Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T04:50:28.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiomics in vestibular schwannomas, misplaced electrode arrays in cochlear implant surgery and local anaesthetic Eustachian tube balloon dilatation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2025

Jonathan Fishman*
Affiliation:
Journal of Laryngology and Otology, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information

Type
Editorial
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

There has been a massive growth of artificial intelligence (AI) in recent years, with the potential to revolutionise medicine and otolaryngological practice.Reference Oremule, Saunders, Kluk, d’Elia and Bruce1, Reference Brennan, Balakumar and Bennett2, Reference Jongbloed and Grover3, Reference Li, Ding, Zhong, Fang, Huang, Huang and Zhang4 Radiomics refers to the converting of medical images into high-quality quantitative data utilising AI algorithms to extract tumour data from magnetic resonance images. A review in this month’s Journal of Laryngology & Otology examines applications of radiomics in vestibular schwannomas and future considerations for translation into clinical practice.Reference Gill, Hamilton and Rajgor5 Their systematic review demonstrated radiomics has the potential for application in vestibular schwannoma care (such as supporting pre-operative decision-making and predicting treatment responses). However, the authors acknowledge that prospective multi-centre collaborative research and developments are required to further the field in this area.

Correct placement of the cochlear implant electrode array within the cochlea is crucial for optimal device functionality and auditory outcomes, and to avoid complications.Reference Das, Sharma, Mohan, Soni and Goyal6, Reference Jinka, Wase and Jeyakumar7, Reference Dalgic, Bozkurt, Aliyeva, Görgülü, Ceylan, Edizer and Olgun8 In this issue, Grover et al. report several cases of electrode misplacement along with the factors causing it and discuss solutions to mitigate them. By addressing such factors, surgical techniques and outcomes in cochlear implant procedures can be optimised.Reference Grover, Kataria, Samdani, Gupta, Preetam and Mehta9

Eustachian tube dysfunction is a commonly encountered condition seen in ENT clinics, and Eustachian tube balloon dilatation has emerged as an effective and relatively safe treatment option for the condition.Reference Kalra, McLeod, Hendriks, Ling and Kuthubutheen10, Reference Hussain, Hashmi and Qayyum11 A previous systematic review published in The Journal last year provided insufficient evidence for the use of intranasal corticosteroid sprays in the management of Eustachian tube dysfunction.Reference Nibhanupudy, Patel, Trinh, Jenkins, Weber and Levi12 Traditionally performed under general anaesthetic, some authors propose successfully carrying out the Eustachian tube balloon dilatation procedure under local anaesthetic. In this issue, Balai et al. report their experience of the local anaesthetic technique, reporting the local anaesthetic protocol they used to perform Eustachian tube balloon dilatation in the out-patient setting and the outcome of their cases.Reference Balai, Bullock, Ross and Ferguson13 The authors propose that Eustachian tube balloon dilatation can be performed successfully in the out-patient setting with equivalent efficacy, no compromise to insufflation pressures or duration, and no increased risk of adverse events. This benefits patients in terms of convenience and immediate return to activity, and offers significant cost and efficiency savings for a department. Newer techniques may also assist in such procedures in the future.Reference Zhang, Zhang, He, Chen, Chen and Su14

References

Oremule, B, Saunders, GH, Kluk, K, d’Elia, A, Bruce, IA. Understanding, experience and attitudes towards artificial intelligence technologies for clinical decision support in hearing health: a mixed-methods survey of healthcare professionals in the UK. J Laryngol Otol 2024;138:928–3510.1017/S0022215124000550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, L, Balakumar, R, Bennett, W. The role of ChatGPT in enhancing ENT surgical training: a trainees’ perspective. J Laryngol Otol 2024;138:480–610.1017/S0022215123001354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jongbloed, WM, Grover, N. The utility of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer as a patient resource in paediatric otolaryngology. J Laryngol Otol 2024;138:1115–1810.1017/S0022215124001154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Z, Ding, S, Zhong, Q, Fang, J, Huang, J, Huang, Z, Zhang, Y. A machine learning model for predicting the three-year survival status of patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using multiple parameters. J Laryngol Otol 2023;137:1041–4710.1017/S0022215123000063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, T, Hamilton, D, Rajgor, A. The application of radiomics in vestibular schwannomas. J Laryngol Otol 2025;139:1810.1017/S0022215125000258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, K N, Sharma, V, Mohan, V, Soni, K, Goyal, A. Comparison of long-term speech and impedance outcome of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf paediatric patients between cochleostomy and round window insertion. J Laryngol Otol 2024;25:18Google Scholar
Jinka, S, Wase, S, Jeyakumar, A. Complications of cochlear implants: a MAUDE database study. J Laryngol Otol 2023;137:1267–7110.1017/S0022215123000828CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalgic, A, Bozkurt, EB, Aliyeva, A, Görgülü, E, Ceylan, ME, Edizer, DT, Olgun, L. Complications after cochlear implantation in adult patients: a retrospective study. J Laryngol Otol 2023;137:259–6210.1017/S0022215122001827CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grover, M, Kataria, T, Samdani, S, Gupta, G, Preetam, C, Mehta, R, et al. Navigating the challenges of misplaced electrode array in cochlear implant surgery: causes, consequences and solutions. J Laryngol Otol 2025;139:12510.1017/S0022215125000222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalra, A, McLeod, K, Hendriks, T, Ling, S, Kuthubutheen, J. The DILATE study: a prospective cohort study of balloon dilatation for Eustachian tube dysfunction in patients with no middle-ear disease. J Laryngol Otol 2025;139:71210.1017/S0022215124001312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, SZM, Hashmi, S, Qayyum, A. Informed consent in balloon Eustachian tuboplasty: a systematic review of possible complications and preventive measures. J Laryngol Otol 2024;138:474–910.1017/S0022215123001998CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nibhanupudy, TJ, Patel, A, Trinh, CP, Jenkins, E, Weber, PC, Levi, JR. Efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid sprays in relieving clinical signs of Eustachian tube dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials. J Laryngol Otol 2024;138:1065–7210.1017/S0022215124000756CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balai, E, Bullock, E, Ross, T, Ferguson, M. Local anaesthetic Eustachian tube balloon dilatation: a prospective case-series analysis of 31 patients. J Laryngol Otol 2025;139:16Google Scholar
Zhang, H, Zhang, Q, He, K, Chen, M, Chen, Y, Su, D, et al. Dilatation Eustachian tuboplasty with a Eustachian tube video endoscope and supporting balloon. J Laryngol Otol 2024;138:246–5210.1017/S0022215123001202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed