Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-nmpfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-15T03:23:05.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Stresses in Al Lines Under Various Passivations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Lee ,
J. C. Bravman ,
P. A. Flinn  and
T. N. Marffib
S. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
J. C. Bravman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
P. A. Flinn
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
T. N. Marffib
Affiliation:
Components Research, Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA
Get access

Abstract

Thermal stresses in pure Al lines passivated with a baseline 1000Å oxide and additional passivations of 0.5μm oxide, 1μm polymer, or 0.5μm, 1μm, or 2μ nitride were analyzed. Results from finite element analysis and X-ray measurements were compared, and samples were examined in a high voltage SEM for stress voids. For unvoided samples, calculated and measured results showed good correlation, while results for the voided samples showed little correlation due to stress relaxation through voiding. Initial in-situ electromigration test results showed that electromigration voids can occur at stress void sites.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 473: Symposium J – Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VII , 1997 , 415
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Lloyd, J. R. and Smith, P. M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A1 (2), pp. 455–458 (1983)Google Scholar
2. Yau, L., Hong, C., and Crook, D. in Proceedings IRPS 23, pp. 115–118 (1985)Google Scholar
3. Anolick, E. S., Lloyd, J. R., Chiu, G. T., and Korobov, V. in Proceedings of the First Technical Conference on Polyimides Vol. 2 (Soc. of Plastics Engineers, Ellenville, NY 1984), pp. 889–904 Google Scholar
4. Lloyd, J. R., Thin Solid Films 91 (2), pp. 175–182 (1982)Google Scholar
5. Tardy, J. and Tu, K. N., Physical Review B 32 (4), pp. 2070–2081 (1985)Google Scholar
6. Flinn, P. A. and Waychunas, G. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6 (6), pp. 1749–1755 (1988)Google Scholar
7. Flinn, P. A. and Chiang, C., J. Appl. Phys. 67 (6), pp. 2927–2931 (1990)Google Scholar
8. Greenebaum, B., Sauter, A. I., Flinn, P. A., Nix, W. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (17), pp. 1845–1847 (1991)Google Scholar
9. Flinn, P. A. in AIP Conference Proceedings No. 263 (Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization. First International Workshop. Ithaca, NY 1991) pp. 73–88 Google Scholar
10. Lee, J., Ma, Q., Marieb, T., Mack, A. S., Fujimoto, H., Flinn, P., Woolery, B., and Keys, L. in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics V, edited by Oates, A. S., Filter, W. F., Rosenberg, R., Greer, A. L., and Gadepally, K. (Mater, res. Soc. Proc. 391, Pittsburgh, PA 1995), pp. 115–119 Google Scholar
11. Marieb, T., Flinn, P., Bravman, J. C., Gardner, D., and Madden, M., J. Appl. Phys. 78 (2), pp. 1026–1032 (1995)Google Scholar
12. Flinn, P. A., MRS Bulletin 20 (11), pp. 70–73 (1995)Google Scholar