The chapter delves into the inquiry regarding technology’s inherent goodness or badness for society, positing that its impact is contingent on human utilization. Three perspectives are presented: technophobes, technothusiasts, and those viewing technology as a neutral tool. Technothusiasts extol technology’s positive societal effects, citing medical breakthroughs, renewable energy, education accessibility, communication, and entertainment. They concede negative repercussions but advocate addressing issues individually rather than condemning technology outright. Technophobes, conversely, emphasize adverse impacts like weaponry, surveillance, social media problems, and concerns about alienation and job loss due to automation and AI. They raise ethical dilemmas, expressing apprehension about humanity losing control with technological advances. The neutral tool perspective contends that technology is neither inherently good nor bad but a tool whose impact hinges on usage. The chapter furnishes examples of positive and negative technology outcomes, underscoring the pivotal roles of context and intentions. It explores societal diversity in defining good or bad, emphasizing evaluating new technologies based on societal values. Additionally, it probes whether technology has an intrinsic trajectory, with some envisioning ceaseless progression fueled by human ambition while others foresee limits. The chapter underscores the importance of awareness to navigate technology’s potential risks and benefits judiciously.