The results of Section 3.1 of the 2017 paper “Isomorphism Theorems between Models of Mixed Choice” need an additional assumption when
$\bullet$ is “
$1$.” If
$\bullet$ is nothing or “
$\leq 1$,” no change is needed. Also, the mistake only applies to the angelic cases, namely to the maps
$r_{{\mathtt {A}}{\mathtt {P}}}$ and
$s^\bullet _{{\mathtt {A}}{\mathtt {P}}}$; the demonic cases
$r_{{\mathtt {D}}{\mathtt {P}}}$ and
$s^\bullet _{{\mathtt {D}}{\mathtt {P}}}$ are unaffected. If
$\bullet$ is “
$1$,” and in the angelic cases, instead of just assuming that
$\mathcal L X$ is locally convex, we need to additionally assume that
$X$ is compact, or that
$\mathcal L X$ is locally convex-compact, sober, and topological – for example, if
$X$ is core-compact – or that
$X$ is LCS-complete, namely, a homeomorph of a
$G_\delta$ subspace of a locally compact sober space.