Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T11:44:09.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Difficult Discussions: Military Intervention and United Nation Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Frederick M. Burkle
Frederick M. Burkle
Affiliation:
Johns A. Burns School of Medicine Houston, Texas and Honolulu, HawaiiUSA E-mail: skipmd77@aol.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Editorial Comments
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 20 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 288 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2005

References

1.Western, J: Doctrinal divisions: The politics of US military interventions. Harvard International Review 2004;26(1):46–50.Google Scholar
2.Hansch, S: Humanitarian Assistance: CSIS-Brookings foreign assistance for the 21st Century Project. Georgetown University Institute for the Study of International Migration, Unpublished data, 2005.Google Scholar
3.Martone, G: Guidelines for interaction with military and belligerent parties. International Rescue Committee, Draft document (08 April 2003):1–8.Google Scholar
4.Evans, G, Sahnoun, M: The responsibility to protect. Foreign Affairs 2002;81 (6):99–111.Google Scholar