Bibliography

doi:10.1017/9781009336741.021

Acquaviva, Ilaria (2019). “Francisco Suárez on Metaphysics of Modality: An Actualist and Essentialist View on Real Possible Beings,” International Philosophical Quarterly, 59(1), 5–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Adams, Marilyn (1987). William Ockham, 2 vols. (South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar

Adriaenssen, Hans Thomas (2024). “Suárez’s Argument against Real Universals,” Mind 133, 323–45.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aertsen, J. (1996). Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: The Case of Thomas Aquinas (Leiden: New York: Cologne: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Aertsen, J. (2012). Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought: From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez (Leiden: Boston: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Åkerlund, Erik (2011). Nisi Temere Agat: Francisco Suárez on Final Causes and Final Causation (Uppsala: Filosofiska institutionen).Google Scholar

Åkerlund, Erik (2015). “Material Causality – Dissolving a Paradox: The Actuality of Prime Matter in Suárez,” in Fink, (ed.) (2015), 43–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Andersen, Claus A. (2015). “Ens rationis ratiocinatae and ens rationis ratiocinantis: Reflections on a New Book on Beings of Reason in Baroque-Age Scholasticism,” Quaestio 14, 315–27.Google Scholar

Anderson, C. Anthony (1999). “Substitutivity salva veritate,” in Audi, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 888.Google Scholar

Anfray, Jean-Pascal (2014). “Partes extra partes: Étendue et impénétrabilité dans la correspondance entre Descartes et More,” Les Études philosophiques 108, 37–59.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anfray, Jean-Pascal (2019). “A Jesuit Debate about the Modes of Union: Francisco Suárez vs. Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93(2), 309–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1969). “Causality and Extensionality,” Journal of Philosophy 66(6), 152–59.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. See Thomas Aquinas.Google Scholar

Ariew, Roger (2011). Descartes among the Scholastics (Leiden: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Ariew, Roger (2012). “Descartes and Leibniz as Readers of Suárez: Theory of Distinctions and Principle of Individuation,” in Hill, and Lagerlund, (eds.) (2012), 38–53.Google Scholar

Ariotti, Piero E. (1973). “Towards Absolute Time: The Undermining and Refutation of the Aristotelian Conception of Time in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries,” Annals of Science 30(1), 31–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle, Barnes, J. (ed.), 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism, 2 vols. (Cambridge: New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. (1989). Universals: An Opinionated Introduction (Boulder: Westview Press).Google Scholar

Arriaga, Rodrigo de (1632). Cursus Philosophicus Auctore R. P. Roderico de Arriaga Hispano Lucroniensi e Soc. Iesu Philosophiae ac Theologiae Doctore, eiusdemque in Caesarea Regiaque Pragensi Universitate Professore (Antuerpiae: Ex Officina Plantiniana Balthasaris Moreti).Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1992a). “Analogy and Equivocation in Thirteenth Century Logic: Aquinas in Context,” Mediaeval Studies 54, 94–135.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1992b). “Equivocation and Analogy in Fourteenth Century Logic: Ockham, Burley and Buridan,” in Mojsisch, B. and Pluta, O. (eds.), Historia philosophiae medii aevi: Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters. Festschrift für Kurt Flasch zu seinem 60. Geburtstag, 2 vols. (Amsterdam: Grüner), I: 23–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aversa, Raffaele (1650). Philosophia Metaphysicam Physicamque Complectens Quaestionibus Contexta In duos Tomos distributa, vol. 1 (Bononiae: Ex Typographia HH. Evangelistae Ducciae).Google Scholar

Avicenna, (2005). The Metaphysics of the Healing, trans. Marmura, Michael (Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press).Google Scholar

Avicenna, (2009). The Physics of the Healing, trans. McGinnis, Jon (Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press).Google Scholar

Baciero Ruiz, Francisco Tadeo (2007). “El genio maligno de Suárez: Suárez y Descartes,” Pensamiento 63, 303–20.Google Scholar

Baldner, Steven (2016). “Thomas Aquinas and Francisco Suarez on the Problem of Divine Concurrence,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 90, 149–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blander, Josh (2020). “Same as It Never Was: John Duns Scotus’ Paris Reportatio Account of Identity and Distinction,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28(2), 231–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan (2001). Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Biard, Joël, and Rashed, Roshdi (eds.) (1997). Descartes et le moyen âge (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar

Brogaard, Berit, and Salerno, Joe (2013). “Remarks on Counterpossibles,” Synthese 190(4), 639–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brower, Jeffrey (2011). “Matter, Form, and Individuation,” in Davis, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 85–103.Google Scholar

Brower, Jeffrey (2014). Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Brower, Jeffrey (2018). “Medieval Theories of Relations,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/relations-medieval/.Google Scholar

Cajetan, (Thomas de Vio). (1888). In Summam theologiae Ia Commentaria, in Aquinas, Thomas (1882–), Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia, vol. 4Google Scholar

Cajetan, (1895). In Summam theologiae IIaIIae Commentaria, in Aquinas, Thomas (1882–), Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia, vol. 8.Google Scholar

Cajetan, (1987). De nominum analogia, ed. Pinchard, Bruno (Paris: J. Vrin).Google Scholar

Cantens, Bernie (2012). “Suárez’s Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God,” in Schwartz, (2012), 89–114.Google Scholar

Capriati, Giuseppe (2019). “Quid Est Causa? The Debate on the Definition of ‘Cause’ in Early Jesuit Scholasticism,” Vivarium 58(1–2), 111–39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Capriati, Giuseppe (2020). Causa e causalità finale nella scolastica gesuita dell’età moderna (Lecce: Università del Salento / Université Paris Sorbonne).Google Scholar

Carraud, Vincent (2002). Causa sive ratio: La raison de la cause, de Suarez à Leibniz (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).CrossRef Google Scholar

Carriero, John (2009). Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes’s Meditations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Collegium Complutense (1624). Artium Cursus sive Disputationes in Aristotelis Dialecticam (Compluti: Apud Ioannem de Orduña).Google Scholar

Collegium Complutense (1651). Disputationes in Octo Libros Physicorum Aristotelis (Lugduni: Sumptibus P. Borde, L. Arnaud & C. Rigaud).Google Scholar

Collegium Conimbricense (1594). Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis Societatis Iesu In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae, 2 vols. (Lugduni: Sumptibus Ioannis Baptistae Buysson).Google Scholar

Conti, Alessandro (2008). “Categories and Universals in the Later Middle Ages,” in Newton, Lloyd (ed.), Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories (Leiden: Brill), 369–409.CrossRef Google Scholar

Courtine, Jean François (1990). Suarez et le système de la métaphysique (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).CrossRef Google Scholar

Cronin, Timothy (1966). Objective Being in Descartes and Suárez (Rome: Gregorian University Press).Google Scholar

Cross, Richard (1998). The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Daniel, Stephen H. (1981). “Seventeenth-Century Scholastic Treatments of Time,” Journal of the History of Ideas 42(4), 587–606.CrossRef Google Scholar

Darge, Rolf (1999). “‘Ens in quantum ens’: Die Erklärung des Subjekts der Metaphysik bei F. Suárez,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 66, 335–61.Google Scholar

Darge, Rolf (2000a). “Die Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Theorie der transzendentalen Eigenschaften des Seienden bei F. Suárez,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 54, 341–64.Google Scholar

Darge, Rolf (2000b). “Suárez’ Analyse der Transzendentalien ‘Ding’ und ‘Etwas’ im Kontext der scholastischen Metaphysiktradition,” Theologie und Philosophie 75 (2000), 339–58.Google Scholar

Darge, Rolf (2004a). “Erste Philosophie als Transzendentalwissenschaft gemäß Duns Scotus: Seinswissenschaft oder ‘Onto-Logik’?,” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 111, 43–61.Google Scholar

Darge, Rolf (2004b). Suárez’ transzendentale Seinsauslegung und die Metaphysiktradition (Leiden: Boston: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Darge, Rolf (2010). “Die Transformation der aristotelischen Analogielehre bei Cajetan und Suárez,” in Darge, R., Bauer, E. J., Frank, G. (eds.), Der Aristotelismus an den europäischen Universitäten der frühen Neuzeit (Stuttgart, Kohlhammer), 57–81.Google Scholar

Darge, Rolf (2011). “Analogie,” in Kolmer, P. and Wildfeuer, G. (eds.), Neues Handbuch philosophischer Grundbegriffe, 3 vols. (Freiburg: Alber), I: 101–12.Google Scholar

Darge, Rolf (2016). “Vom Transzendentalen zum Transzendenten. Der transzendentaltheologische Weg der Metaphysik nach Thomas von Aquin,” Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 385–409.Google Scholar

Des Chene, Dennis (1996). Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Des Chene, Dennis (2000). Life’s Form: Late Aristotelian Conceptions of the Soul (Ithaca: London: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Des Chene, Dennis (2012). “Suárez on the Propinquity and the Efficient Cause,” in Hill, and Lagerlund, (eds.) (2012), 89–100.Google Scholar

Descartes, René (1964–74). Oeuvres de Descartes, Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul (eds.), 11 vols. (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar

Díaz-Herrera, Patricia (2006). “The Notion of Time in Francisco Suárez and Its Contemporary Relevance,” Studia Neoaristotelica 3(2), 142–59.CrossRef Google Scholar

Doyle, John (1967). “Suárez on the Reality of Possibles,” The Modern Schoolman 45, 29–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Doyle, John (1998). “Supertranszendent,” in Ritter, J., Gründer, K., and Gabriel, G. (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, 13 vols. (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), X: 644–49.Google Scholar

Duncan, Stewart (2012). “Leibniz’s Mill Arguments against Materialism,” The Philosophical Quarterly 62, 250–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Embry, Brian (2015). “Truth and Truthmakers in Early Modern Scholasticism,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1(2), 196–216.CrossRef Google Scholar

Embry, Brian (2016). “Descartes on Free Will and Moral Possibility,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96(2), 380–98.Google Scholar

Embry, Brian (2017). “Francisco Suárez on Eternal Truths, Eternal Essences, and Extrinsic Being,” Ergo 4(19), 557–78.Google Scholar

Embry, Brian (2019). “Francisco Suárez on Beings of Reason and Non-Strict Ontological Pluralism,” Philosophers’ Imprint 19(27), 1–15.Google Scholar

Embry, Brian (2020). “Cartesian Composites and the True Mode of Union,” Australian Journal of Philosophy 98(4), 629–45.CrossRef Google Scholar

