Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T01:32:10.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Machine Learning in the study of Star Clusters with Gaia EDR3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2025

Priya Hasan*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad 500032, India
Md Mahmudunnobe
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Minerva University, San Francisco, California 94103, USA
Mudasir Raja
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad 500032, India
Md Saifuddin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad 500032, India
S N Hasan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad 500032, India

Abstract

Determination of membership of star clusters is a very important criterion in their study as they effect determination of cluster parameters like radius, age, distance, mass functions, etc. In an earlier study, we used published membership data of nine open star clusters as a training set to find new members from Gaia DR2 data using a supervised Random Forest (RF) model with a precision of around 90%. The number of new members found was almost double the published number. In this work, we would like to compare the earlier results with results obtained by applying the unsupervised method of Gaussian Mixture Modelling (GMM) and Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) to study the membership of open star clusters of varying ages and locations in the Galaxy using Gaia DR2 and EDR3 data. We shall discuss these techniques and focus on the caveats involved.

Information

Type
Poster Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agarwal, M., Rao, K. K., Vaidya, K., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502(2), 25822599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders, 2020, AA, 633, A99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J., & Xu, X. 1996, in KDD-96 Proceedings (AAAI Press), 226–231Google Scholar
Feigelson, E. D., & Babu, G. J. 2012, Modern Statistical Methods for Astronomy: With R Applications (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, X. 2020, ApSS, 365, 24.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. L. & Reffert, S. 2021, AA, 646, A104.Google Scholar
Md Mahmudunnobe and Priya Hasan and Mudasir Raja and S. N. Hasan, 2021, The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 230, 10, 21772191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 282 Google Scholar
Riello, M., De Angeli, F., Evans, D. W., 2021, AA, 649, A3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar