Book contents
- Women in the History of Quantum Physics
- Women in the History of Quantum Physics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 1 The Spectrum of He+ as a Proving Ground for Bohr’s Model of the Atom: A Legacy of Williamina Fleming’s Astrophysical Discovery
- 2 H. Johanna van Leeuwen, the Other Scientist behind the Bohr–Van Leeuwen Theorem
- 3 Hertha Sponer, Maven of Quantum Spectroscopy
- 4 Angular and Career Momentum: What Lucy Mensing Contributed to Physics and Why She Left the Field
- 5 Discouraging Jane: Dewey Among the Lucky Generation of US Physicists
- 6 Laura Chalk and the Stark Effect
- 7 Elizabeth Monroe Boggs: From Quantum Chemistry to the Manhattan Project
- 8 Excelsior! John Wheeler, Katharine Way, and the Role of Women in the Exploration of the Microcosm
- 9 Sonja Ashauer from São Paulo to Cambridge: A Journey to Quantum Electrodynamics
- 10 Untangling Entanglement History: Early Quantum Contributions of Chien-Shiung Wu
- 11 From Quantum Physics to Ethics: Grete Hermann on Heisenberg’s Cut
- 12 Women Take the Lead: A Physics Laboratory Under the Dictatorship in Portugal, 1940s–1960s
- 13 Carolyn Parker’s Electronic Frequencies
- 14 The Chew–Low–Salzman Method and Freda Friedman Salzman: A Physicist Between Nuclear and Social Interactions
- 15 Out of the Ivory Tower: Maria Lluïsa Canut and X-Ray Crystallography
- 16 Ana María Cetto Kramis: Light in Quantum Mechanics and Open Science
- Index
- References
16 - Ana María Cetto Kramis: Light in Quantum Mechanics and Open Science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 July 2025
Book contents
- Women in the History of Quantum Physics
- Women in the History of Quantum Physics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 1 The Spectrum of He+ as a Proving Ground for Bohr’s Model of the Atom: A Legacy of Williamina Fleming’s Astrophysical Discovery
- 2 H. Johanna van Leeuwen, the Other Scientist behind the Bohr–Van Leeuwen Theorem
- 3 Hertha Sponer, Maven of Quantum Spectroscopy
- 4 Angular and Career Momentum: What Lucy Mensing Contributed to Physics and Why She Left the Field
- 5 Discouraging Jane: Dewey Among the Lucky Generation of US Physicists
- 6 Laura Chalk and the Stark Effect
- 7 Elizabeth Monroe Boggs: From Quantum Chemistry to the Manhattan Project
- 8 Excelsior! John Wheeler, Katharine Way, and the Role of Women in the Exploration of the Microcosm
- 9 Sonja Ashauer from São Paulo to Cambridge: A Journey to Quantum Electrodynamics
- 10 Untangling Entanglement History: Early Quantum Contributions of Chien-Shiung Wu
- 11 From Quantum Physics to Ethics: Grete Hermann on Heisenberg’s Cut
- 12 Women Take the Lead: A Physics Laboratory Under the Dictatorship in Portugal, 1940s–1960s
- 13 Carolyn Parker’s Electronic Frequencies
- 14 The Chew–Low–Salzman Method and Freda Friedman Salzman: A Physicist Between Nuclear and Social Interactions
- 15 Out of the Ivory Tower: Maria Lluïsa Canut and X-Ray Crystallography
- 16 Ana María Cetto Kramis: Light in Quantum Mechanics and Open Science
- Index
- References
Summary
Ana María Cetto Kramis (born 1946) studied physics at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and biophysics at Harvard University. As a faculty member back in Mexico, she spent over half a century delving into the fundamentals of quantum physics, with a singular focus on its stochastic interpretation. In addition to her theoretical work, she founded Latindex and has become a key figure in the open access movement. She has also had a long and influential contribution to international scientific cooperation. Her professional and personal journeys culminate with the dynamization of the International Year of Quantum Science and Technologies 2025, aiming to shed light on her understanding of quantum science and of science as a whole. This chapter is mostly based on an oral history, which is here also revisited as a historiographical methodology from its early use at the origins of the history of quantum physics.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Women in the History of Quantum PhysicsBeyond <i>Knabenphysik</i>, pp. 430 - 459Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Berger Gluch, Sherna and Patai, Daphne (eds.). 1991. Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Canal 22. 2019. Voz de mujer. Ana María Cetto. Online videoclip, April 14. https://youtu.be/6ZpzNJQy3Y8?si=f52gE8Q5b3cNeq2zGoogle Scholar
Cepeda Flores, Francisco Javier. 2006. El Prometeo en México: Raíces Sociales y Desarrollo de la Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM 1867–1980. Ciudad de México: Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas.Google Scholar
Cetto, Ana María. 1986. La Luz. En la naturaleza y en el laboratorio (Ciencia para todos). Ciudad de México: Fondo Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Cetto, Ana María and Hillerud, Kai-Inge (eds.). 1995. Publicaciones científicas en América Latina/Scientific Publications in Latin America. Ciudad de México: Fondo Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Cetto, Ana María, Alonso, Octavio, and Rovalo, Lourdes. 1999. Latindex, a dos años de su concepción. In Cetto Kramis, Ana María, and Alsonso, Octavio (eds.), Revistas Científicas en América Latina/Scientific Journals in Latin America. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 247–254.Google Scholar
Cetto, Ana María (ed.). 2000. World Conference on Science: Science for the Twenty-first Century; A New Commitment. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Cetto, Ana María. 2006. Apuntes para una biografía ilustrada. In Cetto, Ana María (ed.), Navegantes sin fronteras. Homenaje a Luis de la Peña. Ciudad de México: Instituto de Física, pp. 233–258.Google Scholar
Cetto, Ana María, de la Peña, Luis, and Valdés-Hernández, Andrea. 2021. On the physical origin of the quantum operator formalism. Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations, 8(2), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-020-00241-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetto, Ana María. 2022. Electron spin correlations: probabilistic description and geometric representation. Entropy, 24(10), 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24101439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cetto, Ana María and de la Peña, Luis. 2022. Role of the electromagnetic vacuum in the transition from classical to quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 52, 84.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-022-00605-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetto, Ana María. 2025. Oral history interview of Ana María Cetto Kramis by Mar Rivera Colomer on September 1 to 7, 2023. Niels Bohr Library & Archives, American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD USA.Google Scholar
Chaelton, Thomas L., Myers, Lois E., and Sharpless, Rebecca (eds.). 2007. The History of Oral History: Foundations and Methodology. Lanham: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Chiu, Mei-Hung and Wang, Nadia Y. 2011. Marie Curie and science education. In Chiu, Mei-Hung, Glimer, Penny J., and Treagust, David F. (eds.), Celebrating the 100th Anniversary of Madame Marie Sklodowska Curie’s Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 9–39.10.1007/978-94-6091-719-6_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Peña, Luis, Cetto, Ana María, and Brody, Tomas A. 1972. On hidden-variable theories and Bell’s inequality. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 5, 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02815921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Peña, Luis and Cetto, Ana María. 1975. Stochastic theory for classical mechanical systems. Foundations of Physics, 5(2), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Peña, Luis and Cetto, Ana María. 1977. Derivation of quantum mechanics from stochastic electrodynamics. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 8, 1612–1622. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.523448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Peña, Luis and Cetto, Ana María. 1982. Does quantum mechanics accept a stochastic support? Foundations of Physics, 12, 1017–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Peña, Luis and Cetto, Ana María. 1996. The Quantum Dice: An Introduction to Stochastic Electrodynamics. London: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-8723-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Peña, Luis. 2003. La mecánica cuántica en México. La visión desde la física. In Ramos Lara, María de la Paz (ed.), La Mecánica cuántica en México: una visión interdisciplinaria a cien años de su nacimiento. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI de España Editores, pp. 21–44.Google Scholar
de la Peña, Luis, Cetto, Ana María, and Valdés-Hernández, Andrea. 2015. The Emerging Quantum: The Physics Behind Quantum Mechanics. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez Martínez, Raúl. 1999. Historia de la física nuclear en México. Ciudad de México: Plaza y Valdés Editores.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Lucy. 2015. This is our gender person: the messy business of working as a gender expert in international development. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17(3), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2014.918787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, Olival Jr. 2015. The Quantum Dissidents. Rebuilding the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (1950–1990). Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-44662-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, Olival Jr. 2019. On the legacy of a notable quantum dissident: David Bohm (1917–1992). In Matthews, Michael R. (ed.), Mario Bunge: A Centenary Festschrift. Cham: Springer, pp. 349–360.10.1007/978-3-030-16673-1_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gall Sonabend, Olivia. 2005. Ruth Gall. In Viesca López, Georgina (ed.), Biografías de personajes ilustres. Vol. 4, Ciencia y tecnología en México en el siglo XXI. Ciudad de México: Academia Mexicana de Ciencias, pp. 93–110.Google Scholar
Grant, Linda, Ward, Kathryn B., and Forshner, Carrie. 1993. Mentoring experiences of women and men in academic physics and astronomy. In Urry, Meg C., Danly, Laura, Sherbert, Lisa.E., and Gonzaga, Shireen (eds.), Proceedings of Women in Astronomy Meeting. Baltimore: Space Telescope Science Group, pp. 81–86.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald. 1961. On the recent past of physics. American Journal of Physics, 29, 805–810. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1937623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Don. 2004. Who invented the “Copenhagen interpretation”? A study in mythology. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1086/425941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Year of Quantum Science and Technology Partners. 2024. Home. 100 years of quantum is just the beginning …, February 28. https://quantum2025.org/enGoogle Scholar
Kohlstedt, Sally G. 2012. Foreword: the material and personal value of care. In Lykknes, Annette, Optiz, Donald L., and van Tiggelen, Brigitte (eds.), For Better or for Worse? Collaborative Couples in the Sciences. Basel: Springer-Birhäuser, pp. v–viii.Google Scholar
Kraft, Alison and Sachse, Carola. 2019. Science, (Anti-)Communism and Diplomacy. The Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs in the Early Cold War. Leiden-Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., Heilbron, John L., Forman, Paul, and Allen, Lini. 1967. Sources for History of Quantum Physics. An Inventory and Report. Philadelphia, PN: The American Philosophical Society. https://www.amphilsoc.org/guides/ahqp/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Leite, Luciana and Diele-Viegas, Luisa M. 2021. Juggling slow and fast science. Nature Human Behavior, 5(2), 409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01080-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lykknes, Annette, Optiz, Donald L., and van Tiggelen, Brigitte (eds.). 2012. For Better or for Worse? Collaborative Couples in the Sciences. Basel: Springer-Birhäuser.10.1007/978-3-0348-0286-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minor García, Adriana. 2019. Cruzar fronteras: Movilizaciones científicas y relaciones interamericanas en la trayectoria de Manuel Sandoval Vallarta (1917–1942). Ciudad de México: CISAN-UNAM & El Colegio de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Minor García, Adriana. 2021. Atoms in the campus: Van der Graaff accelerators and the making of two major Latin American universities in the 1950s Brazil and Mexico. Annals of Science, 78(4), 504–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2021.1949493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassar, Antônio B. 1985. Derivation of a generalized nonlinear Schrödinger–Langevin equation. Physics Letters A, 109(1–2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(85)90377-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi. 1996. Objectivity or heroism? On the invisibility of women in science. Osiris, 11, 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1086/368756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perks, Robert, and Thomson, Alistair (eds.). 1998. The Oral History Reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plasencia Gaspar, Leticia, Ramos Lara, María de la Paz, and Lozano Mejía, Juan Manuel. 2010. La formación profesional del físico en la UNAM. Trayectoria de su plan de estudios. Perfiles Educativos XXXIII, 131, 155–175.Google Scholar
Prügl, Elisabeth. 2015. Neoliberalising feminism. New Political Economy, 20(4), 614–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2014.951614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pycior, Helena M., Slack, Nancy G., and Abir-Am, Pnina G. (eds.). 1996. Creative Couples in the Science. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Ramos, Lenina. 2020. Ana María Cetto: “Admiro a Einstein, pero en la cocina sigo mis propias leyes.” Milenio, February 18, Lado B. https://www.milenio.com/ciencia-y-salud/ana-maria-cetto-admiro-einstein-cocina-sigoGoogle Scholar
Ramos Lara, María de la Paz. 2003. La Mecánica cuántica en México: Una visión interdisciplinaria a cien años de su nacimiento. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI de España Editores.Google Scholar
Reskin, Barbara F. 1978. Scientific productivity, sex, and the location in the institution of science. American Journal of Sociology, 83(5), 1235–1243. https://doi.org/10.1086/226681CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez Kuri, Ariel. 2003. Los primeros días. Una explicación de los orígenes inmediatos del movimiento estudiantil de 1968. Historia Mexicana, 53(1), 179–228.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret W. 1997. Which science? Which women? Osiris, 12, 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1086/649272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangster, Joan. 1998. Telling our stories: feminist debates and the use of oral history. In Perks, Robert and Thomson, Alistair (eds.), The Oral History Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
Santos, Emilio. 2022. Stochastic interpretations of quantum mechanics. In Freire, Olival Jr, Bacciagaluppi, Guido, Darrigol, Olivier, et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Quantum Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp, 1247–1263.Google Scholar
Shopes, Linda. 2002. What is oral history? Making sense of evidence. History Matters: the US Survey on the Web. http://historymatters.gmu.eduGoogle Scholar
te Heesen, Anke. 2020. Thomas S. Kuhn, earwitness: Interviewing and the making of a new history of science. Isis, 111(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1086/708277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
te Heesen, Anke. 2021. Spoken words, written memories: early oral history and elite interviews. History of Humanities, 6(1), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1086/713261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
te Heesen, Anke. 2022. Revolutionäre im Interview: Thomas Kuhn, Quantenphysik und Oral History. Berlin: Wagenbach Verlag.Google Scholar
Wheeler, John A. 1967. Preface. Sources for History of Quantum Physics. Philadelphia, PN: The American Philosophical Society. https://www.amphilsoc.org/guides/ahqp/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.