Esposito, Costantino (2001). “The Concept of Time in the Metaphysics of Suárez,” in Porro, Pasquale (ed.), The Medieval Concept of Time: The Scholastic Debate and Its Reception in Early Modern Philosophy (Leiden: Brill), 383–98.Google Scholar

Eustachius of St. Paul, (1609). Summa philosophiae quadripartita (Paris: Carolus Chastellain).Google Scholar

Fink, Jacob Leth (ed.) (2015). Suárez on Aristotelian Causality (Leiden: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Fonseca, Pedro da (1615). Commentariorum Petri Fonsecae Lusitani, Doctoris Theologi Societatis Iesu, In Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae Libros, Tomus Secundus (Coloniae: Sumptibus Lazari Zetzneri Biblipolae).Google Scholar

Frost, Gloria (2022). Aquinas on Efficient Causation and Causal Powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

García, Claudia Lorena (2000). “The Falsity of Non-Judgmental Cognitions in Descartes and Suárez,” The Modern Schoolman 77(3), 199–216.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gilson, Etienne (1952). Being and Some Philosophers, 2nd ed. (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies).Google Scholar

Góis, Manuel de (1594). Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis Societatis Iesu, In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae (Lugduni: Sumptibus Ioannis Baptistae Buysson).Google Scholar

Griffin, Michael V. (2012). Leibniz, God and Necessity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1973). Wahrheitstheorien, in Fahrenbach, H. (ed.), Wirklichkeit und Reflexion: Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag (Pfullingen: Neske), 211–65.Google Scholar

Hartman, Peter John (2022). “Durand of St.-Pourçain’s Theory of Modes,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 60(2), 203–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hattab, Helen (2004). “Conflicting Causalities: The Jesuits, Their Opponents, and Descartes on the Causality of the Efficient Cause,” Oxford Studies In Early Modern Philosophy 1, 1–22.Google Scholar

Hattab, Helen (2012). “Suarez’s Last Stand for the Substantial Form,” in Hill, and Lagerlund, (eds.) (2012), 101–18.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin (2004). “Vom Wesen der Wahrheit,” in Wegmarken (1919–1961), ed. von Herrmann, F.-W., Martin Heidegger Gesamtausgabe, 3rd ed. (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann), IX: 73–97.Google Scholar

Heider, Daniel (2007). “Is Suárez’s Concept of Being Analogical or Univocal?,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81(1), 21–41.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heider, Daniel (2009). “The Nature of Suárez’s Metaphysics: Disputationes Metaphysicae and Their Main Systematic Strains,” Studia Neoaristotelica 6(1), 99–110.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heider, Daniel (2011). “The Refusal of the Modernist Interpretation of Suarezian Metaphysics: Was Descartes in His Criticism Right about Suáreźs Conception of the Possibles and Eternal Truths?,” in Busche, H. and Hessbrueggen-Walter, S. (eds.), Aufbruch ins moderne Europa – Philosophie zwischen 1400–1700 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner), 1154–68.Google Scholar

Heider, Daniel (2014). Universals in Second Scholasticism (Amsterdam: Philadelphia: John Benjamins).CrossRef Google Scholar

Heider, Daniel (2015). “Suárez on the Metaphysics and Epistemology of Universals,” in Salas, and Fastiggi, (eds.) (2015), 164–91.Google Scholar

Heider, Daniel (2021). Aristotelian Subjectivism: Francisco Suárez’s Philosophy of Perception (Cham: Springer).CrossRef Google Scholar

Helm, Paul (1998). “John Calvin, the Sensus Divinitatis, and the Noetic Effects of Sin,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43(2), 87–107.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hill, Benjamin, and Lagerlund, Henrik (eds.) (2012). The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas (1839). The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, vol. 3, ed. Molesworth, W. (London: John Bohn).Google Scholar

Hoeres, Walter (2012). Gradatio entis: Sein als Teilhabe bei Duns Scotus und Franz Suárez (Heusenstamm: Editiones scholasticae).Google Scholar

Honnefelder, L. (1987). “Der zweite Anfang der Metaphysik. Voraussetzungen, Ansätze und Folgen der Wiederbegründung der Metaphysik im 13./14. Jahrhundert,” in Beckmann, J., Honnefelder, L., Schrimpf, G., and Wieland, G. (eds.), Philosophie im Mittelalter: Entwicklungslinien und Paradigmen (Hamburg: Meiner), 166–86.Google Scholar

Hughes, Christopher (1998). “Matter and Actuality in Aquinas,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 52 (204), 269–86.Google Scholar

Huismann, Tyler (2016). “Aristotle on Accidental Causation,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2(4), 561–75.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hurtado de Mendoza, Pedro (1624). Universa Philosophia a R. P. Petro Hurtado de Mendoza Valmasedano e Societate Iesu apud fidei Quaesitores Censore, & in Salmanticensi Academia sanctae Theologiae Professore, in unum corpus redacta (Lugduni: Sumpt. Ludovici Prost).Google Scholar

Iturrioz, Jesús (1948). “Fuentes de la metafísica de Suárez,” in Suarez en el cuarto centenario de su nacimiento, a special issue of Pensamiento 4, 31–89.Google Scholar

