Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-tldsr Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-06T12:44:21.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Abnormal Pattern on the Revised Stanford-Binet Scale (Form L)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

C. Roger Myers  and
Elizabeth V. Gifford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has long been recognized that standardized tests of intelligence, when used with psychotic subjects, cease to be valid measures of native intellectual endowment. This does not mean, however, that it is useless to employ such tests in the study of the mentally ill. On the contrary, the intelligence test still provides us with the best objective measure of the present intellectual efficiency of the patient.

Information

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 89 , Issue 374 , January 1943 , pp. 92 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1943 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

(1) Altman, C. H., and Shakow, D. (1937), “A Comparison of the Performance of Matched Groups of Schizophrenic Patients, Normal Subjects and Delinquent Subjects on Some Aspects of the Stanford-Binet,” J. Educ. Psychol., 28, 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Babcock, H. (1930), “An Experiment in the Measurement of Mental Deterioration,” Arch. Psychol., 117, 105.Google Scholar
(3) Idem (1933), “Dementia Praecox: A Psychological Study,” Lancaster, Pa. Science Press, p. 167.Google Scholar
(4) Bolles, M., and Goldstein, K. (1938), “A Study of the Impairment of ‘Abstract Behavior’ in Schizophrenic Patients,” Psychiat. Quart., 12, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Brody, M. B. (1942), “A Survey of the Results of Intelligence Tests in Psychosis,” Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 19, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Cameron, N. (1939), “Schizophrenic Thinking in a Problem-solving Situation,” J. Ment. Sci., 85, 1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Davidson, M. (1937), “A Study of Schizophrenic Performance on the Stanford-Binet Scale,” Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 17, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8) Dearborn, G. V. N. (1926–27), “The Determination of Intellectual Regression and Progression,” Am. J. Psychiat., 8, 725.Google Scholar
(9) Hunt, J. McV. (1935), “Psychological Loss in Paretics and Schizophrenics,” Am. J. Psychol., 47, 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10) Kasanin, J., and Hanfmann, E. (1938), “An Experimental Study of Concept Formation,” Am. J. Psychiat., 95, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11) Schwarz, R. (1932–33), “Measurement of Mental Deterioration in Dementia Praecox,” ibid., 12, 555.Google Scholar
(12) Simmins, C. (1933), “Studies in Experimental Psychiatry. IV: Deterioration of ‘g’ in Psychotic Patients,” J. Ment. Sci., 79, 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13) Vigotsky, L. S. (1934), “Thought in Schizophrenia,” Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 31, 1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14) Wechsler, D. (1939), The Measurement of Adult Intelligence. The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15) Wells, F. L., and Kelly, C. M. (1920–21), “Intelligence and Psychosis,” Am. J. Insan., 77, 17.Google Scholar
(16) Wentworth, M. M. (1924), “Two Hundred Cases of Dementia Praecox Tested by the Stanford Revision,” J. Abn. and Soc. Psychol., 18, 378.Google Scholar
(17) Wittman, P. (1933), “The Babcock Deterioration Test in State Hospital Practice,” ibid. 28, 70.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.