Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface and acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: Sociolinguistic theory and the practice of sociolinguistics
- Part I Theorising social meaning
- 2 The “push” of Lautgesetze, the “pull” of enregisterment
- 3 Variation, meaning and social change
- 4 Indexicality, stance and fields in sociolinguistics
- 5 Sociolinguistic differentiation
- Part II Language, markets and materiality
- Part III Sociolinguistics, place and mobility
- Part IV Power, mediation and critical sociolinguistics
- Part V Sociolinguistics, contexts and impact
- Part VI The evolution of sociolinguistic theory
- Index
- References
3 - Variation, meaning and social change
from Part I - Theorising social meaning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface and acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: Sociolinguistic theory and the practice of sociolinguistics
- Part I Theorising social meaning
- 2 The “push” of Lautgesetze, the “pull” of enregisterment
- 3 Variation, meaning and social change
- 4 Indexicality, stance and fields in sociolinguistics
- 5 Sociolinguistic differentiation
- Part II Language, markets and materiality
- Part III Sociolinguistics, place and mobility
- Part IV Power, mediation and critical sociolinguistics
- Part V Sociolinguistics, contexts and impact
- Part VI The evolution of sociolinguistic theory
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The perspective that I will develop in these pages, what has come to be referred to as the “Third Wave” approach to variation, takes as basic that the meaningfulness of sociolinguistic variation is not incidental, not a by-product of social stratification, but a design feature of language. Sociolinguistic variation constitutes a system of signs that enables the nonpropositional expression of social concerns as they unfold in interaction. It allows people to say things without putting them into words, making it essential to social life and part of the pragmatics that link speech to the wider social system. I will argue further that language is not just a system that happens to change, but a system whose change is central to its semiotic function. Variation is a system of signs that enact a continually changing social world, and it is the potential for change in the meanings of these signs that makes language viable for human life.
This perspective appears to conflict with some of the basic tenets of the view of variation that emerged from work in the First Wave and that endure in much current work in variation. To some extent, this is because the First Wave grew out of the structuralist study of sound change and is primarily concerned with presocial cognitive forces giving rise to change and with macrosocial patterns of variation as structuring the regular social contact that accounts for the spread of change. This limits the view of social meaning to forces deriving from the macrostructure of society, hence external to language. My argument will be that social meaning in variation is an integral part of language and that macrosocial patterns of variation are at once the product of, and a constraint on, a complex system of meaning.
Three waves real quick
The First Wave of survey studies found a robust and repeated pattern of variation correlating with macrosociological categories, showing that change enters communities at the lower end of the socioeconomic hierarchy, and spreads upward. According to the model that emerged in the First Wave, sound change is presocial, originating in the most unconscious and systematic reaches of the speaker's linguistic system and emerging in the speaker's most unmonitored speech, the vernacular.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- SociolinguisticsTheoretical Debates, pp. 68 - 85Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
2014. Pragmatics and the social meaning of determiners. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
2003. The social life of a cultural value. Language and Communication 23: 231–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981. The Dialogic Imagination. (ed.), and (trans.) Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1999. You da man: Narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3 (4): 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. Diagnostics of age-graded linguistic behavior: The case of the quotative system. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. I'll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37: 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. Prosodic variation in SLA: Rhythm in an urban North Carolina Hispanic community. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 2: 59–71.Google Scholar
. 2005. Syntactic variation and beyond: Gender and social class variation in the use of discourse-new markers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9, 4: 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1983. Patterns of encounter management: Further arguments for discourse variables. Language in Society 12: 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Language, situation and the relational self: Theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics. In and (eds.), Stylistic Variation in Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 185–210.Google Scholar
. 2014. Language change, social change, sociolinguistic change: A meta-commentary. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18, 2: 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2014. Sociolinguistic knowledge of a sound change in progress: Perceptions of California TRAP backing. Paper presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, Minneapolis, MN.
2015. Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19 (2): 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
1996. Vowels and nailpolish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. In , , , , , and (eds.), Gender and Belief Systems. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 3: 453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011a. Language and power in the preadolescent heterosexual market. American Speech 86, 1: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011b. Where does the social stop? In (ed.), Language Variation: European Perspectives III. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 13–30.Google Scholar
2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The discursive reconstruction of sexual consent. Discourse and Society 9: 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In and (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 213–250.Google Scholar
2008. Urban princesses: Performance and “women's language” in Japan's Gothic/Lolita subculture. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 18, 1: 130–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2015. The bike, the back, and the boyfriend: Confronting the “definite article conspiracy” in Canadian and British English. Paper presented at Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Portland, OR.
2010. “Poor baby, you got a boo-boo!”: Sound symbolism in adult baby talk. Talk delivered at NWAV 39, San Antonio, TX.
(1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradition in Social Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and . 1986. An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society 15: 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. A linguistic innovation of women in Cairo. Language Variation and Change. 6: 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese.”Journal of English Linguistics 34: 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1978. Toward a theory of social dialect variation. Language in Society 7: 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1, 1: 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Malden MA. and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
2010. Principles of Linguistic Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. The origins of sexist language in discourse. In and (eds.), Discourses in Reading and Linguistics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 433, 123–135.Google Scholar
, and . 2015. Function words, power, and opposition: A socio-pragmatic “deep” corpus study. Poster presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Portland, OR.
2004. Those naughty teenage girls: Japanese Kogals, slang, and media assessments. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14, 2: 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2002. Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice. Memory and Cognition 30, 4: 583–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In , , and (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press, 325–347.Google Scholar
. 1931. The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, vols. 1-6. Eds. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A.W. Burks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11, 4: 478–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . Forthcoming. On the complementarity of the three waves: The acoustic realization of /s/ in inland California.
, and . 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In and (eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. New York: Oxford University Press, 235–276.Google Scholar
1984. On the problem of syntactic varation and pragmatic meaning in sociolinguistic theory. Folia Linguistica 18: 409–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1978. The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In (ed.), Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods. New York: Academic Press, 239–250.Google Scholar
1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In and (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11–55.Google Scholar
2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23, 3–4: 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1: 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: On the irrelevance of identity to new-dialect formation. Language in Society 37: 241–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2014. Diffusion, drift, and the irrelevance of media influence. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18: 214–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005.
, , and . 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In and (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press, 95–188.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 41
- Cited by