Iturrioz, Jesús (1949). Estudios sobre la metafísica de Francisco Suárez, S.J. (Madrid: Estudios Onienses).Google Scholar

Janich, Peter (2005). Was ist Wahrheit? Eine philosophische Einführung, 3rd ed. (München: Beck).Google Scholar

John Duns Scotus, (1973). Ioannis Duns Scoti Opera Omnia, vol. 7 (Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis).Google Scholar

John Duns Scotus, (1999). Opera Philosophica, vol. 1 (St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute).Google Scholar

John of St. Thomas, [João Poinsot] (1930–37). Ioannis a Sancto Thoma O. P. Cursus Philosophicus Thomisticus, ed. Reiser, Beatus, 3 vols. (Taurini: Marietti).Google Scholar

Kann, Christoph (1999). “Wahrheit als Adaequatio: Bedeutung, Deutung, Klassifikation,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 66, 209–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Karofsky, Amy (2001a). “Suárez’s Doctrine of Eternal Truths,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39(1), 23–47.CrossRef Google Scholar

Karofsky, Amy (2001b). “Suárez’s Influence on Descartes’s Theory of Eternal Truths,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10(2), 241–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kaufman, Dan (2014). “Cartesian Substances, Individual Bodies and Corruptibility,” Res Philosophica 91(1), 71–103.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kim, Jaegwon (1981). “Causes as Explanations: A Critique,” Theory and Decision 13, 293–309.CrossRef Google Scholar

Knebel, Sven (2000). Wille, Würfel und Wahrscheinlichkeit: Das System der moralischen Notwendigkeit in der Jesuitenscholastik, 1550–1700 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag).Google Scholar

Knebel, Sven (2002). “Distinctio rationis ratiocinantis,” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 44, 145–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Knebel, Sven (2003). “The Renaissance of Statistical Modalities in Early Modern Scholasticism,” in Friedman, Russell L. and Nielson, Lauge O. (eds.), The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400–1700 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), 231–51.Google Scholar

Kobusch, Theo (2006). “Adaequatio rei et intellectus. Die Erläuterung der Korrespondenztheorie der Wahrheit in der Zeit nach Thomas von Aquin,” in Enders, M. and Szaif, J. (eds.), Geschichte des philosophischen Begriffs der Wahrheit (Berlin: De Gruyter), 149–66.Google Scholar

Kolmer, Petra (2011). “Wahrheit,” in Kolmer, P. and Wildfeuer, A. (eds.), Neues Handbuch philosophischer Grundbegriffe, 3 vols. (Freiburg im Breisgau: Alber), III: 2397–415.Google Scholar

Krempel, A. (1952). La doctrine de la relation chez Saint Thomas: Exposé historique et systématique (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman (2001). The Metaphysics of Creation: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles II (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Kronen, John (2015). “Suárez’s Influence on Protestant Scholasticism: The Cases of Hollaz and Turretín,” in Salas, and Fastiggi, (eds.) (2015), 221–47.Google Scholar

Künne, Wolfgang (1998). “Wahrheit. VI. 20. Jahrhundert,” in Ritter, J., Gründer, K., Gabriel, G. (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, 13 vols. (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), XII: 104–23.Google Scholar

Künne, Wolfgang (2003). Conceptions of Truth (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Lagerlund, Henrik (2011). “The Unity of Efficient and Final Causality: The Mind/Body Problem Reconsidered,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19(4), 587–603.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lamantia, Dominic. “Identity and Real Distinction according to Duns Scotus” (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar

Leinsle, Ulrich G. (2006). Dillinganae Disputationes: Der Lehrinhalt der gedruckten Disputationen an der philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Dillingen 1555–1648 (Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner).Google Scholar

Lodge, Paul (2014). “Leibniz’s Mill Arguments against Mechanical Materialism Revisited,” Ergo 1(3), 79–99.Google Scholar

Maier, Anneliese (1955a). “Die Einheit und Einzigkeit der Zeit,” in Maier, (1955b), 92–137.Google Scholar

Maier, Anneliese (1955b). Metaphysische Hintergründe der spätscholastischen Naturphilosophie (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura).Google Scholar

Maier, Anneliese (1955c). “Das Problem der Finalkausalität um 1320,” in Maier, (1955b), 273–99.Google Scholar

Maier, Anneliese (1955d). “Die Realität des Zeitflusses,” in Maier, (1955b), 47–64.Google Scholar

Maier, Anneliese (1955e). “Wilhelm Ockhams Deutung der Quantität,” in Maier, (1955b), 176–98.Google Scholar

Maier, Anneliese (1955f). “Zeit und Bewegung,” in Maier, (1955b), 65–91.Google Scholar

Maier, Anneliese (1955g). “Die Zweckursachen bei Johannes Buridan,” in Maier, (1955b), 300–35.Google Scholar

Marschler, Thomas (2022). “Divine Attributes,” in Braun, Harald E., De Bom, Erik, and Astorri, Paolo (eds.), A Companion to the Spanish Scholastics (Leiden: Brill), 134–64.Google Scholar

Mas, Diego [Didacus Masius] (1587). Metaphysica disputatio, de Ente, et eius proprietatibus, quae communi nomine inscribitur de Transcendentibus, in quinque libros distributa (Valentiae: apud viduam Petri Huete).Google Scholar

