Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-b5cpw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-13T20:33:58.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

French psychiatrists’ concerns about assisted death

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

E. Olie*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Abstract

A bill on euthanasia and assisted suicide is currently under discussion in France. It proposes that only competent adults suffering from a serious and incurable condition that threatens their life in the medium term, or who are in an advanced or terminal phase, and experiencing unbearable physical or psychological suffering—either refractory to treatment or considered unbearable in the absence of treatment—may request medical assistance in dying (MAiD). However, French psychiatrists have expressed concerns about the bill, as it does not mandate a psychiatric evaluation, despite the high prevalence of mental disorders, including depression, in the general population. These disorders are even more frequent in end-of-life conditions and can significantly impact decision-making capacity and the wish to die. Depression, a common comorbidity in cancer—the leading cause of MAiD requests—affects approximately 15% of cancer patients but is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. The bill also raises concerns regarding its implications for suicide prevention. Some MAiD requests may stem from treatable psychiatric conditions rather than a well-considered end-of-life choice. Furthermore, a proposed obstruction offense could potentially criminalize suicide prevention efforts, complicating the role of mental health professionals. Uniquely, the French bill allows a third party chosen by the patient to administer the lethal substance, a provision not found in any other country. This raises significant ethical and psychological concerns regarding the emotional burden on the designated individual, who may experience distress, guilt, or long-term psychological repercussions from actively participating in assisted dying. Finally, the possibility of future expansion to include psychiatric-only indications, as seen in other countries, remains a critical issue requiring careful ethical and medical scrutiny.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.