Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T11:21:04.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 10 - Complications of the Cord, Amnion, and Gravid Uterus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2025

Edited by
Peter F. Schnatz ,
D. Yvette LaCoursiere ,
Christopher M. Morosky ,
Jonathan Schaffir ,
Vanessa Torbenson  and
David Chelmow
Peter F. Schnatz
Affiliation:
The Reading Hospital, Pennsylvania
D. Yvette LaCoursiere
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Christopher M. Morosky
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut School of Medicine
Jonathan Schaffir
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University College of Medicine
Vanessa Torbenson
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine
David Chelmow
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth School of Medicine
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Pregnancy Complications
A Case-Based Approach
 , pp. 261 - 282
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Dashe, JS, Pressman, EK, Hibbard, JU. SMFM Consult Series #46: Evaluation and Management of Polyhydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219:B2–B8.Google Scholar
Obstetrical Imaging. In: Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Dashe, JS, et al. (eds.). Williams Obstetrics, 26th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2022. 246–271.Google Scholar
Al-Hafez, L, Chauhan, SP, Riegel, M, et al. Routine Third-Trimester Ultrasound in Low Risk Pregnancies and Perinatal Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(4):100242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagan, M, Magann, EF, Rabie, N, et al. Idiopathic Polyhydramnios and Pregnancy Outcome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61:302–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 828: Indications for Outpatient Antenatal Fetal Surveillance. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):e177–e197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 831: Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early Term Deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138(1):e35–e39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallhage, S, Årestedt, K, Schildmeijer, K, Oscarsson, M. Incidence and Risk Factors for Umbilical Cord Prolapse in Labor when Amniotomy Is Used and with Spontaneous Rupture of Membranes: A Swedish Nationwide Register Study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(2):304–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Induction and Augmentation of Labor. In: Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Dashe, JS, et al. (eds.). Williams Obstetrics, 26th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2022.Google Scholar

References

Chamberlain, PF, Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Harman, CR, Lange, IR. Ultrasound Evaluation of Amniotic Fluid Volume. I. The Relationship of Marginal and Decreased Amniotic Fluid Volumes to Perinatal Outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150(3):245–249.Google ScholarPubMed
Practice Bulletin No. 175 Summary: Ultrasound in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(6):1459–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odibo, IN, Whittemore, BS, Hughes, DS, et al. Addition of Color Doppler Sonography for Detection of Amniotic Fluid Disturbances and Its Implications on Perinatal Outcomes. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(9):1875–1881.Google ScholarPubMed
Dildy, GA 3rd, Lira, N, Moise, KJ Jr., Riddle, GD, Deter, RL. Amniotic Fluid Volume Assessment: Comparison of Ultrasonographic Estimates versus Direct Measurements with a Dye-Dilution Technique in Human Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(4 Pt. 1):986–994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kehl, S, Schelkle, A, Thomas, A, et al. Single Deepest Vertical Pocket or Amniotic Fluid Index as Evaluation Test for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (SAFE trial): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(6):674–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brace, RA. Physiology of Amniotic Fluid Volume Regulation. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;40(2):280–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gizzo, S, Noventa, M, Vitagliano, A, et al. An Update on Maternal Hydration Strategies for Amniotic Fluid Improvement in Isolated Oligohydramnios and Normohydramnios: Evidence from a Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;0(12):e0144334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabie, N, Magann, E, Steelman, S, Ounpraseuth, S. Oligohydramnios in Complicated and Uncomplicated Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(4):442–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 831. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138:e35–e39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilberman Sharon, N, Pekar-Zlotin, M, Kugler, N, et al. Oligohydramnios: How Severe Is Severe? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):5754–5760.Google ScholarPubMed

References

Panagiotopoulos, M, Tseke, P, Michala, L. Obstetric Complications in Women with Congenital Uterine Anomalies According to the 2013 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy Classification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(1):138–148.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, SM, Attaran, M, Goldstein, J, et al. ASRM Müllerian Anomalies Classification 2021. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(5):1238–1252.Google ScholarPubMed
Hua, M, Odibo, AO, Longman, RE, et al. Congenital Uterine Anomalies and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(6):558.e1–558.e5.Google ScholarPubMed
Akhtar, MA, Saravelos, SH, Li, TC, Jayaprakasan, K; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reproductive Implications and Management of Congenital Uterine Anomalies: Scientific Impact Paper No. 62 November 2019. BJOG. 2020;127(5):e1–e13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, MA, Kim, HS, Kim, YH. Reproductive, Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes in Women with Congenital Uterine Anomalies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(21):4797.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, S, Wang, K, Hu, Q, et al. Perinatal Outcomes of Women with Müllerian Anomalies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(4):1209–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, YY, Jayaprakasan, K, Tan, A, et al. Reproductive Outcomes in Women with Congenital Uterine Anomalies: A Systematic Review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(4):371–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
External Cephalic Version: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 221. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):e203–e212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e97–e109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lü, Y, Ji, M, Deng, S, Gao, J, Zhou, X. Association of a Unicornuate Uterus with Adverse Obstetric Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(9):3136–3143.Google ScholarPubMed

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins – Gynecology. Management of Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 228. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):e100–e115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, SJ, Best, S, Kumar, S. The Impact of Fibroid Characteristics on Pregnancy Outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(4):395.e1–395.e5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, HJ, Norwitz, ER, Shaw, J. Contemporary Management of Fibroids in Pregnancy. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2010;3(1):20–27.Google ScholarPubMed
Ciavattini, A, Clemente, N, Delli Carpini, G, et al. Number and Size of Uterine Fibroids and Obstetric Outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(4):484–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(6):e241–e256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koren, G, Florescu, A, Costei, AM, et al. Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs during Third Trimester and the Risk of Premature Closure of the Ductus Arteriosus: A Meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:824–829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dildy, GA 3rd, Moise, KJ Jr., Smith, LG Jr., et al. Indomethacin for the Treatment of Symptomatic Leiomyoma Uteri during Pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 1992;9:185.Google ScholarPubMed
Pergialiotis, V, Sinanidis, I, Louloudis, IE, et al. Perioperative Complications of Cesarean Delivery Myomectomy: A Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:1295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):e168–e186.Google Scholar

References

Robertson, M, Scott, P, Ellwood, DA, et al. Endocervical Polyp in Pregnancy: Gray Scale and Color Doppler Images and Essential Considerations in Pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:583–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakimoto, T, Hayashi, S, Koh, I, et al. Relationship between Unremoved Cervical Polyp in Pregnancy and Spontaneous Preterm Birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(6):899.e1–899.e6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. AAGL Practice Report: Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(1):3–10.Google Scholar
Sasaki, LMP, Andrade, KRC, Figueiredo, ACMG, et al. Factors Associated with Malignancy in Hysteroscopically Resected Endometrial Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(5):777–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondagari, L, Josephs, LS. Role of Ultrasound in Managing Cervical Polyps during Pregnancy. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e18702.Google ScholarPubMed
Tokunaka, M, Hasegawa, J, Oba, T, et al. Decidual Polyps Are Associated with Preterm Delivery in Cases of Attempted Uterine Cervical Polypectomy during the First and Second Trimester. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28:1061–1063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuta, K, Yoneda, S, Yoneda, N, et al. Risk Factors for Spontaneous Miscarriage above 12 Weeks or Premature Delivery in Patients Undergoing Cervical Polypectomy during Pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, N, Tachibana, D, Misugi, T, et al. First Trimester Findings of Decidual Polyp: Caution to Avoid Polypectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;249:109–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, L, Shi, G, Zheng, A, et al. A Rare Case of Large Cervical Polyp in Pregnancy Removed through a Minimally Invasive Polypectomy Procedure. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(12):1281–1282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

O’Quinn, C, Cooper, S, Tang, S, et al. Antenatal Diagnosis of Marginal and Velamentous Placental Cord Insertion and Pregnancy Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(4):953–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinkin, JA, Craig, WY, Jones, M, et al. Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Isolated Velamentous Cord Insertion in Singleton and Twin Pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(2):471–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyelese, Y, Smulian, J. Placenta Previa, Placenta Accrete and Vasa Previa. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):927–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Gyamfi-Bannerman, C. Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine Consult Series #44: Management of Bleeding in the Late Preterm. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;44:82–88.Google Scholar
Pavalagantharajah, S, Villani, L, D’Souza, R. Vasa Previa and Associated Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(3):100117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vintzileos, A, Ananth, C, Smulin, J. Using Ultrasound in the Clinical Management of Placental Implantation Abnormalilities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;231(4 Suppl.):S70–S77.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S, Ngo, G, Maurel, K, et al. Timing of Birth and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Cases of Prentally Diagnosed Vasa Previa: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):173–181e24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×