Mastri de Meldula, Bartolomeo (1708). R. P. Bartholomaei Mastrii de Meldula Ordinis Minor. Convent. Magistri Tomis Quartus: Continens Disputationes ad Mentem Scoti in duodecim Aristotelis Stagiritae Libros Metaphysicorum, Pars Prior & Pars Posterior (Venetiis: Apud Nicolaum Pezzana).Google Scholar

Menn, Stephen (1997). “Suárez, Nominalism, and Modes,” in White, Kevin (ed.), Hispanic Philosophy in the Age of Discovery (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press), 226–56.Google Scholar

Menn, Stephen (2000). “On Denis Des Chene’s Physiologia,” Perspectives on Science 8(2), 119–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Merricks, Trenton (2003). Objects and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Mittelstraß, Jürgen (1989). “Die Wahrheit des Irrtums: Über das schwierige Verhältnis der Geisteswissenschaften zur Wahrheit und über ihren eigentümlichen Umgang mit dem Irrtum.” Konstanzer Universitätsreden 173 (Universitätsverlag Konstanz).Google Scholar

Moroney, Stephen K. (2000). The Noetic Effects of Sin: A Historical and Contemporary Exploration of How Sin Affects Our Thinking (Lanham, MA: Lexington Books).Google Scholar

More, Henry (1659). The Immortality of the Soul, so farre forth as it is demonstrable from the Knowledge of NATURE and the light of REASON (London: J. Flesher).Google Scholar

More, Henry (1671). Enchiridion Metaphysicum: Sive, de rebus incorporeis succincta & luculenta dissertatio (London: E. Flesher).Google Scholar

Murray, Michael J. (2004). “Pre-Leibnizian Moral Necessity,” The Leibniz Review 14, 1–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nelson, Alan, and Smith, Kurt (2010). “Divisibility and Cartesian Extension,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 5, 1–24.Google Scholar

Newlands, Samuel (2013). “Leibniz and the Ground of Possibility,” The Philosophical Review 122(2), 155–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

Normore, Calvin (2010). “Accidents and Modes,” The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, ed. Pasnau, Robert, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), II: 674–85.Google Scholar

Novák, Lukáš (ed.) (2014). Suárez’s Metaphysics in Its Historical and Systematic Context (Berlin: New York: De Gruyter).CrossRef Google Scholar

Novák, Lukáš (2015). “Suárezova neuchopitelná teorie vztahu,” Studia Neoaristotelica 12(3), lxxvi–cxi.CrossRef Google Scholar

Novák, Lukáš (2021). “Suárez’s Notion of Analogy,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 95(2), 195–233.CrossRef Google Scholar

Novák, Lukáš (2023). Relations as Accidental Forms (Neunkirchen-Seelscheid: Editiones Scholasticae).Google Scholar

Novotný, Daniel D. (2013). Ens rationis from Suárez to Caramuel (New York: Fordham University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Novotný, Daniel D. (2016). “Arriaga (and Hurtado) against the Baroque Mainstream: The Case of Ens rationis,” Filosofický Časopis 64, 119–44.Google Scholar

Novotný, Daniel D. (2022). “The Method of Philosophy: Gracia’s Gift of Suárez,” in Delfino, Robert A., Irwin, William, Sanford, Jonathan J. (eds.), The Philosophical Legacy of Jorge J. E. Gracia (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), 53–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Novotný, Daniel D. (2025). “Why Hurtado? An Introduction,” in Novotný, Daniel D. and Novák, Lukáš (eds.), Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza (1578–1641): System, Sources and Influence (Leiden: Brill), 3–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Novotný, Daniel D., and Gracia, Jorge J.E. (2012). “Fundamentals in Suárez’s Metaphysics: Transcendentals and Categories,” in , Schwartz (ed.) (2012), 19–38.Google Scholar

Novotný, Daniel D., and Novák, Lukáš (2014). “Why Metaphysics? A Rather Ambitious Introduction,” in Novotný, Daniel D. and Novák, Lukáš (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics (London: Routledge), 11–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ockham, William of. See William of Ockham.Google Scholar

Oderberg, David S. (2016). “Divine Premotion,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79(3), 207–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Olivo, Giles (1997). “L’efficience en cause: Suárez, Descartes et la question de la causalité,” in Biard, and Rashed, (1997), 91–106.Google Scholar

Osler, Margaret J. (2001). “Whose Ends? Teleology in Early Modern Philosophy,” Osiris 16, 151–68.CrossRef Google Scholar

Panaccio, Claude (2023). Ockham’s Nominalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert (1997). Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert (2001). “Intentionality and Final Causes,” in Perler, Dominik (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (Leiden: Brill), 301–23.Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert (2002). Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert (2011). Metaphysical Themes: 1274–1671 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert (2017). After Certainty: A History of Our Epistemic Ideals and Illusions (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert (2018). “On What There Is in Aquinas,” in Hause, Jeffrey (ed.), Aquinas’s Summa theologiae: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 10–28.Google Scholar

Pecorrini, Francisco (1974). “Knowledge of the Singular: Aquinas, Suárez and Recent Interpreters,” The Thomist 38(3), 606–55.Google Scholar

Penner, Sydney (2012). “Rodrigo Arriaga on Relations,” The Modern Schoolman 89(1–2), 25–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Penner, Sydney (2013a). “Free and Rational: Suárez on the Will,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95(1), 1–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

