Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-28T23:38:32.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detecting complex sources in large surveys using an apparent complexity measure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2025

David Parkinson*
Affiliation:
Centre for Theoretical Astrophysics, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 776 Daedeok-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34055, Republic of Korea
Gary Segal*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia CSIRO Space and Astronomy, PO Box 76, Epping, 1710, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Large area astronomical surveys will almost certainly contain new objects of a type that have never been seen before. The detection of ‘unknown unknowns’ by an algorithm is a difficult problem to solve, as unusual things are often easier for a human to spot than a machine. We use the concept of apparent complexity, previously applied to detect multi-component radio sources, to scan the radio continuum Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) Pilot Survey data for complex and interesting objects in a fully automated and blind manner. Here we describe how the complexity is defined and measured, how we applied it to the Pilot Survey data, and how we calibrated the completeness and purity of these interesting objects using a crowd-sourced ‘zoo’. The results are also compared to unexpected and unusual sources already detected in the EMU Pilot Survey, including Odd Radio Circles, that were found by human inspection.

Information

Type
Contributed Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aaronson, S., Carroll, S., Ouellette, L., 2014, http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.6903v1 Google Scholar
Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., et al. 2018, ApJS 239, 18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collaboration, Gaia et al. 2018, A&A 616, A1 Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M., 1994, “The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex,” Henry Holt and CompanyGoogle Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. & Lloyd, S. 1996, Complexity, 2, 1 3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivezić, Ž, Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., et al. 2019, ApJ 873, 2 Google Scholar
Koribalski, B. S., Norris, R. P., Andernach, H., Rudnick, L., Shabala, S., Filipović, M., Lenc, E. 2021, MNRAS Letters, 505, 1 Google Scholar
Norris, R. P., Hopkins, A. M., Afonso, J., Zinner, et al. 2011, PASA, 28, 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. P. 2017, PASA, 34, e007 Google Scholar
Norris, R. P. et al. 2021a, PASA, 38, e046 Google Scholar
Norris, R. P. et al. 2021b, PASA, 38, e0003 Google Scholar
Norris, R. P. et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otrupcek, R. E. & Wright, A. E. 1991, PASA, 9, 1 Google Scholar
Robinson, B. J. 1987, PASA, 7, 220 Google Scholar
Segal, G., Parkinson, D., Norris, R. P., Swan, J., 2019, PASP 131, 1004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar