Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-lgfmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T13:50:21.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deontological guilt feelings in eating disorders: data from an Italian experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

F. Raffone*
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Asl Napoli 1 Centro, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”
D. Atripaldi
Affiliation:
Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples
F. Mancini
Affiliation:
Scuole di Psicoterapia Cognitiva APC-AIPC-SPC-SICC, Rome
A. M. Saliani
Affiliation:
Scuole di Psicoterapia Cognitiva APC-AIPC-SPC-SICC, Rome
A. M. Monteleone
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Università degli Studi della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Guilt and shame are common emotional experiences that may influence the prognosis and treatment of many psychiatric disorders.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine the role of guilt and shame in individuals with eating disorders (ED).

Methods

Forty-three adults diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder were included in the study. They completed the following questionnaires: the Moral Orientation Guilt Scale (MOGS), which measures different components of guilt, and the Eating Disorder Inventory 2 (EDI-2), which measures ED psychopathology. To assess the relationships between MOGS and EDI-2 subscales, Spearman’s correlations and a stepwise multiple regression have been conducted including all patients in a unique ED group.

Results

Positive correlations were found between the EDI-2 bulimia subscale and the MNV (moral normal violation) subscale of the MOGS (0.26, p.=0.05), between the EDI-2 interpersonal distrust subscale and the MNV subscale of the MOGS (Rho=0.28, p=0.03), and between the EDI-2 interpersonal distrust subscale and both altruistic guilt components of the MOGS (Rho=0.33, p=0.01 for harm; Rho=0.29, p=0.03 for empathy). The multiple linear regression model was significant (R²=0.29, F=8.38, p.<0.01) and showed age (t=-2.9, p<0.01) and the HARM subscale (t=3.4, p<0.01) as predictors of interpersonal distrust.

Conclusions

The results provide preliminary evidence for a possible role of guilt in the aetiopathogenesis of ED. Sensitivity to altruistic guilt, and especially to the harm caused, seems to influence the ability to trust others. Avoidance, distancing, or closure may be strategies to overcome high sensitivity to guilt. Further studies with larger samples, including both ED patients and healthy individuals, are needed to determine the role of guilt in EDs.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.