Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T16:13:20.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of Mephenesin on Anxiety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

John A. Ewing  and
John H. Mendenhall
John H. Mendenhall
Affiliation:
State Hospital at Butner, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The drug which is now known officially as Mephenesin (“Myanesin,” “Tolserol”) was introduced by Berger and Bradley (1946), who showed that it antagonizes strychnine convulsions, counteracts pre-narcotic excitement, and increases the duration of barbiturate anaesthesia. Small doses depress the reflex excitability of the spinal cord, and larger doses have an ascending depressant action on the central nervous system. When Berger (1947) found that doses with little effect on voluntary power restored deranged reciprocal innervation to normal, he suggested that mephenesin might be useful in spastic and hypertonic conditions.

Information

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 99 , Issue 416 , July 1953 , pp. 464 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1953 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berger, F. M., Brit. J. Pharmacol., 1947, 2, 241.Google Scholar
Idem and Bradley, W., ibid., 1946, 1, 265.Google Scholar
Idem, Lancet, 1947, i, 97.Google Scholar
Dinenberg, S., and Hecker, A. O., Dis. Nerv. Syst., 1950, 11, 58.Google Scholar
Dixon, H. H., Dickel, H. A., Coen, R. A., and Haugen, G. B., Amer. J. Med. Sci., 1950, 220, 23.Google Scholar
Freudenberg, R. K., J. Ment. Sci., 1950, 96, 751.Google Scholar
Gammon, G. D., and Churchill, J. A., Amer. J. Med. Sci., 1949, 217, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecker, A. O., Mercer, M., and Griffin, M. A., Dis. Nerv. Syst., 1951, 12, 99.Google Scholar
Henneman, E., Kaplan, A., and Unna, K., J. Pharmacol. and Exper. Therap., 1949, 97, 331.Google Scholar
Herman, M., and Effron, A. S., Q. J. Stud. Alc., 1951, 12, 261.Google Scholar
Kaada, B. R., J. Neurophysiol., 1950, 13, 89.Google Scholar
Klopfer, B., and Kelley, D. McG., The Rorschach Technique, 1946. New York.Google Scholar
Mercer, M., and Hecker, A. O., J. Clin. Psychol., 1951, 7, 263.Google Scholar
Paul, L., Psychosom. Med., 1952, 14, 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapaport, D., Diagnostic Psychological Testing, 1946, vol. i, pp. 167–172. Chicago.Google Scholar
Schlan, L. S., and Unna, K., J.A.M.A., 1949, 140, 672.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, E. B., Drew, A. L., and Wood, B., Amer. J. Med., 1948, 4, 365.Google Scholar
Stephen, C. R., and Chandy, J., Canad. Med. Ass. J., 1947, 57, 463.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D., Measurement of Adult Intelligence, 1944, 3rd ed. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.