Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T06:31:55.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Culicidae of Sardinia and Corsica (Diptera)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Thomas H. G. Aitken
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Field observations on the Culicidae of Sardinia and Corsica were undertaken in 1944, during the period 1946 to 1950, and again in 1952. A total of 52 species are recorded as being present, 46 of which are known from Corsica and 35 (exclusive of Dixinae) from Sardinia. The faunal list of the latter island has been increased by 20 new records and that of Corsica by three. The total number of species by genus is as follows: Dixa (7), Chaoborus (3), Anopheles (12), Uranotaenia (1), Culiseta (6), Orthopodomyia (1), Taeniorhynchus (2), Aëdes (12), and Culex (8).

The previously unknown male of Taeniorhynchus buxtoni Edwards is described from Sardinian material. Culiseta litorea (Shute), heretofore known only from England, was found in two localities in Sardinia. Aëdes vittatus (Bigot) was rediscovered in Corsica, 83 years after its original description.

Keys are given to subfamilies, genera and species. Critical notes on species differentiation are included and biological characteristics briefly discussed.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , September 1954 , pp. 437 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Apfelbeck, V. (1929). Neue Culiciden aus Bosnien und Dalmatien.—Konowia, 8, pp. 286–292.Google Scholar
Baranoff, N. (1927). Eine neue Aëdes-Art aus Süd-Serbien (Dipt., Culic.).—N. Beitr. syst. Insektenk., 4, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
Barraud, P. J. (1924). A new mosquito from Kashmir and the North-West Frontier Province.—Indian J. med. Res., 12, pp. 73–74.Google Scholar
Barraud, P. J. (1934). The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Diptera. Vol. V. Family Culicidae. Tribes Megarhinini and Culicini.—xxviii + 463 pp., 8 pls., 106 figs., 1 fldg. map. London, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bates, M. (1939). Variation in the antepalmate hairs of larvae of the Anopheles maculipennis complex.—Riv. Malariol., 18, pp. 299–312.Google Scholar
Bates, M. (1941). Field studies of the Anopheline mosquitoes of Albania.—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash., 43, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar
Belkin, J. N. (1950). A revised nomenclature for the chaetotaxy of the mosquito larva (Diptera: Culicidae).—Amer. Midl. Nat., 44, pp. 678–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belkin, J. N. (1952). The homology of the chaetotaxy of immature mosquitoes and a revised nomenclature for the chaetotaxy of the pupa (Diptera, Culicidae).—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash., 54, pp. 115–130.Google Scholar
Bigot, M. J. (1861). Trois diptères nouveaux de la Corse.—Ann. Soc. ent. Fr., (4) 1, pp. 227–229.Google Scholar
Brumpt, E. (1925). Les anophèles de Corse.—Bull. Acad. Méd., Paris, (3) 94, pp. 811–815.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1924). Applied entomology of Palestine, being a report to the Palestine government.—Bull. ent. Res., 14, pp. 289–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callot, J. (1944). Sur un nouveau moustique arboricole: Aëdes (Finlaya) heracleensis sp. nov.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot., 37, pp. 56–59.Google Scholar
Callot, J. (1945 a). A propos de Aëdes (Finlaya) heracleensis Callot 1944.—Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 20, pp. 93–94.Google Scholar
Callot, J. (1945 b). Diptères nématocères piqueurs d'Auvergne.—Rev. Sci. nat. Auvergne (N.S.), 11, fasc. 1–2, pp. 28–36.Google Scholar
Cambournac, F. J. (1938). Aëdes (Ochlerotatus) longitubus, a new species from Portugal. (Diptera, Culicidae).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., (B) 7, pp. 74–80.Google Scholar
