Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T10:29:42.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

War Trauma in a Civilian Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

D. J. Somasundaram  and
S. Sivayokan
D. J. Somasundaram*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna, and General (Teaching) Hospital, Jaffna
S. Sivayokan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka
*
Dr D. J. Somasundaram, c/o J. Goodhand, SCF representative, Save the Children Fund (UK), 10 Ward Place, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

An epidemiological survey was made of war trauma and its consequences in the general population.

Method

One member aged over 15 years from each of 101 randomly selected families in a Primary Health Area in Sri Lanka were interviewed using the Stress Impact Questionnaire.

Results

Nearly one-half had experienced between five and nine war stresses, and one-quarter experienced over 10 (mean 6.66). Only 6% had not experienced any. Sixty-four per cent had developed psychosocial sequelae, including somatisation (41 %), post-traumatic stress disorder (27%), anxiety disorder (26%), major depression (25%), hostility (19%), relationship problems (13%), alcohol and drug misuse (15%) and functional disability (18%).

Conclusion

The trauma experienced correlated strongly with psychosocial and somatic symptoms.

Information

Type
Short Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 165 , Issue 4 , October 1994 , pp. 524 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn, revised) (DSM-III-R). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Curran, P. S. (1988) Psychiatric aspects of terrorist violence: Northern Ireland 1969–1987. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 470–475.Google Scholar
Department of Census and Statistics (1986) Statistical Pocket Book of Democratic Socialist Republic. Colombo: Department of Census and Statistics.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. J. (1986) Stress Response Syndromes. New York: Aronson.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. J., Wilner, N., Kaltreider, N., et al (1980) Signs and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
lifton, R. J. (1993) From Hiroshima to the Nazi doctors. In International Handbook of Traumatic Stress Syndromes (eds Wilson, J. P. & Raphael, B.). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Puvinathan, S. A., Hema, S., Laksman, M., et al (1989) Study of ex-detainees in the district of Vavuniya. Jaffna Medical Journal, 24, 94.Google Scholar
Raphael, B. (1986) When Disaster Strikes. London: Hutchinson. Raphael, B., lundin, T. & Weisaeth, L. (1990) A research method for the study of psychological and psychiatric aspects of disaster. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 353 (suppl. 80), 1–75.Google Scholar
Sivarajah, N. (1988) Survey of Kokuvil-Kondavil Community Health Project Area. Jaffna, Sri Lanka: Department of Community Medicine, University of Jaffna.Google Scholar
Straker, G., et al (1987) The continuous traumatic stress syndrome: The single therapeutic interview. Psychological Society, 8, 48.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (1981) The psychological problems of Vietnam veterans. Journal of the American Medical Association, 246, 781–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. P. (1988) Trauma, Transformation, and Healing. New York: Bruner/Mazel.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1992) The ICD–10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Young, A. (1980) The discourse on stress and the reproduction of conventional knowledge. Social Science and Medicine, 14, 133.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.