Penner, Sydney (2013b). “Suárez on the Reduction of Categorical Relations,” Philosophers’ Imprint 13(2), 1–24.Google Scholar

Penner, Sydney (2015). “Final Causality: Suárez on the Priority of Final Causation,” in Fink, (ed.) (2015), 122–49.Google Scholar

Penner, Sydney (2018a). “Four Kinds of Intention: Actual, Habitual, Virtual, and Interpretative,” Pensamiento 74, 91–121.Google Scholar

Penner, Sydney (2018b). “Suárez (and Malebranche) on Necessary Causes” (unpublished).Google Scholar

Penner, Sydney (2019). “Suárez on Substantial Form: A Heroic Last Stand?” in Maryks, Robert Aleksander and Senent de Frutos, Juan Antonio (eds.), Francisco Suárez (1548–1617): Jesuits and the Complexities of Modernity (Leiden: Brill), 46–71.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pereira, José (2007). Suárez: Between Scholasticism and Modernity (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar

Perler, Dominik (2010). “Does God Deceive Us? Skeptical Hypotheses in Late Medieval Epistemology,” in Lagerlund, Henrik (ed), Rethinking the History of Skepticism: The Missing Medieval Background (Leiden: Brill), 171–92.Google Scholar

Perler, Dominik (2018). “Suárez on the Metaphysics of Habits,” in Faucher, Nicolas and Roques, Magali (eds.), The Ontology, Psychology and Axiology of Habits (Habitus) in Medieval Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer), 365–84.Google Scholar

Perler, Dominik (2020). “Suárez on the Unity of Material Substance,” Vivarium 58(3), 143–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Perler, Dominik (2021). “Productive Thoughts: Suárez on Exemplar Causes,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 9, 246–89.CrossRef Google Scholar

Perler, Dominik (2022). “Can We Know Substances? Suárez on a Sceptical Puzzle,” Theoria 88(1), 244–69.CrossRef Google Scholar

Perler, Dominik (2023). “Suárez’ Compositional Account of Substance,” in Charles, David (ed.), The History of Hylomorphism: From Aristotle to Descartes (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 351–75.Google Scholar

Pini, Giorgio (2002). Categories and Logic in Duns Scotus (Leiden: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Pini, Giorgio (2005). “Scotus’s Realist Conception of the Categories: His Legacy to Late Medieval Debates,” Vivarium 43(1), 63–110.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pink, Thomas (2018). “Agents, Objects, and Their Powers in Suarez and Hobbes,” Philosophical Explorations 21(1), 3–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Polizzi, Giuseppe (1676). Philosophicarum disputationum tomus secundus (Panormi: Typis Caroli Adamo).Google Scholar

Porro, Pasquale (1996). Forme e modelli di durata nel pensiero medievale: L’aevum, il tempo discreto, la categoria “quando” (Leuven: Leuven University Press).Google Scholar

Prieto López, Leopoldo José (2020). “El pensamiento político de Suárez en el De opere sex dierum y sus nexos con Filmer y Locke,” Isegoría: Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política 63, 583–602.CrossRef Google Scholar

Punch, John (1672). Philosophiae Ad Mentem Scoti Cursus Integer (Lugduni: Sumpt. Laur. Arnaud & Petri Borde).Google Scholar

Puntel, Lorenz B. (1993). Wahrheitstheorien in der neueren Philosophie. Eine kritisch-systematische Darstellung, 3rd ed. (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Rast, Max (1935). “Die Possibilienlehre des Franz Suárez,” Scholastik 10, 340–68.Google Scholar

Reid, Jasper (2012). The Metaphysics of Henry More (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRef Google Scholar

Rota, Michael (2006). “Causation in Contemporary Metaphysics and in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas” (PhD dissertation, Saint Louis University).Google Scholar

Rota, Michael (2012). “Causation,” in Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 104–14.Google Scholar

Rozemond, Marleen (1998). Descartes’s Dualism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Rozemond, Marleen (2011). “Real Distinction, Separability, and Corporeal Substance in Descartes,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25, 240–58.Google Scholar

Rozemond, Marleen (2019). “Leibniz on Internal Action and Why Mills Can’t Think,” Leibniz Review 29, 13–40.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rubio, Antonio (1611). R. P. Commentarii in Octo Libros Aristotelis de Physico auditu seu Ausculatione: Una cum dubiis & quaestionibus hac tempestate agitari solitis (Lugduni: Apud Ioannem Pillehotte).Google Scholar

Salas, Victor M. (2022). Immanent Transcendence: Francisco Suárez’s Doctrine of Being (Leuven: Leuven University Press).Google Scholar

Salas, Victor, and Fastiggi, Robert (eds.) (2015). A Companion to Francisco Suárez (Leiden: Boston: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Schaffer, Jonathan (2005). “Contrastive Causation,” The Philosophical Review 114(3), 327–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schaffer, Jonathan (2007). “The Metaphysics of Causation,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. Zalta, Edward N., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2007/entries/causation-metaphysics/.Google Scholar

Schechtman, Anat (2018). “The Allegedly Cartesian Roots of Spinoza’s Metaphysics,” Philosophers’ Imprint 18(21), 1–23.Google Scholar

Schmaltz, Tad (2008). Descartes on Causation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Schmaltz, Tad (2019). “The Metaphysics of Surfaces in Suárez and Descartes,” Philosophers’ Imprint 19(8), 1–20.Google Scholar

Schmaltz, Tad (2020a). The Metaphysics of the Material World: Suárez, Descartes, Spinoza (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmaltz, Tad (2020b). “Suárez and Descartes on the Mode(s) of Union,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 58(3), 471–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmaltz, Tad (2022). “The Located Subject of Thought: Hobbes, Descartes, More,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 113, 3–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmid, Stephan (2011). Finalursachen in der frühen Neuzeit (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Schmid, Stephan (2014). “Suárez and the Problem of Final Causation,” in Novák, (ed.) (2014), 293–307.Google Scholar

Schmid, Stephan (2015a). “Efficient Causality: The Metaphysics of Production,” in Fink, (ed.) (2015), 85–121.Google Scholar

Schmid, Stephan (2015b). “Finality without Final Causes? Suárez’s Account of Natural Teleology,” Ergo 2(16), 393–425.Google Scholar

Schmutz, Jacob (2004). “Science divine et métaphysique chez Francisco Suárez,” in Francisco Suárez, “Der ist der Mann.” Homenaje al Prof. Salvador Castellote (Valencia: Faculdad de Teología “San Vicente Ferrer”), 347–79.Google Scholar

Schmutz, Jacob (2012). “Medieval Philosophy after the Middle Ages,” in Marenbon, John (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 246–66.Google Scholar

Schuessler, Rudolf (2019). The Debate on Probable Opinions in the Scholastic Tradition (Leiden: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Schulz, Gudrun (1993). Veritas est adaequatio intellectus et rei: Untersuchungen zur Wahrheitslehre des Thomas von Aquin und zur Kritik Kants an einem überlieferten Wahrheitsbegriff (Leiden: Boston: Brill).Google Scholar

Schwartz, Daniel (ed.) (2012). Interpreting Suárez: Critical Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Scorraille, Raoul de (1914). François Suarez de la Compagnie de Jesus, 2 vols. (Paris: Lethielléux).Google Scholar

Scotus, John Duns. See John Duns Scotus.Google Scholar

Secada, Jorge (2000). Cartesian Metaphysics: The Late Scholastic Origins of Modern Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Secada, Jorge (2012a). “Suárez on Continuous Quantity,” in Hill, and Lagerlund, (eds.) (2012), 75–86.Google Scholar

Secada, Jorge (2012b). “Suárez on the Ontology of Relations,” in Schwartz, (ed.) (2012), 62–88.Google Scholar

Secada, Jorge (2014). “Suárez’s Nominalist Master Argument: Metaphysical Disputations 5, 1,” in Novák, (ed.) (2014), 211–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Seigfried, Hans (1967). Wahrheit und Metaphysik bei Suarez (Bonn: Bouvier).Google Scholar

Senner, Walter (2006). “Wahrheit bei Albertus Magnus und Thomas von Aquin,” in Enders, M. and Szaif, J. (eds.), Geschichte des philosophischen Begriffs der Wahrheit (Berlin: De Gruyter), 103–48.Google Scholar

Sider, Theodore (1999). “Presentism and Ontological Commitment,” Journal of Philosophy 96, 325–47.CrossRef Google Scholar

Solère, Jean-Luc (1997). “Descartes et les discussions médiévales sur le temps,” Biard, and Rashed, (1997), 331–48.Google Scholar

Soncinas, Paulus [Paolo Barbo] (1588). Quaestiones metaphysicales acutissimae (Venetiis: Apud Haeredem Hieronymi Scoti).Google Scholar

South, James B. (2002). “Singular and Universal in Suárez’s Account of Cognition,” The Review of Metaphysics 55(4), 785–823.Google Scholar

Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.) (1975). “Ockham’s Distinctions between Absolute and Connotative Terms,” Vivarium 13, 55–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spade, Paul Vincent (1994). Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham (Indianapolis: Cambridge: Hackett).Google Scholar

Specht, Rainer (1988). “Über den Stil der Disputationes metaphysicae von Franciscus Suárez,” Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 13(3), 23–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spencer, Mark (2013). “Transcendental Order in Suárez,” Studia Neoaristotelica, 10(2), 157–95.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stang, Nicholas (2010). “Kant’s Possibility Proof,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 27(3), 275–99.Google Scholar

