Hostname: page-component-65b85459fc-ht497 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-16T15:14:44.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brain Damage after ECT? No significant changes of Neurofilament Light Chain and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Cerebrospinal Fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

S. Riessland*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division of General Psychiatry Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health
M. Ponleitner
Affiliation:
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
V. Millischer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division of General Psychiatry Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health
S. Macher
Affiliation:
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
R. Lanzenberger
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division of General Psychiatry Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health
P. Rommer
Affiliation:
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
R. Frey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division of General Psychiatry Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health
D. Rujescu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division of General Psychiatry Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health
P. Baldinger-Melich
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division of General Psychiatry Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). Only few studies have measured CSF in patients undergoing ECT; thus far, no prognostic candidate biomarkers for treatment response have been found (Kranaster et al. Neuropsychobiology. 2019;77(1):13-22). Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a protein found in the axons of neurons. If elevated in blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), it is an indicator of neuroaxonal damage. A recent study including 15 patients with MDD who underwent ECT found no significant change in serum NfL concentrations after completion of treatment (Besse et al. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2024; 274(5):1187-95). The astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is elevated in MDD and neuroinflammatory diseases. Serum GFAP levels in 40 MDD patients decreased after ECT compared to baseline (Xu et al. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023; 77(12):653-64). No studies measuring CSF levels of both markers have been performed.

Objectives

In this prospective study we aimed to measure changes in CSF of NfL and GFAP in patients undergoing an ECT series.

Methods

In a sample of 9 MDD patients undergoing bilateral ECT, CSF was analyzed before and after the 8th ECT session. Patients took antidepressant medication in a steady state over the course of ECT. A mixed-effects linear regression analysis was done using the log-transformed NfL and GFAP levels as outcome variables. The timepoint (pre-ECT, post-ECT) were entered as fixed effects, patient ID was included as a random effect to account for individual variability. We corrected for multiple testing and defined alpha = 0.05/2 = 0.025. Statistical analyses were performed using R version R-4.3.2.

Results

The mean age ± SD was 34 ± 11 years, 6 out of 9 patients (67%) were women. Mean elevations of NfL by 19,9 pg/ml (95% CI: -120.3 to 160.0) and GFAP by 445.8 pg/ml (95% CI: -1279.6 to 2171.4), there was no significant change in NfL (p = 0.213) or GFAP (p = 0.362) levels after ECT. Figure 1 shows concentrations of both NfL and GFAP pre and post ECT.

Image:

Conclusions

This study found no significant changes of NfL or GFAP levels in CSF after an ECT series, suggesting no evidence of neuroaxonal damage or brain damage through astrocyte activation related to ECT. However, the small sample size may have obscured potential effects. Future research with larger sample sizes is therefore essential.

Disclosure of Interest

S. Riessland Grant / Research support from: This study was sponsored by the Austrian Science Fund (project number KLI 1098, principal investigator P. Baldinger-Melich) and the 2021 NARSAD Young Investigator grant (grant number 29950, principal investigator P. Baldinger-Melich). S. Rießland is partially funded by the Austrian Science fund and the NARSAD Young Investigator Grant., M. Ponleitner: None Declared, V. Millischer: None Declared, S. Macher: None Declared, R. Lanzenberger: None Declared, P. Rommer: None Declared, R. Frey: None Declared, D. Rujescu: None Declared, P. Baldinger-Melich Grant / Research support from: This study was sponsored by the Austrian Science Fund (project number KLI 1098, principal investigator P. Baldinger-Melich) and the 2021 NARSAD Young Investigator grant (grant number 29950, principal investigator P. Baldinger-Melich). The other authors have no conflict of interest related to this study to declare.

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.