Background: In generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), there remains an unmet need for treatments providing meaningful symptom control. Methods: Mean changes in MG-ADL were compared between nipocalimab + standard-of-care (SoC) and placebo+SoC. The proportion of patients achieving: Minimal Symptom Expression (MSE), MG-ADL score 0/1, time with MSE, sustained within person meaningful change (WPMC) starting from Week 4, and time spent with WPMC were compared. Results: Nipocalimab+SoC demonstrated significant improvement in MG-ADL compared to placebo+SOC, LS-mean-change[SE] -4.7[0.329] vs -3.25[0.335]; Difference in means[SE]=-1.45 [0.470], p=0.002. The mean difference favoured nipocalimab+SoC, and was significant as early as week 1: LS-mean-change[SE]: -2.72[2.979] vs -1.77[2.426]; Difference in means[SE] -0.82[0.410], p=0.046. Nipocalimab+SoC patients were three times more likely to achieve MSE at any point during the study vs placebo; Odds Ratio[95% CI]: 3.0[1.3, 6.8]; 31.2% vs. 13.2%. For the 25 patients reaching MSE, the time sustaining MSE [percent time with MSE] was 101.5 days, (60.4%, nipocalimab+SOC) vs 55 days, (32.7%, placebo+SOC). Similarly, the proportion of patients with sustained WPMC favored nipocalimab+SOC, 55.8% vs 26.3%, placebo+SOC, p<0.001. The median percent time spent with WPMC was 84.5%, nipocalimab+SOC vs 39.9%, placebo+SOC, p=0.007. Conclusions: Based on MG-ADL data from Phase 3, nipocalimab an FcRn blocker, demonstrated rapid, substantial, and sustained symptom control.