Steel, Carlos (1994). “Does Evil Have a Cause? Augustine’s Perplexity and Thomas’s Answer,” The Review of Metaphysics 48(2), 251–73.Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (1597). Metaphysicae Disputationum … Tomus prior & Tomus posterior (Salmanticae: apud Ioannem et Andream Renaut fratres).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (1599). Metaphysicarum Disputationum … Tomus prior & Tomus posterior (Venetiis: Apud Baretium Baretium, & Socios).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (1856–78). R. P. Francisci Suarez E Societate Jesu Opera Omnia, ed. André, Michel and Berton, Charles, 28 vols. in 30 (Paris: Luis Vivès).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (1964). On Formal and Universal Unity, trans. with intro. Ross, James (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (1978–91). Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in libros Aristotelis De anima, ed. Castellote, Salvador, 3 vols. (Madrid: Sociedad de Estudios y Publicaciones [vols. 1–2] and Fundación Xavier Zubiri [vol. 3]).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (1982). Suárez on Individuation: Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity and Its Principle, trans. Gracia, Jorge (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (1994). On Efficient Causality: Metaphysical Disputations 17, 18, and 19, trans. Freddoso, Alfred (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (2000). On the Formal Cause of Substance: Metaphysical Disputation XV, trans. Kronen, John and Reedy, Jeremiah (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (2002). On Creation, Conservation, and Concurrence: Metaphysical Disputations 20–22, trans. Freddoso, Alfred J. (South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (2004). The Metaphysical Demonstration of the Existence of God: Metaphysical Disputations 28–29, trans. Doyle, John (South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (2006). On Real Relation (Disputatio Metaphysica XLVII), trans. Doyle, John (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (2014). Metaphysical Disputation XIII.1–3, trans. Penner, Sydney, http://sydneypenner.ca/translations.shtml#dm.Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (2021). Metaphysical Disputation I: On the Nature of First Philosophy or Metaphysics, trans. Duarte, Shane (Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (2023a). L’unità individuale e il suo principio: La quinta Disputazione Metafisica, trans. Galasso, Nicolò and Treves, Paolo (Milan: Mimesis).Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (2023b). Metaphysical Disputation II: On the Essential Concept or Concept of Being, trans. Duarte, Shane (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (2023c). Metaphysical Disputations III and IV: On Being’s Passions in General, and Its Principles, and On Transcendental Unity in General, trans. Duarte, Shane (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Tabarroni, Andrea (2003). “‘Utrum deus sit in praedicamenta’: Ontological Simplicity and Categorical Inclusion,” in Biard, Joël and Rosier-Catach, Irène (eds.), La tradition médiévale des catégories (Louvain: Paris: Peeters), 271–87.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas (1882–). Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII P.M. edita (Romae: Commissio Leonina).Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas (2014). Aquinas: Basic Works, ed. Pasnau, Robert and Hause, Jeffrey (Indianapolis: Hackett).Google Scholar

Trifogli, Cecilia (2022). “Ockham on Time,” in Santelli, Alessio (ed.), Ockhamism and Philosophy of Time: Semantic and Metaphysical Issues Concerning Future Contingents (Berlin: Springer), 11–31.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tuttle, Jacob (2013). Suárez’s Metaphysics of Causation (PhD dissertation, Purdue University).Google Scholar

Tuttle, Jacob (2016). “Suárez’s Non-Reductive Theory of Efficient Causation,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 4, 125–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tuttle, Jacob (2019). “Suárez on Creation and Intrinsic Change,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93(1), 29–51.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tuttle, Jacob (2020). “Suárez’s Metaphysics of Active Powers,” Review of Metaphysics 74(1), 43–80.CrossRef Google Scholar

van Riel, Raphael, and Van Gulick, Robert (2019). “Scientific Reduction,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/scientific-reduction/.Google Scholar

Vázquez, Gabriel (1621). Commentariorum, ac disputationum in primam secundae Sancti Thomae Tomus Primus (Antuerpiae: Apud Petrum & Ioannem Belleros).Google Scholar

Ward, Thomas (2014). John Duns Scotus on Parts, Wholes, and Hylomorphism (Boston: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Wee, Cecilia (2006). Material Falsity and Error in Descartes’ Meditations (London: Routledge).CrossRef Google Scholar

Wells, Norman (1981a). “Suarez on the Eternal Truths: Part I,” The Modern Schoolman, 58(1), 73–104.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wells, Norman (1981b). “Suarez on the Eternal Truths: Part II,” The Modern Schoolman, 58(2), 159–74.Google Scholar

Wells, Norman (1984). “Material Falsity in Descartes, Arnauld and Suarez,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 22(1), 25–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

William of Ockham, (1974). Opera philosophica et theologica: Opera philosophica, vol. 1 (St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute).Google Scholar

William of Ockham, (1978). Opera philosophica et theologica: Opera philosophica, vol. 2 (St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute).Google Scholar

William of Ockham, (1980). Opera philosophica et theologica: Opera theologica, vol. 9 (St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute).Google Scholar

William of Ockham, (1986). Opera philosophica et theologica: Opera theologica, vol. 10 (St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute).Google Scholar

William of Ockham, (1991). Quodlibetal Questions, ed. and trans. Freddoso, Alfred J. and Kelley, Francis E. (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

William of Ockham, (2000). Opera philosophica et theologica: Opera theologica, vol. 4 (St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute).Google Scholar

Wippel, John (2000). The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar

Zavalloni, Roberto (1951). Richard de Mediavilla et la controverse sur la pluralité de formes (Louvain: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie).Google Scholar

Zehetner, Cornelius (2016). “Substanz, Suppositum, Subjekt, Substrat: Suarez’ 34. Metaphysische Disputation auf dem Weg zur ‘Transzendentalphilosophie’?,” in Beier, Kathi and Leidi, Thamar Rossi (eds.), Substanz denken: Aristoteles und seine Bedeutung für die moderne Metaphysik und Naturwissenschaft (Würzburg: Königshausen u. Neumann), 165–200.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Albert (1998). Ontologie oder Metaphysik? Die Diskussion über den Gegenstand der Metaphysik im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert. Texte und Untersuchungen (Leuven: Peeters).Google Scholar