Book contents
- Reflections on English Word-Formation
- Reflections on English Word-Formation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Conventions and Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Basic Questions
- 2 Reflections on the Background to the Study of Word-Formation
- 3 Reflections on Why We Need Word-Formation
- 4 Reflections on the Recognition of Novelty in Words
- 5 Reflections on Blocking and Competition
- 6 Reflections on Potential and Norm
- 7 Reflections on Definition by Stipulation and on Word-Classes
- 8 Reflections on Analogical Word-Formation
- 9 Reflections on the Nature of the Lexeme
- Part II Semantic Questions
- Part III Syntactic Questions
- Part IV Interfaces
- Part V Patterns of Word-Formation in English
- Part VI Historical Questions
- Part VII Questions Involving Inflection
- Index of Topics
- Index of English Word-Forming Elements
- References
2 - Reflections on the Background to the Study of Word-Formation
from Part I - Basic Questions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 October 2025
Book contents
- Reflections on English Word-Formation
- Reflections on English Word-Formation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Conventions and Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Basic Questions
- 2 Reflections on the Background to the Study of Word-Formation
- 3 Reflections on Why We Need Word-Formation
- 4 Reflections on the Recognition of Novelty in Words
- 5 Reflections on Blocking and Competition
- 6 Reflections on Potential and Norm
- 7 Reflections on Definition by Stipulation and on Word-Classes
- 8 Reflections on Analogical Word-Formation
- 9 Reflections on the Nature of the Lexeme
- Part II Semantic Questions
- Part III Syntactic Questions
- Part IV Interfaces
- Part V Patterns of Word-Formation in English
- Part VI Historical Questions
- Part VII Questions Involving Inflection
- Index of Topics
- Index of English Word-Forming Elements
- References
Summary
In this chapter some of the problems facing the scholar of word-formation are considered, including the nature of the word, the boundaries of word-formation, the question of productivity and problems with determining the nature of evidence for it, whether word-formation is defined by rules, some proposed constraints on word-formation and whether word-formation is part of morphology.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reflections on English Word-Formation , pp. 13 - 34Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., Dixon, R.M.W. & White, Nathan M.. (2020). The essence of ‘word’. In Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald, Dixon, R.M.W. & Nathan, M. White (eds.), Phonological Word and Grammatical Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie (1983). English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie (2000). Word. In Booij, G., Lehmann, C. & Mugdan, J. (eds.), Morphology: An International Handbook of Inflection and Word-Formation. Berlin: de Gruyter, 247–57.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie (2001). Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie (2003). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie (2019a). Rethinking Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie (2019b). Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation. Word Structure 12, 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Bauer, Winifred. (2012). The inflection–derivation divide in Māori and its implications. Te Reo 55, 3–24.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. (2013). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Robert. (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. (1996). Inherent versus contextual morphology inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. Yearbook of Morphology 1995, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2023). What is usage-based linguistics? In Díaz-Campos, Manuel & Balasch, Sonia (eds.), The Handbook of Usage-Based Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 9–29.Google Scholar
Cannon, Garland. (1987). Historical Change and English Word-Formation. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. (2004–). British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/bnc/.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. (2002). Word: A typological framework. In Robert, M.W. Dixon & Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–40.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. (2000). Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Doleschal, Ursula & Anna, M. Thornton (eds.), Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology. Munich: Lincom, 1–10.Google Scholar
Firth, J.R. ([1930] 1965). Speech. In The Tongues of Men and Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–211.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Kenneth & Samuel, J. Keyser (eds.), View from Building 20, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–76.Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew. (2015). The word as a universal category. In John, R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 246–69.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1976). An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51, 639–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. (1981). On the Organization of the Lexicon. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle (2022). Introducing Morphology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans. (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. 2nd ed. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Marr, Vivian (ed.). (2008). The Chambers Dictionary. 11th ed. Edinburgh: Chambers Harrap.Google Scholar
OED. Oxford English Dictionary [online]. oed.com.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. (1988). The split morphology hypothesis: Evidence from Yiddish. In Hammond, Michael & Noonan, Michael (eds.), Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego: Academic, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans. (1994). Inflection and derivation. In Ron, E. Asher (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, 1671–8.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. (1972). A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph & MacWhinney, Brian. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory & Cognition 14, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jennifer, Vannest, Thad, A. Polk & Richard, L. Lewis. (2005). Dual-route processing of complex words: New fMRI evidence from derivational suffixation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 5, 67–76.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison. (2015). Why are we so sure we know what a word is? In John, R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 725–50.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. (1987). Plain morphology and expressive morphology. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 330–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.