Aims: This study aims to design and implement a digital health promotion intervention aimed at reducing mental health inequalities among low-income, urban youth in North West England. The intervention is grounded in the hypothesis that a combined approach – incorporating peer mentorship, digital technology, and community-driven initiatives – will enhance mental health awareness, reduce stigma, and increase engagement with mental health services in this vulnerable population.

Methods: The intervention consists of three key components: (1) Training 50 peer mentors to deliver mental health workshops in local schools, (2) Developing a culturally relevant digital mental health app that offers self-help tools and anonymous counselling, and (3) Hosting five community-based mental health awareness events to engage families and local leaders. The intervention is evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. A sample of 500 students will complete pre- and post-intervention surveys to assess changes in mental health literacy, stigma, and help-seeking behaviours. Focus groups will capture qualitative insights into participant experiences, while app analytics will track usage patterns, such as downloads, active users, and interaction with features. School attendance records will also be reviewed to assess the potential impact on student well-being. The evaluation will provide both quantitative and qualitative data to determine the intervention’s effectiveness and acceptability.

Results: The intervention is expected to significantly increase mental health awareness and literacy, with an anticipated 20% reduction in self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. The app is projected to achieve 1,000 downloads and 300 active users within the first 18 months of implementation. The peer mentorship programme is expected to foster a supportive environment in schools, helping to reduce mental health stigma and encouraging students to engage with available services. Additionally, the community-based events are predicted to engage over 300 young people and their families, further reducing stigma and promoting open conversations about mental health.

Conclusion: This intervention has the potential to significantly improve mental health outcomes for low-income, urban youth by addressing both systemic and individual barriers. The predicted results suggest that the model is feasible, scalable, and adaptable to similar socio-economic contexts. The next steps involve expanding the intervention to additional regions, enhancing collaboration with key stakeholders, and refining the digital components of the intervention based on user feedback. Acceptance of this study at this conference would offer an opportunity to share insights into community-driven approaches to tackling mental health inequalities and enhancing access to mental health resources.

Aims: The increasing recognition of neurodivergent conditions within healthcare frameworks highlights the necessity for better understanding and management in neuropsychiatric settings. These conditions often overlap with complex neuropsychiatric diagnoses, complicating both diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and co-occurrence of neurodivergent conditions and traits among patients with neuropsychiatric conditions.

Methods: A descriptive, quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary regional neuropsychiatric outpatient clinic in London. Participants included 166 consecutive patients, assessed using the Comprehensive Autistic Trait Inventory (CATI) and the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1), with demographic characteristics considered.

Results: The study identified significantly higher rates of ASD and ADHD traits among patients with various neuropsychiatric conditions, particularly in those diagnosed with Functional Neurological Disorder (FND). Statistical analyses reinforced the heightened prevalence of these traits compared with general population estimates.

Conclusion: The findings indicate a higher-than-expected prevalence of neurodivergent conditions in patients with Functional Neurological Disorder. Enhanced early identification and tailored treatment approaches are crucial for improving clinical outcomes and patient experiences in neuropsychiatric settings.

Aims: Non-invasive brain stimulation (“neuromodulation”) techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), are used to modulate brain excitability and connectivity. TMS is approved for treating depression in the United Kingdom and preliminary evidence suggests that combining TMS and TES may enhance therapeutic effects. While neuromodulation is generally well-tolerated in research settings, its acceptability among the broader patient population remains unclear due to limited exposure, awareness, and information accessibility. Understanding prospective acceptability, defined as the perceived appropriateness of an intervention before its application, is crucial for improving treatment uptake and addressing concerns about safety and feasibility. We aimed to co-produce a survey with lived experience experts to assess the acceptability of individual and combined neuromodulation techniques among potential service users.

Methods: The study was co-developed with our Neuromodulation Experts-by-experience Advisory patient and public involvement (PPI) group. We underwent three rounds of iterative feedback to refine the survey focus, structure, and questions. A scoping review of existing literature on prospective acceptability of neuromodulation techniques informed the content, alongside the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Given the novelty of combined (TMS+TES) neuromodulation, no prior informational materials exist. PPI members advised it was critical to produce accompanying videos and leaflets to briefly illustrate the different neuromodulation techniques. The video scripts and leaflet content were produced in collaboration with three PPI members who tried the neuromodulation techniques, to avoid rehearsed scripts and ensure honest reviews of the techniques.

Results: The final survey version was adapted to maximise clarity of questions, engagement, and completion rates. The survey incorporated questions on awareness, perceived effectiveness, ethical considerations, and practical burden of different neuromodulation techniques. Online and paper versions of the survey were created to ensure accessibility. We successfully produced three information videos within 90-second target duration featuring PPI members and lead researchers. We developed a supplementary infographic leaflet for enhanced comprehension and accessibility.

Conclusion: Engaging stakeholders through PPI was instrumental in developing the survey to ensure accessibility and relevance for diverse participants with lived experience of mental health conditions. End-user involvement in the design process improved survey comprehensibility, highlighting the importance of co-production in developing effective research tools. Findings from this survey will provide insights into the acceptability of novel neuromodulation techniques, ultimately informing future clinical implementation and patient-centred research strategies.

Aims: This study aimed to review prior research on tabletop role-playing games (TTRPG) as a therapeutic tool for neurodiverse individuals and identify gaps in the field to direct future research.

Methods: A comprehensive systematic review of available literature on the use of TTRPGs in the neurodiverse population was completed, with no limitations to publication language or date. This was completed using appropriate medical subject headings (MeSH terms) and ProQuest to search 21 electronic data bases. Papers were superficially reviewed using the title and abstract to determine if they met the inclusion criteria and relevant articles were reviewed in full.

Results: The systematic search resulted in the identification of 5 relevant articles, containing a combination of peer-reviewed journal articles (n=3), and dissertations/theses (n=2). The majority of papers (n=3) were published in the western world, with others coming from Japan (n=1) and Brazil (n = 1).

Conclusion: Existing literature suggests that TTRPGs offer significant benefits for neurodiverse individuals, particularly in enhancing social skills, communication, and overall social functioning. Kato’s (2019) qualitative case study showed that TTRPGs improved social functioning, intentional communication, and cooperative decision-making in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Henning et al. (2024) echoed these findings, though they were not statistically significant. The benefits of TTRPGs were also demonstrated by Parks (2021), remarking that TTRPGs allow autistic young adults to practice social roles and skills at their own pace. Atherton et al. (2024) expanded this by showing that TTRPGs helped autistic adults form social connections in a safe, structured setting, promoting community and friendship. A shift in focus was seen in the study presented by Rubin-Budick (2022), which focused on the perspective of the therapist over the participants. This research gave an overriding consensus on the effectiveness of TTRPGs in improving emotional attunement and social engagement. Whilst the current body of research highlights these potential benefits, it is important to note that the studies conducted so far have been limited by small sample sizes and narrow participant demographics, with an overriding focus on ASD over other neurodiverse conditions.

Overall, available literature suggests that TTRPGs can enhance social development, communication, and emotional well-being in neurodiverse individuals. This review has also highlighted the need to explore the role of TTRPGs as a therapeutic tool in a wider range of neurodiverse conditions, with particular reference to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Aims: Virtual reality (VR) is becoming readily recognised as a transformative force in healthcare. In recent times there have been rising waiting lists, barriers to accessing care and a need to rapidly scale treatment provision for mental health conditions including depression, anxiety, anorexia, and phobias. As a result, the feasibility and design of current home-based VR mental health treatments has been evaluated to synthesise cohesive guiding principles for further development and implementation of Virtual Reality technologies.

Methods: A multi-method approach was employed, utilising both secondary data from literature reviews and primary data collection through semi-structured expert interviews and surveys to gain insights from all potential stakeholders. These were thematically coded through the COM-b behavioural model to produce a qualitative analysis uncovering key themes hindering and facilitating the adoption of VR technology. Survey data was subject to quantitative analysis to understand attitudes and guide our recommendations.

Results: Analysis of the results ascertained the key barriers and opportunities to provide improved VR mental health services for patients. The two main overarching themes found were: optimisation of the design of technology, and provision of a supportive deployment environment. Within design a significant theme was immersion; This allows simulated environments to replicate the benefits of in-vivo interventions. Presence, a subtheme, is key to supporting immersion and can be thought of as the suspension of disbelief in one’s surroundings, allowing for the mimicking of the effects of in vivo exposure. Personalisation and interaction also contributed to enhancing the design. For the higher theme of creating a supportive deployment environment, the main considerations were acknowledging inequalities regarding both technical barriers and financial challenges.

A patient centered framework was developed to support engagement and adoption of VR, using the COM-B model. The model shows the interaction between the capability to participate in an action, the opportunity, which is determined by external factors that allow behavioural change, and the motivation to implement these changes.

Conclusion: The evidence for VR’s therapeutic efficacy on home mental health is growing rapidly, however, translating evidence-based practices into the NHS can be a lengthy process. A theory driven framework of practical recommendations is vital for implementing VR interventions. Focus should be centred on holistic design and prioritization of facilitators, which address barriers under multiple domains to support patient and clinician confidence, and thus the successful adoption of VR.

