Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T11:55:20.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - The Chew–Low–Salzman Method and Freda Friedman Salzman: A Physicist Between Nuclear and Social Interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2025

Patrick Charbonneau
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Margriet van der Heijden
Affiliation:
Eindhoven University of Technology
Daniela Monaldi
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

American physicist Freda Friedman Salzman (1927–1981) became an active feminist after her faculty position at the University of Massachusetts Boston was not renewed, under the university’s misogynistic anti-nepotism policy. Whereas her long-lasting struggle and eventual reappointment has already been expounded to some extent, her contributions to physics have not been given proper historical consideration. It is easier to learn about Friedman Salzman’s “weight of being a woman” – as she put it – than about her academic work. This chapter remedies that omission by shedding light on one of her key accomplishments. In 1956, Geoffrey Chew and Francis Low established the well-known Chew–Low model to put the understanding of nuclear interactions on a sounder theoretical basis. The model, however, leads to a daunting nonlinear integral equation. Friedman Salzman and her husband managed to solve the integral equation numerically. Stanley Mandelstam soon recognized the achievement of “Salzman and Salzman” (as he wrote) by naming their approach the “Chew–Low–Salzman method.”

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Women in the History of Quantum Physics
Beyond <i>Knabenphysik</i>
, pp. 384 - 401
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chen, Maggie. 2019. The glass ceiling of nepotism. Polycephalic Perceptions, September 6. https://polycephalicperceptions.home.blog/2019/09/06/the-glass-ceiling-of-nepotism/.Google Scholar
Chen, Maggie. 2020. Wives, physics, and nepotism in academia. Lady Science, August 18. https://www.ladyscience.com/essays/wives-physics-nepotism-academia-freda-salzman-2020.Google Scholar
Chew, Geoffrey F. 1953. Pion–nucleon scattering when the coupling is weak and extended. Physical Review, 89(3), 591593. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.89.591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, Geoffrey F. 1954a. One of Schwinger’s variational principles for scattering. Physical Review, 93(2), 341343. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.93.341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, Geoffrey F. 1954b. Renormalization of meson theory with a fixed extended source. Physical Review, 94(6), 17481754. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.94.1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, Geoffrey F. 1954c. Method of approximation for the meson–nucleon problem when the interaction is fixed and extended. Physical Review, 94(6), 17551759. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.94.1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, Geoffrey F. 1954d. Improved calculation of the p-wave pion–nucleon scattering phase shifts in the cut-off theory. Physical Review, 95(1), 285286. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, Geoffrey F. 1954e. Comparison of the cut-off meson theory with experiment. Physical Review, 95(6), 16691675. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, Geoffrey F. and Goldberger, Marvin L. 1949. On the analysis of nucleon–nucleon scattering experiments. Physical Review, 75(11), 16371644. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.75.1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, Geoffrey F. and Low, Francis E. 1956a. Effective-range approach to the low-energy p-wave pion–nucleon interaction. Physical Review, 101(5), 15701579. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.101.1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, Geoffrey F. and Low, Francis E. 1956b. Theory of photomeson production at low energies. Physical Review, 101(5), 15791587. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.101.1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, James T. 2005. Theory Construction and Selection in Modern Physics: The S Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darrigol, Olivier. 1988. The quantum electrodynamical analogy in early nuclear theory or the roots of Yukawa’s theory. Revue d’histoire des sciences, 41(3), 225297. https://doi.org/10.3406/rhs.1988.4098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammel, John L. 1954. Elastic scattering of pions by nucleons and pion production in nucleon–nucleon collisions. Physical Review, 95(1), 209216. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotański, Andrzej. 1963. Consistent formulation of the Chew–Low theory for meson–nucleon scattering. Acta Physica Polonica, XXIV(1), 7378.Google Scholar
Kragh, Helge. 2023. A terminological history of early elementary particle physics. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 77(1), 73120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-022-00299-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattes, Cesare M. G., Muirhead, Hugh, Occhialini, Giuseppe P. S., and Powell, Cecil F. 1947a. Processes involving charged mesons. Nature, 159(4047), 694697. https://doi.org/10.1038/159694a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattes, Cesare M. G., Occhialini, Giuseppe P. S., and Powell, Cecil F. 1947b. Observations on the tracks of slow mesons in photographic emulsions. Nature, 160(4066), 453456. https://doi.org/10.1038/160453a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Harry, Symanzik, Kurt, and Zimmermann, Wolfhart. 1955. Zur Formulierung quantisierter Feldtheorien. Il Nuovo Cimento (1955–1965), 1(1), 205225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02731765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, Francis E. 1955. Boson–fermion scattering in the Heisenberg representation. Physical Review, 97(5), 13921398. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.97.1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Donald M. 1982. Freda Salzman [Obituary]. Physics Today, 35(2), 8990. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2914950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelstam, Stanley. 1958. Determination of the pion–nucleon scattering amplitude from dispersion relations and unitarity. General Theory. Physical Review, 112(4), 13441360. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.112.1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashhoon, Bahram. 2001. In memoriam: Abraham Haskel Taub. SIAM News, 34(7). https://archive.siam.org/news/news.php?id=570Google Scholar
McMillan, Edwin M., Peterson, Jack M., and White, R. Stephen. 1949. Production of mesons by X-rays. Science, 110(2866), 579583. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.110.2866.579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherji, Viśvapriya. 1974. A history of the meson theory of nuclear forces from 1935 to 1952. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 13(1), 27102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, J. Robert and Phillips, Melba. 1935. Note on the transmutation function for deuterons. Physical Review, 48(6), 500502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.48.500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pais, Abraham. 1995. Inward Bound: Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andy. 1989. From field theory to phenomenology: the history of dispersion relations. In Brown, Laurie M., Dresden, Max, and Hoddeson, Lillian (eds.), Pions to Quarks: Particle Physics in the 1950s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Olano, Pablo, Fraser, James D., Gaudenzi, Rocco, and Blum, Alexander S. 2022. Taking approximations seriously: the cases of the Chew and Nambu–Jona–Lasinio models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 93(June), 8295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Freda. 1953a. Photo-Meson Production from a Single Nucleon. PhD Thesis, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Salzman, Freda. 1963. Range of high-energy interactions. Physical Review, 131(3), 13451350. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.131.1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Freda. 1974. Gravitational field of a freely moving mass. Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971–1996), 24(2), 157188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02725955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Freda. 1977. Are sex roles biologically determined? Science for the People, 9(4), 2732, 43.Google Scholar
Salzman, Freda. 1979a. Physicist Freda Salzman. Interview by Eileen Zalisk as episode of series “Women in Science,” radio station WBAI. Pacifica Radio Archive number: IZ1483. https://avplayer.lib.berkeley.edu/Pacifica/b23306718Google Scholar
Salzman, Freda. 1979b. Sociobiology: The controversy continues. Science for the People, 11(2), 2027.Google Scholar
Salzman, Freda and Salzman, George. 1960a. Pion production from π–p collisions in the long-range interaction model. Physical Review, 120(2), 599608. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.120.599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Freda and Salzman, George. 1960b. Single-virtual-boson-exchange interaction in high-energy collisions. Physical Review Letters, 5(8), 377379. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.5.377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Freda and Salzman, George. 1961. High-energy nucleon–nucleon collisions. Physical Review, 121(5), 15411544. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.121.1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Freda and Salzman, George. 1962. Single virtual particle exchange model of high-energy inelastic glancing collisions. Physical Review, 125(5), 17031719. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.125.1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Freda and Salzman, George. 1969. Acceleration of material particles to the speed of light in general relativity. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1969–1970), 1(17), 859864. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02911557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Freda and Salzmann [sic], George. 1965. A theory of T-violation. Physics Letters, 15(1), 9194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(65)91142-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Freda F. and Snyder, James N. 1954. Numerical calculation of pion–nucleon reaction matrix and phase shifts. Physical Review, 95(1), 286287. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, G. and Taub, A. H. 1954. Born-type rigid motion in relativity. Physical Review, 95(6), 16591669. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, George. 1953b. Born-Type Rigid Motion in Relativity. PhD Thesis. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Salzman, George. 1956. Numerical solution of the Chew–Low equation for meson–nucleon scattering. In High Energy Nuclear Physics: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Rochester Conference. New York: Interscience Publishers, pp. III:14–III:18.Google Scholar
Salzman, George. 1957. Phase shifts predicted by the Chew–Low theory. In High Energy Nuclear Physics: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Rochester Conference. New York: Interscience Publishers, pp. II:18–II:22.Google Scholar
Salzman, George. 1971. Discrimination at UMass: Woman scientist fights back. Science for the People, 3(2), 1821.Google Scholar
Salzman, George and Salzman, Freda. 1957. Solutions of the static theory integral equations for pion–nucleon scattering in the one-meson approximation. Physical Review, 108(6), 16191628. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.108.1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweber, Silvan S. 1962. An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Wick, Gian Carlo. 1955. Introduction to some recent work in meson theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 27(4), 339362. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.27.339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Kenneth G. 1961. An Investigation of the Low Equation and the Chew–Mandelstam Equations. PhD Thesis. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.7907/VCDA-4Q31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workman, Ronald L. et al. (Particle Data Group). 2022. Review of particle physics. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022(8), 083C01. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac097Google Scholar
Yukawa, Hideki. 1935. On the interaction of elementary particles. I. Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan. 3rd Series, 17, 4857. https://doi.org/10.11429/ppmsj1919.17.0_48Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×