Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-h4f6x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T01:00:10.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Writers on the Storm. Punishment, Public Debate and Persuasive Speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Tom Daems
Tom Daems*
Affiliation:
Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Institute of Criminal Law and Leuven Institute of Criminology (LINC), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

public criminology(sociology of) punishmentrhetoricpersuasive speech

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
International Annals of Criminology , Volume 47 , Issue 1-2 , 2009 , pp. 47 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 International Society for Criminology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

(1)

This article is based on my book Making Sense of Penal Change (Oxford University Press, 2008).

References

Balvig, F., Christie, N. & Tham, H. (2008), «Whither the Stockholm Prize?», Newsletter of the European Society of Criminology, 7 (1), 1, 8–9.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1990), Thinking Sociologically. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2006), Liquid Fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Boutellier, H. (1985), «Met alleen nog de perso on als inzet. Het jongerenwerk en de moraal», Welzijnsmaandblad, 39 (3), 19–23.Google Scholar
Boutellier, H. (1993), Solidariteit en slachtofferschap, Nijmegen: SUN.Google Scholar
Boutellier, H. (2000), Crime and Morality, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutellier, H. (2004), The Safety Utopia, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Burawoy, M. (2005), «2004 ASA Presidential Address. For Public Sociology», American Sociological Review, 70 (1), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chancer, L. & McLaughlin, E. (eds.) (2007a), «Special issue on public criminology», Theoretical Criminology, 11 (2).Google Scholar
Chancer, L. & McLaughlin, E. (2007b), «Public criminologies. Diverse perspectives on academia and policy», Theoretical Criminology, 11 (2), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, E. (2007), «Against marginality. Arguments for a public criminology», Theoretical Criminology, 11 (2), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daems, T. (2008), Making Sense of Penal Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haan, W. (2009), «Een toekomstverkenning van de Nederlandse criminologie», De Criminoloog. 1 (1), 1–2.Google Scholar
Engbersen, G. (2008), «Criminologie in meervoud. Over theoretische vernieuwin- gen in de Nederlandse criminologie», Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 50 (3), 264272.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (1982), Book review: P. Carlen & M. Collison (eds.), «Radical Issues in Criminology», The Howard Journal, 21, 184–185.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (1985), Punishment and Welfare, Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (1990), Punishment and Modern Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (2001), The Culture of Control, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (2004), «Beyond the Culture of Control», Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 7 (2), 160–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (2006), «Concepts of Culture in the Sociology of Punishment», Theoretical Criminology, 10 (4), 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (2009), «A culturalist theory of punishment?», Punishment & Society, 11 (2), 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. & Young, P. (1983), «Towards a Social Analysis of Penality», In: Garland, D. & Young, P. (eds.), The Power to Punish, London: Heinemann, 1–36.Google Scholar
Gross, A.G. (1990), The Rhetoric of Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harbers, H. (1992), «Gevraagd: een sociologie van intellectuelen», In: Nauta, L. et al. (eds.), De rol van de intellectueel. Een discussie over dìstantie en betrokkenheid, Amsterdam: Van Gennep, 37–53.Google Scholar
Hood, R. (2002), «Criminology and Penal Policy: The Vital Role of Empirical Research», In: Bottoms, A. & Tonry, M. (eds.), Ideology, Crime and Criminal Justice, Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 153–172.Google Scholar
Konrad, G. (1984), Antipolitics, London: Quartet Books.Google Scholar
Loader, I. & Sparks, R. (2008), «‘What are we gonna do now?’ Revisiting the public roles of criminology», Criminal Justice Matters, 72, 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissenberg, E. (1989), Verlagen en verheffen. Rede uitgesproken bij de openbare aanvaarding van het ambt van hoogleraar in de criminologie aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op dinsdag 16 mei 1989, Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom H.D. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Nelken, D. (1994), «Reflexive Criminology?», In: Nelken, D. (ed.), The Futures of Criminology, London: Sage, 7–42.Google Scholar
Pels, D. (1995), «Knowledge Politics and Anti-Politics. Towards a Critical Appraisal of Bourdieu’s Concept of Intellectual Autonomy», Theory and Society, 24 (1), 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. (1981), «Sexuality and the popular appeal of the new right», Contemporary Crises, 5 (4), 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. (1985a), Review: Cohen, S. & Scull, A. (eds.), «Social Control and the State», International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 13, 210–212.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. (1985b), «Juvenile Justice, Social Work and Social Control. The Need for ‘ Positive Thinking», British Journal of Social Work, 15, 1–24.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. (1990), «Crime, time, youth and punishment», Contemporary Crises, 14, 219242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. (1992a), Punishment in a Perfect Society, Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. (1992b), «Punishment and the Lessons from History», Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 25, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. (1997), Governing the Dangerous, Annandale: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. (1998), «Towards the ‘Decivilizing’ of Punishment?», Social and Legal Studies, 7 (4), 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. (2000), «The Return of the Wheelbarrow Men; Or, the Arrival of Postmodern Penality?», British Journal of Criminology, 40, 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. (2002a), Punishment and Civilization, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. (2002b), «Critical Criminology and the Punitive Society: Some New ‘Visions of Social Control’», In: Carrington, K. & Russell, H. (eds.), Critical Criminology. Issues, Debates, Challenges, Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 168–184.Google Scholar
Pratt, J., Brown, D., Brown, M., Hallsworth, S. & Morrison, W. (2005), «Introduction», In: Pratt, J. et al. (eds.), The New Punitiveness. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, xi–xxvi.Google Scholar
Rusche, G. & Kirchheimer, O. (1968), Punishment and Social Structure, New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Smith, D.E. (1974), «The Ideological Practice of Sociology», Catalyst, 8, 39–54.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. (1998), «La tentation pénale en Europe», Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 124, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacquant, L. (1999), Les prisons de la misère, Paris: Raisons d’agir.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2001a), «Deadly symbiosis. When ghetto and prison meet and mesh», Punishment & Society, 3 (1), 95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2001b), «The Penalisation of Poverty and the Rise of Neo-liberalism», European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 9, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2002a), Symbiosi mortale. Neoliberalismo e politica penale, Verona: Ombre Corte.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2002b), «Scrutinizing the Street: Poverty, Morality, and the Pitfalls of Urban Ethnography», American Journal of Sociology, 107 (6), 1468–1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2004), Punir les pauvres, Marseille: Agone.Google Scholar
Walgrave, L. (2008), «Tussen Charlatanisme en Evangélisme. Bedenkingen over de maatschappelijke verantwoordelijkheid van de criminologie en andere sociale wetenschappen», In: Franken, A.A., Langen, M. de & Moerings, M. (eds.), Constante waarden. Liber amicorum prof mr. Constantijn Keik, Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 175–182.Google Scholar
Zedner, L. (2003), «Useful Knowledge? Debating the Role of Criminology in Post-war Britain», In: Zedner, L. & Ashworth, A. (eds.), The Criminological Foundations of Penal Policy: Essays in Honour of Roger Hood, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar