Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-r5dbb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T14:18:36.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy and safety of accelerated deep TMS for depressed patient with active suicidality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

K. Feffer*
Affiliation:
Lev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Tsur Moshe Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
E. Bloemhof-Bris
Affiliation:
Lev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Tsur Moshe
Y. Levi-Belz
Affiliation:
The Lior Tsfaty Center for Suicide and Mental Pain Studies, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel
A. Tamari-Guterman
Affiliation:
Lev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Tsur Moshe
G. Wexler
Affiliation:
Lev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Tsur Moshe
Y. Ben-Ari
Affiliation:
Lev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Tsur Moshe
M. Rachman
Affiliation:
The Lior Tsfaty Center for Suicide and Mental Pain Studies, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel
S. Noam
Affiliation:
Lev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Tsur Moshe
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Suicidality is one of the leading causes of death in young adults. Most of the suicidal patients suffer from background depression. Developments in the last few years in brain simulation technology as dTMS enables a more intensive care in accelerated protocols that have already been approved in the treatment of the depression field. However, most major studies in the field excluded the participation of patient with active suicidality.

Objectives

This study focuses on efficacy of dTMS in patients with active suicidality.

Methods

This double-blind randomized study offers an accelerated protocol dTMS treatment in the span of 10 treatment days, while the patient is maintained in full hospitalization and secure conditions. The study examined the efficacy of the dTMS accelerated protocol (which includes 3 treatments a day for the course of 10 treatment days) on suicidality indicators. This treatment was given in addition (add-on) to standard ward treatments in three arms (1:1:1) sham, active H1 coil and active H7 coil.

Results

38 patients were enrolled in the study. 30 patients successfully completed 10 treatment days. 8 patients did not complete treatment due to withdraw of informed consent before starting treatment (N = 4), panic attack (N = 2), discharge from the ward (N = 1) and suicide attempt (N = 1). Patients received active treatment (both H1 and H7) showed superior response (defined as >50% improvement in depression scale) compared to placebo arm (PA) (p = 0.03). Additionally, clinically close to significance improvement in suicidality intensity scales was found after 5 and 10 days of treatment in active treatment compared to placebo (p = 0.09). However, no significant difference was found regarding suicidality type scores. No major differences in depression and suicidality were found comparing H1 and H7 coils. The main side effects were headaches and dizziness, motoric tremor during the treatments, vomiting and general exhaustion. One patient (placebo group) completed suicide a month following the end of the study.

Conclusions

Active suicidality is a major challenge in treating severe mental disorders, and death by suicide is still a leading cause of death among patients. However, most clinical studies in mental health still exclude patients with active suicidality, hence treatment options are limited. In this study, we found deep TMS accelerated protocol (both H1 and H7 coils) to be both safe and effective in decreasing suicidality intensity and depression symptoms among inpatients with severe mental disorders accompanied by suicidality. Further studies are needed to differentiate H1 and H7 coils effectiveness in different depression sub-types and common psychiatric comorbidities.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.