Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-64p75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-05T10:25:37.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2025

Edited by
Claude Panaccio  and
Jenny Pelletier
Claude Panaccio
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Jenny Pelletier
Affiliation:
University of Leuven
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Ockham’s Summa Logicae
A Critical Guide
 , pp. 289 - 309
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Alexander of Villedieu. Doctrinale. Edited by Reichling, D.. Cambridge: A. Hofmann, 1893.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Destructiones modorum significandi: Herausgegeben und mit Einleitung und Registern versehen. Edited by Kaczmarek, Ludger. Cambridge: B. R. Grüner, 1994. [Translated by Milo Crimi, “Destroying the Modes of Signifying: Anti-modism in Late Medieval Philosophy of Language,” PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 2020.]10.1075/bsp.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. “The Emmeran Treatise on Impossible Positio.” In Medieval Formal Logic. Edited by Yrjönsuuri, M., 217–23. Cambridge: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.10.1007/978-94-015-9713-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. The Fourth Grammatical Treatise. Edited by Ross, M. C. and Wellendorf, J.. Cambridge: Viking Society for Northern Research, 2014.Google Scholar
Aristoteles Latinus, IV, 1–4. Analytica Posteriora, translationes Iacobi, Anonymi sive Ioannis, Gerardi et recensio Guillelmi de Moerbeka. Edited by Laurentius Minio-Paluello and Bernardus C. Dod. Cambridge: Desclée de Brouwer, 1968.Google Scholar
Aristoteles Latinus, III, 1–4. Analytica Priora, translatio Boethii (recensiones duae), translatio anonyma, pseudo-Philoponi aliorumque scholia, specimina translationum recentiorum. Edited by Minio-Paluello, Laurentius. Reprint with a supplement composed by J. Shiel. Cambridge: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Aristoteles Latinus, XXVI, 1–3. Ethica Nichomachea fasc 4, translatio Roberti Grosseteste Lincolniensis sive Liber Ethicorum, recensio recognita secundum exemplar Parisiacum. Edited by Renatus A. Gauthier. Cambridge: Desclée de Brouwer, Leiden: Brill, 1973.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Categories and On Interpretation. Translated by Ackrill, J. L.. Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 2002 [originally printed in 1963].Google Scholar
Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. Translated with commentary by Barnes, J., Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Prior Analytics I. Translated with an introduction and commentary by Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Averroes. De physico auditu, vol. 5. Cambridge: Iuntina edition, 1562.Google Scholar
Boethius. De hypotheticis syllogismis. Edited and translated with commentary by Orbetello, Luca. Cambridge: Paideia, 1969.Google Scholar
Bradwardine, Thomas. Insolubilia. Edited by Read, Stephen (with English translation). Cambridge: Peeters, 2010.Google Scholar
Buridan, John. Summulae de Dialectica. Translated by Klima, Gyula. Cambridge: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Burley, Walter. “Obligations” (selections). In The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, vol. 1: Logic and the Philosophy of Language. Edited by Kretzmann, Norman and Stump, Eleonore, 369–412. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Burley, Walter. On the Purity of the Art of Logic: The Shorter and the Longer Treatises. Translated by Spade, Paul Vincent. Cambridge: Yale University Press, 2000.10.12987/yale/9780300082005.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campsall, Richard (Pseudo-). “Logica Campsale Anglicj, ualde utilis et realis contra Ocham.” In The Works of Richard of Campsall, vol. 2. Edited by Synan, Edward A., 75–420. Cambridge: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1982.Google Scholar
Chatton, Walter. Lectura super Sententias. 3 vols. Edited by Wey, Joseph C. and Etzkorn, Girard J.. Cambridge: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2007–9.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, N. J. “Walter Burley’s ‘De consequentiis,’ an Edition.” Franciscan Studies 40 (1980): 102–66.10.1353/frc.1980.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosseteste, Robert. Commentarius in Posteriorum analyticorum libros. Edited by Rossi, P. B.. Cambridge: Olschki, 1981.Google Scholar
Kilwardby, Robert. Notule libri Priorum. Critical edition with translation, introduction, and indexes by Paul Thom and John Scott. 2 vols. Cambridge: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 2015.Google Scholar
Nicholas of Paris. “Syncategoremata.” In Die 13de eeuwse Tractaten over syncategorematische Termen, vol. 2: Uitgave van Nicolaes von Parijs’ Syncategoremata. Edited by Braakhuis, H. A. G.. Cambridge: Krips Repro Meppel, 1979.Google Scholar
Paul of Venice. “Logica Magna: Secunda Pars. Tractatus de Obligationibus (= Part II, Fascicule 8).” In The British Academy: Classical and Medieval Logic Texts, vol. 5. Edited by Ashworth, E. Jennifer. Cambridge: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1988.Google Scholar
Paul of Venice. Logica Magna: The Treatise on Insolubles. Edited by Read, Stephen and Bartocci, Barbara (with English translation). Cambridge: Peeters, 2022.Google Scholar
Peter of Spain. Peter of Spain: Summaries of Logic. Edited and translated by Copenhaver, Brian with Normore, Calvin and Parsons, Terence. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/actrade/9780199669585.book.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, d’Ailly. Concepts and Insolubles. Translated by Spade, Paul Vincent. Cambridge: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1980.Google Scholar
Thomas of Erfurt. Grammatica Speculativa of Thomas of Erfurt. Edited and translated by Bursill-Hall, G. L.. Cambridge: Longman, 1972.Google Scholar
Uguccione da Pisa. Derivationes. 2 vols. Edited by Arbizzoni, Guido, Cecchini, Enzo, Lanciotti, Settimio et al. Cambridge: SISMEL Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2004.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. Demonstration and Scientific Knowledge in William of Ockham: A Translation of Summa logicae, III–2: De syllogismo demonstrativo and Selections from the Prologue to the Ordinatio. Translated by Longeway, J. E.. Cambridge: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. Opera philosophica. 7 vols. Edited by Gál, Gedeon et al. Cambridge: The Franciscan Institute, 1974–88.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. Opera theologica. 10 vols. Edited by Gál, Gedeon et al. Cambridge: The Franciscan Institute, 1967–86.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. Predestination, God’s Foreknowledge, and Future Contingents. 2nd edition. Translated by Adams, Marilyn McCord and Kretzmann, Norman. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. Quodlibetal Questions: Quodlibets 1–4. Translated by Freddoso, Alfred J. and Kelley, Francis E.. Cambridge: Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. Quodlibetal Questions: Quodlibets 5–7. Translated by Freddoso, Alfred J.. Cambridge: Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. William of Ockham’s Theory of Propositions: Part II of the Summa Logicae. Translated by Freddoso, Alfred J. and Schuurman, Henry. Cambridge: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. William of Ockham’s Theory of Terms: Part I of the Summa Logicae. Translated by Loux, Michael J.. Cambridge: University of Notre Dame Press, 1974.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. Selections from Part I of William of Ockham’s Summa logicae. Translated by Spade, Paul Vincent. https://pvspade.com.Google Scholar
William of Ockham. Somme de logique. 4 vols. French translation by Biard, Joël, Grellard, Christophe, and Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang. Cambridge: Éditions Trans Europ Repress, 1988–2008.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Adams, Marilyn M. “Ockham’s Nominalism and Unreal Entities.” The Philosophical Review 86 (1977): 144–76.10.2307/2184004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Marilyn M. “Was Ockham a Humean about Efficient Causality?” Franciscan Studies 39 (1979): 5–48.10.1353/frc.1979.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Marilyn M. William Ockham. 2 vols. Cambridge: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn M., and Kretzmann, Norman. “Introduction.” In William Ockham, Predestination, God’s Foreknowledge, and Future Contingents. 2nd edition. Translated by Adams, Marilyn McCord and Kretzmann, Norman, 1–33. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
Angelelli, I. “The Techniques of Disputation in the History of Logic.” The Journal of Philosophy 67 (1970): 800–15.10.2307/2024013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “Burley, Ockham, and English Logicians on Impositio as a Type of Obligatio.” In The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Pelletier, Jenny and Roques, Magali, 233–45. Cambridge: Springer International Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “Inconsistency and Paradox in Medieval Disputations: A Development of Some Hints in Ockham.” Franciscan Studies 44 (1984): 129–39.10.1353/frc.1984.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. Language and Logic in the Post-medieval Period. Cambridge: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1974.10.1007/978-94-010-2226-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “Metaphor and the Logicians from Aristotle to Cajetan.” Vivarium 45 (2007): 311–27.10.1163/156853407X217795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. “The Post-medieval Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Edited by Dutilh Novaes, Catarina and Read, Stephen, 166–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer, and Spade, Paul V.. “Logic in Late Medieval Oxford.” In The History of the University of Oxford, vol. 2: Late Medieval Oxford. Edited by Catto, J. I. and Evans, R., 35–64. Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 1992.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199510122.003.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awodey, Steve. “Continuity and Logical Completeness: An Application of Sheaf Theory and Topoi.” In The Age of Alternative Logics: Assessing Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics Today. Edited by van Benthem, Johan, Heinzmann, Gerhard, Rebuschi, Manuel, and Visser, Henk, 139–49. Cambridge: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
Baudry, Léon. Guillaume d’Occam. Sa vie, ses oeuvres, ses idées sociales et politiques. Cambridge: J. Vrin, 1949.Google Scholar
Baudry, Léon. Lexique philosophique de Guillaume d’Ockham. Étude des notions fondamentales. Cambridge: Lethielleux, 1958.Google Scholar
Bealer, George. “Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance.” In Conceivability and Possibility. Edited by Gendler, Tamar Szabo and Hawthorne, John, 71–125. Cambridge: Oxford University Press. 2002.10.1093/oso/9780198250890.003.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bealer, George. Quality and Concept. Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 1982.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198244288.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beretta, Béatrice. Ad Aliquid: La relation chez Guillaume d’Occam. Cambridge: Éditions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse, 1999.Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. Guillaume d’Ockham et la théologie. Cambridge: Éditions du Cerf, 1999.Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. “Les controverses sur l’objet du savoir et les ‘complexe significabilia’ à Paris au XIVe siècle.” In Quia inter doctores est magna dissensio: Les débats de philosophie naturelle à Paris au XIVe siècle. Edited by Caroti, Stefano, 1–31. Cambridge: Olschki, 2004.Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. “Nominalism in the Later Middle Ages.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, vol. 2. Edited by Pasnau, Robert, 661–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. “Peter of Ailly.” In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy between 500 and 1500. Edited by Lagerlund, Henrik, 953–57. Cambridge: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
Black, Max. “Metaphor.” In Models and Metaphors, 24–47. Cambridge: Cornell University Press, 1962.10.7591/9781501741326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, Patrick, and van Benthem, Johan. “Modal Logic: A Semantic Perspective.” In Handbook of Modal Logic, vol. 3. Edited by Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J., and Wolter, F., 1–84. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2007.10.1016/S1570-2464(07)80004-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehner, Philotheus. Collected Articles on Ockham. Edited by Buytaert, Eligius. Cambridge: The Franciscan Institute, 1992.Google Scholar
Boehner, Philotheus. “Ockham’s Theory of Signification.” Franciscan Studies 6 (1946): 143–70. [Reprinted in Collected Articles, 201–32.]10.1353/frc.1946.0021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehner, Philotheus. “Ockham’s Theory of Supposition and the Notion of Truth.” Franciscan Studies 6 (1946): 261–92. [Reprinted in Collected Articles, 232–67.]Google Scholar
Boh, Ivan. Epistemic Logic in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Boh, Ivan. “Metalanguage and the Concept of Ens Secundae Intentionis.” In Thomas von Aquin: Werk und Wirkung im Licht neuerer Forschungen. Edited by Zimmerman, Albert, 53–70. Cambridge: De Gruyter, 1987.Google Scholar
Boler, John. “Connotative Terms in Ockham.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1985): 21–37.Google Scholar
Boolos, George, Burgess, John, and Jeffrey, Richard, Computability and Logic. 4th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.10.1017/CBO9781139164931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie, Alexander. Introduction to Medieval Logic. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 1993.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198240266.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey. “Medieval Theories of Relations.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2018 edition. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/relations-medieval/.Google Scholar
Brower-Toland, Susan. “Causation and Mental Content: Against the Externalist Reading of Ockham.” In The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Claude Panaccio. Edited by Pelletier, Jenny and Roques, Magali, 59–80. Cambridge: Springer International Publishing, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66634-1_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower-Toland, Susan. “Deflecting Ockham’s Razor: A Medieval Debate over Ontological Commitment.” Mind 132 (2023): 659–79.10.1093/mind/fzad007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower-Toland, Susan. “Medieval Approaches to Consciousness: Ockham and Chatton.” Philosophers’ Imprint 12 (2012): 1–29.Google Scholar
Brower-Toland, Susan. “Medieval Theories of Propositions: Ockham and the Later Medieval Debate.” In The Routledge Handbook of Propositions. Edited by Murray, A. R. and Tillman, C., 115–29. Cambridge: Routledge, 2023.Google Scholar
Brower-Toland, Susan. “Ockham on Judgment, Concepts, and the Problem of Intentionality.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37.1 (2007): 67–110.10.1353/cjp.2007.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower-Toland, Susan. “William Ockham on the Scope and Limits of Consciousness.” Vivarium 52.3–4 (2014): 197–219.10.1163/15685349-12341275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Deborah. “The Puzzle of Names in Ockham’s Theory of Mental Language.” Metaphysics 50.1 (1996): 79–99.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F. “Walter Chatton’s Lectura and William of Ockham’s Quaestiones in libros Physicorum.” In Essays Honoring Allan B. Wolter. Edited by Frank, William A. and Etzkorn, Girard J., 81–115. Cambridge: The Franciscan Institute, 1985.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F. “William of Ockham.” In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy between 500 and 1500. Edited by Lagerlund, H., 1410–16. Cambridge: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L. Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages: The Doctrine of the partes orationis of the Modistae. Cambridge: Mouton, 1971.10.1515/9783110872750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buytaert, Eligius M. “The Tractatus Logicae Minor of Ockham: Introduction.” Franciscan Studies 24 (1964): 34–100.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. The Logical Syntax of Language. Cambridge: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1937.Google Scholar
Cesalli, Laurent, Goubier, Frédéric, and de Libera, Alain, eds., Formal Approaches and Natural Language in Medieval Logic. Cambridge: Brepols, 2017.10.1484/M.TEMA-EB.5.109610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, David. “Is There Synonymy in Ockham’s Mental Language?” In The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Edited by Spade, Paul Vincent, 76–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1017/CCOL052158244X.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chellas, Brian. Modal Logic: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.10.1017/CBO9780511621192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Alessandro, ed. A Companion to Walter Burley: Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician. Cambridge: Brill, 2013.10.1163/9789004244603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, William J. Adam Wodeham: An Introduction to His Life and Writings. Cambridge: Brill, 1978.10.1163/9789004477797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, William J. “The Introduction of Oxford Logic into Italy.” In English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries. Acts of the 5th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics. Edited by Maierù, Alfonso, 13–32. Cambridge: Bibliopolis, 1982.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J. Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought. Cambridge: Brill, 2008.10.1163/ej.9789004168305.i-420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covington, Michael. Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Crimi, Milo. “Formal and Material Consequences in Ockham and Buridan.” Vivarium 56 (2018): 241–71.10.1163/15685349-12341360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimi, Milo. “Inhering Hylomorphic Modes or Hylomorphic Modes of Inherence? The Anti-modist Hylomorphism Argument in the Destructions of the Modes of Signifying.” Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 26 (2023): 115–43.10.1075/bpjam.00103.criCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimi, Milo. “From Modes to Modes of Modes: The Anti-modist Regress Argument in the Destructions of the Modes of Signifying.” In Modes, Terms, and Propositions: Continental versus British Traditions in Medieval Logic. Edited by Kann, Christoph and Rode, Christian. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales, Bibliotheca 22. Cambridge: Peeters, 2024, 223–76.Google Scholar
Crimi, Milo. “No Mode of Being, No Mode of Signifying: The Anti-modist Emptiness Argument in the Destructions of the Modes of Signifying.” Vivarium 62 (2024): 1–36.10.1163/15685349-06201001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimi, Milo. “Significative Supposition and Ockham’s Rule.” Vivarium 52 (2014): 72–101.10.1163/15685349-12341272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahllhöf, Matts. On the Semantics of Propositional Attitude Reports. Cambridge: Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg, 1995.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “What Metaphors Mean.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 245–64. Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “Buridan’s Consequentia: Consequence and Inference in Token-Based Semantics.” History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (2005): 277–97.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “A Comparative Taxonomy of Medieval and Modern Approaches to Liar Sentences.” History and Philosophy of Logic 29.3 (2008): 227–61.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. Formalizing Medieval Logical Theories: Suppositio, Consequentiae, and Obligationes. Cambridge: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “An Intensional Interpretation of Ockham’s Theory of Supposition.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 365–94.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “Logic in the 14th Century after Ockham.” In Handbook of the History of Logic, Vol. 2: Medieval and Renaissance Logic. Edited by Gabbay, Dov M. and Woods, John, 433–504. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2008.10.1016/S1874-5857(08)80029-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “A Medieval Reformulation of the de dicto/de re Distinction.” In LOGICA Yearbook 2003, 111–24. Cambridge: Filosofia, 2004.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “Ockham on Supposition and Equivocation in Mental Language.” In Knowledge, Mental Language, and Free Will. Edited by Klima, Gyula and Hall, Alexander, 37–50. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “Ockham on Supposition Theory, Mental Language, and Angelic Communication.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86.3 (2012): 415–34.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “Ralph Strode’s Obligationes: The Return of Consistency and the Epistemic Turn.” Vivarium 44.2–3 (2006): 338–74.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “The Role of ‘Denotatur’ in Ockham’s Theory of Supposition.” Vivarium 51 (2013): 352–70.10.1163/15685349-12341253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “The Syllogism as Defined by Aristotle, Ockham, and Buridan.” In The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Pelletier, Jenny and Roques, Magali, 217–31. Cambridge: Springer International Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina, and Uckelman, Sara L.. “Obligationes.” In Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Edited by Novaes, Catarina Dutilh and Read, Stephen, 370–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.10.1017/CBO9781107449862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, Umberto. “Signification and Denotation from Boethius to Ockham.” Franciscan Studies 44 (1984): 1–29.10.1353/frc.1984.0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englebretsen, George. Something to Reckon With: The Logic of Terms. Cambridge: University of Ottawa Press, 1996.10.1353/book6591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falessi, Davide, and Schang, Fabien. “A Relational Semantics for Ockham’s Modalities.” Axioms 12 (2023). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/axioms12050445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feferman, Solomon. “Toward Useful Type-Free Theories I.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1984): 75–111. [Reprinted in Robert Martin, ed., Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, 237–87. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.]10.2307/2274093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J. “Ockham’s Theory of Truth Conditions.” In William of Ockham’s Theory of Propositions: Part II of the Summa Logicae, 1–76. Cambridge: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Gaifman, Haim. “Naming and Diagonalization, from Cantor to Gödel to Kleene.” Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2006): 709–28.10.1093/jigpal/jzl006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaifman, Haim. “Pointers to Truth.” The Journal of Philosophy 89 (1992): 223–61.10.2307/2027167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, Peter. “Aristotle on Conjunctive Propositions.” In Logic Matters, 13–27. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1972.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. “Assertion.” In Logic Matters, 254–69. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1972.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. “History of the Corruptions of Logic.” In Logic Matters, 44–61. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1972.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. Mental Acts: Their Content and Their Objects. Cambridge: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. Reference and Generality: An Examination of Some Medieval and Modern Theories. Emended edition. Cambridge: Cornell University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. “Subject and Predicate.” Mind 59 (1950): 461–82.Google Scholar
Gelber, Hester, and Slotemaker, John T.. “Robert Holkot.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2021 edition. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/holkot/.Google Scholar
Geudens, Christophe, and Demey, Lorenz. “On the Aristotelian Roots of the Modal Square of Opposition.” Logique et Analyse 255 (2021): 313–48.Google Scholar
Gierz, Gerhard, Hofmann, Karl, Keimel, Klaus, Lawson, Jimmie, Mislove, Michael, and Scott, Dana. A Compendium of Continuous Lattices. Cambridge: Springer-Verlag, 1980.10.1007/978-3-642-67678-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Jean-Yves. “From Foundations to Ludics.” Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (2003): 131–68.10.2178/bsl/1052669286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddu, André. “Connotative Concepts and Mathematics in Ockham’s Natural Philosophy.” Vivarium 31 (1993): 106–39.10.1163/156853493X00114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödel, Kurt. “On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems I.” In Kurt Gödel: Collected Works. Vol. 1: Publications 1929–1936. Edited by Feferman, Solomon, Dawson, John Jr., Kleene, Stephen, Moore, Gregory, Solovay, Robert, and van Heijenoort, Jean, 144–95. Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 1986. [Reprint and translation of “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I.” Monatschefte für Mathematik und Physik 38 (1931): 173–98.]Google Scholar
Goldblatt, Robert. Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic. Revised 2nd edition. Cambridge: Dover Publications, 2006.Google Scholar
Goubier, Frédéric. “The Role of the Speaker in Roger Bacon and William of Ockham’s Supposition Theories: A Contrast.” In The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Pelletier, Jenny and Roques, Magali, 169–82. Cambridge: Springer International Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Goubier, Frédéric, and Pouscoulous, Nausicaa. “Virtus sermonis and the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction.” Vivarium 49 (2011): 214–39.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, N. J. “Walter Burley, De consequentiis and the Origin of the Theory of Consequence.” In English Logic and Semantics: From the End of the Twelfth Century to the Time of Ockham and Burleigh. Edited by Braakhuis, H. A. G., Kneepkens, C. H., and De Rijk, L. M., 279–304. Cambridge: Ingenium, 1981.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. “Meaning.” In Studies in the Way of Words, 213–23. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. “Meaning Revisited.” In Studies in the Way of Words, 283–303. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Guelluy, Robert. Philosophie et théologie chez Guillaume d’Ockham. Cambridge: E. Nauwelaerts – Vrin, 1947.Google Scholar
Gupta, Anil. “Truth and Paradox.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1982): 1–60.10.1007/BF00302338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Anil, and Belnap, Nuel, The Revision Theory of Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.10.7551/mitpress/5938.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbach, Volker, Leitgeb, Hannes, and Welch, Philip. “Possible-Worlds Semantics for Modal Notions Conceived as Predicates.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (2003): 179–223.10.1023/A:1023080715357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbach, Volker, and Welch, Philip. “Necessities and Necessary Truths: A Prolegomena to the Use of Modal Logic in the Analysis of Intensional Notions.” Mind 118 (2009): 71–100.10.1093/mind/fzn030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heijenoort, Jean van. From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Henninger, Mark. Relations: Medieval Theories 1250–1325. Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Henry, Desmond P. “Leśniewski’s Ontology and Some Medieval Logicians.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 10 (1969): 324–6.10.1305/ndjfl/1093893724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Desmond P. Medieval Logic and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Hutchinson University Library, 1972.Google Scholar
Henry, Desmond P. “Ockham, Suppositio, and Modern Logic.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 5 (1964): 290–2.10.1305/ndjfl/1093957976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzberger, Hans. “Notes on Naive Semantics.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1982): 61–102.10.1007/BF00302339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, Larry. Modern Theories of Higher Level Predicates: Second Intentions in the Neuzeit. Cambridge: Philosophia Verlag, 1980.10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8kbCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, David. “Metaphor.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2022 edition. Edited by Edward N. Zalta and U. Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/metaphor.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko. “The Once and Future Sea Fight: Aristotle’s Discussion of Future Contingents in De Interpretatione IX.” The Philosophical Review 73 (1964): 461–92.10.2307/2183302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaako. The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Gaskin, J. C. A.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M. “Via Antiqua and Via Moderna in the Fifteenth Century: Doctrinal, Institutional, and Church Political Factors in the Wegestreit.” In The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400–1700. Edited by Friedman, Russell L. and Nielsen, Lauge O., 9–36. Cambridge: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. E., and Cresswell, M. J.. A New Introduction to Modal Logic. Cambridge: Routledge, 1996.10.4324/9780203290644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacona, Andrea. “Modal Predicates.” Australasian Journal of Logic 2 (2004): 56–69.10.26686/ajl.v2i0.1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Lu. Ockhams Theorie der Modalitäten: Metaphysische, natürliche und historische Notwendigkeit. Cambridge: Logos Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Johnston, Spencer. “Ockham and Buridan on the Ampliation of Modal Propositions.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (2015): 234–55.10.1080/09608788.2014.986712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaczmarek, Ludger. “Einleitung.” In Destructiones modorum significandi: Herausgegeben und mit Einleitung und Registern versehen. Edited by Kaczmarek, Ludger, ix–lx. Cambridge: B. R. Grüner, 1994.10.1075/bsp.9.03ianCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaluza, Zénon. “Les sciences et leurs langages. Note sur le statut du 29 décembre 1340 et le prétendu statut perdu contre Ockham.” In Filosofia e teologia nel trecento. Studi in recordo di Eugenio Randi. Edited by Bianchi, Luca, 197–258. Cambridge: Brepols, 1994.10.1484/M.TEMA-EB.4.00411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David, and Montague, Richard. “A Paradox Regained.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 1 (1960): 79–90. [Reprinted in Montague, Formal Philosophy, 271–85.]10.1305/ndjfl/1093956549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karger, Elizabeth. “Would Ockham Have Shaved Wyman’s Beard?” Franciscan Studies 40 (1980): 244–64.10.1353/frc.1980.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, Rondo. Ockham Explained. Cambridge: Open Court, 2010.Google Scholar
Keele, Rondo, and Pelletier, Jenny. “Walter Chatton.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2021 edition. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spring2021/entries/walter-chatton/.Google Scholar
Kindt, Walther. “The Introduction of Truth Predicates into First-Order Languages.” In Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages. Edited by Guenthner, F. and Schmidt, S., 359–71. Cambridge: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1979.Google Scholar
King, Peter. “William of Ockham: Summa logicae.” In Central Works in Philosophy. Vol. 1: Ancient and Medieval. Edited by Shand, J., 242–69. Cambridge: Acumen, 2005.Google Scholar
Klein, Martin. “Metaphors, Dead and Alive.” In Metaphysics Through Semantics. The Philosophical Recovery of the Medieval Mind. Essays in Honor of Gyula Klima. Edited by Hochschild, Joshua P., Nevitt, Turner C, Wood, Adam, and Borbély, Gábor, 133–52. Cambridge: Springer, 2023.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “The Changing Role of Entia Rationis in Mediaeval Semantics and Ontology: A Comparative Study with a Reconstruction.” Synthese 96 (1993): 25–58.10.1007/BF01063801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Consequence.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Edited by Novaes, Catarina Dutilh and Read, Stephen, 316–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Consequences of a Closed, Token-Based Semantics: The Case of John Buridan.” History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2004): 95–110.10.1080/01445340310001610944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “The Nominalist Semantics of Ockham and Buridan: A ‘Rational Reconstruction.’” In Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic. Edited by Gabbay, Dov and Woods, John, 389–431. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2008.10.1016/S1874-5857(08)80028-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Ockham’s Semantics and Ontology of the Categories.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Edited by Spade, Paul Vincent, 118–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. “Modal Theories and Modal Logic.” In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy between 500 and 1500. Edited by Lagerlund, Henrik, 799–806. Cambridge: Springer, 2011 10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. Modalities in Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Routledge, 1993 [reprinted in 2020].Google Scholar
Konyndyk, Kenneth. Introductory Modal Logic. Cambridge: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986.10.2307/jj.21995505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. “Outline of a Theory of Truth.” The Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975): 690–716.10.2307/2024634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutschera, Franz von. “Zwei modallogische Argumente für den Determinismus: Aristoteles und Diodor.” Erkenntnis 24 (1986): 203–17.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik. “Medieval Theories of Modality.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2021 edition. Edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/modality-medieval/.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik. Modal Syllogistics in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Brill, 2000.10.1163/9789004452961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawvere, William. “Diagonal Arguments and Cartesian Closed Categories.” Reprints in Theory and Applications of Categories 15 (2006): 1–13.Google Scholar
Lawvere, William, and Rosebrugh, Robert. Sets for Mathematicians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.10.1017/CBO9780511755460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecq, Ria van der, and Braakhuis, H. A. G.. “Introduction.” In Buridanus, J.. Questiones Elencorum, ix–xxxviii. Cambridge: Ingenium, 1994.10.1484/M.ART-EB.5.105706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. “Preface to an Edition of Nizolius.” In Philosophical Papers and Letters. 2nd edition. Edited and translated by Loemker, Leroy E.. Cambridge: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.Google Scholar
Leitgeb, Hannes. “Metaworlds: A Possible-Worlds Semantics for Truth.” In Principles of Truth. Edited by Halbach, V. and Horsten, L., 129–51. Cambridge: Ontos Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Leitgeb, Hannes. “Towards a Logic of Type-Free Modality and Truth.” In Logic Colloquium 2005. Edited by Dimitracopoulos, C., Newelski, L., Normann, D., and Steel, J., 68–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511546464.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitgeb, Hannes. “What Truth Depends On.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (2005): 155–92.10.1007/s10992-004-3758-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, Martin. Mentale Sätze. Cambridge: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Lenzen, Wolfgang. “Ockhams modale Aussagenlogik.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 75.5 (1993): 125–59.10.1515/agph.1993.75.2.125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, Michael. “The Logical Syntax of TFL.” In Sommers, The Logic of Natural Language, 426–56.Google Scholar
Longeway, John Lee. “Medieval Theories of Demonstration.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2021 edition. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/demonstration-medieval/.Google Scholar
Mac Lane, Saunders, and Moerdijk, Ieke. Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory. Cambridge: Springer, 1994.10.1007/978-1-4612-0927-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, John. “Logical Constants.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2017 edition. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win 2017/entries/logicalconstants/.Google Scholar
Malink, Marko. “Précis of Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 110.3 (2015): 716–23.Google Scholar
Marmo, Costantino. “Guglielmo di Ockham e il significato delle proposizioni.” Versus: Quaderni di Studi Semiotici 38/39 (1984): 115–48.Google Scholar
Marmo, Costantino. Semiotica e linguaggio nella scolastica: Parigi, Bologna, Erfurt, 1270–1330. La semiotica dei Modisti. Cambridge: Nella Sede Dell’Instituto Palazzo Borromini, 1994.Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher J. “The Logic of Negation in Boethius.” Phronesis 36 (1991): 277–304.10.1163/156852891321052705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Christopher J. “Negation and the Conditional as Syncategorematic Terms in the British and Continental Traditions.” In Modes, Terms, and Propositions: Continental versus British Traditions in Medieval Logic. Edited by Kann, Christoph and Rode, Christian. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales, Bibliotheca 22. Cambridge: Peeters, 2024, 93–116.10.2307/jj.22992792.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Robert, and Woodruff, Peter. “On Representing ‘True-in-L’ in L.” Philosophia 5 (1975): 213–17. [Reprinted in Language in Focus: Foundation, Methods and Systems. Essays in Memory of Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. Edited by Asa Kasher, 113–17. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1976.]10.1007/BF02379018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Armand. “Method in Ockham’s Nominalism.” In Being and Knowing, 403–21. Cambridge: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1990.Google Scholar
Maurer, Armand. The Philosophy of William of Ockham in the Light of Its Principles. Cambridge: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1999.Google Scholar
McGrade, Arthur S. “Plenty of Nothing: Ockham’s Commitment to Real Possibles.” Franciscan Studies 45 (1985): 145–56.10.1353/frc.1985.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michon, Cyrille. “Asymétries: Thomas d’Aquin et Guillaume d’Occam précurseurs de Frege.” Les Études philosophiques 3 (1996): 307–21.Google Scholar
Michon, Cyrille. Nominalisme: La théorie de la signification de Guillaume d’Occam. Cambridge: J. Vrin, 1994.Google Scholar
Montague, Richard. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Edited by Thomason, R.. Cambridge: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Montague, Richard. “Syntactical Treatments of Modality, with Corollaries on Reflexion Principles and Finite Axiomatizability.” Acta Philosophica Fennica 16 (1963): 153–67. [Reprinted in Formal Philosophy, 286–302.]Google Scholar
Moody, Ernest A. The Logic of William of Ockham. Cambridge: Sheed and Ward, 1935.Google Scholar
Moody, Ernest A. Truth and Consequences in Medieval Logic. Cambridge: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1953.Google Scholar
Murzi, Julien, and Carrara, Massimiliano. “Paradox and Logical Revision: A Short Introduction.” Topoi (2015) 34: 7–14.10.1007/s11245-014-9286-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Ernest, and Newman, James. Gödel’s Proof. Revised edition. Cambridge: New York University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Nicolai, Carlo. “In Sensu Diviso: De Re Ascriptions and Necessary Existence.” Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 2 (2017): 333–47.Google Scholar
Nicolai, Carlo, and Stern, Johannes, eds. Modes of Truth: The Unified Approach to Truth, Modality, and Paradox. Cambridge: Routledge, 2021.10.4324/9780429030208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noah, Aris. “Quine’s Version of Term Logic and Its Relation to TFL.” In Sommers, The Logic of Natural Language, 372–85.Google Scholar
Noah, Aris. “Sommers’s Cancellation Technique and the Method of Resolution.” In The Old New Logic: Essays on the Philosophy of Fred Sommers. Edited by Oderberg, David, 169–82. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Buridan’s Ontology.” In How Things Are: Studies in Predication and the History and Philosophy of Science. Edited by Bogen, J. and McGuire, J. E., 189–203. Cambridge: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985.10.1007/978-94-009-5199-0_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Divine Omniscience, Omnipotence, and Future Contingents: An Overview.” In Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Rudavsky, Tamar, 3–22. Cambridge: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985.10.1007/978-94-015-7719-9_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “The End of Mental Language.” In Le langage mental du Moyen Âge à l’Âge classique. Edited by Biard, Joël, 293–306. Cambridge: Peeters, 2009.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Ockham and the Foundations of Modality in the Fourteenth Century.” In Logical Modalities from Aristotle to Carnap. Edited by Cresswell, M., 133–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Future Contingents.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony, and Pinborg, Jan, 358–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Material Supposition and the Mental Language of Ockham’s Summa Logicae.” Topoi 16 (1997): 27–33.10.1023/A:1005711702025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Medieval Connectives, Hellenistic Connections: The Strange Case of Propositional Logic.” In Atoms, Pneuma, Tranquillity. Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Edited by Osler, Margaret J., 25–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.10.1017/CBO9780511608353.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Ockham on Being.” In Categories of Being: Essays on Metaphysics and Logic. Edited by Haaparanta, Leila and Koskinen, Heikki, 78–98. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199890576.003.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Ockham on Mental Language.” In Historical Foundations of Cognitive Science. Edited by Smith, J.-C., 53–70. Cambridge: Kluwer, 1991.10.1007/978-94-009-2161-0_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Some Aspects of Ockham’s Logic.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Edited by Spade, Paul Vincent, 31–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1017/CCOL052158244X.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. “Ockham on Performed and Signified Predication.” In Ockham and Ockhamists. Edited by Bos, E. P. and Krop, H. A., 55–62. Cambridge: Ingenium, 1987.Google Scholar
Øhrstrøm, Peter, and Jakobsen, David. “William of Ockham on Future Contingency.” KronoScope 18 (2018): 138–53.10.1163/15685241-12341413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otte, Richard. “Modality as a Metalinguistic Predicate.” Philosophical Studies 41 (1982): 153–9.10.1007/BF00354857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Angels’ Talk, Mental Language, and the Transparency of the Mind.” In Vestigia, Imagines, Verba: Semiotics and Logic in Medieval Theological Texts. Edited by Marmo, Costantino, 323–35. Cambridge: Brepols, 1997.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Connotative Concepts and Their Definitions in Ockham’s Nominalism.” In La tradition médiévale des catégories (XIIe–XVe siècles). Edited by Biard, Joël and Rosier-Catach, Irène, 141–55. Cambridge: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Connotative Terms in Ockham’s Mental Language,” Cahiers d ‘épistémologie, no. 9016. Cambridge: Université du Québec à Montréal, 1990.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Four Notes on the Grammar of Ockham’s Mental Language.” In Metaphysics Through Semantics: The Philosophical Recovery of the Medieval Mind – Essays in Honor of Gyula Klima. Edited by Hochschild, Joshua P., Nevitt, Turner C., Wood, Adam, and Borbély, Gábor, 207–19. Cambridge: Springer, 2023.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Guillaume d’Ockham, les connotatifs et le langage mental.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 11 (2000): 297–316.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Intuition and Causality: Ockham’s Externalism Revisited.” Quaestio 10 (2010): 241–53. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.1.102336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Le jugement comme acte mental selon Guillaume d’Ockham.” In Le langage mental du Moyen Âge à l’Âge Classique. Edited by Biard, Joël, 117–33. Cambridge: Peeters, 2009.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Linguistic Externalism and Mental Language in Ockham and Buridan.” In Questions on the Soul by John Buridan and Others. A Companion to John Buridan’s Philosophy of Mind. Edited by Klima, G., 225–37. Cambridge: Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. Mental Language: From Plato to William of Ockham. Translated by Hochschild, J. P. and Ziebart, M. K.. Cambridge: Fordham University Press, 2017 [Originally published Le discours intérieur: De Platon à Guillaume d’Ockham. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1999].10.5422/fordham/9780823272600.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. Les mots, les concepts et les choses. La sémantique de Guillaume d’Occam et le nominalisme d’aujourd’hui. Cambridge: Vrin, 1992.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Ockham on Abstract Pseudo-names.” In Thinking and Calculating: Essays in Logic, Its History and Its Philosophical Applications in Honour of Massimo Mugnai. Edited by Ademollo, Francesco, Amerini, Fabrizio, and de Risi, Vincenzo, 171–83. Cambridge: Springer, 2022.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Ockham and Buridan on Epistemic Sentences: Appellation of the Form and Appellation of Reason.” Vivarium 50.2 (2012): 139–60.10.1163/156853412X631906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Ockham and Buridan on Simple Supposition.” Vivarium 51 (2013): 371–84.10.1163/15685349-12341254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. Ockham on Concepts. Cambridge: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Ockham’s Commitment to Merely Possible Beings.” Medioevo 44 (2019): 81–98.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Ockham’s Externalism.” In Intentionality, Cognition, and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Klima, G., 166–85. Cambridge: Fordham University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. Ockham’s Nominalism: A Philosophical Introduction. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2023.10.1093/oso/9780190078980.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Restrictionism: A Medieval Approach Revisited.” In Unity, Truth and the Liar. The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox Edited by Shahid Rahman, S, Tulenheimo, Tero, and Genot, Emmanuel, 229–53. Cambridge: Springer, 2008.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Semantics and Mental Language.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Edited by Spade, Paul Vincent, 53–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1017/CCOL052158244X.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Solving the Insolubles: Hints from Ockham and Burley.” In Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar. Edited by Read, Stephen, 398–410. Cambridge: Kluwer, 1993.10.1007/978-94-011-1767-8_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Tarski et la suppositio materialis.” Philosophiques 31.2 (2004): 295–309.10.7202/009809arCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude, and Piché, David. “Ockham’s Reliabilism and the Intuition of Non-existents.” In Rethinking the History of Skepticism. Edited by Lagerlund, Henrik, 97–118. Cambridge: Brill, 2009.10.1163/ej.9789004170612.i-238.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude, and Perini-Santos, Ernesto. “Guillaume d’Ockham et la suppositio materialis.” Vivarium 42.2 (2004): 202–24.10.1163/1568534043084784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Terence. Articulating Medieval Logic. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688845.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Terence“The Development of Supposition Theory in the Later 12th through 14th Centuries.” In Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic. Edited by Gabbay, Dov and Woods, John, 157–280. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2008.10.1016/S1874-5857(08)80025-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Metaphysical Themes 1274–1671. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2011.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567911.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. “Lecture 1: Early Nominalism and Realism.” In Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition. Vol. 2: 1867–1871. Edited by Moore, E. C., 310–17, Cambridge: Indiana University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Jenny. “Getting Real: Ockham on the Human Contribution to the Nature and Production of Artifacts.” Philosophies 90.7 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7050090.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Jenny. “Social Powers and Mental Relations: William Ockham on the Semantics and Ontology of Lordship and Ownership.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 8 (2020): 248–76.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Jenny. William Ockham on Metaphysics: The Science of Being and God. Cambridge: Brill, 2013.10.1163/9789004230163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, Jenny, and Roques, Magali (eds.). The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Springer International Publishing, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-66634-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perini-Santos, Ernesto. “The Metatheoretical Framework of William of Ockham’s Modal Logic.” In The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Claude Panaccio. Edited by Pelletier, Jenny and Roques, Magali, 137–47. Cambridge: Springer International Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Perini-Santos, Ernesto. “La structure de la proposition modale ockhamienne.” In Medieval Theories on Assertive and Non-assertive Language. Edited by Maierù, Alfonso and Valente, Luisa, 355–75. Cambridge: Leo S. Olschki Editore, 2004.Google Scholar
Perini-Santos, Ernesto. La théorie ockhamienne de la connaissance évidente. Cambridge: Vrin, 2006.Google Scholar
Perini-Santos, Ernesto. “The Underdetermination of Mental Language in William of Ockham and John Buridan.” In Cesalli, Goubier, and De Libera, Formal Approaches, 417–34.10.1484/M.TEMA-EB.4.2017106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter. Cambridge: Aschendorff, 1967.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. “Speculative Grammar.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony, and Pinborg, Jan, 254–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Pini, Giorgio. “Scotus’s Realist Conception of the Categories: His Legacy to Late Medieval Debates.” Vivarium 43.1 (2005): 63–110.10.1163/1568534054068410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. The Nature of Necessity. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Pozzi, Lorenzo. Il Mentitore e il Medioevo. Il dibattito sui paradossi dell’autoriferimento. Cambridge: Zara, 1987.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. “Modality as a Meta-concept.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (1976): 401–14.10.1305/ndjfl/1093887632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Graham. “A Refoundation of Modal Logic.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18 (1977): 340–54.10.1305/ndjfl/1093888007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Graham, and Read, Stephen. “Ockham’s Rejection of Ampliation.” Mind, New Series, 90.358 (1981): 274–79.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. “The Possibly-True and the Possible.” Mind 78 (1969): 481–92.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. “Tense-Logic and the Continuity of Time.” Studia Logica 13 (1962): 133–51.10.1007/BF02317267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. “Algebraic Logic and Predicate Functors.” In The Ways of Paradox, 283–307.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. “Intensions Revisited.” In Theories and Things, 113–23. Cambridge: The Belknap Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. “Three Grades of Modal Involvement.” In The Ways of Paradox, 158–76.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. “The Variable.” In The Ways of Paradox, 272–82.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Revised and enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Read, Stephen. “How Is Material Supposition Possible?” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8 (1999): 1–20.Google Scholar
Read, Stephen. “Logic in the Latin West in the Fourteenth Century.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Edited by Novaes, Catarina Dutilh and Read, Stephen, 142–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Read, Stephen. “Walter Segrave’s ‘Insolubles’: A Restrictivist Response to Bradwardine.” In Theories of Paradox in the Middle Ages. Edited by Read, Stephen and Bartocci, Barbara, 43–66. Cambridge: College Publications, 2023.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, William. “Necessity Predicates and Operators.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (1980): 437–50.10.1007/BF00262865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, Mark. “Language, Lies, and Human Action in William of Ockham’s Treatment of Insolubles.” Vivarium 36 (1998): 108–33.10.1163/1568534982579404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Marie La Palme, Macnamara, John, Reyes, Gonzalo, “A Category-Theoretic Approach to Aristotle’s Term Logic, with Special Reference to Syllogisms.” In Québec Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Part I: Logic, Mathematics, Physics and History of Science. Essays in Honor of Hugues Leblanc. Edited by Marion, Mathieu and Cohen, Robert, 57–68. Cambridge: Kluwer, 1995.Google Scholar
Reyes, Marie La Palme, Macnamara, John, Reyes, Gonzalo, “Functoriality and Grammatical Role in Syllogisms.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1994): 41–66.Google Scholar
Reyes, Marie La Palme, Macnamara, John, Reyes, Gonzalo, “Reference, Kinds, and Predicates.” In The Logical Foundations of Cognition. Edited by Macnamara, John and Reyes, Gonzalo, 91–143. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 1994.10.1093/oso/9780195092158.003.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Marie La Palme, Reyes, Gonzalo, and Zolfaghari, Houman, Generic Figures and Their Glueings: A Constructive Approach to Functor Categories. Cambridge: Polimetrica, 2004.Google Scholar
de Rijk, Lambert Marie. “Semantics and Ontology: An Assessment of Medieval Terminism.” Vivarium 51 (2013): 13–59.10.1163/15685349-12341242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rijk, Lambert Marie. “Some Thirteenth Century Tracts on the Game of Obligation III.” Vivarium 14 (1976): 26–49.10.1163/156853476X00023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, Aurélien. “L’explication causale selon Guillaume d’Ockham.” Quaestio 2 (2002): 241–66.10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.2.300466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, Aurélien. “William Crathorn on Predication and Mental Language.” Analytica 14 (2010): 227–58.Google Scholar
Rode, Christian, ed. A Companion to Responses to Ockham. Cambridge: Brill, 2016.10.1163/9789004309838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roques, Magali. “Définition et démonstration d’après Guillaume d’Ockham.” In Raison et démonstration. Les commentaires médiévaux sur les Seconds Analytiques. Edited by Biard, Joël, 113–30. Cambridge: Brepols, 2015.Google Scholar
Roques, Magali. “Metaphor and Mental Language in Late-medieval Nominalism.” Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 22 (2019): 136–67.10.1075/bpjam.00043.roqCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosiak, Daniel. Sheaf Theory through Examples. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2022.10.7551/mitpress/12581.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosier, Irène. La grammaire spéculative des Modistes. Cambridge: Presses Universitaires de Lille, 1983.Google Scholar
Rosier, Irène. La parole comme acte. Sur la grammaire et la sémantique au XIIIe siècle. Cambridge: Vrin, 1994.Google Scholar
Rosier, Irène. “La théorie médiévale des modes de signifier.” Langages 65, Signification et référence dans l’antiquité et au moyen âge (March 1982): 117–28.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Grammar.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Pasnau, Robert and van Dyke, Christina, 196–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Rossi, Pietro B. “Filosofia naturale e scienza del contingente nella tradizione aristotelica medievale.” In Conoscenza e contingenza nella tradizione aristotelica medievale. Edited by Perfetti, Stefano, 51–82. Cambridge: Edizione ETS, 2008.Google Scholar
Rossi, Pietro B. “Grosseteste’s Influence on Thirteenth- and Fourteenth-Century British Commentators on Posterior Analytics: A Preliminary Survey.” In Robert Grosseteste, His Thought and Its Impact. Edited by Cunningham, Jack P., 140–66. Cambridge: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2012.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. “Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types.” American Journal of Mathematics 30 (1908): 222–62. [Reprinted in van Heijenoort, From Frege to Gödel, 150–82.]10.2307/2369948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schierbaum, Sonja. “Late Medieval Theories of (Self-)Consciousness.” In Philosophy of Mind in the Late Middle Ages & Renaissance. Edited by Schmid, Stephen, 125–43. Cambridge: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Schierbaum, Sonja. “Ockham on Awareness of One’s Acts: A Way Out of the Circle.” Society and Politics 12 (2018): 8–27 (special issue Consciousness and Memory in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Edited by M. Klein, N. Osorio-Kupferblum, and O. I. Tóth).Google Scholar
Schierbaum, Sonja. Ockham’s Assumption of Mental Speech. Cambridge: Brill, 2014.10.1163/9789004277625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schierbaum, Sonja. “Two Kinds of Assent according to Ockham.” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 12 (2009): 269–87.10.30965/26664275-01201014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheard, Michael. “A Guide to Truth Predicates in the Modern Era.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (1994): 1032–54.10.2307/2275927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffer, Stephen. The Things We Mean. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2003.10.1093/0199257760.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Keith. “On a Medieval Solution to the Liar Paradox.” History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (1987): 121–40.10.1080/01445348708837113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Keith. Universality and the Liar: An Essay on Truth and the Diagonal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.10.1017/CBO9780511551499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirridge, Mary. “Supposition and the Fallacy of Figure of Speech in the Abstractiones.” Vivarium 51 (2013): 147–168.10.1163/15685349-12341245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, Brian. “An Immaculate Conception of Modality, or How to Confuse Use and Mention.” The Journal of Philosophy 75 (1978): 368–87.10.2307/2025495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotemaker, John T., and Witt, Jeffrey C.. “Adam de Wodeham.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2019 edition. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/wodeham/.Google Scholar
Słupecki, Jerzy. “S. Leśniewski’s Calculus of Names.” Studia Logica 3 (1955): 7–77.10.1007/BF02067245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smullyan, Raymond. Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 1992.10.1093/oso/9780195046724.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, Fred. The Logic of Natural Language. Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Sommers, Fred. “Types and Ontology.” The Philosophical Review (72) 1963: 327–63.10.2307/2183167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, Fred, and Englebretsen, George. An Invitation to Formal Reasoning: The Logic of Terms. Cambridge: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. ed. The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1017/CCOL052158244XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Five Early Theories in the Medieval Insolubilia-Literature.” Vivarium 25 (1987): 24–46.10.1163/156853487X00049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Insolubilia.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony and Pinborg, Jan, 246–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Introduction.” In Peter of Ailly: Concepts and Insolubles, 1–15. Translated by Spade, Paul Vincent. Cambridge: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1980.10.1007/978-94-009-8993-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Les modalités aléthiques selon Ockham.” Histoire Épistémologie Langage 3 (1981): 29–34. [Reprinted in Lies, Language, and Logic.]10.3406/hel.1981.1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. Lies, Language and Logic in the Late Middle Ages. Cambridge: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “The Logic of ‘Sit verum’ in Richard Brinkley and William of Ockham.” Franciscan Studies 54 (1994–97): 227–50.10.1353/frc.1994.0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. The Mediaeval Liar: A Catalogue of the Insolubilia-Literature. Cambridge: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1975.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Ockham, Adams, and Connotation: A Critical Notice of Marilyn Adams, William Ockham.” The Philosophical Review (99) 1990: 593–612.10.2307/2185618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Ockham on Self-reference.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (1974): 298–300. [Reprinted in Lies, Language, and Logic.]10.1305/ndjfl/1093891306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Ockham on Terms of First and Second Imposition and Intention, with Remarks on the Liar Paradox.” Vivarium 19 (1981): 47–55. [Reprinted in Lies, Language, and Logic.]10.1163/156853481X00027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Ockham’s Distinctions between Absolute and Connotative Terms.” Vivarium 13 (1975): 55–76. [Reprinted in Lies, Language, and Logic.]10.1163/156853475X00033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Ockham’s Nominalist Metaphysics: Some Main Themes.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Edited by Spade, Paul Vincent, 100–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1017/CCOL052158244XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Ockham’s Rule of Supposition: Two Conflicts in His Theory.” Vivarium 12 (1974): 63–73.10.1163/156853474X00070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Synonymy and Equivocation in Ockham’s Mental Language.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 18.1 (1980): 9–22.10.1353/hph.2008.0355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. Thoughts, Words and Things: An Introduction to Late Mediaeval Logic and Semantic Theory. Version 1.0. July 1, 1996. www.pvspade.com/Logic/docs/thoughts.pdf.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. “Three Versions of Ockham’s Reductionist Program.” Franciscan Studies 56 (1998): 335–46.10.1353/frc.1998.0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent, Panaccio, Claude, and Pelletier, Jenny. “William of Ockham.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2019 edition. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/ockham/.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent, and Read, Stephen. “Insolubles.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2021 edition. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/insolubles/.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Joke, and Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. “Those ‘Funny Words’: Medieval Theories of Syncategorematic Terms.” In Linguistic Content: New Essays on the History of the Philosophy of Language. Edited by Cameron, Margaret and Stainton, Robert, 100–20. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Stahl, Gérold. “Une formalisation de quelques syllogismes modaux.” Logique et Analyse 19 (1976): 175–217.Google Scholar
Stahl, Gérold. “Indications formelles sur les syllogismes avec ‘contingent.’” Logique et Analyse 79 (1977): 199–220.Google Scholar
Stahl, Gérold. “Quelques relations entre temporalité de re et temporalité de dicto et leur extension aux modalités.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 166 (1976): 165–78.Google Scholar
Stahl, Gérold. “Les syllogismes avec ‘savoir’ chez Occam.” Logique et Analyse 84 (1978): 437–49.Google Scholar
Stahl, Gérold. “Termes temporels dans des systèmes fonctionnels.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 164 (1974): 293–303.Google Scholar
Stern, Johannes. “Montague’s Theorem and Modal Logic.” Erkenntnis 79 (2014): 551–70.10.1007/s10670-013-9523-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Johannes. Toward Predicate Approaches to Modality. Cambridge: Springer, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-22557-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, Gisela. From Aristotle to Cicero: Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2022.10.1093/oso/9780198868385.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strobino, Riccardo, and Thom, Paul. “The Logic of Modality.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Edited by Novaes, Catarina D. and Read, Stephen, 342–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Topics: Their Development and Absorption into Consequences.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony, and Pinborg, Jan, 273–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Sweeney, Eileen. “Literary Forms of Medieval Philosophy.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2019 edition. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/medieval-literary.Google Scholar
Swiniarski, John. “A New Presentation of Ockham’s Theory of Supposition with an Evaluation of Some Contemporary Criticisms.” Franciscan Studies 30 (1970): 181–217.10.1353/frc.1970.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarski, Alfred. “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.” Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938. Translated by Woodger, J. H.. Cambridge: Clarendon Press, 1956, 152–278. Translation of “Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen.” Studia Philosophica 1 (1935): 261–405.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundation of Semantics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4.3 (1944): 341–76.10.2307/2102968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarski, Alfred. “Truth and Proof.” Scientific American 220 (1969): 63–77.10.1038/scientificamerican0669-63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tennison, B. R. Sheaf Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.10.1017/CBO9780511661761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thijssen, J. M. M. H. “The Crisis over Ockhamist Hermeneutic and Its Semantic Background: The Methodological Significance of the Censure of December 29, 1340.” In Vestigia, Imagines, Verba. Semiotics and Logic in Medieval Theological Texts (XIIth–XIVth Century). Edited by Marmo, Costantino, 371–92. Cambridge: Brepols, 1997.Google Scholar
Thom, Paul. “Analysing Arguments in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries.” In Cesalli, Goubier, and De Libera, Formal Approaches, 133–48.10.1484/M.TEMA-EB.4.2017093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thom, Paul. “Ecthesis.” Logique et analyse 19 (1976): 299–310.Google Scholar
Thom, Paul. The Logic of the Trinity. Cambridge: Fordham University Press, 2012.10.5422/fordham/9780823234769.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thom, Paul. Medieval Modal Systems: Problems and Concepts. Cambridge: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
Thom, Paul. The Syllogism. Cambridge: Philosophia, 1981.10.2307/j.ctv2x8v875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thom, Paul. “Termini obliqui and the Logic of Relations.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 59 (1977): 143–55.10.1515/agph.1977.59.2.143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Richmond. “A Note on Syntactical Treatments of Modality.” Synthese 44 (1980): 391–5.10.1007/BF00413468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndyke, Lynn. University Records and Life in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Columbia University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Trentman, John. “On Interpretation, Leśniewski’s Ontology, and the Study of Medieval Logic.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 217–22.10.1353/hph.2008.0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trentman, John. “Leśniewski’s Ontology and Some Medieval Logicians.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 7 (1966): 361–4.10.1305/ndjfl/1093958756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trentman, John. “Ockham on Mental.” Mind, New Series, 79.316 (1970): 586–90.Google Scholar
Trentman, John. “Predication and Universals in Vincent Ferrer’s Logic.” Franciscan Studies 28 (1968): 47–62.10.1353/frc.1968.0000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweedale, Martin. “Ockham’s Supposed Elimination of Connotative Terms and His Ontological Parsimony.” Dialogue 31 (1992): 431–44.10.1017/S0012217300012075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uckelman, Sara L. “Deceit and Indefeasible Knowledge: The Case of dubitatio.” Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics 21.3/4 (2011): 503–19.10.3166/jancl.21.503-519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uckelman, Sara L. “Interactive Logic in the Middle Ages.” Logic and Logical Philosophy 21.3 (2012): 439–71.Google Scholar
Uckelman, Sara L. “Sit verum and Counterfactual Reasoning.” Vivarium 53 (2015): 90–113.10.1163/15685349-05301005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uckelman, Sara L., Maat, Jaap and Rybalko, Katherina. “The Art of Doubting in Obligationes Parisienses.” In Modern Views of Medieval Logic. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales–Bibliotheca 16. Edited by Kann, Christoph, Löwe, Benedikt, Rode, Christian, and Uckelman, Sara. L., 11–27. Cambridge: Peeters, 2018.Google Scholar
Urbaniak, Rafal. Leśniewski’s Systems of Logic and Foundations of Mathematics. Cambridge: Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-3-319-00482-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webering, Damascene. Theory of Demonstration According to William of Ockham. Cambridge: The Franciscan Institute, 1953.Google Scholar
Wolter, Allan B. “Philotheus Boehner: In Memoriam.” Franciscan Studies 44 (1984): vii–x.10.1353/frc.1984.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega. “In Honorem: Gedeon Gal.” Franciscan Studies 45 (1985): vii–xii.10.1353/frc.1985.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanofsky, Noson. “A Universal Approach to Self-Referential Paradoxes, Incompleteness, and Fixed Points.” The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (2003): 362–86.10.2178/bsl/1058448677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko. “Supposition and Truth in Ockham’s Mental Language.” Topoi 16 (1997): 15–25.10.1023/A:1005759617955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko. “William Ockham and Mental Language.” In Representation and Objects of Thought in Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Lagerlund, Henrik, 101–16. Cambridge: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Zheng, Yiwei. “Ockham’s Connotation Theory and Ontological Elimination.” Journal of Philosophical Research 26 (2001): 623–34.10.5840/jpr_2001_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Claude Panaccio, Université du Québec à Montréal, Jenny Pelletier, University of Leuven
  • Book: Ockham’s <i>Summa Logicae</i>
  • Online publication: 04 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009288743.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Claude Panaccio, Université du Québec à Montréal, Jenny Pelletier, University of Leuven
  • Book: Ockham’s <i>Summa Logicae</i>
  • Online publication: 04 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009288743.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Claude Panaccio, Université du Québec à Montréal, Jenny Pelletier, University of Leuven
  • Book: Ockham’s <i>Summa Logicae</i>
  • Online publication: 04 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009288743.015
Available formats
×