Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T03:34:16.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RANKIN’S METHOD AND JACOBI FORMS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES

Part of: Discontinuous groups and automorphic forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2010

B. RAMAKRISHNAN  and
BRUNDABAN SAHU
B. RAMAKRISHNAN
Affiliation:
Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Chhatnag Road, Jhusi, Allahabad 211 019, India (email: ramki@hri.res.in)
BRUNDABAN SAHU*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (email: brundaban.sahu@ucd.ie)
*
✉For correspondence; e-mail: brundaban.sahu@ucd.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Following R. A. Rankin’s method, D. Zagier computed the nth Rankin–Cohen bracket of a modular form g of weight k1 with the Eisenstein series of weight k2, computed the inner product of this Rankin–Cohen bracket with a cusp form f of weight k=k1+k2+2n and showed that this inner product gives, up to a constant, the special value of the Rankin–Selberg convolution of f and g. This result was generalized to Jacobi forms of degree 1 by Y. Choie and W. Kohnen. In this paper, we generalize this result to Jacobi forms defined over ℋ×ℂ(g,1).

Keywords

Rankin’s methodJacobi forms of higher degreeRankin–Cohen differential operators

MSC classification

Secondary: 11F50: Jacobi forms

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 131 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2010

References

[1]Böcherer, S. and Kohnen, W., ‘Estimates for Fourier coefficients of Siegel cusp forms’, Math. Ann. 297 (1993), 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Choie, Y., ‘Jacobi forms and the heat operator’, Math. Z. 225(1) (1997), 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Choie, Y., ‘Jacobi forms and the heat operator II’, Illinois J. Math. 42 (1998), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Choie, Y. and Kim, H., ‘Differential operators on Jacobi forms of several variables’, J. Number Theory 82 (2000), 140–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Choie, Y. and Kohnen, W., ‘Rankin’s method and Jacobi forms’, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 67 (1997), 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cohen, H., ‘Sums involving the values at negative integers of L-functions of quadratic characters’, Math. Ann. 217 (1977), 81–94.Google Scholar
[7]Eichler, M. and Zagier, D., The Theory of Jacobi Forms, Progress in Mathematics, 55 (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Kohnen, W., ‘On the uniform convergence of Poincaré series of exponential type on Jacobi groups’, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 66 (1996), 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Maass, H., ‘Über die gleichmässige Konvergenz der Poincaréschen Reihen n-ten Grades’, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen Math.-Phys. Kl. II 12 (1964), 137–144.Google Scholar
[10]Rankin, R. A., ‘The construction of automorphic forms from the derivatives of a given form’, J. Indian Math. Soc. 20 (1956), 103–116.Google Scholar
[11]Rankin, R. A., ‘The construction of automorphic forms from the derivatives of given forms’, Michigan Math. J. 4 (1957), 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Sahu, B., ‘Some problems in number theory’, PhD Thesis, Harish-Chandra Research Institute, University of Allahabad, 2008.Google Scholar
[13]Zagier, D., ‘Modular forms whose Fourier coefficients involve zeta-functions of quadratic fields’, in: Modular Functions of One Variable, VI (Proc. 2nd Int. Conf., Univ. Bonn, Bonn, 1976), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 627 (Springer, Berlin, 1977), pp. 105–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Zagier, D., ‘Modular forms and differential operators’, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 104 (1994), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Ziegler, C., ‘Jacobi forms of higher degree’, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 59 (1989), 191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar