Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T06:38:06.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The inheritance of life-cycle differences in Myzus persicae (Sulz.) (Hem., Aphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. L. Blackman
R. L. Blackman
Affiliation:
Imperial College Field Station, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The response to short photoperiod (10 h) of the F1 and F2 sexual generations of Myzus persicae (Sulz.) resulting from a cross between oviparae from a holocyclic clone and males from an androcyclic clone were examined and compared in experiments done at Imperial College Field Station, England. F1 and F2 progeny segregated into three distinct phenotypes; holocyclic, androcyclic and intermediate. Intermediate clones reared at 10 h photoperiod produced alatae which were physiologically intermediate between gynoparae and virginoparae, because their progeny consisted of oviparae, apterous virginoparae and intermorphs. Intermediacy was not affected by temperature and seems to be genetically determined. Segregation ratios in the F1 and F2 indicate that the androcyclic condition is induced by a recessive ‘ switch-gene ’ which completely suppresses the production of sexual females, and partially suppresses male production. This gene could be present in the heterozygous condition in a large proportion of parthenogenetic lines of the aphid, and thus confer a latent potentiality for anholocycly on populations even where conditions will not regularly permit this method of overwintering. Conversely where anholocycly is strongly favoured many aphids would be homozygous for the recessive, androcyclic character, but the potential for gamic reproduction could remain widespread.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , November 1972 , pp. 281 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blackman, R. L. (1971). Variation in the photoperiodic response within natural populations of Myzus persicae (Sulz.).—Bu11. ent. Res. 60, 533–546.Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, F. S.& Swirski, E. (1957). The Aphidoidea of the Middle East.—378 pp. Jerusalem, Weizmann Science Press.Google Scholar
Bonnemaison, L. (1950). Influence de l'alimentation et de la lumiére sur Ia reproduction sexuée du Myzus persicae (Hem. Aphidinae).—C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris 230, 136–137.Google Scholar
Bonnemaison, L. (1951). Contribution a l'étude des facteurs provoquant l'apparition des formes ailées et sexuées chez les Aphidinae.—Annls Épiphyt. 2, 1–380.Google Scholar
Cocinerri, G. (1961). Endomeiosis in parthenogenetic lines of aphids.—Experientia 17, 168–169.Google Scholar
Costa, C. L. (1970). Variaçües sazonais da migracáo de Myzus persicae em Campinas nos anos de 1967 a 1969.—Bragantia 29, 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. (1971). The ‘interval timer’ and photoperiod in the determination parthenogenetic and sexual morphs in the aphid Drepanosiphurm platanoides.—J. Insect Physiol. 17, 251–260.Google Scholar
Espul, J. C.& Mansur, P. S. (1968). Reproducción sexual del‘pulgón verde del duraznero’ Myzus persicae (Sulz.) en Mendoza (Argentina).—Revta Invest. agropec., B. Aires 5, 63–71.Google Scholar
Ford, E. B. (1964). Ecological genetics. —335 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1960). The role of photoperiod and temperature in the determination of partheno genetic and sexual forms in the aphid Megoura viciae Buckton.—II The operation of the ‘interval timer’ in young clones.—J. Insect Physiol. 4, 154–175.Google Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1963). The role of photoperiod and temperature in the determination of parthenogenetic and sexual forms in the aphid Megoura viciae Buckton.—III Further properties of the maternal switching mechanism in apterous aphids.—J. Insect Physiol. 9, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1966). The control of polymorphism in aphids. In Beament, J. W. L., Treherne, J. E., Wigglesworth, V. B.Eds. Advances in insect physiology 3, 207–277. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mordvilko, A. (1924). Aphids with incomplete cycles of generations and their origin.—C. r. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. (Sér. A) 1924, 50–53.Google Scholar
Mordvilko, A. (1935). Die Blattläuse mit unvollstandigem Generationszyldus und ihre Entstehung.—Ergebn. Fortschr. Zool 8, 36–328.Google Scholar
Müller, F. P.(1954). Holozyklie und Anholozyklie bei der grünen Pfirsichblattlaus, Myzodes persicae (Sulz.).—Z. angew. Ent. 36, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, F. P.(1958). Bionomische Rassen der grünen Pfirsichblattlaus, Myzus persicae (Sulz.).—Arch. Freunde NatGesch. Mecklenb. 4, 200–232.Google Scholar
Müller, F. P. (1971). Vorläufige Ergebnisse nach Iangjähriger zwangsweiser parthenogenetischer Dauerzuchthaltimg von Aphiden (Homoptera: Aphididae).—Beitr. Ent. 21, 165–178.Google Scholar
Pagliai, A.-M. (1965). A new category of females in the life-cycle of Brevicoryne brassicae L.: the ambiphasic females.—Experientia 21, 283–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöll, S. E. & Daiber, C. C. (1958). Notes on the occurrence of holocyclic overwintering of the green peach aphid in South Africa.—J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 21, 315–322.Google Scholar
Waldhaijer, W. (1953). Über Rassendifferenzierung im Formenkreis der grünen Pfirsich blattlaus (Myzodes persicae Sulz.).—NachrBl. dt. PflSchutzdienst, Ben. 7, 95–99.Google Scholar
Waldhauer, W. (1957). Untersuchungen an Kionen der grünen Pfirsichblattlaus Myzodes persicae (SuIz.) zur Frage ihrer virginogenen Überwinterung. (Inaug. Diss.).— 115 pp. Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms-Universität.Google Scholar
Zimmerman-Gries, S. & Swrasiu, E. (1956). La diffusione degli afidi sulle patate in Israele.—Boll. Lab. Zool. gen. agr. Portici 33, 303–311.Google Scholar