Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-dbm8p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T02:06:29.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Childhood sexual abuse and dissociation: Testing the betrayal trauma theory in two Chinese samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

C. H. O. Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work and Social Administration
A. K. C. Chau
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, the University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam
C. T. Y. Cheung
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon
W. T. Chien
Affiliation:
The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin
S. K. K. Lam
Affiliation:
The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin
J. Y.-H. Wong
Affiliation:
School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Hong Kong Metropolitan University
H. W. Fung*
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) is a major public health concern and is closely associated with dissociative symptoms. According to the betrayal trauma theory, dissociation can be interpreted as a response towards betrayal trauma (i.e., trauma perpetrated by a close person, such as a family member). No previous study has validated this theory with a focus on CSA in the Chinese context.

Objectives

We hypothesized that people with betrayal CSA, but not non-betrayal CSA, would report significantly more dissociative symptoms than people without CSA. We also hypothesized that betrayal CSA, but not non-betrayal CSA, would be significantly associated with the severity of dissociative symptoms. We tested the hypotheses in two independent Chinese-speaking samples.

Methods

Sample 1 (N = 91) consisted of participants seeking treatment in an evaluation study; while Sample 2 (N = 376) included community health service users in a survey study. In both Chinese-speaking samples, participants completed the two CSA items on the Brief Betrayal Trauma Survey and the 16-item Dissociative Features Section of the Self-report Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule (SR-DDIS). ANOVA and regression analyses were used to test our hypotheses.

Results

Across both samples, participants with betrayal CSA reported significantly more dissociative symptoms than those without any CSA (Sample 1: M = 5.60, SD = 3.14 vs M = 3.67, SD = 3.06; F = 3.301, p = .041, Sample 2: M = 2.06, SD = 2.49 vs M = 0.93, SD = 1.32; F = 8.428, p < .001). As hypothesized, no significant differences in dissociative symptoms were observed between participants with and without non-betrayal CSA (Sample 1: M = 4.00, SD = 3.71 vs M = 3.67, SD = 3.06; Sample 2: M = 1.14, SD = 1.83 vs M = .93, SD = 1.32). Across both samples, betrayal CSA, but not non-betrayal CSA, was significantly associated with dissociative symptoms (Sample 1: β = .250, p = .024, Sample 2: β = .189, p < .001), after controlling for age and gender.

Conclusions

This study provides cross-cultural evidence for the betrayal trauma theory. We suggest that proactive family-centered child protection is needed to prevent CSA, and screening for dissociative symptoms is also necessary in CSA survivors.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.