Catanei, A. (1925). Anophèles de hautes régions de la Corse. Presence d'A. bifurcatus L. et d'A. plumbeus H. et S. dans l'île.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot., 18, pp. 655–657.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R. (1933). The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Diptera. Vol. IV. Family Culicidae. Tribe Anophelini.—xi + 371 pp., 3 pls., 53 figs. London, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Clavero, G. (1946). Aedinos de España.—Rev. Sanid. Hig. públ., Madr., 20, repr. 28 pp., 39 pls.Google Scholar
Del Vecchio, G. (1939). Sulle varietà di A. claviger (bifurcatus). Nota I.—Riv. Parassit., 3, pp. 27–37.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1920 a). The British Chaoborinae and Dixinae (Diptera, Culicidae).—Ent. mon. Mag., 56, pp. 264–270.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1920 b). Mosquito notes.—Bull. ent. Res., 10, pp. 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1921). A revision of the mosquitos of the palaearctic region.—Bull. ent. Res., 12, pp. 236–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1926). Una revisione delle zanzare delle regioni paleartiche.—Riv. Malariol., 5, pp. 253–285, 392–466, 613–652.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1928). The nematocerous Diptera of Corsica.—Encycl. ent. (B) II, Diptera, 4, pp. 157–189. Paris, Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1930). The British species of Chaoborus and Mochlonyx (Diptera, Culicidae).—Ent. mon. Mag., 66, pp. 163–165.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1932). Diptera. Fam. Cullicidae.—Genera Insect., 194, 258 pp., 5 pls. Brussels: Wytsman.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1941). Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian region. III. Culicine adults and pupae.—viii + 499 pp., 4 pls., 184 figs. London, Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
Ficalbi, E. (1889). Notizie preventive sulle zanzare italiane. VIa nota preventiva. Quistioni zoologiche intorno al Culex pipiens e descrizione di una specie nuova (Culex phytophagus).—Bull. Soc. ent. ital., 21, pp. 124–131.Google Scholar
Ficalbi, E. (1890). Notizie preventive sulle zanzare italiane. VIIa nota preventiva. Descrizione di una specie nuova. Zanzara impudica, Culex impudicus, sp. n.—Bull. Soc. ent. ital., 22, pp. 81–84.Google Scholar
Ficalbi, E. (1896). Notizie sulle zanzare italiane. IXa nota. Descrizione di una specie nuova. Zanzara delle saline, Culex salinus, sp. n.—Bull. Soc. ent. ital., 28, pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
Ficalbi, E. (1899). Venti specie di zanzare (Culicidae) italiane, classate e descritte e indicate secondo la loro distribuzione corologica.—Bull. Soc. ent. ital., 31, pp. 46–234.Google Scholar
Galliard, H. (1927 a). Note sur les culicinés de Corse.—Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 5, pp. 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galliard, H. (1927 b). Note sur les larves de Culex hortensis Ficalbi et Culex apicalis Adams.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot., 20, pp. 609–613.Google Scholar
Galliard, H. (1928). Quelques culicidés nouveaux pour la Corse en particulier Culex impudicus Ficalbi.—Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 6, pp. 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galliard, H. (1931). Culex brumpti, n. sp. moustique nouveau trouvé en Corse.—Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 9, pp. 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galliard, H. & Sautet, J. (1934 a). Note préliminaire sur les races d'Anopheles maculipennis de Corse.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot., 27, pp. 30–34.Google Scholar
Galliard, H. & Sautet, J. (1934b). Anopheles sacharovi Favr (elutus Edw.) et A. maculipennis var. labranchiae dans leurs rapports avec le paludisme en Corse.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot., 27, pp. 855–857.Google Scholar
Galliard, H. & Sautet, J. (1935). Nouvelle contribution à l'étude de l'anophélisme en Corse. Les variations saisonnières de l'indice maxillaire.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot., 28, pp. 453–456.Google Scholar
Gil Collado, J. (1930). Datos actuales sobre la distribución geográfica de los culícidos españoles.—Eos, 6, pp. 329–347.Google Scholar
Hackett, L. W. & Missiroli, A. (1935). The varieties of Anopheles maculipennis and their relation to the distribution of malaria in Europe.—Riv. Malariol., 14, pp. 45–109.Google Scholar
Hadjinicolaou, J. (1938). Observations of Anopheles marteri S. & P. (Diptera, Culicidae).—Riv. Malariol., 17, pp. 44–50.Google Scholar
Hopkins, G. H. E. (1936). Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian region. I. Larval bionomics of mosquitoes and taxonomy of culicine larvae.—250 pp., 158 figs. London, Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
Jaujou, C., Camain, R. & Adam, J. P. (1950). Plan de mise en valeur de la Corse. Rapport sur l'activité du service antipaludique en 1949.—75 pp. Ajaccio, Impr. Siciliano.Google Scholar
Jaujou, C., Michel, L. & Hamon, J. (1951). Plan de mise en valeur de la Corse. Rapport sur l'activité du service antipaludique en 1950.—63 pp. Paris, Alépée et Cie.Google Scholar
La Face, L. (1929). Morfologia delle larve anofeliche e descrizione delle specie italiane.—Riv. Malariol., 8, pp. 538–568.Google Scholar
Langeron, M. (1925). Présence en Corse de l'Aëdes (Stegomyia) argenteus (Poiret 1787).—Bull. Soc. Path. exot., 18, pp. 723–725.Google Scholar
Langeron, M. & Galliard, H. (1933). Deux types de larves d'Anopheles nouveaux pour la Corse.—Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 11, pp. 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laven, H. (1950). Der Schuppenindex als Unterscheidungsmerkmal der Arten in der Anopheles maculipennis-Gruppe.—Z. Tropenmed., 2, pp. 111–124.Google Scholar
Laveran, A. (1900). Paludisme et moustiques; quelques faits recueillis dans le midi de France et en Corse.—C. R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 52, pp. 987–989.Google Scholar
Logan, J. A. & others (1953). The Sardinian project: an experiment in the eradication of an indigenous malarious vector.—Amer. J. Hyg. Monogr. Ser., no. 20, xxix + 415 pp., frontis., 56 pls., 37 figs., 1 map. Baltimore, Md., Johns Hopkins Pr.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. F. (1938). The British mosquitoes.—xi + 341 pp., 20 pls., 172 figs. London, Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
Marshall, J. F. & Staley, J. (1933). Theobaldia (Culicella) litorea (Shute) n. sp. (Diptera, Culicidae).—Parasitology, 25, pp. 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, P. F. & others (1951). The Culex pipiens complex.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 102, pp. 331–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medschid, P. F. (1928). Über Aëdes lepidonotus Edw. und Aëdes refiki n. sp.—Arch. Schiffs-u. Tropenhyg., 32, pp. 306–315.Google Scholar
Missiroli, A. (1927). La prevenzione della malaria nel campo pratico.—Riv. Malariol., 6, pp. 501–572.Google Scholar
Missiroli, A. (1944). La malaria nel 1944 e misure profilattiche previste peril 1945.—R. C. Ist. sup. Sanit., 7, pp. 616–641.Google Scholar
Montchadsky, H. S. [Monchadskiî, A. S.] (1926). Larva of Aëdes (Ochlerotatus) pulchritarsis Rond. var. stegomyina, Stack. & Montch. nov., from Turkestan.—Bull. ent. Res., 17, pp. 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peus, F. (1934 a). Über einige bisher nicht oder wenig bekannte Dixa-Arten der palaearktischen Fauna (Diptera: Nematocera).—Arb. morph. taxon. Ent. Berl., 1, pp. 195–204.Google Scholar
Peus, F. (1934 b). Zur Kenntnis der Larven und Puppen der Chaoborinae (Corethrinae auct.). (Morphologie, Ökologie, Entwicklungsbiologie).—Arch. Hydrobiol., 27, pp. 641–668.Google Scholar
Roman, E. (1939). Moustiques arboricoles de la région lyonnaise. La larve et la nymphe d'Aedes pulchritarsis.—J. Méd. Lyon, 20, pp. 153–160.Google Scholar
Roman, E. (1940). Sur quelques moustiques rares de la région lyonnaise (Dipt. Culicidae).—Bull. Soc. ent. Fr., 45, pp. 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SÉguy, E. (1921). Description d'un nouveau moustique français du groupe de l'Aedes mariae et synopsis des espèces de ce groupe.—Bull. Soc. ent. Fr., 26, pp. 192–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Séguy, E. (1923 a). Remarques sur quelques moustiques.—Ann. Soc. ent. Fr., 92, pp. 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Séguy, E. (1923 b). Histoire naturelle des moustiques de France. Encycl. prat. Nat., 14, ii + 225 pp., 201 figs. Paris, Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. (1924). Les moustiques de l'Afrique mineure, de l'Egypte et de la Syrie.—Encycl. Ent., (A) 1, 257 pp., 29 pls., 106 figs., 10 maps. Paris, Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. (1925). Notes sur les moustiques de l'Afrique mineure, de l'Egypte et de la Syrie. I.—Encycl. Ent., (B) II, Diptera, 2, pp. 13–21. Paris, Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. (1927). Notes sur les moustiques de l'Afrique mineure, de l'Egypte et de la Syrie. II.—Op. cit., 4, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. (1930 a). Notes sur les moustiques. III.—Op. cit., 5, pp. 177–178.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. (1930 b). Contribution à l'étude des diptères du Maroc.—Mém. Soc. Sci. nat. Maroc, 24, 206 pp.Google Scholar
Senevet, G. (1935). Les Anophèles de la France et de ses colonies. 1re partie. France, Corse, Afrique, Madagascar, La Réunion.—Encycl. Ent., (A) 19, 361 pp., 144 figs. Paris, Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Senevet, G. (1947). La genre Culex en Afrique du nord. I. Les larves.—Arch. Inst. Pasteur Algér., 25, pp. 107–136.Google Scholar
Senevet, G. (1949). Le genre Culex en Afrique du nord. II. Les armures génitales mâles.—Arch. Inst. Pasteur Algér., 27, pp. 48–65.Google Scholar
Senevet, G. & Trensz, A. (1932). A propos de l'Aëdes mariae (Sergent, 1903).—Bull. Soc. Path. exot., 25, pp. 702–709.Google Scholar
Shakhov, S. (1928). Anopheles plumbeus Hal. in Ukraine.—Rev. Microbiol., Saratov, 7, pp. 23–34. [In Russian with English summary, p. 137.]Google Scholar
Shute, P. G. (1928). A new variety of Culicella morsitans (Theobald) (Diptera).—Entomologist, 61, p. 186.Google Scholar
Spanedda, A. (1940). Tipi di anophelini esistenti in provincia di Cagliari.—Rass. med. Sarda, 42, no. 4, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Theobald, F.V. (1903). A monograph of the Culicidae or mosquitoes, 3, p. 252. London, Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
Theodor, O. (1925). Observations on Palestinian Anopheles.—Bull. ent. Res., 15, pp. 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres Cañamares, F. (1945). Contribución al conocimento del Anopheles claviger Mg. de España. (Dip. Cul.).—Eos, 20, pp. 233–245.Google Scholar
Torres Cañamares, F. (1951). Una nueva especie de Aedes (Dipt. Cul.).—Eos, 27, pp. 79–92.Google Scholar
Toumanoff, C. & Rageau, J. (1949). Rapport sur l'enquête malariologique effectuée en Corse (15 october–15 november 1947).—Rec. Inst. nat. Hyg., 3, vol. 3 pp. 1029–1094.Google Scholar
Ungureanu, E. & Shute, P. G. (1947). The value of the wing scales as an aid to the taxonomy of adult Anopheles maculipennis.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., (B) 16, pp. 79–85.Google Scholar
Van Thiel, P. H. (1941). The identification of the pupae of Anopheles superpictus, Anopheles bifurcatus and of the different biotypes of Anopheles maculipennis.—Acta leidensia, 15–16, pp. 283–288.Google Scholar
Vogel, R. (1929). Aëdes pulchritarsis Rondani (Culicidae) ein Baumhöhlenbrüter.—Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 21, pp. 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar