Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-31T10:19:23.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2025

Raissa A. von Doetinchem de Rande
Raissa A. von Doetinchem de Rande
Affiliation:
University of Chicago Divinity School
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Islamic Ethics
Hierarchy and Human Nature in the Philosophical Tradition
 , pp. 301 - 322
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

ʿAbd al-Jabbār, . Tanzīh al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār al-Nahḍa al-Ḥadītha, 1966.Google Scholar
al-ʿAlawī, Jamāl al-Dīn. Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān li-Ibn Sīnā, Ibn Ṭufayl wa-l-Suhrawardī, edited by Amīn, Aḥmad. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1959.Google Scholar
al-ʿAlawī, Jamāl al-Dīn. al-Matn al-rushdī. Casablanca: Dār Tūbqāl li-l-Nashr, 1986.Google Scholar
al-ʿAlawī, Jamāl al-Dīn. Rasāʾil falsafiyya. Beirut: Dār al-Thaqāfa, 1983.Google Scholar
, Aristotle. Manṭiq Arisṭū, edited by Badawī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. 3 vols. Kuwait: Wakālat al-Maṭbūʿāt, 1980.Google Scholar
al-ʿAsqalānī, Ibn Ḥajar. Fatḥ al-bārī fī sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Cairo: Maktabat al-Kulliyyāt al-Azhariyya, 1978.Google Scholar
al-ʿAyyāshī, Abū al-Naḍr Muḥammad ibn Masʿūd. Tafsīr al-ʿAyyāshī. 2 vols. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī li-l-Maṭbūʿāt, 1991.Google Scholar
al-Baghawī, Abū Muḥammad al-Ḥusayn. Tafsīr al-Baghawī: Maʿālim al-tanzīl. Riyadh: Dār al-Ṭība, 1993.Google Scholar
al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2014.Google Scholar
al-Būrsawī, Ismāʿīl Ḥaqqī. Rūḥ al-bayān. Cairo: Maṭbūʿāt Būlāq, 1870.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Falsafat Arisṭūṭālīs, edited by Mahdi, Muhsin. Beirut: Dār Majallat Shiʿr, 1961.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Al-Fārābī on Aristotle’s “Prior Analytics,” edited and translated by Rescher, Nicholas. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1963.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Al-Farabi on the Perfect State: Abū Naṣr al-Fārābī’s Mabādiʾ ārāʾ ahl al-madīna al-fāḍila: A Revised Text with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary), edited and translated by Walzer, Richard. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Alfarabi’s Book of Letters (Kitāb al-ḥurūf), edited by Mahdi, Muhsin. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1969.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Alfarabi’s Book of Religion and Related Texts, edited by Mahdi, Muhsin. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1968.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Al-Farabi’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s “De Interpretatione,” edited and translated by Zimmermann, Fritz W.. London: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. “Al-Fārābī’s Paraphrase of the Categories of Aristotle,” edited and translated by Dunlop, D. M., Part I. Islamic Quarterly 4, no. 4 (1958): 168–196.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. “Al-Fārābī’s Paraphrase of the Categories of Aristotle,” edited and translated by Dunlop, D. M., Part II. Islamic Quarterly 5, no. 1 (1959): 21–54.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Fuṣūl al-madanī: Aphorisms of the Statesman, edited and translated by Dunlop, D. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Fuṣūl muntazaʿa, edited by Najjār, Fauzī M.. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1971.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. “Fuṣūl tashtamilu ʿalā jamīʿ mā yuḍtarru ilā maʿrifatihi man arāda al-shurūʿ fī ṣināʿat al-manṭiq, wa-hiya khamsa fuṣūl,” edited and translated by Dunlop, D. M.. Islamic Quarterly 2 (1955): 264–282.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Iḥṣāʾ al-ʿulūm, edited by Amīn, ʿUthmān. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī, 1949.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. “Jawāmiʿ kitāb al-nawāmīs li-Aflāṭūn,” edited by Druart, Thérèse-Anne. Bulletin d’Études Orientales 50 (1998): 109–155.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Kitāb al-alfāẓ al-mustaʿmala fī al-manṭiq, edited by Mahdi, Muhsin. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1968.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Kitāb al-burhān wa-kitāb ṣharāʾiṭ al-yaqīn, edited by Fakhry, Majid. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1987.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Kitāb al-jamʿ bayna raʾyay al-ḥakīmayn Aflāṭūn al-ilāhī wa-Arisṭūṭālīs, edited and translated by Najjār, Fauzī M. and Mallet, Dominique. In L’harmonie entre les opinions de Platon et d’Aristote. Damascus: Institut Français de Damas, 1999.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Kitāb al-mūsīqī, edited by Khashaba, Ghaṭṭās ʿAbd al-Malik and al-Ḥifnī, Maḥmūd Aḥmad. Cairo: Dār al-Kātib al-ʿArabī, 1967.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Kitāb taḥsīl al-saʿāda, edited by al-Jaʿfar, Yāsīn. Beirut: Dār al-Andalus, 1981.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Kitāb al-tanbīh ʿalā sabīl al-saʿāda. In Rasāʾil al-Fārābī. Hyderabad: Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif al-ʿUthmāniyya, 1926.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. al-Manṭiq ʿinda al-Fārābī, edited by al-ʿAjam, Rafīq. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1986.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Risāla fī al-ʿaql, edited by Bouyges, Maurice. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1938.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. “Risāla ṣudira bihā al-kitāb,” edited and translated by Dunlop, D. M.. Islamic Quarterly 3, no. 4 (1957): 224–235.Google Scholar
al-Fārābī, Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. al-Siyāsa al-madaniyya, edited by Najjār, Fauzī M.. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1964.Google Scholar
al-Farrāʾ, Abū Zakariyyāʾ. Maʿānī al-Qurʾān. 3 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Surūr, 1983.Google Scholar
al-Fayrūzābādī, . al-Qāmūs al-muḥīṭ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1995.Google Scholar
al-Hawwārī, Hūd ibn Muḥakkam. Tafsīr kitāb Allāh al-ʿazīz. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1990.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿAbbās, . Tanwīr al-miqbās min tafsīr Ibn ʿAbbās. Egypt: al-Maktaba al-Tijāriyya al-Kubrā, 1960.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿAdī, Yaḥyā. The Reformation of Morals, edited by Griffith, Sidney H.. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿArabī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad. Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-karīm. Beirut: Dār al-Thaqāfa al-ʿArabiyya, 1968.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿAṭiyya, ʿAbd al-Ḥaqq. al-Muḥarrar al-wajīz fī tafsīr al-kitāb al-ʿazīz. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1993–1995.Google Scholar
Ibn Bājja, Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn Yaḥyā. La conduite de l’isolé et deux autres épitres, edited and translated by Genequand, Charles. Paris: Vrin, 2010.Google Scholar
Ibn Bājja, Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn Yaḥyā. Conjunction of the Intellect with Man. In Classical Arabic Philosophy: An Anthology of Sources, edited and translated by McGinnis, Jon and Reisman, David C., 269–283. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2007.Google Scholar
Ibn Bājja, Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn Yaḥyā. Tadbīr al-mutawaḥḥid, edited by Ziyadah, Ma’an. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-Islāmī, 1978.Google Scholar
Ibn Baṭṭāl, Abū al-Ḥasan. Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Rushd, 2000.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Jawzī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. Zād al-masīr fī ʿilm al-tafsīr. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1994.Google Scholar
Ibn Kathīr, Abū al-Fidāʾ al-Qurashī. Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿaẓīm. Riyadh: Dār al-Ṭība, 1998.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Khaṭīb, Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh. Rawḍat al-taʿrīf bi-l-ḥubb al-sharīf. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-ʻArabī, 1968.Google Scholar
Ibn Manẓūr, . Lisān al-ʿarab. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1988.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Nafīs, ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn Abū al-Ḥasan. Sharḥ al-wurayqāt fī al-manṭiq, edited by Ṭālibī, ʿAmmār. Tunis: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 2009.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Nafīs, ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn Abū al-Ḥasan. The “Theologus Autodidactus” of Ibn al-Nafīs, translated by Meyerhof, Max and Schacht, Joseph. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Averroes: The Book of the Decisive Treatise Determining the Connection between the Law and Wisdom and the Epistle Dedicatory, translated by Butterworth, Charles. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Averroes’ Commentary on Plato’s Republic, edited and translated by Rosenthal, Erwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Averroes’ Middle Commentaries on Aristotle’s “Categories” and “De Interpretatione.” Translated by Butterworth, Charles E.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Averroes’ Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s “De Anima”: A Critical Edition of the Arabic Text, edited and translated by Ivry, Alfred L.. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Averroes’ Mittlerer Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ “De Generatione et Corruptione,” edited and translated by Eichner, Heidrun. Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh, 2005.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Averroes on Aristotle’s “Metaphysics”: An Annotated Translation of the So-Called “Epitome,” translated by Arnzen, Rüdiger. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Averroes’ Three Short Commentaries on Aristotle’s “Topics,” “Rhetoric,” and “Poetics,” edited and translated by Butterworth, Charles. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Bidāyat al-mujtahid (The Distinguished Jurist’s Primer). 2 vols. Cairo: Maktabat al-Kulliyyat al-Azhariyya, 1966.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. The Epistle on the Possibility of Conjunction with the Active Intellect by Ibn Rushd with the Commentary of Moses Narboni, edited and translated by Bland, Kalman P.. New York: Jewish Theological Seminary, 1982.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Epitome de Anima, edited by Nogales, Salvator Gomez. Madrid: Instituto Hispano-Arabe de Cultura, 1985.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Epitome del libro “Sobre la generacion y la corrupcion,” edited and translated by Montada, Josep Puig. Madrid: Instituto Hispano-Arabe de Cultura, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 1992.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Falsafat Ibn Rushd. Beirut: Dār al-Arfāq al-Jadīda, 1978.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Ibn Rushd, Massgebliche Abhandlung: Faṣl al-maqāl, translated by Griffel, Frank. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag der Weltreligionen, 2010.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Ibn Rushd’s Metaphysics: A Translation with Introduction of Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Book Lām, translated by Genequand, Charles. Leiden: Brill, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Kashf ʿan manāhij. In The Philosophy and Theology of Averroes, translated by Jamil-ur-Rehman, Mohammad. Baroda: A. G. Widgery, 1921. Also translated by Ibrahim Y. Najjar as Faith and Reason in Islam: Averroes’ Exposition of Religious Arguments. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2004.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Kitāb al-samāʿ al-ṭabīʿī, edited by Montada, Josep Puig. Madrid: Instituto Hispano-Arabe de Cultura, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 1939.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Long Commentary on the “De Anima” of Aristotle, translated by Taylor, Richard C.. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Tafsīr mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa, edited by Bouyges, Maurice. 3 vols. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1938–1942.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Tafsīr al-maqāla al-marsūm ʿalayhā ḥarf al-lām li-Arisṭūṭālīs. Damascus: al-Takwīn, 2007.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Tahāfut al-tahāfut, edited by Bouyges, Maurice. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholoique, 1930.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, translated by van den Bergh, Simon. 2 vols. Cambridge: E. J. W. Gibb Memorial Trust, 1954.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Talkhīṣ kitāb al-nafs, edited by Ahwānī, Aḥmad F.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya, 1950.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Talkhīṣ mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa, edited by Amīn, ʿUthmān. Cairo: Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1958.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Talkhīṣ manṭiq li-Arisṭū li-Ibn Rushd, edited by Jahāmī, Jīrār. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-Lubnānī, 1992.Google Scholar
Ibn Rushd, Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Sharḥ al-burhān li-Arisṭū wa-talkhīṣ al-burhān, edited by Badawī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. Kuwait: al-Majlis al-Waṭanī li-l-Thaqāfa wa-l-Funūn wa-l-Ādāb, Qism al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1984.Google Scholar
Ibn Sallām, Yaḥyā. Tafsīr Yaḥyā ibn Sallām. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2004.Google Scholar
Ibn Sulaymān, Muqātil. Tafsīr Muqātil ibn Sulaymān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2003.Google Scholar
Ibn Ṭufayl, Abū Bakr. Hayy ben Yagdhān: roman philosophique d’Ibn Thofail, edited by Gauthier, Léon. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1936.Google Scholar
Ibn Ṭufayl, Abū Bakr. The History of Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān, translated by Ockley, Simon. London: Chapman and Hall, 1929.Google Scholar
Ibn Ṭufayl, Abū Bakr. Ibn Tufayl’s “Hayy ibn Yaqzān,” translated by Goodman, Lenn Evan. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibn Ṭufayl, Abū Bakr. Le Récit “Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān,” translated by Goichon, Anne-Marie. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1959.Google Scholar
ʿIyāḍ ibn Mūsā, . Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim li-l-qāḍī ʿIyāḍ. Al-Mansoura: Dār al-Wafāʾ, 1998.Google Scholar
al-Jāḥiẓ,  Abū ʿUthmān ʿAmr. Majmūʿ al-rasāʾil, edited by Muḥammad Hārūn, ʿAbd al-Salām. 4 vols. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khānjī, 1964–1979.Google Scholar
al-Khaṭṭābī, Abū Sulaymān Muḥammad. Aʿlām al-ḥadīth fī sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Mecca: Jāmiʿat Umm al-Qurā, 1988.Google Scholar
Maḥallī, Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad, and Abī Bakr al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn. Tafsīr al-Jalālayn. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth, 2001.Google Scholar
al-Marrākushī, ʿAbd al-Wāḥid. Histoire des Almohads d’Abd el-Wāhʾid Merrākechi, translated by Fagnan, Edmond. Algiers: Adolphe Jourdan, 1893.Google Scholar
al-Marrākushī, ʿAbd al-Wāḥid. The History of the Almohads (Kitāb al-muʿjib fī talkhīṣ akhbār al-Maghrib), edited and translated by Dozy, Reinhart. Leiden: Brill, 1881.Google Scholar
al-Māturīdī, Abū Manṣūr. Taʾwīlāt ahl al-sunna. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2005.Google Scholar
al-Māwardī, Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad ibn Habīb. al-Nukat wa-l-ʿuyūn: Tafsīr al-Māwardī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1992.Google Scholar
al-Māzarī, . al-Muʿlim bi-fawāʾid Muslim. Tunis: Bayt al-Ḥikma, 1987.Google Scholar
al-Muḥāsibī, al-Ḥārith ibn Asad. al-ʿAql wa-fahm al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1971.Google Scholar
