Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T15:13:49.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phytolithic analysis of geological sediments from Panama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Dolores Piperno
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The analysis of phytoliths, microscopic pieces of silica formed within the cells of living plants, is a recent addition to archaeobotanical studies in the New World (Carbone, 1977; Pearsall, 1978; Lewis, 1981; Robinson, 1983; Piperno, 1983, 1984, in press, a; Piperno & Clary, 1984). Because these mineralized bodies are very resistant to destruction in soils over long periods of time, they have enormous, and for the most part, untapped potential in ecological reconstruction. However, phytoliths are at the stage in their development as an analytical technique where much of the Easic research into the taxonomy of their bodies, their distribution in soils, and their application to various research problems remains to be resolved. Hence, as various authors have indicated (Pearsall, 1982 ; Rovner, 1983; Piperno, 1983), a considerable amount of baseline research remains to be carried out in order to properly delineate the strengths and limitations of phytolith analysis in paleo-ecological reconstruction

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 59 , Issue 225 , March 1985 , pp. 13 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bartlett, A. S. & Barghoorn, E. S. 1973 PhytOgeographic history of the Isthmus of Panama during the past 12,000 years (A history of vegetation, climate and sea-level change), in (ed.) Graham, A., Vegetation and vegetatitmal history of Sorthem Latin America (New York), 203—99.Google Scholar
Carbone, V. 1977. Phytoliths as palaeological indicators, Annals of the Sew York Academy of Science, 288, 194-205.Google Scholar
Caseldine, , C. J. 1981. Surface pollen studies across Bankhead Moss, Fife, Scotland, Journal of Ethnobiology, 8, 7-25.Google Scholar
Kfnover, L. A. 1929. General and successional ecology of the lowland tropical rain forest at Barro Colorado Island, Panama, Ecology, 10, 201-22.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. O. 1981. Use of opal phytoliths in palaeoenvironmental reconstructions, Journal of Ethnobiology, 1, 175—81.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, , C. R. 1960. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons I. Gramineae (London).Google Scholar
Pearsall, D. M. 1978. Phytolith analysis of archaeological soils: evidence of maize cultivation in Formative Ecuador, Science, 199, 177—8.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D. M. 1982. Phytolith analysis: applications of a new palaeo ethnobotanical technique in archaeology, American Anthropologist, 84, 862-71.Google Scholar
Piperno, D. R. 1983. The applications of phytolith analysts to the reconstruction of plant subsistence and environments in prehistoric Panama (Ph.D. dissertation, Temple University, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Piperno, D. R. 1984. A comparison and differentiation of phytoliths from maize and wild grasses: use of morphological criteria, ^American Antiquity, 49, 361-83.Google Scholar
In press, a. First report on the phytolith analysis of the Vegas Site OGSE -80, Ecuador, in (ed.) Stothart, K. E., The Vegas Culture: early prehistory of Southwestern Ecuador (Guayaquil).Google Scholar
In press, b. Phytolith analysis and tropical paleo-ecology. Production and taxonomic significance of siliceous forms in New World plant domesticates and wild species, Review of Paleobotany and Pal\-nology. Google Scholar
Piperno, D. R. & Husxjm-Clary, K. . In press. Early Plant Use And Cultivation In The Santa Maria Basin, Panama: Data From Phytoliths And Pollen, in (ed.) Lange, F., Recent advances in Isthmian archaeology (BAR Oxford).Google Scholar
Piperno, D. R., Husum-Clary, K., Cooke, R., Ranerf, A. J.. Weiland, D., Preceramic, N.D. maize from Central Panama: evidence from phytoliths and pollen, American. Xnthropologist. Google Scholar
Robinson, R. 1983. The Quaternary of Texas: the biosilica evidence (paper presented at the annual meeting of the AAAS, Detroit).Google Scholar
Rovner, I. 1983. Plant opal phytolith analysis: major advances in archaeo-botanical research, in (ed.) Schiffer, M., Advances in archaeological method and theory: (New York), 225-66.Google Scholar
Twiss, P. Suess, C, E. & Smith., R. M. 1969. Morphological classification of grass phytoliths, Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 33, 109—15.Google Scholar