Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., Dixon, R.M.W. & White, Nathan M.. (2020). The essence of ‘word’. In Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald, Dixon, R.M.W. & Nathan, M. White (eds.), Phonological Word and Grammatical Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Anne & Hengeveld, Kees. (2012). Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. (1980). In the beginning was the word. Te Reo 23, 73–80.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie (1983). English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie (2000). Word. In Booij, G., Lehmann, C. & Mugdan, J. (eds.), Morphology: An International Handbook of Inflection and Word-Formation. Berlin: de Gruyter, 247–57.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie (2001). Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie (2003). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie (2019a). Rethinking Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie (2019b). Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation. Word Structure 12, 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie & Bauer, Winifred. (2012). The inflection–derivation divide in Māori and its implications. Te Reo 55, 3–24.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. (2013). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beard, Robert. (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. (1996). Inherent versus contextual morphology inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. Yearbook of Morphology 1995, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Botha, Rudolf P. (1984). Morphological Mechanisms. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. (2023). What is usage-based linguistics? In Díaz-Campos, Manuel & Balasch, Sonia (eds.), The Handbook of Usage-Based Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 9–29.Google Scholar

Cannon, Garland. (1987). Historical Change and English Word-Formation. New York: Lang.Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. (2004–). British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/bnc/.Google Scholar

Dixon, R.M.W. (2014). Making New Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R.M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. (2002). Word: A typological framework. In Robert, M.W. Dixon & Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–40.Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. (2000). Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Doleschal, Ursula & Anna, M. Thornton (eds.), Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology. Munich: Lincom, 1–10.Google Scholar

Firth, J.R. ([1930] 1965). Speech. In The Tongues of Men and Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–211.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Kenneth & Samuel, J. Keyser (eds.), View from Building 20, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–76.Google Scholar

Hippisley, Andrew. (2015). The word as a universal category. In John, R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 246–69.Google Scholar

Hooper, Joan B. (1976). An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51, 639–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lappe, Sabine. (2007). English Prosodic Morphology. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. (1981). On the Organization of the Lexicon. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle (2022). Introducing Morphology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marchand, Hans. (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. 2nd ed. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Marr, Vivian (ed.). (2008). The Chambers Dictionary. 11th ed. Edinburgh: Chambers Harrap.Google Scholar

OED. Oxford English Dictionary [online]. oed.com.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David M. (1988). The split morphology hypothesis: Evidence from Yiddish. In Hammond, Michael & Noonan, Michael (eds.), Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego: Academic, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plag, Ingo. (1999). Morphological Productivity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Plank, Frans. (1994). Inflection and derivation. In Ron, E. Asher (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, 1671–8.Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. (1972). A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio. (1984). Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Stemberger, Joseph & MacWhinney, Brian. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory & Cognition 14, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jennifer, Vannest, Thad, A. Polk & Richard, L. Lewis. (2005). Dual-route processing of complex words: New fMRI evidence from derivational suffixation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 5, 67–76.Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. (2015). Why are we so sure we know what a word is? In John, R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 725–50.Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. (1987). Plain morphology and expressive morphology. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 330–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. (2000). Word. In Booij, G., Lehmann, C. & Mugdan, J. (eds.), Morphology: An International Handbook of Inflection and Word-Formation. Berlin: de Gruyter, 247–57.Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. (2002). Word: A typological framework. In Robert, M.W. Dixon & Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–40.Google Scholar

Hippisley, Andrew. (2015). The word as a universal category. In John, R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 246–69.Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. (1944). Review of Linguistic Interludes and Morphology: The Descriptive Analysis of Words by E.A. Nida. Language 20, 252–5.Google Scholar

Zipf, George K. ([1949] 1965). The Psycho-Biology of Language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Anshen, Frank & Aronoff, Mark. (1997). Morphology in real time. Yearbook of Morphology 1996, 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corbin, Danielle. (1987). Morphologie dérivationelle et structuration du lexique, 2 vols. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Lehnert, Martin. (1971). Reverse Dictionary of Present-Day English. Leipzig: VEB.Google Scholar

Marr, Vivian (ed.). (2008). The Chambers Dictionary. 11th ed. Edinburgh: Chambers Harrap.Google Scholar

Meys, W.J. (1975). Compound Adjectives in English and the Ideal Speaker-Listener. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Renouf, Antoinette & Bauer, Laurie. (2001). Contextual clues to word-meaning. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 5, 231–58.Google Scholar

Santen, Ariane J. van. (1992). Produktiviteit in Taal en Taalgebruik. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Thompson, Della (ed.). (1995). The Concise Oxford Dictionary. 9th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark (2023). Three ways of looking at morphological rivalry. Word Structure 16, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. (2003). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. (2013). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. (1975). Aspects of Language. 2nd ed. New York: Harper, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Burgschmidt, Ernst. (1977). Strukturierung, Norm und Produktivität in der Wortbildung. In Herbert, E. Brekle & Kastovsky, Dieter (eds.), Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschungen. Bonn: Bouvier, 39–47.Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. & Clark, Herbert H.. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55, 767–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sciullo, Di, Maria, Anna & Williams, Edwin. (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grzega, Joachim. (2009). Compounding from an onomasiological perspective. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217–32.Google Scholar

Marr, Vivian (ed.). (2008). The Chambers Dictionary. 11th ed. Edinburgh: Chambers Harrap.Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. (2003). Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rainer, Franz. (1988). Towards a theory of blocking: The case of Italian and German quality nouns. Yearbook of Morphology 1988, 155–85.Google Scholar

Štekauer, Pavol. (2005). Onomasiological approach to word-formation. In Štekauer, Pavol & Lieber, Rochelle (eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stratton, James M. (2023). Where did wer go? Lexical variation and change in third person male adult noun referents in Old and Middle English. Language Variation and Change 35: 199–221.Google Scholar

Thornton, Anna M. (2011). Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non‐canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Maiden, Martin, Smith, John Charles, Goldbach, Maria & Hinzelin, Marc-Olivier (eds.), Morphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 358–81.Google Scholar

Adams, Valerie. (1973). An Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Barnhart, Robert K., Steinmetz, Sol & Barnhart, Clarence L.. (1990). Third Barnhart Dictionary of New English. New York: H.W. Wilson.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. (2003). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. (2022). What you must say, what you can say and what you do not say. In Andreea, S. Calude & Bauer, Laurie (eds.), Mysteries of English Grammar. New York: Routledge, 11–20.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Ingo, Plag. (2013). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coseriu, Eugenio. (1952). Sistema, norm y habla. Montevideo: Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Instituto de Filología, Departamento de Lingüistica.Google Scholar

OED. The Oxford English Dictionary [online]. oed.comGoogle Scholar

Pawley, Andrew & Hodgetts Syder, Frances. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack, C. Richards & Richard, W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and Communication. London: Routledge, 191–225.Google Scholar

Rainer, Franz. (2012). Morphological metaphysics: Virtual, potential, and actual words. Word Structure 5, 165–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. (2004). A Glossary of Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie (2017). Compounds and Compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie (2025). Fixity or why English may not have compounds. In Sara Matriciano-Mayerhofer, Johannes Schnitzer & Elisabeth Peters (eds.) (2025). Patterns, Variants and Change: Through the Prism of morphology. Studies in Honour of Franz Rainer. Strasbourg: Éditions de Linguistique et de Philologie.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. (2013). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brugmann, Karl. (1891). A Comparative Grammar of the Indo-Germanic Languages. Conway, Trans. Robert Seymour and Rouse, W.H.D.. New York: Westermann.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick, A. Jacobs & Peter, S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn, 184–221.Google Scholar

Crystal, David. ([1967] 2004). English word-classes. In Aarts, Bas, Denison, David, Keizer, Evelien & Popova, Gergana (eds.), Fuzzy Grammar: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 191–211 [reprinted from Lingua 17, 24–56].Google Scholar

Hollmann, Willem B. (2020). Word classes. In Aarts, Bas, Bowie, Jill & Popova, Gergana (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar. Oxford; Oxford University press, 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kastovsky, Dieter. (2009). Astronaut, astrology, astrophysics: About combining forms. classical compounds, and affixoids. In McConchie, R.W., Honkapohja, Alpo & Tyrkkö, Jukka (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, 1–13.Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. (2020). Affixoids. In Körtvélyessy, Lívia & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), Complex Words: Advances in Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217–37.Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor H. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Moore, T.E. (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, New York: Academic Press, 111–44.Google Scholar

Taylor, John. (2003). Linguistic Categorization. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. (2001). Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan. (1985). Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schultink, Henk. (1961). Productiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen. Forum der Letteren 2, 110–25.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. (2013). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergenholtz, Henning & Mugdan, Joachim. (1979). Einführung in die Morphologie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Booij, Geert E. (2015). The structure of words. In John, R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157–74.Google Scholar

Boyé, Gilles. (2018). Lexemes, categories and paradigms. In Bonami, Olivier, Boyé, Gilles, Dal, Georgette, Giraudo, Hélène & Namer, Fiammetta (eds.), The Lexeme in Descriptive and Theoretical Morphology. Berlin: Language Science Press, 19–41.Google Scholar

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. (2002). An Introduction to English Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Sciullo, Di, Maria, Anna & Williams, Edwin. (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R.M.W. & Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald. (2002). Word: A typological framework. In Dixon, R.M.W. & Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–41.Google Scholar

Fradin, Bernard. (2013). Nouvelles approches en morphologie. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Lipka, Leonhard. (2002). English Lexicology. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Lyons, John. (1968). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyons, John (1970). Introduction. In Lyons, John (ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics. Harmondsworth: Pelican, 7–28.Google Scholar

Lyons, John (1977). Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Martinet, André. (1967). Éléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar

Matthews, P.H. (1970). Recent developments in morphology. In Lyons, John (ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics. Harmondsworth: Pelican, 96–114.Google Scholar

Matthews, P.H. (1972). Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, P.H. (1991). Morphology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar