Hostname: page-component-65b85459fc-bczq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-16T18:37:11.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quality of life in patients with pituitary tumors: features of diagnostics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

Y. Sidneva*
Affiliation:
neuropsychiatry, N.N.Burdenko National Medical Research Institute of Neurosurgery neurorehabilitation, Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma
L. Astafyeva
Affiliation:
neuroendocrinology
P. Kalinin
Affiliation:
neurosurgery
A. Shkarubo
Affiliation:
neurosurgery
M. Kutin
Affiliation:
neurosurgery
I. Voronina
Affiliation:
neurology, N.N.Burdenko National Medical Research Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russian Federation
D. Fomichev
Affiliation:
neurosurgery
D. Andreev
Affiliation:
neurosurgery
O. Sharipov
Affiliation:
neurosurgery
I. Chernov
Affiliation:
neurosurgery
A. Donskoy
Affiliation:
neurosurgery
I. Klochkova
Affiliation:
neuroendocrinology
I. Badmaeva
Affiliation:
neuroendocrinology
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The term “quality of life” is widely used in the world community, has an interdisciplinary concept that characterizes the effectiveness of all aspects of human life. But it should be understood that its main component is the psychological and psychiatric part, which is based on self-perception. And in this regard, it is obvious that the degree of quality of life of patients with pituitary tumors, manifested by a complex clinical picture, sometimes a multi-component treatment strategy, is important for understanding, diagnostics and correction.

Objectives

to assess and compare the degree of quality of life in patients with pituitary tumors.

Methods

120 patients (18-79 years old) after surgery for diencephalic tumor, 2019-2022. The following scales were proposed: 1) assessment of the severity of cognitive impairment and social maladjustment - the Global Deterioration Rating (GDR) scale (stages 1 to 7, where 1 is no impairment/deficit); 2) assessment of the general condition of cancer patients - the Karnofsky index (from 0% to 100%, where 100% is normal condition, no complaints); 3) a short version of the quality of life assessment (SF-12, 2000). All patients were examined dynamically by a psychiatrist.

Results

The quality of life was assessed during treatment, when the degree: improves, remains unchanged, worsens. Different dynamics were noted with different tumor morphology, volumes of surgical intervention, and course of recovery after surgery. Thus, after surgery, the number of patients with severe disorders in large and giant tumors, especially with spread to the third ventricle (according to the Karnofsky and GDR scales), increased, respectively, they were found to have a low degree of “quality of life”. The use of questionnaires (SF-12) showed the inappropriateness of their use, since 33-78% of patients (with different tumor morphology) showed personality changes, they were not fully aware of their condition. Assessment by scales revealed the following features: 1) A large sample, no universal; 2) Mostly self-questionnaires, which is questionable due to the high percentage of patients with lack of criticality, inadequate assessment of the situation and themselves; 3) Conducted by different specialists; 4) To interpret the results, an assessment by a psychiatrist is necessary. Patients with pituitary tumors were divided into: 1) with pronounced health problems - sufficient quality of life; 2) with minimal symptoms - deeply “unhealthy”.

Conclusions

In assessing the “quality of life”, the primary factors are not the symptoms of the disease and their manifestations, but the perception of oneself and the ability to feel “happiness”. In the case of pituitary tumors, non-specific scales and self-questionnaires should be used with reservations; for the adequacy of the interpretation of the results, it is worth comparing the data with the psychiatric report.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.