Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T01:06:47.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Elephant in the Family Room: Work–Family Considerations as Central to Evolving HR and I-O

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2017

Maura J. Mills  and
Satoris S. Culbertson
Maura J. Mills*
Affiliation:
Culverhouse College of Commerce, Department of Management, University of Alabama
Satoris S. Culbertson
Affiliation:
Pamplin School of Business, University of Portland
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Maura J. Mills, Culverhouse College of Commerce, University of Alabama, 361 Stadium Drive, Box 870225, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0225. E-mail: mjmills@culverhouse.ua.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In their focal article, Schiemann and Ulrich (2017) provide a broad overview of thoughts and insights by 73 of today's human resources/industrial–organizational (HR/I-O) leaders. It was both interesting and valuable to hear from those “in the trenches” every day and to learn what they considered to be the key recommendations, cautions, and needs central to the HR/I-O practice of today—and tomorrow. That said, we were surprised that, considering the zeitgeist of the current workscape, work–family considerations did not make more of an appearance in these reports of leaders’ values and priorities for their organizations and for the field as a whole.

Information

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 26 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aitken, Z., Garrett, C. C., Hewitt, B., Keogh, L., Hocking, J. S., & Kavanagh, A. M. (2015). The maternal health outcomes of paid maternity leave: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 130, 32–41.Google Scholar
Bloom, N., Kretschmer, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2011). Are family-friendly workplace practices a valuable firm resource? Strategic Management Journal, 32, 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breaugh, J. A., & Frye, N. K. (2007). An examination of the antecedents and consequences of the use of family-friendly benefits. Journal of Managerial Issues, 19, 35–52.Google Scholar
Cameron, K., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Dill, K. (2016, July 29). The best companies for work-life balance. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/kathryndill/2016/07/29/the-best-companies-for-work-life-balance-3/#5b3e798017e4 Google Scholar
Huang, R., & Yang, M. (2015). Paid maternity leave and breastfeeding practice before and after California's implementation of the nation's first paid family leave program. Economics & Human Biology, 16, 45–59.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. (2014). Maternity and paternity at work: Law and practice across the world. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Levin-Epstein, J. (2006). Getting punched: The job and family clock. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695–706.Google Scholar
Mills, M. J. (Ed.). (2015). Gender and the work–family experience: An intersection of two domains. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, R., Gornick, J. C., & Schmitt, J. (2009). Parental leave policies in 21 countries: Assessing generosity and gender equality. Washington, DC: The Sloan Work and Family Research Network News.Google Scholar
Ruhm, C. J. (2000). Parental leave and child health. Journal of Health Economics, 19, 931–960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, A. M., & Kossek, E. E. (2008). Work-life policy implementation: Breaking down or creating barriers to inclusiveness? Human Resource Management, 47, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiemann, W. A., & Ulrich, D. (2017). Rise of HR—New mandates for I-O. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10 (1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayne, J. H., & Casper, W. J. (2012). Why does firm reputation in human resource policies influence college students? The mechanisms underlying job pursuit intentions. Human Resources Management, 51, 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadek, S. (2004, December). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 125–132.Google Scholar
Zarya, V. (2016, September 8). Exclusive: Deloitte enters the paid leave arms race with 16 weeks of family leave. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/09/08/deloitte-family-leave/ Google Scholar