al-Murtaḍā, Abū al-Qāsim ʿAlī ibn Ḥusayn al-Sharīf. Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-karīm. Qom: Muʾassasat al-Sibṭayn al-ʿĀlamiyya, 1430 [2009].Google Scholar
Muslim, Abū al-Ḥusayn Asākir al-Dīn. The Ṣaḥīḥ of Muslim. Cairo: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyya, 1955.Google Scholar
al-Nawawī, Abū Zakariyya Yaḥyā ibn Sharaf. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim bi-sharḥ Muḥyī al-Dīn al-Nawawī. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifa, 1994.Google Scholar
al-Qummī, ʿAlī ibn Ibrāhīm. Tafsīr al-Qummī. Qom: Muʾassasat al-Imām al-Mahdī, 2014.Google Scholar
Qurṭubī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. al-Jāmiʿ li-aḥkām al-Qurʾān. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-Miṣriyya al-ʿĀmma li-l-Kitāb, 1977.Google Scholar
Quṭb, Sayyid. Fī ẓilāl al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār al-Shurūq, 1973–1974.Google Scholar
al-Rāzī, Abū Ḥātim. Kitāb al-zīna. Sanaʿa: Markaz al-Dirāsāt, 1994.Google Scholar
al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. al-Tafsīr al-kabīr (Mafātīḥ al-ghayb). Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1981.Google Scholar
al-Rāzī, Ibn Abī Ḥātim. Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿaẓīm. Riyadh: Maktabat Nizār Muṣṭafā al-Bāz, 1999.Google Scholar
al-Samarqandī, Abū al-Layth. Tafsīr al-Samarqandī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2014.Google Scholar
al-Ṣanʿānī, ʿAbd al-Razzāq. Muṣannaf. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2000.Google Scholar
al-Suhrawardī, Shihāb al-Dīn. The Mystical and Visionary Treatises of Shihabuddin Yahya Suhrawardi, translated by Thackston, William. London: Octagon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
al-Sulamī, Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. Haqāʾiq al-tafsīr. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2001.Google Scholar
al-Ṭabarī, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2014.Google Scholar
Ṭabarsī, Abū ʿAlī Faḍl ibn Ḥasan. Majmaʿ al-bayān fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1963.Google Scholar
al-Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn. al-Mīzān fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī, 1970.Google Scholar
al-Tirmidhī, al-Ḥakīm. “Ghawr al-umūr.” In Annales Islamologiques 28, edited by Gobillot, Geneviève (1994): 1–83.Google Scholar
al-Tirmidhī, al-Ḥakīm. Nawādir al-uṣūl fī maʿrifat aḥādīth al-rasūl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1992.Google Scholar
al-Ṭūsī, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Ḥasan. al-Tibyān fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Qom: al-Muʾassasa al-Nashr al-Islāmī, 1413 [1992].Google Scholar
al-Tustarī, . Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿaẓīm. Egypt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyya al-Kubrā, 1911.Google Scholar
al-Wāḥidī, ʿAlī ibn Aḥmad. al-Wasīṭ fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-majīd. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1995.Google Scholar
al-Zamakhsharī, Abū al-Qāsim Maḥmūd ibn ʿUmar. al-Kashshāf ʿan ḥaqāʾiq al-tanzīl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2015.Google Scholar
Zenker, J. T. (ed.) Kitāb Arisṭūṭālis al-musammā qāṭīghūriyā ay al-maqūlāt: Aristotelis Categoriae. Leipzig: Engelmann, 1846.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abbasi, Rushain. “Did Premodern Muslims Distinguish the Religious and Secular? The Dīn-Dunyā Binary in Medieval Islamic Thought.” Journal of Islamic Studies 31, no. 2 (2020): 185–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbasi, Rushain. “Islam and the Invention of Religion: A Study of Medieval Muslim Discourses on Dīn.” Studia Islamica 116, no. 1 (2021): 1–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdel Haleem, M. A. S. The Qur’an: A New Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Abed, Shukri B. Aristotelian Logic and Arabic Language in Alfārābī. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Abou-Bakr, Omaima. “Turning the Tables: Perspectives on the Construction of ‘Muslim Manhood.’” Journal of Women of the Middle East and the Islamic World 11 (2003): 98–107.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. Al-Kindi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. “Knowledge of Universals and Particulars in the Baghdad School.” Documenti et studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 18 (2007): 141–164.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter. “Posterior Analytics II.19: A Dialogue with Plato?” In Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato, edited by Harte, Verity, McCabe, Mary M., Sharples, Robert W., and Sheppard, Anne, 1–19. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2010.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter, and Di Giovanni, Matteo (eds.). Interpreting Averroes: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter, and Di Giovanni, Matteo “Introduction.” In Adamson and Di Giovanni, Interpreting Averroes, 1–8, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Peter, and Taylor, Richard C. (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter, and Taylor, Richard C. “Introduction.” In Adamson and Taylor, Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, 1–9, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adang, Camilla. “Islam as the Inborn Religion of Mankind: The Concept of Fiṭra in the Works of Ibn Ḥazm.” Al-Qantara: Revista de Estudios Arabes 21, no. 2 (2000): 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Shahab. Before Orthodoxy: The Satanic Verses in Early Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Shahab. What Is Islam: The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Akasoy, Anna. “The Arabic and Islamic Reception of the Nichomachean Ethics.” In The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, edited by Miller, Jon, 85–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akasoy, Anna, and Fidora, Alexander (eds.). The Arabic Version of the “Nichomachean Ethics.” Leiden: Brill, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhtar, Ali Humayun. Philosophers, Sufis, and Caliphs: Politics and Authority from Cordoba to Cairo and Baghdad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alon, Ilai. “Fārābī’s Funny Flora: Al-Nawābit as ‘Opposition.’” Arabica 37 (1990): 56–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, Alexander. “Ibn Bājja on Man’s Ultimate Felicity.” In Harry Austryn Wolfson Jubilee Volume (English Section), Vol. 1, ed. Lieberman, Saul, 47–87. Jerusalem: American Academy for Jewish Research, 1965.Google Scholar
Anjum, Ovamir. Politics, Law, and Community in Islamic Thought: The Taymiyyan Moment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Arnaldez, Roger. Averroes: A Rationalist in Islam. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Arnzen, Rüdiger. Platonische Ideen in der arabischen Philosophie. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Talal. “The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam.” Occasional Papers Series. Washington, DC: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University, 1986.Google Scholar
al-ʿĀṭī, Ibrāhīm. al-Insān fī falsafat al-Fārābī. Beirut: Dār al-Nubūgh, 1998.Google Scholar
Attar, Samar. The Vital Roots of European Enlightenment: Ibn Ṭufayl’s Influence on Modern Western Thought. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Ayoub, Mahmoud. The Qur’an and Its Interpreters, Volume 1. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ayubi, Zahra. Gendered Morality: Classical Islamic Ethics of the Self, Family, and Society. New York: Columbia University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azadpur, Mohammad. “Is ‘Islamic Philosophy’ Islamic?” In Voices of Diversity and Change, edited by Safi, Omid, Vol. 5 of Voices of Islam, edited by Cornell, Vincent, 23–42. Westport: Preager, 2007.Google Scholar
Bashier, Salman H. The Story of Islamic Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bauer, Karen. An Anthology of Qur’anic Commentaries, Volume II: On Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Bauer, Karen. “A Note on the Relationship between Tafsīr and Common Understanding with Reference to Contracts of Marriage.” In Islamic Cultures, Islamic Contexts: Essays in Honor of Professor Patricia Crone, edited by Ahmed, Asad Q., Sadeghi, Behnam, Hoyland, Robert G., and Silverstein, Adam, 97–111. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Bauer, Thomas. A Culture of Ambiguity: An Alternative History of Islam. New York: Columbia University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Greg. “Coming to Know Principles in Posterior Analytics II 19.” Apeiron 30 (1997): 109–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Zaken, Avner. Reading Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Berman, Lawrence. “Excerpts from the Lost Arabic Original of Ibn Rushd’s ‘Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics.’” Oriens 20 (1967): 31–59.Google Scholar
Berman, Lawrence. “Ibn Rushd’s ‘Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics’ in Medieval Hebrew Literature.” In Multiple Averroès, edited by Jolivet, Jean, 87–321. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1978.Google Scholar
Bernand, Marie. “La critique de la notion de nature (ṭab’) par le Kalām.” Studia Islamica 51 (1980): 59–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Deborah. “Constructing Averroes’ Epistemology.” In Adamson and Di Giovanni, Interpreting Averroes, 96–115, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Deborah. “Estimation (Wahm) in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions.” Dialogue 32 (1993): 219–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Deborah. “Al-Fārābī on Meno’s Paradox.” In The Age of al-Fārābī: Arabic Philosophy in the Fourth/Tenth Century, edited by Adamson, Peter, 15–34. London: Warburg Institute, 2008.Google Scholar
Black, Deborah. “Knowledge (‘Ilm) and Certitude (Yaqīn) in al-Fārābī’s Epistemology.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16, no. 1 (2006): 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaustein, Michael. “Aspects of Ibn Bājja’s Theory of Apprehension.” In Maimonides and Philosophy: Papers Presented at the Sixth Jerusalem Philosophical Encounter (May 1985), edited by Pines, Shlomo, 202–212. Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bou Akl, Ziad. “Averroes on Juridical Reasoning.” In Adamson and Di Giovanni, Interpreting Averroes, 45–63, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouhafa, Feriel. An Economy of Contingency in Ethics, Law, and Truth: Averroes’s Moral Philosophy. Leiden: Brill, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bouhafa, Feriel. “Natural Justice under the Scope of Rhetoric: The Written and Unwritten Laws in Ibn Rushd’s Political and Legal Philosophy.” PhD diss., Georgetown University, 2016.Google Scholar
Bouhafa, Feriel. “Towards New Perspectives on Ethics in Islam: Casuistry, Contingency, and Ambiguity.” Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 21 (2021): 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlin, John. Contingency and Fortune in Aquinas’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Ethics in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Bronstein, David. “The Origin and Aim of Posterior Analytics II.19.” Phronesis 57 (2012): 29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürgel, J. C. “Ibn Tufayl and His Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān: A Turning Point in Arabic Philosophical Writing.” In The Legacy of Muslim Spain, edited by Jayyusi, Salma K., 830–846. Leiden: Brill, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürgel, J. C. “‘Symbols and Hints:’ Some Considerations concerning the Meaning of Ibn Ṭufayl’s Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān.” In Conrad, World of Ibn Ṭufayl, 114–132, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, Charles E. Alfarabi: The Political Writings: Selected Aphorisms and Other Texts. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Butterworth, Charles E. Alfarabi: The Political Writings, Volume 2. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Carra de Vaux, Bernard. “Ibn Ṭufayl.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online, edited by Bearman, P.. Brill, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_3394Google Scholar
Chemli, Mongi. “La philosophie morale d’Ibn Bājja à travers Tadbīr al-mutawaḥḥid.” Institut des Belles Lettres Arabes 31 (1968): 167–221.Google Scholar
Collingwood, Robin G. Autobiography. London: Oxford University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Colmo, Christopher A. Breaking with Athens: Alfarabi as Founder. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colville, Jim. Two Andalusian Philosophers. London: Kegan Paul International, 1999.Google Scholar
Conrad, Lawrence I. “An Andalusian Physician at the Court of the Muwaḥḥids.” Al-Qantara: Revista de Estudios Arabes 16 (1995): 1–13.Google Scholar
Conrad, Lawrence I. “Research Resources on Ibn Ṭufayl and Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān.” In Conrad, , World of Ibn Ṭufayl, 267–293. Leiden: Brill, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Lawrence I. “Through the Thin Veil: On the Question of Communication and the Socialization of Knowledge in Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān.” In Conrad, World of Ibn Ṭufayl, 238–266, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Lawrence I. (ed.). The World of Ibn Ṭufayl: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān. Leiden: Brill, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John M. Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Plotinus to Socrates. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, Henry. Avicenna and the Visionary Recital. New York: Pantheon Books, 1960.Google Scholar
Cornell, Vincent. “Understanding Is the Mother of Ability: Responsibility and Action in the Doctrine of Ibn Tūmart.” Studia Islamica 66 (1987): 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crone, Patricia. “‘No Compulsion in Religion.’ Q. 2:256 in Medieval and Modern Interpretation.” In Le shīʿisme imāmite quarante ans après: hommage à Etan Kohlberg, edited by Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali, Bar-Asher, Meir M., and Hopkins, Simon, 131–178. Turnhout: Brepols, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crone, Patricia. “Prophetie und Ethik bei Fārābī (gest. 339/950).” In L’homme et son univers au Moyen Âge: actes du septième Congrès international de philosophie médiévale, Vol. 2, edited by Wenin, Christian, 729–753. Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 1986.Google Scholar
Crone, Patricia. “The Reception of Islamic Philosophy at Oxford in the 17th Century: The Pocock(e)s’ (Father and Son) Contribution to the Understanding of Islamic Philosophy in Europe.” In The Introduction of Islamic Philosophy into Europe, edited by Butterworth, Charles E., 65–82. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Davidson, Herbert A. Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haas, Frans A. J., Leunissen, Mariska, and Martijn, Marije (eds.). Interpreting Aristotle’s “Posterior Analytics” in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden: Brill, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, Frederick. “Circumcision.” In Encyclopaedia of the Qur’an Online, edited by McAuliffe, Jane Dammen. Brill, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-3922_q3_EQSIM_00079)Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, Matteo. “Averroes, Philosopher of Islam.” In Adamson and Di Giovanni, Interpreting Averroes, 9–26, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “Al-Fārābī, Ethics, and First Intelligibles.” Documenti et studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8 (1997): 403–423.Google Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “Al-Farābī on the Practical and Speculative Aspects of Ethics.” In Les Philosophies morales et politiques au Moyen Âge (Actes du IXe Congrès international de philosophie médiévale), Vol. 1, edited by Carlos Bazán, B., Andújar, Eduardo, and Sbrocchi, Léonard G., 476–85. New York: Legas, 1995.Google Scholar
Dunlop, Douglas Morton. “The Existence and Definition of Philosophy.” Iraq 13, no. 2 (1951): 76–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, Douglas Morton. “Ibn Bādjdja.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online, edited by Bearman, P.. Brill, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_3098Google Scholar
Dunlop, Douglas Morton. “Philosophical Predecessors and Contemporaries of Ibn Bājjah.” Islamic Quarterly 2 (1955): 100–116.Google Scholar
Ekhtiar, Shelly. “Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān: The 18th Century Reception of an Oriental.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 302 (1992): 217–245.Google Scholar
Endress, Gerhard. “Grammatik und Logik: Arabische Philologie und griechische Philosophie im Widerstreit.” In Sprachphilosophie in Antike und Mittelalter, edited by Mojsisch, Burkhard, 163–299. Amsterdam: Grüner, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endress, Gerhard. “Theology as a Rational Science: Aristotelian Philosophy, the Christian Trinity and Islamic Monotheism in the Thought of Yaḥyā ibn ʿAdī.” In Janos, Ideas in Motion in Baghdad and Beyond, 221–225, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endress, Gerhard. The Works of Yaḥyā ibn ʿAdī: An Analytical Inventory. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1977.Google Scholar
Ezzati, Abū al-Faẓl. Islam and Natural Law. London: ICAS Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid (ed.). Averroes (Ibn Rushd): His Life, Works and Influence. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid Al-Fārābī: Founder of Islamic Neoplatonism. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2002.Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid Ibn Bājjah: Opera Metaphysica. Beirut: Dār al-Nahār, 1968.Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid Philosophy, Dogma and the Impact of Greek Thought in Islam. Brookfield, VT: Variorum, 1994.Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid (ed.). “Taʿālīq Ibn Bājja ʿalā kitāb Īsāghūjī.” Al-Abhath 23 (1970): 33–52.Google Scholar
Fakhry, Majid (ed.). Taʿālīq Ibn Bājja ʿalā manṭiq al-Fārābī. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1994.Google Scholar
Fancy, Nahyan. Science and Religion in Mamluk Egypt: Ibn al-Nafīs, Pulmonary Transit and Bodily Resurrection. New York: Routledge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fancy, Nahyan. “The Virtuous Son of the Rational: A Traditionalist’s Response to the Falāsifa.” In Avicenna and His Legacy, edited by Langermann, Zvi, 219–248. Turnhout: Brepols 2009.Google Scholar
Fierro, Maribel. “Spiritual Alienation and Political Activism: The Ġurabāʾ in al-Andalus during the Sixth/Twelfth Century.” Arabica 4, no. 2 (2000): 230–260.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Madeleine. “The Almohad Tawhīd.” Numen 38, no. 1 (1991): 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fradkin, Hillel. “The Political Thought of Ibn Tufayl.” In The Political Aspects of Islamic Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Muhsin S. Mahdi, edited by Butterworth, Charles E., 234–261. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 1960. Reprint, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.Google Scholar
Galston, Miriam. Politics and Excellence: The Political Philosophy of Alfarabi. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, Miriam. “A Re-examination of al-Fārābī’s Neoplatonism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 15 (1977): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser-Wingate, Marc. “Aristotle on Induction and First Principles.” Philosopher’s Imprint 16, no. 4 (2016): 1–20.Google Scholar
Gatje, Helmut, and Schoeler, Gregor. “Averroes Schriften zur Logik: Der arabische Text der zweiten Analytiken im Grossen Kommentar des Averroes.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 130 (1980): 556–585.Google Scholar
Germann, Nadja. “Philosophizing without Philosophy.” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 75, no. 2 (2008): 271–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Ghannouchi, Abdelmajid. “Distinction et relation des discours philosophique et religeux chez Ibn Rushd: Faṣl al-maqāl ou la double vérité.” In Averroes (1126–1198) oder der Triumph des Rationalismus, edited by Khoury, Raif G. 139–145. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, 2002.Google Scholar
Gobillot, Geneviève. “L’épître du discours sur la fiṭra (Risāla fī-l-kalām ʿalā-l-fiṭra) de Taqī-l-Dīn Aḥmad ibn Taymīya (661/1262–728/1328). Présentation et traduction annotée.” Annales Islamologiques 20 (1984): 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobillot, Geneviève. La fiṭra: la conception originelle, ses interprétations et fonctions chez les penseurs musulmans. Damascus: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale, 2000.Google Scholar
Goichon, Anne-Marie. “Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online, edited by Bearman, P.. Brill, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0281Google Scholar
Griffel, Frank. “Contradictions and Lots of Ambiguity: Two New Perspectives on Premodern (and Postclassical) Islamic Societies.” Middle East Book Review 8, no. 1 (2017): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffel, Frank. The Formation of Post-Classical Philosophy in Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffel, Frank. “Al-Ghazālī’s Use of ‘Original Human Disposition’ (Fiṭra) and Its Background in the Teachings of al-Fārābī and Avicenna.” Muslim World 102, no. 1 (2011): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, Sidney H. “From Patriarch Timothy I to Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq: Philosophy and Christian Apology in Abbasid Times; Reason, Ethics and Public Policy.” In Christians and Muslims in Dialogue in the Islamic Orient of the Middle Ages, edited by Tamcke, Martin, 75–98. Beirut: Orient-Institut, 2007.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “Avicenna’s Eastern Philosophy.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 10 (2000): 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “The Empiricism of Avicenna.” Oriens 40, no. 2 (2012): 391–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “Fārābī I. Biography.” In Encyclopaedia Iranica (online edition, 2012), www.iranicaonline.org/articles/farabi-i.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ‘Abbāsid Society. London: Routledge, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “Ibn Ṭufayl on Ibn Sīnā’s Eastern Philosophy.” Oriens 34 (1994): 222–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “The Study of Arabic Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: An Essay on the Historiography of Arabic Philosophy.” BrisMES 29, no. 1 (2002): 5–25.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “Ibn Taymiyya on the Existence of God.” Acta Orientalia 52 (1991): 49–69.Google Scholar
Hamza, Feras, and Rizvi, Sajjad (eds.). An Anthology of Qur’anic Commentaries, Vol. 1: On the Nature of the Divine. London: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Harry, Chelsea C. “Ibn Bājja and Heidegger on Retreat from Society.” Journal of Islamic Philosophy 4 (2008): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Steven. “The Place of the Philosopher in the City according to Ibn Bājja.” In The Political Aspects of Islamic Philosophy: Essays in Honor of M. S. Mahdi, edited by Butterworth, Charles E., 199–233. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1992.Google Scholar
Hasanali, Parveen. “Texts, Translators, Transmissions: Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān and Its Reception in Muslim, Judaic, and Christian Milieux.” PhD diss., McGill University, 1995.Google Scholar
Hatzistavrou, Anthony. “Happiness and the Nature of the Philosopher-Kings.” In New Essays on Plato, edited by Herrmann, Fritz-Gregor, 95–124. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawi, Sami. Islamic Naturalism and Mysticism. Leiden: Brill, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawi, Sami. “Ibn Ṭufayl’s Appraisal of His Predecessors.” Islamic Studies 13 (1974): 135–177.Google Scholar
Hayoun, Maurice-Ruben. “Moses Narbonis (1300–1362) Kommentar zum Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān des Ibn Ṭufayl (ob. 1185).” In “Sprich doch mit deinen Knechten Aramäisch, wir verstehen es!”: 60 Beiträge zur Semitistik: Festschrift für Otto Jastrow zum 60. Geburtstag, edited by Arnold, Werner and Bobzin, Hartmut, 217–235. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2002.Google Scholar
