Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T16:15:54.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intra- and interspecific variation of otolith morphometric asymmetry in Ethmalosa fimbriata, Galeoides decadactylus, and Cynoglossus monodi living at different depth levels in the Komo Estuary, Gabon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2025

Kecia Carmen Moussavou Mbadinga
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
Marwa Mejri
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
Madel Floriane Adjibayo Houeto
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
Wided Bakkari
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
Abderraouf Ben Faleh
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
Jean-Pierre Quignard
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ichthyology, University of Montpellier II, Montpellier, France
Monia Trabelsi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
Adel Abdel Aleem Basyouny Shahin*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Minia University, El Minia, Egypt
Nawzet Bouriga
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms (LR/18/ES/41), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia Department of Marine Sciences, Higher Institute of Marine Sciences of Bizerte, University of Carthage, Bizerte, Tunisia
*
Corresponding author: Adel Abdel Aleem Basyouny Shahin; Email: adel.shahin@mu.edu.eg

Abstract

This study is the first to investigate the intra- and interspecific differences in otolith’s length (Lo), width (Wo), perimeter (Po), area (Ao), and mass asymmetry (OMA) in the pelagic Ethmalosa fimbriata, demersal Galeoides decadactylus, and benthic Cynoglossus monodi collected from the Lebe fishing site located along the Komo Estuary, central-western Gabon. The objectives were to (1) verify whether or not otolith morphometry differs in relation to living depth levels of the three species, (2) examine fluctuating asymmetry (FA) in the otolith morphometry, and (3) assess the relationship between OMA and total length (TL). A significant asymmetry was found in Lo, Wo, Po, and Ao between the left and right otoliths within and among males and females at the intraspecific level and only in Wo and Ao at the interspecific level due to FA. At the intraspecies level, a significant OMA was only observed within females of G. decadactylus and C. monodi and males and females of E. fimbriata and C. monodi. Moreover, a significant relationship between OMA and TL was detected only among males and females within the pelagic E. fimbriata and the demersal G. decadactylus, and no significant relationship was found at the interspecific level. As a result, significant differences in Wo and Ao and non-significant differences in OMA were recorded between the three species based on variations in living depth levels. These results highlight the importance of using otolith morphometry and OMA analyses to address the relationship between fish species and their living depth levels.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adjibayo Houeto, MF, Mejri, M, Bakkari, W, Bouriga, N, Chalh, A, Shahin, AAB, Quiganrd, J-P, Trabelsi, M and Ben Faleh, A (2024) Discriminant inter and intrapopulation variation in sagittal otolith shape and morphometry in Chelon ramada (Actinopterygii, Mugilidae) from the Boughrara and El Bibane lagoons in Tunisian waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 104, 111.10.1017/S0025315423000851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Balushi, AH, Jawad, LA and Al Busaidi, HK (2017) Otolith mass asymmetry in Lutjanus ehrenbergii (Peters, 1869) collected from the Sea of Oman. International Journal of Marine Science 7, 366370.Google Scholar
Al-Mamry, JM, Jawad, L and Ambuali, A (2011) Fluctuating asymmetry in the otolith length and width of adult Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier, 1817) collected from Muscat waters at the Sea of Oman. Journal of the Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment 17, 254259.Google Scholar
Ambuali, A, Jawad, LA and AL-Mamry, J (2011) Otolith mass asymmetry in the adult Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier, 1816), collected from the Sea of Oman. Asian Fisheries Science 24, 426431.10.33997/j.afs.2011.24.4.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Labidi, M, Mejri, M, Shahin, AAB, Quignard, JP, Trabelsi, M and Ben Faleh, AR (2020a) Stock discrimination of the bogue Boops boops (Actinopterygii, Sparidae) form two Tunisian marine lagoons using the otolith shape. Acta Ichthyologica Et Piscatoria 50, 413422.10.3750/AIEP/02978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Labidi, M, Mejri, M, Shahin, AAB, Quignard, JP, Trabelsi, M and Ben Faleh, AR (2020b) Otolith fluctuating asymmetry in Boops boops (Actinopterygii, Sparidae) from two marine lagoons (Bizerte and Kelibia) in Tunisian waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 100, 11351146.10.1017/S0025315420001022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Mohamed, S, Mejri, M, Chalh, A, Shahin, AAB, Quignard, J-P, Trabelsi, M and Ben Faleh, A (2023) Distinct inter and intrapopulation variation in the otolith shape and size of Mullus barbatus (Actinopterygii: Mullidae) from the Bizerte and Ghar El Melh lagoons in Tunisian waters. Marine Biology Research 19, 234248.10.1080/17451000.2023.2203503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, G (1986) Fichas FAO de Identifacao de Espécies Para Propósitos Comerciais. Guia de Campo Para as Espécies Comerciais Marinhas E de Águas Salobras de Angola. Preparado Com O Apoio da NORAD E da FAO (FIRM) Programa Regular. FAO: Rome.Google Scholar
Bose, APH, Zimmermann, H, Winkler, G, Kaufmann, A, Strohmeier, T, Koblmüller, S and Sefc, KM (2020) Congruent geographic variation in saccular otolith shape across multiple species of African cichlids. Scientific Reports 10, 12820.10.1038/s41598-020-69701-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouriga, N, Bahri, WR, Bejaoui, S, Adjibayo Houeto, MF, Shahin, AAB, Quignard, J-P, Trabelsi, M and Ben Faleh, A (2023) Discrimination between six commercially relevant and ecologically diverse fish species across the Gulf of Tunis using fatty acid composition and otolith shape analyses. Turkish Journal of Zoology 47, 231252.10.55730/1300-0179.3136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouriga, N, Mejri, M, Dekhil, M, Bejaoui, S, Quignard, J-P and Trabelsi, M (2021) Investigating otolith mass asymmetry in six benthic and pelagic fish species (Actinopterygii) from the Gulf of Tunis. Acta Ichthyologica Et Piscatoria 51, 193197.10.3897/aiep.51.64220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capoccioni, F, Costa, C, Aguzzi, J, Menesatti, P, Lombarte, A and Ciccotti, E (2011) Ontogenetic and environmental effects on otolith shape variability in three Mediterranean European eel (Anguilla anguilla, L.) local stocks. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 397, 17.10.1016/j.jembe.2010.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinale, M, Doerin-Arjes, P, Kastowsky, M and Mosegaard, H (2004) Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61, 158167.10.1139/f03-151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakour, A and Elouizgani, H (2018) The uses of otolith shape in discrimination of the sand sole (Solea lascaris, Risso 1810) population. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science 9, 31603166.Google Scholar
Daget, J (2003) Polynemidae. In Lévêque, C, Paugy, D and Teugels, GG (eds), Faune Des Poissons D’eaux Douce Et Saumâtres de l’Afrique de l’Ouest, Tome 2. Coll. Faune et Flore Tropicales 40. Tervuren, Belgique: Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale, 616621. Paris, France: Museum National d’Histoire Naturalle and Paris, France: Institut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementGoogle Scholar
Deida, T, Gammoudi, M, El Ayari, T, Ben Faleh, A, Djimera, L, Shahin, AAB, and Bouriga, N (2024) Do eco-geospatial differences induce otolith morphological variations? Assessment in Chelon auratus (Mugiliformes, Mugilidae) populations collected from Tunisian and Mauritanian waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 104 115.10.1017/S0025315424000547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Gil, C, Palmer, M, Catalán, IA, Alós, J, Fuiman, LA, García, E, Del Mar Gil, M, Grau, A, Kang, A, Maneja, RH, Mohan, JA, Morro, B, Schaffler, JJ, Buttay, L, Riera-Batle, I, Tolosa, B and Morales-Nin, B (2015) Otolith fluctuating asymmetry: A misconception of its biological relevance? ICES Journal of Marine Science 72, 20792089.10.1093/icesjms/fsv067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Iglio, C, Natale, S, Albano, M, Savoca, S, Famulari, S, Gervasi, C, Lanteri, G, Panarello, G, Spanò, N and Capillo, G (2021) Otolith analyses highlight morpho-functional differences of three species of mullet (Mugilidae) from transitional water. Sustainability 14, 398.10.3390/su14010398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dkhili, M, Bouriga, N, Fatnassi, M, Ben Mohamed, S, Quignard, JP and Trabelsi, M (2018) Significant difference in otolith mass asymmetry between pelagic and benthic teleost species in the Tunis bay. Journal of New Sciences 9, 178183.Google Scholar
Echreshavi, S, Esmaeili, HR, Teimori, A and Safaie, M (2021) Otolith morphology: A hidden tool in the taxonomic study of goatfishes (Teleostei: Perciformes: Mullidae). Zoological Studies 60, 36.Google ScholarPubMed
El-Regal, M, Jawad, L, Mehanna, S and Ahmad, Y (2016) Fluctuating asymmetry in the otolith of two parrotfish species, Chlorurus sordidus (Forsskål, 1775) and Hipposcarus harid (Forsskål, 1775) from Hurghada, Red Sea coast of Egypt. International Journal of Marine Science 6, 15.Google Scholar
FAO-FIGIS (2001) A world overview of species of interest to fisheries. Chapter: Ethmalosa fimbriata. access date 10 May 2024. www.fao.org/figis/servlet/species?fid=2095Google Scholar
Gabis, G, Nichols, E, Kelpsaite, L, Parkins, C, Castro, K, and Barbara Somers, B (2012) Guide for the Identification of Commonly Caught Fish in the Bottom Set Gillnet Fishery in the Gambia. Narragansett, USA: Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island, 68.Google Scholar
Gourène, G and Teugels, GG (2003) Clupeidae. In Paugy, D, Lévêque, C and Teugels, GG (eds), The Fresh and Brackish Water Fishes of West Africa Volume 1. Coll. Faune et Flore Tropicales 40. Paris, France: Institut de recherche de développement, 125142. Paris, France: Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, and Tervuren, Belgium: Musée royal de l’Afrique Central.Google Scholar
Gunderson, DR (1993) Surveys of Fisheries Resources. John Wiley and Sons: New York.Google Scholar
Helling, K, Hausmann, S, Clarke, A and Scherer, H (2003) Experimentally induced motion sickness in fish: Possible role of the otolith organs. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 123, 488492.10.1080/0036554021000028121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jawad, LA (2003) Asymmetry in some morphological characters of four sparid fishes from Benghazi, Libya. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 32, 8388.Google Scholar
Jawad, LA (2012) Fluctuating asymmetry in the otolith dimensions of Lutjanus bengalensis (Lutjanidae) collected from Muscat coast on the Sea of Oman. Biological Journal of Armenia 2, 117121.Google Scholar
Jawad, LA (2013) Otolith mass asymmetry in Carangoides caerulepinnatus (Rüppell, 1830) (family: Carangidae) collected from the sea of Oman. Ribarstvo 71, 3741.Google Scholar
Jawad, LA, Al-Mamry, JM, Al-Mamari, D and Al-Hasani, L (2012b) Study on the otolith mass asymmetry in Lutjanus bengalensis (Family: Lutjanidae) collected from Muscat City on the sea of Oman. Journal of FisheriesSciences Com 6, 7479.Google Scholar
Jawad, LA, Dörtbudak, MY, Yalçin, H and Park, JM (2023b) Bilateral asymmetry in asterisci otoliths of Cyprinion kais and C. macrostomum (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae) collected from Tigris River, Şirnak Region, Türkiye: Otolith asymmetry in Cyprinion species. Zoodiversity 57, 411420.10.15407/zoo2023.05.411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawad, LA and Mahe, K (2022) Fluctuating asymmetry in asterisci otoliths of common carp Cyprinus carpio collected from three localities in Iraqi rivers linked to environmental factors. Fishes 7, 91.10.3390/fishes7020091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawad, LA, Mehanna, SF, El-Regal, MAA and Ahmed, YA (2017) Otolith mass asymmetry in two parrotfish species, Chlorurus sordidus (Forsskål, 1775) and Hipposcarus harid (Forsskål, 1775) from Hurghada, Red Sea coast of Egypt. International Journal of Marine Science 7, 200204.Google Scholar
Jawad, LA and Sadighzadeh, Z (2013) Otolith mass asymmetry in the mugilid fish, Liza klunzingeri (Day, 1888) collected from Persian Gulf near Bandar Abbas. Anales de Biología 35, 105107.Google Scholar
Jawad, L, Gnohossou, P and Tossou, GA (2020) Bilateral asymmetry in the mass and size of otolith of two cichlid species collected from Lake Ahémé and Porto-Novo Lagoon (Bénin, West Africa). Anales de Biología 42, 920.10.6018/analesbio.42.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawad, L, Qasim, A, Farrag, MMS, Alaa, O, Samy-Kamal, M, Mehanna, S and Abdel-Maksoud, Y (2023a) Investigation of otolith asymmetry in Mulloidichthys flavolineatus and Parupeneus forsskali (Perciformes: Mullidae) from Egypt’s Hurghada fishing harbour on the Red Sea. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 52, 6878.10.26881/oahs-2023.1.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawad, L, Sadighzadeh, Z and Al-Mamary, D (2012a) Fluctuating asymmetry in the otolith length, width and thickness in two pelagic fish species collected from the Persian Gulf near Bandar Abbas. Annales, Series Historia Naturalis 22, 8388.Google Scholar
