shen, X, Zhang, L, Li, J, et al. (2019) Recent findings in the regulation of programmed death Ligand 1 expression. Front Immunol 10, 1337.Google Scholar
Buchbinder, E I, Desai, A. (2016) CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways: similarities, differences, and implications of their inhibition. Am J Clin Oncol 39, 98106.Google Scholar
Herbst, R S, Giaccone, G, De Marinis, F, et al. (2020) Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of PD-L1-selected patients with NSCLC. N Engl J Med 383, 13281339.Google Scholar
Motzer, R J, Penkov, K, Haanen, J, et al. (2019) Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 380, 11031115.Google Scholar
Salik, B, Smyth, M J, Nakamura, K. (2020) Targeting immune checkpoints in hematological malignancies. J Hematol Oncol 13, 111.Google Scholar
Chen, R, Manochakian, R, James, L, et al. (2020) Emerging therapeutic agents for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Hematol Oncol 13, 58.Google Scholar
Zhu, X D, Sun, H C. (2019) Emerging agents and regimens for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hematol Oncol 12, 110.Google Scholar
Robert, C, Schachter, J, Long, G V, et al. (2015) Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med 372, 25212532.Google Scholar
Tang, B, Yan, X, Sheng, X, et al. (2019) Safety and clinical activity with an anti-PD-1 antibody JS001 in advanced melanoma or urologic cancer patients. J Hematol Oncol 12, 7.Google Scholar
Qiu, Z, Chen, Z, Zhang, C, et al. (2019) Achievements and futures of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Exp Hematol Oncol 8, 19.Google Scholar
Yi, M, Jiao, D, Xu, H, et al. (2018) Biomarkers for predicting efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Mol Cancer 17, 129.Google Scholar
Niu, M, Yi, M, Li, N, et al. (2021) Predictive biomarkers of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in NSCLC [J]. Exp Hematol Oncol 10, 18.Google Scholar
Ghaffari, A, Peterson, N, Khalaj, K, et al. (2018) STING agonist therapy in combination with PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade enhances response to carboplatin chemotherapy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 119, 440449.Google Scholar
Pan, B S, Perera, S A, Piesvaux, J A, et al. (2020) An orally available non-nucleotide STING agonist with antitumor activity. Science 369, eaba6098.Google Scholar
Li, C, Li, T, Niu, K, et al. (2022) Mild phototherapy mediated by manganese dioxide-loaded mesoporous polydopamine enhances immunotherapy against colorectal cancer. Biomater Sci 10, 36473656.Google Scholar
Cheng, L, Zhang, P, Liu, Y, et al. (2023) Multifunctional hybrid exosomes enhanced cancer chemo-immunotherapy by activating the STING pathway. Biomaterials 301, 122259.Google Scholar
Marcus, A, Mao, A J, Lensink-Vasan, M, et al. (2018) Tumor-derived cGAMP triggers a STING-mediated interferon response in non-tumor cells to activate the NK cell response. Immunity 49, 754763.Google Scholar
Wang, X, Liu, Y, Xue, C, et al. (2022) A protein-based cGAS-STING nanoagonist enhances T cell-mediated anti-tumor immune responses. Nat Commun 13, 5685.Google Scholar
Hayes, C, Donohoe, C L, Davern, M, et al. (2021) The oncogenic and clinical implications of lactate induced immunosuppression in the tumour microenvironment. Cancer Lett 500, 7586.Google Scholar
Ippolito, L, Morandi, A, Giannoni, E, et al. (2019) Lactate: a metabolic driver in the tumour landscape. Trends Biochem Sci 44, 153166.Google Scholar
Lee, E S, Gao, Z, Bae, Y H. (2008) Recent progress in tumor pH targeting nanotechnology. J Control Release 132, 164170.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Xu, M, Mu, Y, et al. (2019) Reasonably retard O(2) consumption through a photoactivity conversion nanocomposite for oxygenated photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials 218, 119312.Google Scholar
Luo, S, Yang, Y, Chen, L, et al. (2024) Outer membrane vesicle-wrapped manganese nanoreactor for augmenting cancer metalloimmunotherapy through hypoxia attenuation and immune stimulation. Acta Biomater 181, 402414.Google Scholar
Ning, Z, Yang, L, Yan, X, et al. (2022) Effect and mechanism of the Lenvatinib@H-MnO(2)-FA drug delivery system in targeting intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Curr Pharm Des 28, 743750.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z H, Liang, S Y, Zhao, T C, et al. (2021) Overcoming chemotherapy resistance using pH-sensitive hollow MnO(2) nanoshells that target the hypoxic tumor microenvironment of metastasized oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Nanobiotechnology 19, 157.Google Scholar
Zheng, X, Zhang, J, Wang, J, et al. (2015) Polydopamine coatings in confined nanopore space: toward improved retention and release of hydrophilic cargo. J Phys Chem C 119, 2451224521.Google Scholar
Liu, J, Guo, C, Li, C, et al. (2023) Redox/pH-responsive hollow manganese dioxide nanoparticles for thyroid cancer treatment. Front Chem 11, 1249472.Google Scholar
Wang, B, Wang, T, Jiang, T, et al. (2024) Circulating immunotherapy strategy based on pyroptosis and STING pathway: Mn-loaded paclitaxel prodrug nanoplatform against tumor progression and metastasis. Biomaterials 306, 122472.Google Scholar
Catania, G, Rodella, G, Vanvarenberg, K, et al. (2023) Combination of hyaluronic acid conjugates with immunogenic cell death inducer and CpG for glioblastoma local chemo-immunotherapy elicits an immune response and induces long-term survival. Biomaterials 294, 122006.Google Scholar
Liang, X, Wang, D, Zhao, Y, et al. (2024) Tumor microenvironment-responsive manganese-based nano-modulator activate the cGAS-STING pathway to enhance innate immune system response. J Nanobiotechnology 22, 535.Google Scholar
Luo, G, Li, X, Lin, J, et al. (2023) Multifunctional calcium-manganese nanomodulator provides antitumor treatment and improved immunotherapy via reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment. ACS Nano 17, 1544915465.Google Scholar
Zhu, H, Xu, C, Geng, Y, et al. (2025) Endoplasmic reticulum-targeted polymer-manganese nanocomplexes for tumor immunotherapy. ACS Nano 19, 49594972.Google Scholar
Tuakashikila, Y M, Mata, H M, Kabamba, M M, et al. (2023) Reference intervals for Cd, Hg, Mn and Pb in the general children population (3-14 years) of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) between June 2019 and June 2020. Arch Public Health 81, 40.Google Scholar
Williams, M, Todd, G D, Roney, N, et al. (2012) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Toxicological Profiles [M]. Toxicological Profile for Manganese. Atlanta (GA); Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (US).Google Scholar
O’neal, S L, Zheng, W. (2015) Manganese toxicity upon overexposure: a decade in review. Curr Environ Health Rep 2, 315328.Google Scholar
Rahil-Khazen, R, Bolann, B J, Myking, A, et al. (2002) Multi-element analysis of trace element levels in human autopsy tissues by using inductively coupled atomic emission spectrometry technique (ICP-AES). J Trace Elem Med Biol 16, 1525.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Byrne, P, Wang, H, et al. (2014) A compact DD neutron generator-based NAA system to quantify manganese (Mn) in bone in vivo . Physiol Meas 35, 18991911.Google Scholar
Morton, J, Tan, E, Leese, E, et al. (2014) Determination of 61 elements in urine samples collected from a non-occupationally exposed UK adult population. Toxicol Lett 231, 179193.Google Scholar
Luk, E E, Culotta, V C. (2001) Manganese superoxide dismutase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae acquires its metal co-factor through a pathway involving the Nramp metal transporter, Smf2p. J Biol Chem 276, 4755647562.Google Scholar
Radin, J N, Zhu, J, Brazel, E B, et al. (2019) Synergy between nutritional immunity and independent host defenses contributes to the importance of the MntABC manganese transporter during Staphylococcus aureus infection. Infect Immun 87, e00642-18.Google Scholar
Handke, L D, Gribenko, A V, Timofeyeva, Y, et al. (2018) MntC-dependent manganese transport is essential for Staphylococcus aureus oxidative stress resistance and virulence. mSphere 3, e00336-18.Google Scholar
Ouyang, A, Gasner, K M, Neville, S L, et al. (2022) MntP and YiiP contribute to manganese efflux in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium under conditions of manganese overload and nitrosative stress. Microbiol Spectr 10, e0131621.Google Scholar
Veyrier, F J, Boneca, I G, Cellier, M F, et al. (2011) A novel metal transporter mediating manganese export (MntX) regulates the Mn to Fe intracellular ratio and Neisseria meningitidis virulence. PLoS Pathog 7, e1002261.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Mn in the human body. Mn contents in various tissues of the human body and the pathways of Mn intake and excretion.

Figure 1

Table 1. Mn homeostasis. The concentration of Mn in human organs and body tissues ranked from lowest to highest

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Pathogen microbes and nutritional immunity. Host cells and pathogenic microorganisms compete for Mn. Calprotectin in host cells compete for the Mn in pathogen metalloproteins, inactivating them and impairing their defence against host immune responses. Pathogenic microorganisms, however, compete with the host calprotectin to obtain Mn, thereby allowing the pathogen to proliferate and maintain its SOD activity.

Figure 3

Table 2. Transport proteins. The functions of different transport proteins in pathogenic microbes/cells

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Role of Mn in mitochondria in human cells. Mn is involved in the regulation of mitochondrial function by regulating SOD2 activity. A disruption of Mn homeostasis in mitochondria impairs the composition and function of mitochondrial RNA particles, leading to a disruption of mitochondrial transcriptional processes that results in impaired assembly and function of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. If Mn accumulates in mitochondria, it inhibits calcium efflux and triggers mitochondrial dysfunction.

Figure 5

Fig. 4 cGAS-STING signalling pathway. Mn increases the sensitivity of cGAS to dsDNA in cancer cells and regulates the cGAS–STING pathway to promote the anti-cancer immunity of immune cells. Mn binds to cGAS and enhances its anti-cancer effect by inhibiting the binding of immune receptors such as PD-1 and CTLA-4 on the surface of immune cells to ligands such as PDL-1 and BT on the surface of cancer cells. In the STING pathway, Mn stimulates IRF-3 in tumour cells to produce IFN, thereby activating the anti-cancer effect of immune cells such as NKT and CTL.