Holmes Katz, Marion. Wives and Work: Islamic Law and Ethics Before Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtzman, Livnat. “Human Choice, Divine Guidance and the Fiṭra Tradition: The Use of Hadith in Theological Treatises by Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya.” In Ibn Taymiyya and His Times, edited by Rapoport, Yossef and Ahmed, Shahab, 163–188. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Holtzman, Livnat. “The Politics of Fiṭra: On Ibn Taymiyya’s Epistemological Optimism: An Essay Review on Politics, Law, and Community in Islamic Thought: The Taymiyyan Moment, by Ovamir Anjum.” Ilahiyat Studies: A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies 5, no. 2 (2014): 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, Jon. Ibn Taymiyya’s Theodicy of Perpetual Optimism. Leiden: Brill , 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, Jon. “Fiṭra.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam Three Online, edited by Fleet, Kate, Krämer, Gudrun, Matringe, Denis, Nawas, John, and Stewart, Devin J.. Brill, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_27155Google Scholar
Hughes, Aaron W. The Texture of the Divine: Imagination in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Humbert, Geneviève. “al-Sīrāfī.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online, edited by Bearman, P.. Brill, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_1090Google Scholar
Ibrāhīm, Najāshī. Khiṣāl al-fiṭra fī al-fiqh al-islāmī. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat al-Taqaddum, 1980.Google Scholar
Idris, Murad. “Ibn Ṭufayl’s Critique of Politics.” Journal of Islamic Philosophy 7 (2011): 67–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idris, Murad. “Producing Islamic Philosophy: The Life and Afterlives of Ibn Ṭufayl’s Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān in Global History, 1882–1947.” European Journal of Political Theory 15, no. 4 (2016): 382–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, Brannon. “Is Islam a ‘Religion’? Contesting Din-Religion Equivalence in Twentieth Century Islamist Discourse.” In Words of Experience: Translating Islam with Carl W. Ernst, edited by Wheeler, Brannon and Fuerst, Ilyse Morgenstein, 19–40. Sheffield: Equinox, 2021.Google Scholar
Jaffray, Angela. “At the Threshold of Philosophy: A Study of al-Fārābī’s Introductory Works on Logic.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 2000.Google Scholar
Janos, Damien. “Al-Fārābī.” In Encyclopedia of Islam Three Online, edited by Fleet, Kate, Kraemer, Gudrun, Matringe, Denis, Nawas, John, and Stewart, Devin J.. Brill, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_26962Google Scholar
Janos, Damien. (ed.). Ideas in Motion in Baghdad and Beyond: Philosophical and Theological Exchanges between Christians and Muslims in the Third/Ninth and Fourth/Tenth Centuries. Leiden: Brill, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janos, Damien. Method, Structure, and Development in al-Fārābī’s Cosmology. Leiden: Brill, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juynboll, Theodorus W. “Farḍ.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online, edited by Bearman, P.. Brill, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_2277Google Scholar
Karamustafa, Ahmet. “Islamic Din as an Alternative to Western Models of ‘Religion.’” In Religion, Theory, Critique: Classic and Contemporary Approaches and Methodologies, edited by King, Richard, 163–171. New York: Columbia University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasimis, Demetra. “Plato’s Open Secret.” Contemporary Political Theory 15, no. 4 (2016): 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemal, Salim. “Justifications of Poetic Validity: Ibn Ṭufayl’s Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān and Ibn Sīnā’s Commentary on the Poetics of Aristotle.” In Conrad, World of Ibn Tufayl, 195–228, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, Alexander. Language between God and the Poets: Maʿnā in the Eleventh Century. Oakland: University of California Press, [2018].Google Scholar
Khalidi, Muhammad. Medieval Islamic Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khoury, Raif Georges (ed.). Averroes (1126–1198) oder der Triumph des Rationalismus. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, 2002.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua, Prasada, Sandeep, and Newman, George E.. “Dual Character Concepts and the Normative Dimension of Conceptual Representation.” Cognition 127, no. 2 (May 2013): 242–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochin, Michael S. “Weeds: Cultivating the Imagination in Medieval Arabic Political Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 60, no. 3 (1999): 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korolec, Jerzy B. “Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles.” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 31 (1992): 61–118.Google Scholar
Kraemer, Joel L. “The Jihād of the Falāsifa.” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 10 (1987): 288–324.Google Scholar
Kraemer, Joel L. Philosophy in the Renaissance of Islam: Abū Sulaymān al-Sijistānī and His Circle. Leiden: Brill, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krawietz, Birgit. “Body, in Law.” In Encyclopedia of Islam Three Online, edited by Fleet, Kate, Kraemer, Gudrun, Matringe, Denis, Nawas, John, and Stewart, D. J.. Brill, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_23722Google Scholar
Kruk, Remke. “An 18th Century Descendant of Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān and Robinson Crusoe.” Arabica 34 (1987): 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruk, Remke. “A Frothy Bubble: Spontaneous Generation in the Medieval Islamic Tradition.” Journal of Semitic Studies 35 (1990): 330–334.Google Scholar
Kruk, Remke. “Neoplatonists and After: From Ibn Ṭufayl to Ibn al- Nafīs.” In The Neoplatonic Tradition: Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Themes, edited by Vanderjagt, Arie and Patzold, Detlev, 75–85. Cologne: Dinter, 1991.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, Taneli. Ibn Ṭufayl: Living the Life of Reason. London: Oneworld Publications, 2014.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, Taneli. “No Man Is an Island: Nature and Ethics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46, no. 2 (2008): 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambton, Ann. State and Government in Medieval Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lameer, Joep. Al-Fārābī and Aristotelian Syllogistics: Greek Theory and Islamic Practice. Leiden: Brill, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Melissa. The Birth of Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Lane, Melissa. “Virtue as the Love of Knowledge in Plato’s Symposium and Republic.” In Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honor of Myles Burnyeat, edited by Scott, Dominic, 44–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langhade, Jacques. Du Coran à la philosophie: la langue arabe et la formation du vocabulaire philosophique de Farabi. Damascus: Institut Français de Damas, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaman, Oliver. Averroes and His Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Leaman, Oliver. “Ibn Bājja on Society.” Der Islam 57 (1980): 109–119.Google Scholar
Lerner, Ralph, and Mahdi, Muhsin (eds.). Medieval Political Philosophy: A Sourcebook. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Leslie, Sarah-Jane. “‘Hillary Clinton is the Only Real Man in the White House’: Dual Character Concepts, Generics, and Gender.” Analytic Philosophy 56, vol. 2 (2015): 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lettinck, Paul. Aristotle’s Physics and Its Reception in the Arabic World. New York: Brill, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lettinck, Paul. “Ibn Bājja’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics.” In Akten des Zweiten Symposium Græco-Arabicum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum 1987, edited by Endress, Gerhard, 32–40. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner, 1989.Google Scholar
Lizzini, Olga. “What Does Tawḥīd Mean? Yaḥyā ibn ʿAdī’s Treatise on the Affirmation of the Unity of God between Philosophy and Theology.” In Janos, Ideas in Motion in Baghdad and Beyond, 253–280, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. “Law and Nature in Greek Thought.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law, edited by Gagarin, Michael and Cohen, David, 412–430. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. A Short History of Ethics: A History of Moral Philosophy from the Homeric Age to the Twentieth Century. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Mahdi, Muhsin. Alfarabi and the Foundation of Islamic Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahdi, Muhsin. Alfarabi’s Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1962.Google Scholar
Mahdi, Muhsin. “Language and Logic in Classical Islam.” In Logic in Classical Islamic Culture, edited by von Grunebaum, Gustave E., 51–83. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1970.Google Scholar
March, Andrew F. “Taking People as They Are: Islam as a ‘Realistic Utopia’ in the Political Theory of Sayyid Quṭb.” American Political Science Review 104, no. 1 (2010): 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margoliouth, David Samuel. “The Discussion between Abu Bishr Matta and Abu Saʿid al-Sirafi on the Merits of Logic and Grammar.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1905): 79–129.Google Scholar
Marlow, Louise. Hierarchy and Egalitarianism in Islamic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmura, Michael. “The Islamic Philosophers’ Conception of Islam.” In Islam’s Understanding of Itself, edited by Hovannisian, Richard G. and Vryonis, Speros Jr., 87–102. Malibu: Undena Publications, 1983.Google Scholar
Marmura, Michael. “The Philosopher and Society.” Arab Studies Quarterly 1, no. 4 (1979): 309–323.Google Scholar
McKirahan, Richard D. Jr. Philosophy before Socrates. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994.Google Scholar
Menn, Stephen. “Al-Fārābī’s Kitāb al-ḥurūf and His Analysis of the Senses of Being.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 18 (2008): 59–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensia, Mokdad. “Dogmatics, Theology, and Philosophy in Averroes.” In Adamson and Di Giovanni, Interpreting Averroes, 27–44, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miṣbāh, ʿUthmān. Mafhūm al-fiṭra: Dirāsa naqdiyya li-maqālāt al-islāmiyyīn. Morocco: Islamic-West-Institute for Education and Scientific Research, 2012.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Yasien. Fitra: The Islamic Concept of Human Nature. London: Ta-Ha Publishers, 1996.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Yasien. “The Interpretations of Fiṭrah.” Islamic Studies 34, no. 2 (1995): 129–151.Google Scholar
Montada, Josef P. “Philosophy in Andalusia: Ibn Bājja and Ibn Ṭufayl.” In Adamson and Taylor, Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, 155–179, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motzki, Harald. “The Muṣannaf of ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Ṣanʿānī as a Source of Authentic Aḥādīth of the First Islamic Century.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 50, no. 1 (January 1991): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muṭahharī, Murtaḍā. Fiṭrat. Tehran: Ṣadrā, 1991.Google Scholar
Naaman, Erez. Literature and the Islamic Court: Cultural Life Under al-Ṣāḥib ibn ʿAbbād. New York: Routledge, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naaman, Erez. “Nurture over Nature: Habitus from al-Fārābī through Ibn Khaldūn to ʿAbduh.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 137, no. 1 (2017): 1–24.Google Scholar
Nasri, Hani. “The Mystic and Society according to Ibn Bajjah and Ibn Ṭufayl.” International Philosophical Quarterly 26 (1986): 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neria, Chaim Meir. “Al-Fārābī’s Lost Commentary on the Ethics: New Textual Evidence.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 23, no. 1 (2013): 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netton, Ian Richard. Al-Fārābī and His School. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Netton, Ian Richard. Muslim Neoplatonists. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic J. Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Orwin, Alexander. Redefining the Muslim Community: Ethnicity, Religion, and Politics in the Thought of Alfarabi. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özervarli, M. Sait. “Divine Wisdom, Human Agency and the Fiṭra in Ibn Taymiyya’s Thought.” In Islamic Theology, Philosophy and Law: Debating Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, edited by Krawietz, Birgit and Tamer, Georges, 37–60. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacios, Miguel Asin. “Avempace Botanico.” Al-Andalus 5, no. 2 (1940): 255–300.Google Scholar
Parens, Joshua. An Islamic Philosophy of Virtuous Religions. Introducing Alfarabi. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincoffs, Edmund. “Quandry Ethics.” Mind 80, no. 320 (1971): 552–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. “The Limitations of Human Knowledge According to al-Farābī, Ibn Bājja, and Maimonides.” In Maimonides: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Buijs, Joseph A., 91–121. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. “A Tenth Century Philosophical Correspondence.” In Studies in the History of Jewish Thought, edited by Pines, Shlomo, 177–210. Reprint, Jerusalem: Magnes Press, Hebrew University, 1955 [1997].Google Scholar
Pingree, D. E., and Nomanul Haq, S.. “Ṭabīʿa.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online, edited by Bearman, P.. Brill, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_1135Google Scholar
Qadhi, Yasir. “Confronting the Transgender Ideology.” Youtube Video, uploaded May 5, 2023. www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEKQv04OSCsGoogle Scholar
Qadhi, Yasir. “Reconciling Reason and Revelation in the Writings of Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728/1328): An Analytical Study of Ibn Taymiyya’s ‘Dar’ al-ta’arud.’” PhD diss., Yale University, 2013.Google Scholar
al-Qarnī, ʿAlī ibn ʿAbd Allāh. al-Fiṭra: Ḥaqīqatuhā wa-madhāhib al-nās fīhā. Riyadh: Dār al-Muslim, 2002.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. “On What There Is.” Review of Metaphysics 2 (1948): 21–38.Google Scholar
Rashed, Marwan. “On the Authorship of the Treatise On the Harmonization of the Opinions of the Two Sages Attributed to al-Fārābī.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 19, no. 1 (2009): 43–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, David C. “Plato’s Republic in Arabic: A Newly Discovered Passage.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14, no. 2 (2004): 263–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Erwin I. J. “The Place of Politics in the Philosophy of Ibn Bājja.” Islamic Culture 25, no. 1 (1951): 187–211.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Erwin I. J. Political Thought in Medieval Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Erwin I. J. Political Thought in Medieval Islam: An Introductory Outline. London: Cambridge University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. Greek Philosophy in the Arab World. Brookfield, VT: Variorum, 1990.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Ulrich. “Al-Fārābī und die Muʿtazila.” In A Common Rationality. Muʿtazilism in Islam and Judaism, edited by Adang, Camilla, Schmidtke, Sabine, and Sklare, David, 59–80. Würzburg: Ergon, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Ulrich. (ed.). Philosophie in der Islamischen Welt (Bd.1). Basel: Schwabe, 2012.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Ulrich, Hansberger, Rotraud, and Adamson, Peter (eds.). Philosophy in the Islamic World, Volume I: 8th–10th Centuries. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Saleh, Walid. The Formation of the Classical Tafsīr Tradition: The Qurʼān Commentary of al-Thaʿlabī (d. 427/1035). Leiden: Brill, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saleh, Walid. “Marginalia and Peripheries: A Tunisian Historian and the History of Qur’anic Exegesis.” Numen 68 (2011): 284–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiker, Hasan. Hierarchy and Freedom: An Examination of Some Classical Metaphysical and Post-Enlightenment Accounts of Human Autonomy. Cambridge: New Andalus Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Spiker, Hasan. Things as They Are: Nafs al-Amr and the Metaphysical Foundations of Objective Truths. Abu Dhabi: Tabah Research, 2021.Google Scholar
Strohmaier, Gotthard. “Chaj ben Mekitz: Die unbekannte Quelle der Divina Commedia.” Deutsches Dante-Jahrbuch 55–56 (1980–1981): 191–207.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Sarah. Andalus and Sefarad. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Sarah. “Avicenna’s Philosophical Stories: Aristotle’s Poetics Reinterpreted.” Arabica 39, no. 2 (1992): 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroumsa, Sarah. “The Beginnings of Mystical Philosophy.” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, 36 (2009): 201–253.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Sarah. “Philosopher-King or Philosopher-Courtier? Theory and Reality in the Falāsifa’s Place in Islamic Society.” In Identidades Marginales, edited by de la Puente, Cristina, 433–459. Madrid: CSIC, 1988.Google Scholar
Switzer, Robert. “The Place of Nature in Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān and Robinson Crusoe.” In Culture and the Natural Environment: Ancient and Modern Middle Eastern Texts, edited by Elmusa, Sharif S., 49–71. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Szpiech, Ryan. “In Search of Ibn Sīnā’s ‘Oriental Philosophy’ in Medieval Castile.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 20, no. 2 (2010): 185 – 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamcke, Martin (ed.). Christians and Muslims in Dialogue in the Islamic Orient of the Middle Ages. Beirut: Orient-Institut, 2007.Google Scholar
Tareen, SherAli K. Defending Muhammad in Modernity. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. “Nomos and Physis in Democritus and Plato.” In Freedom, Reason, and the Polis: Essays in Ancient Greek Political Philosophy, edited by Keyt, David and Miller, Fred D., Jr., 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard C. “Averroes: Religious Dialectic and Aristotelian Philosophical Thought.” In Adamson and Taylor, Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, 180–200, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakkar, Jonny. Plato as Critical Theorist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Théry, P. G. “Conversation à Marrakech: Révolution intellectuelle dans l’Europe.” L’Islam et l’Occident (1947): 73–91.Google Scholar
Thom, Paul. “Averroes’ Logic.” In Adamson and Di Giovanni, Interpreting Averroes, 81–95, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Tobgui, Carl Sharif. Ibn Taymiyya on Reason and Revelation: A Study of Darʾ taʿāruḍ al-ʿaql wa-l-naql. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Urvoy, Dominique. Ibn Rushd. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Urvoy, Dominique. “La pensée Almohade dans l’oeuvre d’Averroès.” In Multiple Averroès: Actes du Colloque international organizé à l’occasion du 850e anniversaire de la naissance d’Averroès, Paris 20–23 Septembre 1976, 47–53. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1978.Google Scholar
Vallat, Philippe. Al-Farabi et l’École d’Alexandrie: Des prémisses de la connaissances à la philosophie politique. Paris: Vrin, 2004.Google Scholar
Van Ess, Joseph. Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1997.Google Scholar
Van Ess, Joseph. Zwischen Ḥadīth und Theologie: Studien zum Entstehen Prädestinatianischer Überlieferung. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1975.Google Scholar
Van Gelder, Geert, and Hammond, Marle (eds.). Takhyīl: The Imaginary in Classical Arabic Poetics. Exeter: E. J. W. Gibb Memorial Trust, 2008.Google Scholar
Vasalou, Sophia. Ibn Taymiyya’s Theological Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasalou, Sophia. Moral Agents and Their Deserts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Doetinchem de Rande, Raissa A. “An Exceptional Sage and the Need for the Messenger: The Politics of Fiṭra in a 12th-Century Tale.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 29, no. 2 (2019): 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Doetinchem de Rande, Raissa A. “In the Shadow of Hourani: Thinking Islamic Ethics in the 21st Century.” Journal of Religious Ethics 51, no. 2 (2023): 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Doetinchem de Rande, Raissa A. “A Possible Influence: Ibn Masarra’s (d. 931) Epistle of Contemplation (Risālat al-iʿtibār) and Ibn Ṭufayl’s (d. 1185) Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān (Risāla Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān).” Revista al-Qantara, 44, no. 1 (2023): 1–14 (first view, online).Google Scholar
Von Kuegelgen, Anke. Averroes und die arabische Moderne. Leiden: Brill, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Kuegelgen, Anke. “The Poison of Philosophy: Ibn Taymiyya’s Struggle for and against Reason.” In Islamic Theology, Philosophy and Law: Debating Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, edited by Krawietz, Birgit and Tamer, Georges, 253–328. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Paul E. “Philosophy of Religion in al-Fārābī, Ibn Sīnā, and Ibn Ṭufayl.” In Reason and Inspiration in Islam: Theology, Philosophy, and Mysticism in Muslim Thought (Essays in Honour of Hermann Landolt), edited by Lawson, Todd, 85–101. London: I. B. Tauris, 2005.Google Scholar
Walker, Vanessa. “‘Natürliche Gotteskompetenz’ und fiṭra als Ausgangspunkte einer gemeinsamen abrahamitischen Religionsanthropologie.” Hikma 10, no. 2 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Richard. “Aspects of Islamic Political Thought.” Oriens 16 (1963): 40–60.Google Scholar
Walzer, Richard. “Al-Farābī.” In Encylopedia of Islam New Edition Online, edited by Bearman, P.. Brill, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0212Google Scholar
Watt, John A. “Christianity in the Renaissance of Islam: Abū Bishr Mattā, al-Fārābī, and Yaḥyā ibn ʿ Adī.” In Christians and Muslims in Dialogue in the Islamic Orient of the Middle Ages. Christlich-muslimische Gespräche im Mittelalter, edited by Tamcke, Martin, 99–112. Beirut: Orient-Institut, 2007.Google Scholar
Watt, John A. “The Syriac Aristotelian Tradition and the Syro-Arabic Baghdad Philosophers.” In Janos, Ideas in Motion in Baghdad and Beyond, 7–43, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, W. Montgomery. Islamic Philosophy and Theology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Watt, W. Montgomery. “Philosophy and Theology under the Almohads.” In Actas primer congreso de estudios arabes e islamicos, 101–108. Madrid: Comite Permanente del Congreso de Estudios Arabes e Islamicos, 1964.Google Scholar
Wensinck, Arent J. The Muslim Creed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Mark R. “Concept Acquisition in ‘Posterior Analytics’ B19.” Hermathena 167 (Winter 1999): 13–34.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirmer, David. “Arabic Philosophy and the Art of Reading, I: Political Philosophy.” In La philosophie arabe a l’etude: Sens, limites et defis d’une discipline moderne, edited by Brenet, Jean-Baptiste and Lizzini, Olga, 179–250. Paris: Vrin, 2019.Google Scholar
Wirmer, David. Vom Denken der Natur zur Natur des Denkens. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woerther, Frédérique. “Averroes’ Goals in the Paraphrase (Middle Commentary) of Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics.” In Adamson and Di Giovanni, Interpreting Averroes, 218–232, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarepour, Mohammad Saleh. “Avicenna’s Notion of Fiṭrīyāt: A Note on Gutas’s Interpretation.” Philosophy East and West 70, no. 3 (2020): 819–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziyadah, Ma’an. “Ibn Bājja’s Book Tadbīr al-Mutawaḥḥid: An Edition, Translation and Commentary.” MA thesis, McGill University, 1968.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×