Khedher, M, Mejri, M, Shahin, AAB, Quiganrd, JP, Trabelsi, M and Ben Faleh, A (2021) Discrimination of Diplodus vulgaris (Actinopterygii, Sparidae) stock from two Tunisian lagoons using the otolith shape analysis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 101, 743751.10.1017/S0025315421000667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontaş, S, Bostanci, D, Yedіer, S, Kurucu, G and Polat, N (2018) Investigation of fluctuating asymmetry in the four otolith characters of Merlangius merlangus collected from Middle Black Sea. Turkish Journal of Maritime and Marine Sciences 4, 128138.Google Scholar
Lemberget, T and McCormick, MI (2009) Replenishment success linked to fluctuating asymmetry in larval fish. Oecologia 159, 8393.10.1007/s00442-008-1212-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lychakov, DV and Rebane, YT (2004) Otolith mass asymmetry in 18 species of fish and pigeon. Journal of Gravity Physiology 11, 1734.Google Scholar
Lychakov, DV and Rebane, YT (2005) Fish otolith mass asymmetry: Morphometry and influence on acoustic functionality. Hearing Research 201, 5569.10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lychakov, DV, Rebane, YT, Lombarte, A, Demestre, M and Fuiman, L (2008) Saccular otolith mass asymmetry in adult flatfishes. Journal of Fish Biology 72, 25792594.10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01869.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lychakov, DV, Rebane, YT, Lombate, A, Fuiman, LA and Takabayashi, T (2006) Fish Otolith asymmetry: Morphometry and modelling. Hearing Research 219, 111.10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahé, K (2019) Sources de Variation de la Forme des Otolithes: Implications Pour la Discrimination des Stocks de Poissons. Thèse de Doctorat. Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale: Boulogne-sur-mer, France.Google Scholar
Maigret, J and Ly, B (1986) Les poissons de mer de Mauritanie. Centre national de recherchesocéanographiques et des pêches (Mauritania) and Science Naturales, Compiègne, France, 213 pp.Google Scholar
Martin, GB and Wuenschel, MJ (2006) Effect of temperature and salinity on otolith element incorporation in juvenile gray snapper Lutjanus griseus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 324, 229239.10.3354/meps324229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbega, J-D, Sadio, O, Liwouwou, J-F, Mvé Beh, J-H, Bamba, I, Eleng Spanian, A, Yedi, M-L, Cardiec, F and Le Loc’h, F (2021) Reproductive biology of the lesser African threadfin Galeoides decadactylus in Gabon, Gulf of Guinea. African Journal of Marine Science 43, 499509.10.2989/1814232X.2021.1995493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejri, M, Bakkari, W, Allagui, F, Rebaya, M, Jmil, I, Mili, S, Shahin, AAB, Quignard, J-P, Trabelsi, M and Ben Faleh, A (2022b) Interspecific and intersexual variability of the sagitta otolith shape between Liza aurata and Chelon ramada (Mugiliformes: Mugilidae) inhabiting the Boughrara lagoon, Tunisia. Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences 38, 13571369.10.1007/s41208-022-00460-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejri, M, Bakkari, W, Tazarki, M, Mili, S, Chalh, A, Shahin, AAB, Quignard, J-P, Trabelsi, M and Ben Faleh, A (2022a) Discriminant geographic variation of saccular otolith shape and size in the common Pandora, Pagellus erythrinus (Sparidae) across the Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia. Journal of Ichthyology 62, 10531066.10.1134/S0032945222060169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejri, M, Trojette, M, Jmil, I, Ben Faleh, A, Chalh, A, Quignard, J-P and Trabelsi, M (2020) Fluctuating asymmetry in the otolith shape, length, width and area of Pagellus erythrinus collected from the Gulf of Tunis. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 60, 17.Google Scholar
Moussavou Mbadinga, KC, Benghorbel, M, Adjibayo Houeto, MF, Tazarki, M, Ben Faleh, A, Quignard, J-P, Trabelsia, M, Shahin, AAB and Bouriga, N (2024) Intra and interspecies discrimination of three teleost species collected from the Komo Estuary in Gabon in relation to living depth levels using otolith shape analysis. Marine Biology Research 20, 288303.10.1080/17451000.2024.2400251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njock, JC (1990) Polynemidae. In Quéro, JC, Hureau, JC, Karrer, C, Post, A and Saldanha, L (eds), Check-list of the Fishes of the Eastern Tropical Atlantic (CLOFETA). Lisbon, SEI, Paris: UNESCO, 2, 865867.Google Scholar
Özpiçak, M, Saygın, S and Savaş, Y (2024) Comparative otolith morphology in two species of Salmo genus from Türkiye. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41, 815.10.12714/egejfas.41.1.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, AR and Strobeck, C (1986) Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, patterns. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17, 391421.10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, İ, Ateş, C and Jawad, L (2023) The asymmetry in the sagitta of four mugilid species obtained from Köyceğiz Lagoon, Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Fish Biology 103, 666674.10.1111/jfb.15484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riede, K (2004) Global register of migratory species - from global to regional scales. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (Final Report of the R&D-Projekt 808 05 081), Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Santos, RS, Azevedo, MCC, Albuquerque, CQ and Araújo, FG (2017) Different sagitta otolith morphotypes for the white mouth croaker Micropogonias furnieri in the Southwestern Atlantic coast. Fisheries Research 195, 222229.10.1016/j.fishres.2017.07.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, H, Helling, K, Clarke, AH and Hausmann, S (2001) Motion sickness and otolith asymmetry. Biological Sciences in Space 15, 401404.10.2187/bss.15.401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, W (1990) FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Field guide to the commercial marine resources of the Gulf of Guinea. In Prepared and Published with the Support of the FAO Regional Office for Africa. Rome: FAO, 268.Google Scholar
Schulz-Mirbach, T, Ladich, F, Plath, M and Heß, M (2019) Enigmatic ear stones: What we know about the functional role and evolution of fish otoliths. Biological Reviews 94, 457482.10.1111/brv.12463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunda, WG and Cai, WJ (2012) Eutrophication induced CO2-acidification of subsurface coastal waters: Interactive effects of temperature, salinity, and atmospheric P-CO2. Environmental Science and Technology 46, 1065110659.10.1021/es300626fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, GJ, Lombarte, A and Morales-Nin, B (2000) Sagittal otolith size and shape variability to identify geographical intraspecific differences in three species of the genus Merluccius. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80, 333342.10.1017/S0025315499001915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yedier, S, Bostancı, D, Kontaş, S, Kurucu, G and Polat, N (2018) Comparison of otolith mass asymmetry in two different Solea solea populations in Mediterranean Sea. Ordu University Journal of Science and Tecnology 8, 125133.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 1

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material
Download Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 759.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 2

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material
Download Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 788.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 3

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material
Download Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 1.2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 4

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material
Download Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 371 KB
Supplementary material: File

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 5

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material
Download Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 566.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 6

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material
Download Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 6(File)
File 2.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 7

Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material
Download Moussavou Mbadinga et al. supplementary material 7(File)
File 15.4 KB