Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-23T14:47:17.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMPARAZIONE E METODO COMPARATO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2016

Giovanni Sartori

Introduzione

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sulla politica comparata e sul metodo che la sostiene scrivevo vent'anni fa (quasi). Ne scrivevo perché ne ero fautore. Ma l'esito, oggi, è stato di gran lunga inferiore alle aspettative. Come mai? è per via di una sopravvalutazione iniziale? O perché siamo andati inciampando nel corso del cammino? O per altre ragioni ancora? Rispondere a queste domande è come tirare un consuntivo. Dove stiamo? Dove ci conviene andare? è un dibattito da riaprire. Nel mio scritto, diciamo, originario, chiedevo nell'ordine 1) perché comparare, 2) cosa è comparabile, 3) come comparare. Gioverà ripetere le stesse domande nello stesso ordine.

Information

Type
La Comparazione in Scienza Politica
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 397 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Almond, G. (1970), Political Theory and Political Science, ora in Political Development: Essays in Heuristic Theory, Boston, Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. (1963), Concepts and Generalizations in Comparative Sociological Studies , in «American Sociological Review», XXVIII, pp. 532–39.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. (1964), Nation Building and Citizenship, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. (1978), Kings or People, Berkeley, University of California Press, trad. it., Re o popolo, Milano, Feltrinelli, 1982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, M.B. e Nagel, E., (1934), An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dogan, M. e Pelassy, D. (1984), How to Compare Nations: Strategies in Comparative Politics, Chatham, Chatam House.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1947), Les Regies de la Méthode Sociologique, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Eckstein, H. (1975), Case Study and Theory in Political Science , in Greenstein, F.I. e Polsby, N.W. (a cura di) Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7, cap. 3. Reading, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Fisichella, D. (a cura di), (1985), Metodo Scientifico e Ricerca Politica, Roma, La Nuova Italia Scientifica.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1975), Against Method, London, Verso.Google Scholar
Frendreis, J.P. (1983), Explanation of Variation and Detection of Covariation: The Purpose and Logic of Comparative Analysis , in «Comparative Political Studies», XVI, pp. 255–72.Google Scholar
Graziano, L. (a cura di) (1986), La Scienza Politica in Italia: Bilancio e Prospettive, Milano, Angeli.Google Scholar
Holt, R.T. e Turner, J.E. (a cura di) (1970), The Methodology of Comparative Research, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P. e More, C.H. (a cura di) (1970), Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A.L. (1966), The Logic of Comparison: A Methodological Note on the Comparative Study of Political Systems , in «World Politics», XIX, pp. 69–82.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970), Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , in Lakatos, I. e Musgrave, A. (a cura di) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, J.E. (1987), Against Theoreticism , in «International Review of Sociology», III, pp. 149–185.Google Scholar
LaPalombara, J. (1970), Parsimony and Empiricism in Comparative Politics, in Holt, e Turner, (1970).Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. (1968), The Future of the Comparative Method , in «Comparative Politics», I, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1971), Comparative Politics and Comparative Method , in «American Political Science Review», LXV, pp. 682–693.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1975), The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research , in «Comparative Political Studies», VIII, pp. 158–177.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M., Trow, M. e Coleman, J.S. (1956). Union Democracy, Glencoe, Free Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M., Trow, M. e Coleman, J.S. (1963), The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective, New York, Norton.Google Scholar
Macridis, R.C. (1953), Research in Comparative Politics [Report of the Social Science Seminar on Comparative Politics], in «American Political Science Review» XXXXVII, pp. 641–75.Google Scholar
Macridis, R.C. (1955), The Study of Comparative Government, New York, Random House.Google Scholar
Marradi, A. (1985), Natura. Forme e Scopi della Comparazione: un Bilancio, in Fisichella, (1985), pp. 293–321.Google Scholar
Mayer, L.C. (1989), Redefining Comparative Politics, Newbury Park, Sage Google Scholar
Osgood, C.E. (1967), On the Strategy of Cross-National Research into Subjective Culture , in «Social Science Information», VI.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. e Teune, H. (1970), The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1987), Methods of Cross-National Research, 1970-83: An Overview , in Dierkes, M. et. al. (a cura di) Comparative Policy Research: Learning from Experience, Aldershot, Gower.Google Scholar
Rae, D.W. (1971), The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, C., e Zaret, D. (1983), Theory and Method in Comparative Research , in «Social Forces», LXI, pp. 731–754.Google Scholar
Ragin, C.C. (1987), The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Riker, W.H. (1982), Two-Party System and Duverge's Law , in «American Political Science Review», LXXVI, pp. 753–66.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1970), Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics , in «American Political Science Review», LXIV, pp. 1033–53.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1971), La politica comparata: premesse e problemi , in «Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica», I, pp. 7–66.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1976), Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1979), La Politica: Logica e Metodo in Scienze Sociali, Milano, SugarCo.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1984a), Le ‘Leggi’ sull'Influenza dei Sistemi Elettorali , in «Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica», XIV, pp. 3–40.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1984b), Guidelines for Concept Analysis , in Sartori, , (a cura di) Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis, Beverly Hills, Sage, pp. 15–85.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1987), Elementi di Teoria Politica, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Sartori, G., Riggs, F.W. e Teune, H. (1975), Tower of Babel: On the Definition and Analysis of Concepts in the Social Sciences, Pittsburgh, International Studies Association.Google Scholar
Smelser, N.J. (1966), Notes on the Methodology of Comparative Analysis of Economic Activity , in Transactions of the Sixth World Congress of Sociology, 2, pp. 101–17, Evian, International Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Smelser, N.J. (1967), Sociology and the Other Social Sciences , in Lazarsfeld, P. F. et al. (a cura di) The Uses of Sociology, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Smelser, N.J. (1976), Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Sundquist, J.L. (1988), Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States , in «Political Science Quarterly», CIII, pp. 613–35.Google Scholar
Vallier, I. (a cura di), (1971), Comparative Methods in Sociology, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Verba, S. (1967), Some Dilemmas in Comparative Research , in «World Politics», XX, pp. 112–127.Google Scholar
Verba, S. (1985), Comparative Politics: Where Have we Been, Where Are we Going?, in Wiarda, (1985).Google Scholar
Wiarda, H.J. (a cura di) (1985), New Directions in Comparative Politics, Boulder, Westview Press.Google Scholar
Zelditch, M. (1971), Intelligible Comparisons, in Vallier, (1971), pp. 267–307.Google Scholar