Aims: Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) represents the earliest, reversible stage in Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) spectrum, marked by self-appraised cognitive deterioration, that escapes objective detection. The intricate fine-tuning of cognition by cerebellum has been substantiated by the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome and “Dysmetria of thought” theory. However, the role of cerebellum in SCD is understated in research. This study aims to determine the relationship between cerebellar neuroimaging parameters and cognition in patients with SCD.

Methods: Patients with SCD, with a Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0, were assessed on Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE). Multiparametric MRI (Volumetric analysis of cerebellum, Diffusion tensor imaging at Middle Cerebellar Peduncles (MCP), Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)) was carried out. Relationship between cognition and neuroimaging parameters was determined.

Results: A total of 28 SCD patients with a mean age of 70.89±3.89 years were included. There were significant positive correlations of attention with axial diffusivities (AxD) at bilateral MCP; fluency with right cerebellar white matter volumes (CWMV); visuospatial function with left CWMV and fractional anisotropy (FA); total ACE scores with total CWMV, bilateral AxD. Significant negative correlations of myoinositol/creatine (mI/Cr) with attention, fluency and memory were revealed on MRS. Linear regression analysis exhibited significant associations between total ACE scores and CWMV; attention and axial diffusivities; memory and right cerebellar volume; fluency and CWMV, Cerebellar cortical volumes; Visuo-spatial function and FA at left MCP.

Conclusion: The aforementioned significant relationships highlight the unique role of multiparametric neuroimaging in early detection of cerebellar ultrastructural alterations, and the modulatory impact of cerebellum in cognition during initial stages of AD continuum. Furthermore, longitudinal studies are warranted to predict long term cognitive outcomes in SCD using cerebellar neuroimaging parameters.

Aims: COVID-19 affected many countries globally, including the UK, to which the UK responded by placing lockdown measures throughout the country. This meant that many people were restricted in their everyday lives, including students. This study is used to understand the impact of these measures on sixth form students.

Methods: The Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale was sent to students in a sixth-form grammar school in September 2021 to assess students’ mental well-being. A semi-structured proforma was then also sent in May 2022 to compare students’ experiences and mental health before and after the lockdown measures.

Results: On the well-being scale, 47.1% of sixth-form students scored below 44 (average to low mental well-being), while 31% of the 1st year sixth-form students and 27% of the 2nd year sixth-form students scored 40 and below (lower than average mental well-being). In the semi-structured proforma, 73.90% of students (n=69) experienced quarantine since the pandemic started. 69.10% of them felt that the quarantines negatively impacted their mental health. In response to the question ‘In your own words, what was the most difficult thing that you experienced during the COVID pandemic?’ (n=55), 5 general themes were identified: Isolation, not socialising, loneliness, loss of teenage life/youth, and online learning.

Conclusion: The study showed that the mental well-being of sixth-form grammar school students in Cumbria was mostly negatively affected by the lockdown measures. The authors concluded that more accessible and approachable support should be provided to students in case of a similar event. More research is needed to understand the long-term impacts of such measures on students’ school and social lives.

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the literature for COVID-19 induced psychosis in a child and adolescent population.

Methods: This review included a comprehensive literature search across major databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. The inclusion criteria encompassed case reports, case series, longitudinal studies, and observational studies involving children or adolescents (under 18 years) who had a diagnosis of COVID-19 or a recent history of COVID-19 vaccination and presented with features of psychosis. Data extraction focused on key demographic information, such as age, gender, and past medical and psychiatric history. Additionally, details regarding COVID-19 treatment and the management of psychosis were recorded.

Results: Eight studies included patients with a history of COVID-19 infection or vaccination who subsequently presented with psychosis. Five were male (62.5%), and three were female (37.5%). COVID-19 infection was confirmed by PCR (50%), antibody tests (25%), positive viral swabs (12.5%), or positive lateral flow tests (12.5%). Most patients were managed conservatively for COVID-19 (50%), while others received steroids (37.5%) or antibiotics (12.5%). Antipsychotic medication was the primary treatment for psychosis in most cases (75%), with some patients also receiving lithium (12.5%), SSRIs (12.5%), or benzodiazepines (12.5%). Regarding prior psychiatric history, 62.5% of patients had no previous psychiatric diagnoses. However, 25% had a history of learning disabilities, and 12.5% had a history of depressive disorder and illicit drug use.

Conclusion: Neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19 in adolescents are less frequently reported compared with adults. Common presentations include insomnia, mood disorders, and, less commonly, psychosis. The precise mechanisms underlying these neuropsychiatric complications remain unclear, but they are hypothesized to be linked to an exaggerated immune response, including cytokine storms, triggered by the infection. This review highlights the need for further research and the development of specific management guidelines for these patients within this population.

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the attitudes of resident doctors toward the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical psychiatric practice. As AI technology continues to advance, its potential to support patient care is becoming increasingly significant, and understanding the perspectives of resident doctors provides crucial insights into how AI can be integrated effectively into psychiatric practice.

Methods: An anonymised online survey was sent to resident and speciality doctors of different grades to elicit their views on the use of AI in psychiatric practice. The survey consisted of Likert scale and multiple-choice questions relating to attitudes towards AI and perceived barriers to its clinical use. Participants were also invited to share their thoughts in a free-text question at the end of the survey.

Results: 41 resident doctors replied to the survey. 83% of responders had used AI personally, 78% of whom had used ChatGPT. There was clear consensus that AI could help with written tasks, with 85% of doctors reporting that they felt AI could help with summarising notes, and 78% indicating that it could support writing clinical letters. Only 34% of responders felt that AI could help with more complex generative tasks, such as guiding risk assessment, suggesting treatment options or interpreting investigation results.

There were evident barriers to the adoption of AI with lack of trust in the accuracy/reliability of the information produced (82%) and concerns about possible bias in the algorithms/data used by AI (84%). Legal (71%) and ethical concerns (67%) were also widely reported as barriers to its adoption.

Attitudes to using AI initially varied, with 29% of doctors reporting that they were “very unlikely” or “unlikely” to use AI in their clinical practice. After engaging with the concepts presented in the survey, attitudes demonstratably shifted with this figure dropping to 20%.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the diversity of opinion surrounding the use of AI among resident doctors in psychiatry. The majority of respondents agreed that AI would be of use in administrative tasks, but felt that the main barriers to its use included concerns about the accuracy of the generated information, and ethicolegal considerations, particularly related to information governance.

Aims: ADHD is commonly comorbid with depression and this comorbidity is associated with increased symptom severity and worse outcomes than either condition alone. Depression is highly heterogeneous and may present differently in populations with ADHD. This study aimed to explore different symptom presentations of depression and associated clinical correlates in a clinical ADHD sample.

Methods: We analysed data from the Study of ADHD Genes and Environment (SAGE). Parents completed semi-structured questionnaires about their child’s psychopathology at baseline (mean age 10.9 years) and the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire to capture their child’s depression symptoms approximately 5 years later (mean age = 14.6 years, N=249). Depression symptom presentations were derived by latent profile analysis.

Results: Analyses found three presentations of depression symptoms: a ‘low symptoms’ (48.5% of the sample) class, a ‘high symptoms’ class (15.5%) with consistently high depression symptoms, particularly for suicidality and poor self-esteem items, and an ‘irritable/poor sleep’ class (36.1%) with intermediate levels of depression symptoms and high scores for irritability and poor sleep. All three classes had elevated irritability and symptoms that overlap with ADHD. Behavioural problems were associated with an increased likelihood of being in the high symptoms compared with low symptoms class, and higher autism symptoms were associated with being in the intermediate ‘irritable/poor sleep’ compared with low class.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that while young people with ADHD often have elevated depression symptoms, there is notable heterogeneity. Young people with ADHD and behavioural disorders may be particularly at risk of more severe depression symptom presentations characterised by high suicidal cognitions, whilst those with ADHD and autistic traits may present with more irritability and poor sleep.

Aims: There was an exponential increase in the rates of deliberate self-harm (DSH) in Sri Lanka over the last two decades coinciding with the rise of social media. Werther effect is the phenomenon where sensationalised media reports on suicide/DSH leads to increased rates of DSH/suicide. Therefore, assessing the impact of social media on DSH and implementing media regulations are timely needs. The objectives of this study included assessing the extent of exposure and the severity of emotional disturbance incurred due to social media content depicting DSH/suicide and determining the association between exposure and emulating DSH behaviour they were exposed to.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in 2022, consisted of a sample of 162 individuals presenting with DSH to NHSL. A semi-structured clinical interview was used to collect data. Relevant statistical tests were used to analyse data.

Results: The average duration this study population spent on social media (1–3 hours) surpassed previous records for Sri Lankans (34 minutes). Fifty per cent were aged 20–29 years and 59.8% were female; a notable over-representation of minority religious and ethnic groups compared with general population demographics in Sri Lanka was seen. Out of 162 participants, 148 (91%) acknowledged being exposed to social media content depicting self-harm at some point. Facebook and YouTube were the top two platforms through which individuals were exposed to DSH/suicide content and the commonest methods published were hanging and overdose.

Although there was no statistically significant association between age and sharing self-harm content on social media, an overwhelming majority (87%) were <30 years of age. Approximately 30% of the sample reported experiencing severe emotional disturbance following exposure to DSH/suicide content.

Individuals who intentionally searched social media for DSH/suicide content consisted 11% of the sample and they were more likely to emulate similar behaviour than those who did not actively search such content. Spending 5 hours or more in a day on social media significantly increased several risks including the likelihood of being exposed to content depicting DSH/suicide, experiencing emotional disturbance and emulating the self-harm behaviours they were exposed to.

Conclusion: The notable ethnic and religious disparity seen in this sample suggests the need to examine healthcare accessibility, socioeconomic disparities, and tailored mental health literacy programmes. Prolonged social media exposure, particularly over 5 hours increases the risks of exposure and emulation significantly, warranting implementation of policies to reduce harmful content on social media and targeted interventions to promote healthy social media use among vulnerable populations.

Aims: Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Despite its efficacy, there are potential life-threatening side effects, including pericarditis, which has limited its usage. Clozapine-induced pericarditis may range from mild symptoms to life-threatening complications. Despite increasing case reports, a comprehensive synthesis is lacking, necessitating a systematic review.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Eight databases, including PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO, were searched, identifying case reports published between 1980 and 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on English-language case reports diagnosing clozapine-induced pericarditis. Exclusion criteria included non-clozapine-induced pericarditis and mixed aetiologies without clozapine-specific data. Data extraction included demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, management, and outcomes.

Results: Of the 941 identified articles, 36 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 33.56 years (SD: 15.56), with males comprising 63.9%. Chest pain (63.8%), fever (52.8%), breathlessness (50%), and tachycardia (44.4%) were the most common symptoms. Diagnostic tests consistently indicated elevated inflammatory markers, including CRP (mean: 88.13 mg/dL) and ESR (mean: 72.72 mm/hr). Echocardiograms confirmed pericardial effusion in 88.9% of cases. Management strategies included colchicine (16.7%) and analgesics (19.4%), with cardiac recovery achieved in all but one case. Clozapine rechallenge was attempted in 16.7%, with successful outcomes in 83.3% of these cases. Time to recovery averaged 3.73 weeks (SD: 9.8). Psychiatric stability was maintained in most cases following substitution with alternative antipsychotics, primarily olanzapine and risperidone.

Conclusion: Clozapine-induced pericarditis is a rare but significant adverse event characterized by elevated inflammatory markers and diagnostic imaging abnormalities. Prompt recognition and tailored management, including anti-inflammatory treatment and careful rechallenge, can lead to favourable cardiac and psychiatric outcomes. This review underscores the need for heightened clinician awareness and standardized protocols to optimize care for patients requiring clozapine therapy.

Aims: Huntington’s disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor dysfunction, cognitive decline, and psychiatric symptoms. Among the psychiatric manifestations, psychotic symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations remain underreported and poorly understood. This systematic review aims to analyse the prevalence, clinical presentation, assessment tools, and treatment approaches for psychosis in HD patients.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar) was conducted using multiple electronic databases to identify studies reporting psychotic symptoms in HD patients. Inclusion criteria involved case reports that provided detailed psychiatric presentations, genetic findings, and treatment interventions. Data extracted included patient demographics, genetic CAG repeat counts, psychiatric symptoms, assessment tools, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, side effects, and patient outcomes.

Results: A total of 53 case reports with 60 cases were included. The mean age of psychiatric symptom onset was 42.58 years, and the mean age at HD diagnosis was 38.09 years. The mean CAG repeat count was 44.71, and the mean age of onset of motor symptoms was 41.25 years. The review identified multiple cases of HD patients presenting with psychotic symptoms, including persecutory and grandiose delusions, auditory and visual hallucinations, and paranoia. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was used in 20% of cases. The most frequently used antipsychotics were risperidone (26.7%), olanzapine (23.3%), clozapine (16.7%), aripiprazole (16.7%), and haloperidol (13.3%). A family history of HD was present in 73.3% of patients. In 36.6% of cases, side effects were reported, including extrapyramidal side effects, orthostatic hypotension, neutropenia, and increased sedation. In 93.3% of cases, symptomatic improvement was reported, though some patients exhibited persistent cognitive dysfunction and residual psychotic features.

Conclusion: Psychotic symptoms in HD are a significant but understudied phenomenon, frequently complicating disease management. The findings highlight the need for standardized assessment protocols and tailored treatment approaches to mitigate psychiatric distress while balancing cognitive and motor function preservation. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to better understand the trajectory of psychosis in HD and optimize treatment strategies.

Aims: Psychiatric trainees are often the “first responders” to manage patients with personality disorders but receive little specific training in this. Transference Focused Psychotherapy (TFP) is a manualized evidence-based treatment for severe personality disorders based on a psychodynamic approach that focuses on object relations theory. There is an expanding experience in applying TFP in different psychiatric settings. While there is evidence of effective training of applied TFP in the UK, Europe, South Africa and India, TFP training in Malaysia is a relatively new concept.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a series of teaching sessions on TFP as applied to patients with personality disorders, on improving the attitude and technical confidence of psychiatric trainees in one of the major universities in Malaysia (UiTM), in their clinical encounters with patients with personality disorders.

Methods: A cohort of psychiatric trainees at UiTM received four 2-hour teaching sessions on applied TFP over consecutive weeks via video teleconference. Nineteen trainees completed 2 questionnaires, pre and post four teaching sessions. The cohort included first-year trainees (n=7) and senior trainees (n=12, comprising second, third and final-year psychiatry trainees). The questionnaires used were the Attitude to Personality Disorder Questionnaire (APDQ) and the Clinical Confidence with Personality Disorder Questionnaire (CCPDQ), both are validated instruments with good psychometric properties.

Results: The mean age of participants was 33.18 years, with an average of 2–8 years of experience in psychiatry. Quantitative analyses revealed significant improvements in both attitudes and clinical confidence. For the Attitudes to Personality Disorder Questionnaire (APDQ), the mean pre-intervention score was 71.11±9.87, while the post-intervention mean score was 65.05±10.79, representing a statistically significant reduction (t(18) = 4.11, p=0.00065). This finding indicates improved attitudes toward patients with personality disorders. Similarly, the Clinical Confidence with Personality Disorder Questionnaire (CCPDQ) showed a significant increase in confidence levels. The mean pre-intervention score was 16.11±6.38, which rose to 22.58±7.76 post-intervention (t(18) = −3.58, p=0.0021).

Conclusion: Teaching sessions on applied TFP to personality disorders can significantly improve psychiatric trainees’ attitudes and technical confidence in clinical encounters with patients with personality disorders. Given the low resource requirements (8 hours of training, delivered remotely), and the growing international experience of effective teaching of applied TFP training, it may be considered not only in Malaysia but in a range of countries.

Aims: To outline the development and implementation of the West Midlands Psychiatry Leadership Programme, a pioneering initiative believed to be unique within UK psychiatry training, and to evaluate participant feedback on its impact and benefits.

Methods: The programme, led by honorary leadership tutors who are higher psychiatry trainees, combines three online training days and a face-to-face conference. Conducted across 2024, it allowed participants time to reflect between sessions. Open to all psychiatry higher trainees in the West Midlands Deanery, invitations were sent via email. Feedback, collected via Microsoft Forms, evaluated its impact in preparing trainees for consultant roles through theory, practical application, self-awareness, and team leadership.

Day 1: Focused on leadership roles within the NHS, exploring operational structures, financial frameworks, emotional intelligence, and personal leadership styles.

Day 2: Addressed “Preparing to be a Consultant” with presentations, scenario analysis, and panel discussions on transitioning to consultancy.

Day 3: Explored “Leading in Teams and Organisations” through organisational change frameworks, team-building exercises, and QI project workshops.

Conference: Provided a platform for trainees to showcase achievements, network, and gain insights from external speakers.

Results: Quantitative and qualitative feedback was collected.

Day 1: Overall satisfaction of the day averaged a score of 4.5/5. 48% of attendees rated the content as “very good” and 52% rated it as “good”. Participants praised the interactive breakout rooms and emotional intelligence sessions, with suggestions for enhanced face-to-face elements.

Day 2: Overall satisfaction of the day averaged 4.63/5. More specifically, 77% of attendees were “very satisfied” with the content. The practical consultant preparation talks and scenario-based discussions were highly valued. Feedback emphasised the value of real-world insights.

Day 3: Overall satisfaction of the day averaged 4.52/5. More specifically, 79% of attendees rated the content as “very satisfied”. The engaging role-playing activities and QI workshops were key highlights. Suggestions from feedback included more examples of successful QI projects.

Conference: Overall satisfaction averaged 4.53/5, with 80% reporting that they were “very satisfied” with speakers. 61% stated expectations were met, while 39% said expectations were exceeded. Networking opportunities and personal leadership insights were praised. Suggestions from feedback included a broader range of topics and more external speakers.

Conclusion: The programme addresses a critical gap in psychiatry leadership training by blending theory with practice and fostering collaboration. High satisfaction and positive feedback highlight its success. The conference enhances its impact by showcasing achievements and fostering networking. Future iterations will refine content, broaden participation, and assess long-term outcomes.

Aims: The psychiatry residency programme in Qatar recently faced challenges with didactic activities, prompting the formation of an educational committee composed of trainees and supervisors. Their mission was to revamp the curriculum to meet competency-based standards and address accreditation concerns. A pivotal change was designating one uninterrupted day per week for education. This structured day now starts with a redesigned morning report focused on real-time discussions of overnight emergency cases, integrating various disciplines to broaden clinical insight. Following this, residents engage in newly established, two-hour resident-led sessions covering DSM–5 diagnoses, multiple-choice question (MCQ) practice, simulated learning, and psychiatric disorder management. Afterward, junior residents join Balint groups for reflective practice, while senior residents participate in psychotherapy supervision. Additional activities include case conferences, journal clubs, and workshops, culminating in didactic lectures led by senior clinicians.

Methods: To evaluate the impact of this revamped schedule, the committee conducted a cross-sectional, anonymized survey among all psychiatry residents. The survey contained six core questions, each rated on a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree), supplemented by a free-text section to gather qualitative feedback. Of the 30 residents invited to participate, 22 (73%) completed the survey. Quantitative data were then analysed to assess perceived benefits, identify challenges, and guide further adjustments.

Results: Results indicated that first- and second-year residents reported substantial gains from both the structured teaching and the opportunity to collaborate closely with peers. In contrast, third- and fourth-year residents suggested splitting certain sessions by training level to better match their advanced needs. Another noted concern was the level of faculty engagement, with respondents requesting increased direct supervision, more robust involvement in lectures and case discussions, and pre-assigned case presentations. Residents also expressed a desire for more frequent mock interviews and for simulated sessions in additional languages, targeting the diverse patient population seen in Qatar. Dedicated sessions for MCQ practice were requested to enhance board exam preparation.

Conclusion: Overall, these curricular changes have produced a more interactive and clinically relevant educational experience. However, the survey highlighted clear areas for improvement, particularly with regard to tailoring sessions to various training levels and expanding faculty participation. Further refinements will rely on continuous resident feedback, systematic assessment of learning outcomes, and enhanced faculty development. By maintaining an adaptive and trainee-centred approach, the programme aims to strengthen psychiatric education and foster the clinical competencies necessary for high-quality patient care.

Aims: The aim of this project was to gain a better understanding of clinical and professional areas that international medical graduates find difficult and often these areas can be a barrier in further career progression. This project was undertaken as part of the Leadership and Management Fellow Scheme organised by the Royal College of Psychiatrists. The idea was to align the learnings to broader goals at organisational level.

Methods: A survey questionnaire was created to gather information about the areas that international medical graduates struggle with in their professional career. In response to this a 'Resource Hub’ was created to provide concise information on clinically relevant topics and this was made available for all participants to access. Feedback was obtained about the utility of those resources and this was used to further broaden the 'Resource Hub'.

Results: The areas where people struggled to gain competence ranged from membership exams (22%) to research and development (35%), mental health legislations, and trust protocols (50%).

Following this a list of topics were brainstormed and relevant resources were added on the Trust Home page.

Feedback result for the resources was collated in terms of content (84%), precision (90%), relevance (86%), and overall effectiveness (85%). Other suggestions were taken into consideration for additional resource linking to promote communication skills, tribunal reports, and preparation for appraisal.

Conclusion: It was a valuable project which has helped to shed light on how to facilitate provision of clinically relevant resources that would help international medical graduates in their progress and overall attainment of career goals. The recommendations have been shared across the Trust with quality improvement and medical workforce race equality standards team.

Aims: Transcultural psychiatry is a critical field that examines the influence of cultural factors on mental health, illness, and treatment across diverse societies. It acknowledges that psychiatric symptoms and disorders can manifest distinctly based on cultural contexts, beliefs, and practices.

The Transcultural Psychiatry Workshop was held face to face at the Sheffield Health and Social Care Trust Grand Round in September 2024. The aim was to aid in implementing comprehensive training programmes, leverage workforce diversity, encourage culturally sensitive interventions, share helpful learning, enhance community engagement.

Methods: The workshop was 120 minutes and was attended by 104 doctors. The workshop included a specialist panel of experts from experience, carers and professionals, presentation regarding data regarding healthcare experience of ethnic minority groups in the area and case-based learning opportunity. Pre- and post-workshop surveys were administered to assess the effectiveness of the workshop and to inform future planning and educational strategies. They used a 5 point Likert scale for most questions.

Results: There were 75 responses received for the pre-workshop questionnaire and 48 for the post-workshop questionnaire. For the question how likely are you to effectively and consistently intervene when you observe discriminatory behaviours in others, there was an increase from 29.33% to 39.58% to be very likely. Regarding awareness of local policy those answering yes went from 28.00% to 97.92%. Whereas 26.67% of respondents felt their knowledge of transcultural psychiatry was below average and 4.00% felt it was far below average, after the workshop 0.00% rated in these two categories. The understanding of potential barriers for people from ethnic backgrounds when accessing healthcare increased in the above average category from 29.33% before to 66.67% after.

Conclusion: The feedback received from participants was predominantly positive and encouraging, reflecting the workshop’s effectiveness in meeting objectives.

Participants expressed particular interest in the diverse panel, including a representative from a third-sector organization, an expert by experience, a carer, a psychiatrist and chaplaincy, thereby enriching the workshop’s relevance and depth. These findings indicate that the workshop effectively enhanced understanding of transcultural issues and resources, underscoring the significance of educational initiatives in fostering cultural competence within healthcare settings.

Organise further education opportunities. Include greater lived experience and scenario discussions in next workshops. Cover topics like old age psychiatry, cultural backgrounds, correct cultural terminologies and expression of mental distress. Disseminate data regionally and nationally to raise awareness.

Aims: The overall aim of this project was to encourage mental health patients to participate in the general election. To raise awareness among staff about patient voting rights so they are better equipped to encourage patients to participate.

Methods: We conducted face-to-face interviews with all patients throughout the voting process from June to July 2024 on one of the wards.

– Created a page on the trust intranet with information about voting for staff.

– Created a leaflet that was available on the intranet for staff to print out and display.

– Made an educational video on the trust YouTube account and embedded it on the trust intranet.

– Conducted a staff survey after the election to assess knowledge and attitudes about mental health patient voting rights and to evaluate the effectiveness of our interventions.

Results: A survey was conducted and was open for 1 month until 18 October 2024. This was circulated to all staff via email distribution lists. We had 18 completed surveys.

– 44% of respondents were vaguely aware or not aware at all of patient voting rights.

– 39% were not confident about which mental health patients could vote in the general election.

– 67% of respondents did not see any of the voting resources.

– 83% were not confident in supporting patients at the general election.

– 88% of staff agreed that the trust should support patients to vote.

– 93% of staff thought it was important for the trust to promote voting rights of patients; however, 5% thought it was not important at all.

– Of all the patients on the ward (N=19), 7 (36.8%) were not interested in voting, 1 was not eligible and 57.9% were already registered.

– Of those registered, 5 (45.5%) made their own arrangements to vote and 2 were supported by the ward to vote (in person and by post).

– 36.4% (4) of patients who had registered to vote and had expressed interest in voting were not able to vote.

Conclusion: There is a need to increase awareness of voting rights among both staff and patients. Survey uptake was low, but from the data collected, most staff did not see any of our resources and most are not having conversations with patients about voting rights and the support available to exercise these rights

Aims: In collaboration with Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT) Clinical Teaching Academy piloted a novel Balint Group (BG) scheme for 4th-year medical students during their psychiatry placement. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time BGs have been accessible to 460 students in one year, and to every student attending psychiatry placement. Research shows that empathy declines in medical students as they progress through their career. However, BGs are known to improve student empathy and support the development of a clinical identity, yet no research has assessed whether through the process of Balint, students successfully gain skills in transference, emotional and cognitive learning, and case mirroring in group dynamics.

Methods: All 4th-year students participated in weekly BG sessions during their placement. Upon completing the 4 sessions, students filled out the Balint Group Questionnaire, which assesses three main learning principles: Reflection of Transference Dynamics in the Doctor-Patient Relationship, Emotional and Cognitive Learning, and Case Mirroring in the Group Dynamic. The questionnaire consisted of 15 questions, with a total score of up to 75. The results were analysed using SPSS.

Results: 210 students completed the survey. The mean score was 47.1/75. Scores were highest for the Mirroring domain (M=3.42, SD=1.05), followed by Transference (M=3.27, SD=1.04), and Emotional and Cognitive Learning (M=2.94, SD=1.15). A repeated measures ANOVA showed statistically significant differences between the domains. Transference (M=3.27) was rated higher than Emotional and Cognitive Learning (M=2.94), with a mean difference of 0.326 (p<0.001). Similarly, Mirroring (M=3.42) was rated higher than Transference (mean difference –0.152, p=0.022), and Mirroring was also rated significantly higher than Emotional and Cognitive Learning (mean difference –0.479, p <0.001).

Conclusion: Higher engagement in Mirroring suggests that BGs help students develop self-awareness and empathy by reflecting on emotional responses to cases, potentially improving patient care and clinical insight. Two more cohorts of students will participate in the study, and we expect similar results with a larger sample size. These findings support the positive role of BGs in medical education.