‘Glasgow Style and Oxford Manners’, The Glasgow Herald, 13 February 1965, 10.Google Scholar

‘Can Stare Decisis Be Abolished?’, Juridical Review (New Series), 11, 197–213.Google Scholar

‘Review of Legal Systems and Lawyers’ Reasonings by J. Stone’, Juridical Review (New Series), 11, 187–191.Google Scholar

‘Review of Sovereignty within the Law by A. Larson, C. W. Jenks and Others’, Juridical Review (New Series), 11, 283–286.Google Scholar

‘Review of Human Law and Human Justice by J. Stone’, Scots Law Times (News), 7–8.Google Scholar

‘Seabathing, Sunbathing and Sea Coal’, Scots Law Times (News), 69–71.Google Scholar

‘The Misrepresentation Act 1967’, Scots Law Times (News), 190–192.Google Scholar

‘Review of Other People’s Law by Lord Kilbrandon’, Journal of the Law Society of Scotland, 12(2), 77–79.Google Scholar

‘Balliol’s Experimental Summer School’, Oxford Magazine 4 (Michaelmas), 44–46.Google Scholar

The Scottish Debate, (ed.) (London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

‘Introduction’, in MacCormick, N. (ed.), The Scottish Debate (London: Oxford University Press), 1–3.Google Scholar

‘Independence and Constitutional Change’, in MacCormick, N. (ed.), The Scottish Debate (London: Oxford University Press), 52–64.Google Scholar

‘Delegated Legislation and Civil Liberty’, Law Quarterly Review, 86, 171–180.Google Scholar

‘Ius Quaesitum Tertio: Stair v. Dunedin’, Juridical Review, 15, 228–246.Google Scholar

‘Review of Morality and the Law by S.E. Stumpf’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 20(80), 300–301.Google Scholar

‘Review of The Ethics of Punishment by W. Moberly’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 20(80), 301–302.Google Scholar

‘Social Services and Controls’, in Wade, H. W. R. (ed.), Annual Survey of Commonwealth Law (London: Butterworths), 666–685.Google Scholar

‘Review of The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System by J. Raz’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 21(85), 380–381.Google Scholar

‘Review of The Constitutional Decisions of John Marshall (ed.) by J.P. Cotton’, Notes and Queries, 18(10), 394–395.Google Scholar

‘Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers’, Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume), 46, 59–78 (symposium with J. Raz) (also published with modification as chapter 10 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Review of Constitutional and Administrative Law by S.A. de Smith’, Summer, Public Law, 174–179.Google Scholar

‘Legal Obligation and the Imperative Fallacy’, in Simpson, A. W. B. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, 2nd Series (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 100–130.Google Scholar

Law as Institutional Fact, Edinburgh University Inaugural Lecture, No. 52 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press) (also published in the Law Quarterly Review in 1974, and as chapter 2 of An Institutional Theory of Law in 1986).Google Scholar

‘Introductory Lecture to Students’, Jurisprudence course at Edinburgh Law School, September 1973 (Edinburgh University Archives).Google Scholar

‘A Note upon Privacy’, Law Quarterly Review, 89, 23–27.Google Scholar

‘Justice According to Rawls’, Law Quarterly Review, 89, 393–417.Google Scholar

‘Review of James Kellas, The Scottish Political System’, Scottish International Review, 6(4), 27–28.Google Scholar

‘Law as Institutional Fact’, Law Quarterly Review, 90, 102–129 (also published by Edinburgh University Press in 1973, and as chapter 2 of An Institutional Theory of Law in 1986).Google Scholar

‘Privacy: A Question of Definition’, British Journal of Law and Society, 1(1), 75–78.Google Scholar

‘Principles of Law’, Juridical Review (New Series), 19, 217–226.Google Scholar

‘The Rise of Scottish Nationalism: A Case of Too Little Too Late?’, The Round Table, 64(256), 425–438.Google Scholar

‘Jurisprudence in the Law Course: A Footnote’, Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law (New Supplement), 13(1974–1975), 359–362.Google Scholar

‘A Filial Look at Home Rule’s Founding Father’, The Scotsman, 20 November 1974, 13.Google Scholar

Independence and Federalism after the Referendum, presented to the Andrew Fletcher Society in June 1975, Dundee: Andrew Fletcher Society, 10 pages.Google Scholar

‘Rapports Introductifs de la Responsabilité considérée comme un droit’, Revue de Sciences Criminelle et Droit Pénal Comparé, 2, 484–497 (translated into French by D. Chast) (presented at 21 Journées de défense sociales: Journées Franco-Ecossaises, Edinburgh, 25–27 September 1974).Google Scholar

‘We Need a New Politics’, Life and Work, February, 12–18.Google Scholar

Lawyers in their Social Setting (ed.) (Edinburgh: W. Green & Son).Google Scholar

‘Editor’s Foreword’, in MacCormick, N. (ed.), Lawyers in Their Social Setting (Edinburgh: W. Green & Son), vii–ix.Google Scholar

◦ ‘Accountability, Professionalism and the Scottish Judiciary’, in Clarke, M. G. and Drucker, H. M. (eds.), Our Changing Scotland (Edinburgh: Polygon Press), 79–86.Google Scholar

‘Minority Report’, with Aitken, I., Brinton, T. and Haviland, J., Report of the Committee on Financial Aid to Political Parties, Cmnd. 6601, 75–81.Google Scholar

‘Justice: An Un-Original Position’, Dalhousie Law Journal, 3, 367–384 (presented as a lecture at the Institut für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie der Universität des Saarlandes, 1 June 1975) (also published with modification as chapter 5 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Children’s Rights: A Test Case for Theories of Right’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 52(3), 305–316 (also published with modification as chapter 8 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Formal Justice and the Form of Legal Arguments’, Etudes de Logique Juridique, 6, 103–118.Google Scholar

‘The Mandate Question’, Question, 12, 8–9.Google Scholar

‘Review of How to Do Things with Rules by W. Twining and D. Miers’, British Journal of Law and Society, 3(2), 279–282.Google Scholar

‘Review of Independence and Devolution: The Legal Implications for Scotland by J.P. Grant (ed.)’, Scots Law Times (News), 303–304.Google Scholar

‘Two-Stranded Support for Legislative Devolution’, The Scotsman, 5–6 February 1976, 7.Google Scholar

Civil Liberties and the Law, presented at Heriot-Watt University on 25 October 1977, Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University Special Lecture Series, 20 pages (also published with modification as chapter 3 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Rights in Legislation’, in Hacker, P. M. S. and Raz, J. (eds.), Law, Morality and Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 189–209.Google Scholar

‘Challenging Sociological Definitions’, British Journal of Law and Society, 4(1), 87–94.Google Scholar

‘Iudex qui Litem Suam Fecit’, Acta Juridica 149–165.Google Scholar

‘Provincialism and the Scottish Universities’, Question, 18 March 1977, 3.Google Scholar

‘Liberty and Law’, Letter to the Editor, The Scotsman, 27 October 1977.Google Scholar

‘Westminster Must Beware of Pushing the SNP into an All-out Battle’, The Times, 17 May 1977, page 14.Google Scholar

‘The Referendum: Historical Parallels?’, The Scotsman, 6 December 1977.Google Scholar

Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press) (reprinted with a new foreword in 1994).Google Scholar

‘The Motivation of Judgement in the Common Law’, in Perelman, Ch. and Foriers, P. (eds.), La Motivation des Décisions de Justice (Brussels: Bruylant), 167–194 (presented as a lecture at the Centre National de Recherches de Logique, Brussels, 18 May 1976).Google Scholar

‘Privacy and Obscenity’, in Dhavan, R. and Davies, C. (eds.), Censorship and Obscenity (Oxford: Martin Robertson & Co), 76–97 (also published with modification as chapter 9 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘The Obligation of Reparation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series), 78, 175–193 (presented at a Meeting of the Aristotelian Society, London, 20 March 1978) (also published with modification as chapter 11 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Does the United Kingdom Have a Constitution? Reflections on MacCormick v. Lord Advocate’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 29(1–2), 1–20.Google Scholar

‘Dworkin as Pre-Benthamite’, Philosophical Review, 87(4), 585–607 (extended review essay of R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously) (also published with modification as chapter 7 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Review of Lectures on Jurisprudence by A. Smith’, in R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael, P. G. Stein (eds.), The Economic Journal, 88(352), 837–839.Google Scholar

‘What Assembly? Why?’, The Patriot for Scotland, Referendum Special, December 1978–March 1979, 2.Google Scholar

‘Constitutional Points’, in Mackay, D. I. (ed.), Scotland: The Framework for Change (Edinburgh: Paul Harris), 47–67.Google Scholar

‘Nation and Nationalism’, in MacLean, C. (ed.), The Crown and the Thistle (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press), 97–111 (also published with modification as chapter 13 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Constitution’, in MacLean, C. (ed.), The Crown and the Thistle (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press), 149–155 (also published in a modified version, by SUNY Press, in 1999).Google Scholar

‘Law, Obligation and Consent: Reflections on Stair and Locke’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 65(3), 387–411 (presented as the Austin Lecture, UK Association for Legal and Social Philosophy in 1978) (also published with modification as chapter 4 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Review of Law and Society: Crisis in Legal Ideals, by E. Kamenka, R. Brown and E. R. S. Tay’, Political Studies, 27(3), 525.Google Scholar

‘The Coherence of a Case and the Reasonableness of Doubt’, Liverpool Law Review, 2, 45–50.Google Scholar

‘Wie ernst soll man Rechte Nehmen?’, Rechtstheorie, 11(1), 1–7 (review essay of R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, 1978).Google Scholar

‘Review of Natural Law and Natural Rights, by J. Finnis’, Political Studies, 28(4), 651.Google Scholar

H.L.A. Hart (London: Edward Arnold) (2nd edition, with substantive revisions, in 2008 with Stanford University Press).Google Scholar

‘Stair as Analytical Jurist’, in Walker, D. M. (ed.), Stair Tercentenary Studies (Edinburgh: Stair Society), 276–288.Google Scholar

‘The Artificial Reason and Judgement of Law’, in Aarnio, A., Niiniluoto, I. and Uusitalo, J. (eds.), Methodologie und Erkenntnistheorie der Juristischen Argumentation, Rechtstheorie Beiheft [Supplement] 2 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot), 105–120.Google Scholar

‘Adam Smith on Law’, Valparaiso University Law Review, 15(2), 243–263 (also published with modification as chapter 6 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Natural Law Reconsidered’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), 99–109.Google Scholar

‘Law, Morality and Positivism’, Legal Studies, 1(2), 131–145 (also published as chapter 6 of An Institutional Theory of Law in 1986).Google Scholar

‘The Limits of Reason: A Reply to Dr. Knud Haakonssen’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 67, 504–509 (also published with modification as part of chapters 6 and 13 in Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘The Rational Discipline of Law’, Juridical Review (New Series), 26, 146–160 (presented at the Stair Tercentenary Conference, University of Glasgow, 28 March 1981).Google Scholar

‘A Political Frontier of Jurisprudence: John Chipman Gray on the State’, Cornell Law Review, 66(5), 973–985.Google Scholar

‘Review of Justice and Liberty by D.D. Raphael’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 67(4), 557–558.Google Scholar

‘Review of Judging Justice: An Introduction to Political Philosophy by P. Pettit, and Justice by E. Kamenka and A. Erh-Soon Tay’ (ed.), Legal Studies, 1(2), 213–216.Google Scholar

Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

‘Law and Enlightenment’, in Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S. (eds.), The Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment (Edinburgh: John Donald), 150–166.Google Scholar

‘On Analytical Jurisprudence’, in Trappe, P. (ed.), Conceptions Contemporaires du Droit, Vol. I (Wiesbaden: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Supplementa), 29–41 (also published as chapter 4 of An Institutional Theory of Law in 1986).Google Scholar

‘Coercion and Law’, in Trappe, P. (ed.), Conceptions Contemporaires du Droit, Vol. II (Wiesbaden: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Supplementa), 259–271 (also published with modification as chapter 12 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Legal Reasoning and Practical Reason’, in French, P. A., Uehling, T. E. Jr and Wettstein, H. K. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 7 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Rights, Claims and Remedies’, in Stewart, M. A. (ed.), Law, Morality and Rights (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), 161–181 (also published in Law and Philosophy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Rights, Claims and Remedies’, Law and Philosophy, 1(2), 337–357 (also published by Reidel in 1982).Google Scholar

‘Legal Right and Social Democracy’, Queen’s Quarterly, 89(2), 209–304 (presented as the Corry Lecture at Queen’s University, 19 March 1981) (also published with modification as chapter 1 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘The Nature of Legal Reasoning: A Brief Reply to Dr. Wilson’, Legal Studies, 2(3), 286–290.Google Scholar

‘The Polity and Values: The Question of Moral Disestablishment’, International Social Science Review, 57(1), 32.Google Scholar

‘Review of Social Order and the Limits of Law: A Theoretical Essay, by I. Jenkins’, Political Studies, 30(1), 153–154.Google Scholar

‘Review of The Science of a Legislator, by K. Haakonssen’, Political Studies, 30(2), 328–329.Google Scholar

‘Dr. W.D. Lamont’, The Times, 20 November 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Boldness on the Bench. Review of What Next in the Law, by Lord Denning’, Times Literary Supplement, 4148, 1 October 1982, 1076.Google Scholar

‘Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Rediscovery of Practical Reason’, Journal of Law and Society, 10(1), 1–18 (also published by Dartmouth in 1996).Google Scholar

‘Jurisprudence and the Constitution’, Current Legal Problems, 36, 13–30 (also published as chapter 8 of An Institutional Theory of Law in 1986).Google Scholar

‘Legal Decisions and Their Consequences: From Dewey to Dworkin’, New York University Law Review, 58, 239–258 (presented as the Dewey Lecture in Jurisprudence, School of Law, New York University, 5 October 1982) (also published with modification as chapter 6 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘What Is Wrong with Deceit?’, Sydney Law Review, 10(1), 5–19 (presented as a public lecture at the School of Law, University of Sydney, 22 July 1981).Google Scholar

‘Reply to Mr Tur’, Philosophical Books, 24(4), 205–208.Google Scholar

‘Gewirth’s Fallacy’, Queen’s Law Journal, 9(2), 345–351 (1983–1984) (review of A. Gewirth, Human Rights).Google Scholar

‘At the Side of the Accused. Review of Not Without Prejudice, by D. Napley’, 4164 Times Literary Supplement, 21 January 1983, 66.Google Scholar

‘The Idea of Liberty: Some Reflections on Lorimer’s Institutes’, in Hope, V. (ed.), Philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 233–248 (Festschrift for George Davie).Google Scholar

‘On Reasonableness’, in Perelman, C. and Vander Elst, R. (eds.), Les Notions à Contenu Variable en Droit (Brussels: Bruylant), 233–248 (also published with modification by Notre Dame Law Review in 1999, and as chapter 9 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘Coherence in Legal Justification’, in Krawietz, W., Schelsky, H., Winkler, H. and Schramm, A. (eds.), Theorie der Normen: Festgabe für Ota Weinberger zum 65. (Geburtstag, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot), 37–53 (also published by Reidel in 1984 and Jurisdiska Fakulteten i Uppsala in 1992).Google Scholar

‘Coherence in Legal Justification’, in Peczenik, A., Lindahl, L. and van Roermund, B. (eds.), Theory of Legal Science: Proceedings of the Conference on Legal Theory and Philosophy of Science, Lund, Sweden, 11–14 December 1983 (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), 235–251 (also published by Duncker & Humblot in 1984 and Jurisdiska Fakulteten i Uppsala in 1992).Google Scholar

‘Der Rechtsstaat und die Rule of Law’, Juristenzeitung, 39, 65–70.Google Scholar

‘Analytical Jurisprudence and the Possibility of Legal Knowledge’, Saskatchewan Law Review, 49, 1–13 (1984–1985).Google Scholar

‘Review of Max Weber, by A.T. Kronman’, Political Studies, 32(3), 512–513.Google Scholar

‘Review of Ethics and the Rule of Law, by D. Lyons’, Political Studies, 32(4), 695–696.Google Scholar

‘Between the One and the Many. Review of Public and Private in Social Life, by S. I. Benn and G.F. Gaus’, 4216 Times Literary Supplement, 20 January 1984, 58.Google Scholar

‘Education for Judges’, The Times, Letter, 18 January 1984, 11.Google Scholar

Grundlagen des Institutionalistischen Rechtspositivismus, with Weinberger, O. (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot) (Schriften zur Rechtstheorie, Heft 113) (published in English in 1986 by Reidel).Google Scholar

Conditions of Validity and Cognition in Modern Legal Thought [Geltungs- und Erkenntnisbedingungen im modernen Rechtsdenken], with Panou, S. and Lombardi Vallauri, L. (eds.) (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag) (Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft [Supplement], 25).Google Scholar

‘Alcuni problemi circa l’ordine spontaneo’, in Ricossa, S. and Robilant, E. (eds.), Libertà giustizia e persona nella società tecnologica (Milan: Dott A. Giuffré), 51–68 (presented in Turin in April 1984) (also published, with modifications, under the title ‘Spontaneous Order and the Rule of Law: Some Problems’, in 1986 (Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart) and 1989 (Ratio Juris)).Google Scholar

‘The Limits of Rationality in Legal Reasoning’, in Arnaud, A-J., Hilpinen, R. and Wróblewski, J. (eds.), Juristic Logic, Rationality and Irrationality in Law (Rechtstheorie, Beiheft [Supplement], 8) (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot), 161–177 (also published as chapter 9 of An Institutional Theory of Law in 1986).Google Scholar

‘The Idea of a Free Government’, Occasional Paper of the Wilson Center (Washington, DC: The Wilson Center), 7–17 (presented at Johns Hopkins University, 12 September 1985).Google Scholar

‘The Democratic Intellect and the Law’, Legal Studies, 5(2), 177–183 (Presidential Address to the Society of Public Teachers of Law, 19 September 1984).Google Scholar

‘A Moralistic Case for A-Moralistic Law?’, Valparaiso University Law Review, 20(1), 1–41 (presented as the Seegers Lectures at the Valparaiso School of Law, 26 and 27 March 1985).Google Scholar

‘A Too Brief Reply to D’Amato, Boyle, Cullison and Stith’, Valparaiso University Law Review, 20(1), 77–82.Google Scholar

‘Review of Good Law: Towards a Rational Lawmaking Process, by H.J.M. Boukema’, Rechtstheorie, 16, 503–504.Google Scholar

Translator of ‘The Digest of Justinian: Book One’, in Mommsen, T. and Krueger, P. J. (eds.) (English translation edited by A. Watson), The Digest of Justinian (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press), 1–39.Google Scholar

An Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism, with Weinberger, O. (Dordrecht: D. Reidel) (originally published in German in 1985 by Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar

The Legal Mind: Essays for Tony Honoré, with Birks, P. (eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

‘Editors’ Preface’, with Birks, P., in Birks, P. and MacCormick, N. (eds.), The Legal Mind: Essays for Tony Honoré (Oxford: Oxford University Press), v–vi.Google Scholar

‘Speech Acts, Legal Institutions and Real Laws’, with Bańkowski, Z., in Birks, P. and MacCormick, N. (eds.), The Legal Mind: Essays for Tony Honoré, with P. Birks (eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 121–134.Google Scholar

‘The Interest of the State and the Rule of Law’, in Wallington, P. and Merkin, R. (eds.) Essays in Memory of Professor F.H. Lawson (London: Butterworths), 169–187 (originally presented as the 5th Annual Lawson Lecture, Lancaster University, 12 March 1985) (also published with modification as chapter 3 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘Theory in the Law Curriculum’, with Twining, W., in Twining, W. (ed.), Legal Theory and Common Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 238–254.Google Scholar

‘Spontaneous Order and the Rule of Law: Some Problems’, Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, 35, 1–13 (presented at Liberty Fund conference at Gleneagles, Scotland, July 1986) (also published in Ratio Juris in 1989; earlier version in Italian published by Dott A. Giuffré in 1985).Google Scholar

‘Comment on G. Postema’s “The Normativity of Law”’, in Gavison, R. (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 105–113.Google Scholar

‘Universalisation and Induction in Law’, in Faralli, C. and Pattaro, E. (eds.), Reason in Law (Milan: Seminario Giuridico dell Università di Bologna), 91–106 (also published with modification as part of chapter 5 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘Smashing the Two-Way Mirror’, in Simpson, E. (ed.), Anti-Foundationalism and Practical Reasoning: Conversations between Hermeneutics and Analysis (Edmonton, Alberta: Academic Printing and Publishing), 201–216.Google Scholar

‘Why Cases have Rationes and What These Are’, in Goldstein, L. (ed.), Precedent in Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 155–182 (also published with modification as chapter 8 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘Law’, in Miller, D. (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 274–294.Google Scholar

‘John Austin’, in Miller, D. (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 27–28.Google Scholar

‘William Blackstone’, in Miller, D. (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 47.Google Scholar

‘Hans Kelsen’, in Bogdanor, V. (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Institutions (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 309–310.Google Scholar

‘Law’, in Bogdanor, V. (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Institutions (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 319–321.Google Scholar

‘Sovereignty’, in Bogdanor, V. (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Institutions (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 583–584.Google Scholar

‘Review of The Ivory Tower: Essays in Philosophy and Public Policy, by A. Kenny’, Political Studies, 35(4), 702.Google Scholar

‘Review of A Matter of Principle, by R. Dworkin’, Political Studies, 35(3), 533.Google Scholar

‘Review of Essays on Kelsen, by R. Tur and W. Twining (eds.)’, Philosophical Books, 28(3), 183–186.Google Scholar

‘Review of Philosophy and the Criminal Law by A. Duff and N.E. Simmonds’ (ed.), Canadian Philosophical Reviews, 7(5), 190–192.Google Scholar

‘Review of Precedent and Law: Dynamics of Common Law Growth, by J. Stone’, Summer Public Law, 297–299.Google Scholar

‘Foreword’, in Weinberger, O., Law, Institution, and Legal Politics: Fundamental Problems of Legal Theory and Social Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), ix–xi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Access to the Goods. Review of The Morality of Freedom, by J. Raz’, 4392 Times Literary Supplement, 5 June 1987, 599.Google Scholar

Constitutionalism and Democracy, presented as the 3rd Lecture at the Scottish National Party Annual National Conference, Inverness, September 1988 (Edinburgh: SNP Publications Department), 16 pages.Google Scholar

‘Persons as Institutional Facts’, in Weinberger, E. and Krawietz, W. (eds.), Reine Rechtslehre im Spiegel Ihrer Fortsetzer und Kritiker (Vienna and New York: Springer-Verlag), 371–393 (also published with modification as chapter 5 in Institutions of Law, 2007).Google Scholar

‘The Ethics of International Intervention: Reply to Mr. McMahan’, in Ellis, A. (ed.), Ethics and International Relations (Manchester: Manchester University Press), 82–85.Google Scholar

‘On the Interpretation and Understanding of Case Law’, in Panou, S., Bozonis, G., Georgas, D. and Trappe, P. (eds.), Theory and Systems of Legal Philosophy, Vol. III (Stuttgart: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Supplementa), 134–144.Google Scholar

‘The Determinacy of Selves’, in Macartney, W. J. A. (ed.), Self-Determination in the Commonwealth (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press), 112–118.Google Scholar

‘Institutions, Arrangements and Practical Reason’, Ratio Juris, 1(1), 73–82.Google Scholar

‘Le Raisonnement juridique’, Archives de Philosophie du Droit, 33, 99–112.Google Scholar

‘Law, Morality and Discursive Rationality: Foreword’, with Jerzy Wróblewski, in Aarnio, A. and Tuori, K. (eds.), Law, Morality, and Discursive Rationality (Helsinki: Publications of the University of Helsinki), 1–7 (proceedings from the Law and Legitimacy symposium in Murikka Centre, Finland, August 1988).Google Scholar

‘Courage in Costume. Review of A “Life is too Short” – Autobiography, Vol 1, by N. Fairbairn’, 4426 Times Literary Supplement, 29 January 1988, 107.Google Scholar

‘How the Tories Raised the Stakes’, The Scotsman, 17.Google Scholar

Enlightenment, Rights and Revolution: Essays in Legal and Social Philosophy, with Bańkowski, Z. (eds.) (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press).Google Scholar

‘Editors’ Preface’, with Bańkowski, Z., in Bańkowski, Z. and MacCormick, N. (eds.), Enlightenment, Rights and Revolution: Essays in Legal and Social Philosophy (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press), ix–xii.Google Scholar

‘La Texture Ouverte des Règles Juridiques’, in Amselek, P. (ed.), Controverses autour de l’Ontologie Juridique (Paris: P.U.F.), 109–126 (also published in English by Edinburgh University Press in 1991).Google Scholar

‘Law, Morality and Discursive Rationality: Foreword’, with Wróblewski, J., in Aarnio, A. and Tuori, K. (eds.), Law, Morality and Discursive Rationality (Helsinki: Department of Public Law, University of Helsinki), 1–7.Google Scholar

‘Some Principles of Statutory Interpretation’, with Bańkowski, Z., in van Dunné, J. (ed.), Legal Reasoning and Statutory Interpretation (Arnhem: Youda Quint), 41–53 (presented as one of the Rotterdam Lectures in Jurisprudence, 1 June 1988).Google Scholar

‘Unrepentant Gradualism’, in Edwards, O. D. (ed.), A Claim of Right for Scotland (Edinburgh: Polygon Press), 99–109.Google Scholar

‘Constitutionalism and Constitutions’, in McCrone, D. (ed.), What Scotland Wants: Ten Years On, Proceedings of a One Day Conference on 25 February 1989 (Edinburgh: Unit for the Study of Government in Scotland), 3–8.Google Scholar

‘Constitutionalism and Democracy’, in Weinberger, O. (ed.), Aktuelle Probleme Der Demokratie [Actual Problems of Democracy], Internationales Jahrbuch für Rechtsphilosophie und Gesetzgebung (Vienna: Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung), 17–28.Google Scholar

‘Discretion and Rights’, Law and Philosophy, 8(1), 23–36.Google Scholar

‘Spontaneous Order and Rule of Law: Some Problems’, Ratio Juris, 2(1), 41–54 (also published in Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart in 1986; translation into Spanish referred to under 1986; earlier version in Italian published by Dott A. Giuffré in 1985).Google Scholar

‘Preface’, Southern California Law Review, 62, 743–745 (Symposium: The Works of Joseph Raz).Google Scholar

‘The Ethics of Legalism’, Ratio Juris, 2, 184–193.Google Scholar

Translator, with R. Alder, of R. Alexy, A Theory of Legal Argumentation (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

‘Universalisation and Induction in Law’, in South Korean IVR (eds.), Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy East and West: Festschrift for Dr. Ton-Kak Suh’s 70th Birthday (Seoul), 105–118.Google Scholar

‘General Legal Concepts’, in Smith, T. B. and Black, R. (eds.), The Laws of Scotland: Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia, Vol. 11 (Edinburgh: The Law Society of Scotland and Butterworths), 359–419 (also published with modification as chapters 5–9 in Institutions of Law, 2007).Google Scholar

‘Reconstruction after Deconstruction: A Response to CLS’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 10, 539–558 (also published, in a shorter version, by Edinburgh University Press in 1993).Google Scholar

‘Of Self-Determination and Other Things’, 15 Bulletin of the Australian Society of Legal Philosophy, 1–20.Google Scholar

‘Commentary on “The Future of Legal Systems” by Koopmans, T.’ (Edinburgh: David Hume Institute) (response to the Presidential Address to the David Hume Institute delivered at Royal Society of Edinburgh, November 1989), 13–18.Google Scholar

Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study, with Summers, R. S. (eds.) (Aldershot: Dartmouth).Google Scholar

Controversies About Law’s Ontology, with Amselek, P. (eds.) (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

‘On Method and Methodology’, with Bańkowski, Z., Summers, R. S. and Wróblewski, J., in MacCormick, N. and Summers, R. S. (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Dartmouth), 9–28.Google Scholar

‘Statutory Interpretation in the United Kingdom’, with Bańkowski, Z., in MacCormick, N. and Summers, R.S. (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Dartmouth), 359–406.Google Scholar

‘Interpretation and Justification’, with Summers, R. S., in MacCormick, N. and Summers, R. S. (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Dartmouth), 511–544.Google Scholar

‘On “Open Texture” in Law’, in Amselek, P. and MacCormick, N. (eds.), Controversies About Law’s Ontology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 72–83 (also published in French by P.U.F. in 1989).Google Scholar

‘Foreword to English Edition’, in Amselek, P. and MacCormick, N. (eds.), Controversies About Law’s Ontology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), vii–x.Google Scholar

‘An Idea for a Scottish Constitution’, in Finnie, W., Himsworth, C. and Walker, N. (eds.), Edinburgh Essays in Public Law (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 159–181.Google Scholar

‘Moral Disestablishment and Rational Discourse’, in Jung, H., Müller-Dietz, H. and Neumann, U. (eds.), Recht und Moral (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag), 219–234.Google Scholar

‘Preface’, with Twining, W., in Twining, W. (ed.), Issues of Self-Determination (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press), xi–xvii.Google Scholar

‘Is Nationalism Philosophically Credible?’, in Twining, W. (ed.), Issues of Self-Determination (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press), 8–19 (also published with modification as chapter 10 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999.Google Scholar

‘Donoghue v. Stevenson and Legal Reasoning’, in Burns, P. T. and Lyons, S. J. (eds.), Donoghue v. Stevenson and the Modern Law of Negligence (Vancouver, B.C.: Continuing Legal Education of British Columbia), 191–214.Google Scholar

‘Philosophy in Legal Education’, Scots Philosophical Newsletter, March, 5–9.Google Scholar

‘Notes on Narrativity and the Normative Syllogism’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 4(2), 163–174 (also published with modification as part of chapter 4 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘Citizens’ Legal Reasoning and its Importance for Jurisprudence’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (Beiheft [Supplement], 40), 15–21 (ed. by E. Dais, S. Jorgensen and A. Erh-Soon Tay).Google Scholar

‘Neil Gunn and Nationalism: A Memoir’, Chapman, 67 (Winter), 63–64 (Reprinted in A. McCleery (ed.), Nation and Nationalism (2013) (Dunbeath: Whittles Publishing), 39–42.Google Scholar

‘Law, State and Feminism: MacKinnon’s Theses Considered. Review of C. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Law and Philosophy, 10(4), 447–452.Google Scholar

‘Llewellyn Revisited. Review of The Case Law System in America, by K. Llewellyn’, with Z. Wiseman, Texas Law Review, 70, 771–779 (1991–1992).Google Scholar

‘Review of D. Lieberman: The Province of Legislation Determined’, Utilitas, 3(2), 313–317.Google Scholar

‘Doing and Discussing. Review of General Theory of Norms, by H. Kelsen’, 4607 Times Literary Supplement, 19 July 1991, 22.Google Scholar

Legal Reasoning, Vols. I and II, with A. Aarnio (eds.) (Aldershot: Dartmouth).Google Scholar

The Judicial Application of Law by J. Wróblewski, with Z. Bańkowski (eds.) (Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishing).Google Scholar

‘Introduction’, with Aarnio, A., in Aarnio, A. and MacCormick, N. (eds.), Legal Reasoning, Vol. I (Aldershot: Dartmouth), ix–xvii.Google Scholar

‘Introduction’, with Aarnio, A., in Aarnio, A. and MacCormick, N. (eds.), Legal Reasoning, Vol. II (Aldershot: Dartmouth), xi–xvii.Google Scholar

‘Republicanism and Enlightenment Thought: Observations from Scotland’, in Dick Howard, A. E. (ed.), The United States Constitution: Roots, Rights and Responsibilities (Washington, DC and London: Smithsonian Inst. Press), 97–114.Google Scholar

‘Coherence in Legal Justification’, in De Lege: Skrifter av Fakultetens Hedersdoktorer, Jurisdiska Fakulteten i Uppsala, Yearbook 2, 311–330 (also published by D. Reidel in 1984).Google Scholar

‘La Raisonnement Juridique en Common Law: La Motivation Comme Justification’, in Legrand, P. (ed.), Common Law: d’un siècle à l’autre (Cowansville, Québec: Editions Yvonne Blais), 309–332 (also published in Archives de philosophie du droit in 1988).Google Scholar

‘Natural Law and the Separation of Law and Morals’, in George, R. P. (ed.), Natural Law Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Further Thoughts on Institutional Facts’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 5(1), 3–15.Google Scholar

‘Legal Deduction, Legal Predicates and Expert Systems’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 5(2), 181–202 (also published with modification as part of chapter 4 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘A Deductivist Rejoinder to a Semiotic Critique’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 5(2), 215–224 (also published with modification as part of chapter 4 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘The North Star: Scotland in Europe’, 1 Edit: University of Edinburgh Magazine, 26–27.Google Scholar

‘Time to Tear Ourselves Away’, Thursday, 6 February 1992, The Scotsman.Google Scholar

‘Responsibility’, The Scotsman, Letter, 8 February 1992.Google Scholar

‘H. L. A. Hart’, The Guardian, 23 December 1992.Google Scholar

‘Law’, in Scott, P. H. (ed.), Scotland: A Concise Cultural History (Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing), 343–355.Google Scholar

‘Reconstruction after Deconstruction: Closing in on Critique’, in Norrie, A. (ed.), Closure or Critique: New Directions in Legal Theory (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 142–156 (also published, in a longer version, in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies in 1990).Google Scholar

‘Constitutionalism and Democracy’, in Bellamy, R. (ed.), Theories and Concepts of Politics (Manchester: Manchester University Press), 124–147.Google Scholar

‘Beyond the Sovereign State’, Modern Law Review, 56(1), 1–18 (delivered as the Chorley Lecture at LSE on 3 June 1992).Google Scholar

‘Argumentation and Interpretation in Law’, Ratio Juris, 6(1), 16–29 (also published in Argumentation in 1995, and with modification as chapter 7 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘H.L.A. Hart: In Memoriam’, Ratio Juris, 6(3), 337–338.Google Scholar

‘Can a Law Be Bad? Review of Norm and Nature, by R. Shiner’, 4696 Times Literary Supplement, 28 April 1993, 23.Google Scholar

‘With Due Respect: Ties of Sentiment and the Vindication of Rights. Review of What’s Wrong with Rights? by E.F. Kingdom, and Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, by C. MacKinnon’, 4686 Times Literary Supplement, 22 January 1993, 3–4.Google Scholar

Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press) (includes new ‘Foreword’, ix–xvi).Google Scholar

Prescriptive Formality and Normative Rationality in Modern Legal Systems, with Krawietz, W. and von Wright, G. H. (eds.) (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Four Quadrants of Jurisprudence’, in Krawietz, W., MacCormick, N. and von Wright, G. H. (eds.), Prescriptive Formality and Normative Rationality in Modern Legal Systems (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Legal Concepts’, in Asher, R. (ed.) and Simpson, J. W. (exec. ed.), Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics (Oxford: Pergamon Press), 2069–2074.Google Scholar

‘Diritto, “Rule of Law”, e democrazia’, translated into Italian by Diciotti, E. and Guastini, R., in Comanducci, P. and Guastini, R. (eds.), Analisi e Diritto (Torino: Giappichelli), 189–209.Google Scholar

‘What Place for Nationalism in the Modern World?’, in McQueen, H. (ed.), In Search of New Constitutions, Hume Papers in Public Policy, 2 (Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute), 79–95 (presented as Stevenson Lecture in Citizenship, University of Glasgow, 18 June 1994; also published by Westview Press in 1996, and with modification as part of chapter 11 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘Constitutionalism, Democracy and Welfare’, in Adler, M. (ed.), Democracy and Social Security, Proceedings of the 5th Annual Erasmus/Tempus Course on ‘Social Security in Europe’ (Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh), 5–8.Google Scholar

‘Legal Reasoning and the Institutional Theory of Law’, in Koller, P., Krawietz, W. and Strasser, P. (eds.), Institution und Recht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot) (Rechtstheorie Beiheft [Supplement], 14), 117–139 (also published with modification as chapter 4 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘The Concept of Law and the Concept of Law’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 14(1), 1–23 (also published by Clarendon Press in 1996) (presented as the Hart Lecture, University of Oxford, 11 May 1993).Google Scholar

‘Sovereignty, Democracy and Subsidiarity’, Juridisk Tidskrift vid Stockholms Universitet, 2, 290–297 (also published by Lothian Foundation Press in 1995; by Sakkoulas Publications in 1994; by Schäffer-Poeschel in 1997; and in Rechtstheorie in 1994) (presented as a Lecture on the occasion of receiving a Doctor Juris honorary degree at the University of Saarland).Google Scholar

‘Sovereignty, Democracy and Subsidiarity’, in Kotsiris, L. (ed.), Law at the Turn of the 20th Century (Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas Publications), 1994, 185–197 (also published by Lothian Foundation Press in 1995; by Schäffer-Poeschel in 1997; in Juridisk Tidskrift vid Stockholms Universitet in 1994; and in Rechtstheorie in 1994).Google Scholar

‘Sovereignty, Democracy and Subsidiarity’, Rechtstheorie, 25, 281–290 (also published by Lothian Foundation Press in 1995; by Sakkoulas Publications in 1994; by Schäffer-Poeschel in 1997; and in Juridisk Tidskrift vid Stockholms Universitet in 1994).Google Scholar

‘On Justification and Interpretation’, with J. Wróblewski, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 53, 255–268.Google Scholar

‘John Smith: An Appreciation’, Scottish Affairs, 8, 5–8.Google Scholar

‘In Memoriam: Eugene Kamenka’, IVR Newsletter, 17, 1–2.Google Scholar

‘Review of Interpretation and Legal Theory by A. Marmor’, Ethics, 105(1), 195–196.Google Scholar

‘Names Can Hurt People: Should “Shameless Indecency” Be an Exception to Free Speech? Review of Only Words by C.A. MacKinnon’, Times Literary Supplement, 4757, 3 June 1994, 3–4.Google Scholar

‘Free Under the Law. Review of Ethics in the Public Domain, by J. Raz’, 4787 Times Literary Supplement, 30 December 1994, 11.Google Scholar

‘Rights of a Sovereign Nation’, The Scotsman, 20 December 1994, page 6.Google Scholar

‘Legal Training’, The Scotsman, Letter, 21 June 1994.Google Scholar

Contemporary Questions in Legal Theory: Intensive Course, Course Reader for the Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 202 pages.Google Scholar

‘Defeasibility in Law and Logic’, in Bańkowski, Z., White, I. and Hahn, U. (eds.), Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 99–117 (also published with modification as chapter 12 in Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘Argumentation und Interpretation im Recht: “Rule Consequentialism” und rationale Rekonstruktion’, in Teubner, G. (ed.), Entscheidungsfolgen als Rechtsgrund (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft), 39–53 (draws on passages from ‘On Method and Methodology’ in Interpreting Statutes, 1991) (translated into German with the assistance H. Jung).Google Scholar

‘Sovereignty, Democracy and Subsidiarity’, in Bellamy, R., Bufacchi, V. and Castliglione, D. (eds.), Democracy and Constitutional Culture in Europe (London: Lothian Foundation Press), 95–106 (also published in Juridisk Tidskrift vid Stockholms Universitet in 1994, and in Rechtstheorie in 1994, both in slightly different versions).Google Scholar

‘Time, Narratives and Law’, in Bjarup, J. and Blegvad, M. (eds.), Time, Law and Society, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag), [Supplement], 64, 111–125 (also published with modification as chapter 11 in Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘Sovereignty: Myth and Reality’, in De Lege: Uppsala University Law Faculty Yearbook (Special Issue ed. by Jareborg, N., ‘Towards Universal Law: Trends in National, European and International Lawmaking’) (Uppsala: Iustus Förlag), 227–248 (also published with modification in Scottish Affairs in 1995, and as chapter 8 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘Sovereignty: Myth and Reality’, Scottish Affairs, 11, 1–13 (also published with modifications by Iustus Förlag in 1995, and as chapter 8 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now’, European Law Journal, 1(3), 259–266.Google Scholar

‘The Relative Heteronomy of Law’, European Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 69–85 (presented at the Legal Theory Workshops Series, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 23 September 1994) (also published with modification as chapter 14 in Institutions of Law, 2007).Google Scholar

‘Argumentation and Interpretation in Law’, Argumentation, 9(3), 467–480 (also published in Ratio Juris in 1993).Google Scholar

‘Eugene Kamenka 1928–1994’, Bulletin of the Australian Society of Legal Philosophy, 20, 1–3.Google Scholar

‘The European Union?’, with Z. Bańkowski and A. Scott, RUSEL Working paper No. 22, Department of Politics, University of Exeter, 10 pages.Google Scholar

‘Professor Barrie Wilson: A Tribute by the Provost of Law and Social Sciences’, in 5 Bulletin: The University of Edinburgh News, 1 and 24.Google Scholar

‘Review of H. Kelsen, General Theory of Norms. Trans. by M. Hartney’, Political Studies, 43(4), 784.Google Scholar

‘Evils that Mann Did. Review of Crossing Over the Line, Legislating Morality and the Mann Act, by D.J. Langum’, 4800 Times Literary Supplement, 31 March 1995, 10.Google Scholar

‘What Place for Nationalism in the Modern World?’, in Caney, S., George, D. and Jones, P. (eds.), National Rights, International Obligations (Boulder: Westview Press), 34–52 (also published by The David Hume Institute in 1994, and with modification as part of chapter 11 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘The Concept of Law and The Concept of Law’, in George, R. P. (ed.), The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 163–194 (also published in the Oxford Journal of Legal Studies in 1994).Google Scholar

‘Law and Philosophy: The Rediscovery of Practical Reason’, in Thomas, P. A. (ed.), Legal Frontiers, Aldershot: Dartmouth, 41–65 (also published in the Journal of Law and Society in 1983.Google Scholar

‘The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now’, in Fleerackers, F., van Leeuwen, E., and van Roermund, B. (eds.), Law, Life and the Image of Man: Modes of Thought in Modern Legal Theory, Festschrift for Jan. M. Broekman (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot), 1996, 447–453.Google Scholar

‘Liberalism, Nationalism and the Post-sovereign State’, Political Studies, 44(3), 553–567 (special issue ed. by R. Bellamy and D. Castiglione) (also published with modification as part of chapter 11 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘Libertad, Igualdad y Nacionalismo’, Sistema: Revista de ciencas sociales, 130, 31–49 (translated into Spanish by L. R. Abascal).Google Scholar

‘Institutional Normative Order: A Conception of Law’, Cornell Law Review, 82, 1051–1070 (also published with modification as chapter 1 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘Justice as Impartiality: Assenting with Anti-contractualist Reservations. Comment on Justice as Impartiality by B. Barry’, Political Studies, 44(2), 305–310.Google Scholar

‘Preface’ to Japanese translation of H. L. A. Hart (1981), translated into Japanese by T. Tsunoda, as Hāto Hórigaku no zenizō, Kōyō: Shobō, 1996.Google Scholar

‘The Law Is a Mongrel: How a Separate Legal Tradition Underpins Scottish Nationhood. Review of A Legal History of Scotland, Vol. 2, by D.M. Walker’, 4845 Times Literary Supplement, 9 February 1996, 3–4.Google Scholar

‘Whither Scotland’s Flower?’, The Times Higher Education Supplement, 13 December 1996 (1258), 16.Google Scholar

Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study, with R. S. Summers (eds.) (Aldershot: Dartmouth).Google Scholar

Constructing Legal Systems: ‘European Union’ in Legal Theory, (ed.) (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing).Google Scholar

‘Democracy, Subsidiarity and Citizenship in the “European Commonwealth”’, in MacCormick, N. (ed.), Constructing Legal Systems: ‘European Union’ in Legal Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing), 1–26 (also published in Law and Philosophy in 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Introduction’, with Summers, R. S., in MacCormick, N., Summers, R. S. and Goodhart, A. L. (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Dartmouth), 1–15.Google Scholar

‘Precedent in the United Kingdom’, with Bańkowski, Z. and Marshall, G., in MacCormick, N., Summers, R. S. and Goodhart, A. L. (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Dartmouth), 315–354.Google Scholar

‘Further General Reflections and Conclusions’, with Summers, R. S., in MacCormick, N., Summers, R. S. and Goodhart, A. L. (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Aldershot: Dartmouth), 531–550.Google Scholar

‘The Ideal and the Actual of Law and Society’, in Tasioulas, J. (ed.), Law, Values and Social Practices (Aldershot: Dartmouth), 15–37.Google Scholar

‘Universal and Particular: The Problem with Precedent’, in Aarnio, A., Alexy, R. and Bergholtz, G. (eds.), Justice, Morality and Law: A Tribute to Aleksander Peczenik on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, 16 November 1997 (Lund: Juristförklaget i Lund), 261–271.Google Scholar

‘On Institutional Normative Order: An Idea About Law’, in Valdés, E. G., Krawietz, W., von Wright, G. H. and Zimmerling, R. (eds.), Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory: Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot), 1997, 411–425.Google Scholar

‘Sovereignty, Democracy and Subsidiarity’, in Herberger, M., Scheer, A.-W. and Zentes, J., Entwicklungslinien in Recht und Wirtschaft (Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel), 247–254 (also published by Lothian Foundation Press in 1995; by Sakkoulas Publications in 1994; by Schäffer-Poeschel in 1997; in Juridisk Tidskrift vid Stockholms Universitet in 1994; and in Rechtstheorie in 1994).Google Scholar

‘Estado de derecho y rule of law’, in Thesing, J. (ed.), Estado de Derecho y Democracia (Buenos Aires: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung), 101–117.Google Scholar

‘Democracy, Subsidiarity and Citizenship in the “European Commonwealth”’, Law and Philosophy, 16(4), 331–356 (also published by Kluwer Academic Publishing in 1997, in Diritto Pubblico in 1999, and with modification as chapter 9 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999; delivered as the Annual European Lecture at Queen Mary and Westfield College, 11 November 1996).Google Scholar

‘Law as Institutional Normative Order’, Rechtstheorie, 28, 219–234 (contribution to special issue, ed. by A. Aarnio and W. Krawietz, ‘New Approaches and Ways of Legal Thinking: The Otto Brusiin Lectures 1982–1997’) (also published with modification as chapter 1 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘The Memory of Sir Walter Scott’, Bulletin of the Edinburgh Walter Scott Society, 6–14.Google Scholar

‘Speaking Volumes: J.M. MacCormick’s The Flag in the Wind’, The Times Higher Education Supplement, 26 December 1997, Issue 1312, 22.Google Scholar

‘Scottish National Party’, Round&About, April 6.Google Scholar

‘Stop Grousing and Play Rugby’, Daily Record, January 9.Google Scholar

Laws, Institutions and Facts, with H. de Jong (eds.), Law and Philosophy, 17(3), 213–345 (Special Issue).Google Scholar

‘Sovereignty or Subsidiarity? Some Comments on Scottish Devolution’, in Tomkins, A. (ed.), Devolution and the British Constitution (London: Key Haven Publications), 1–18.Google Scholar

‘Sovereign States and Vengeful Victims: The Problem of the Right to Punish’, with Garland, D., in Ashworth, A. and Wasik, M. (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory: Essays in Honour of Andrew von Hirsch (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 11–30.Google Scholar

‘Weinberger, O’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 701–702.Google Scholar

‘Villey, M’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 614–615.Google Scholar

‘Savigny, F. K. von’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 482–483.Google Scholar

‘Renner, K’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 267–268.Google Scholar

‘Pound, R’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 609–610.Google Scholar

‘Pothier, R. J.’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 608–609.Google Scholar

‘Llewellyn, K. N.’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 661–662.Google Scholar

‘Hohfeld, W. N.’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 476–477.Google Scholar

‘Hart, H. L. A.’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 234–236.Google Scholar

‘Frank, J’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 725–726.Google Scholar

‘Legal Reasoning and Argumentation’, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 525–531.Google Scholar

‘Law, Philosophy of’, with Brown, B., in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 464–468.Google Scholar

‘The English Constitution, the British State, and the Scottish Anomaly’, Scottish Affairs (Special Issue: ‘Understanding Constitutional Change’ (delivered as The British Academy Lecture 1997), 129–146 (also published in Proceedings of the British Academy in 1999, and with modification as chapter 4 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘The Dialectic of Might and Right: Legal Positivisms and Constitutional Change’, Current Legal Problems, 51, 37–63 (special issue, ed. by M. D. A Freedman, ‘Legal Theory at the End of the Millennium’, Oxford: Oxford University Press) (also published with modification as chapter 5 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘Raimo Siltala, A Theory of Precedent: From Analytical Positivism to A Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law, Opponent’s Review’, Oikeus, 4, 424–432.Google Scholar

‘Norms, Institutions and Institutional Facts’, Law and Philosophy, 17(3), 301–345 (also published with modification as chapters 1 and 2 in Institutions of Law, 2007).Google Scholar

‘After Sovereignty: Understanding Constitutional Change’, The King’s College Law Journal, 9, 20–38 (also published with modification as chapter 6 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘Precedent as a Source of Law’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 60, 177–185 (special issue ed. by E. Attwooll and P. Comanducci).Google Scholar

‘The Significance of Precedent’, Acta Juridica 174–187.Google Scholar

‘Reasonableness and Objectivity’, Notre Dame Law Review, 74(5), 1575–1603 (1998–1999) (also published with modification by Bruylant in 1984, and as chapter 9 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘The Scottish Parliament as Law-Maker: Laws for an Information Age?’, Law Librarian, 29(3), 152–156 (presented as the Annual Lecture of the Scottish Group of the Society for Computers and Law, Edinburgh, 18 June 1998).Google Scholar

‘Preface’, with H. de Jong, Law and Philosophy, 17(3), 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘A Parliament Once Again?’, Times Literary Supplement, 4976, 14 August 1998, 11–12.Google Scholar

‘The Comparative Precedent Project of the Bielefelder Kreis. 1992–97’, with Robert Summers, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie/Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 84(1), 147–152.Google Scholar

‘Risking Constitutional Collision in Europe?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18(3), 517–532 (review of D. Rossa Phelan, Revolt or Revolution: The Constitutional Boundaries of the European Community) (also published with modification as chapter 7 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘Jurisprudence, Democracy, and the Death of the Weimar Republic. Review of Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law by P.C. Caldwell and Legality & Legitimacy by D. Dyzenhaus’, Texas Law Review, 77(4), 1095–1106 (1998–1999).Google Scholar

‘To “Ought” from “Is”. Review of The Disintegration of Natural Law: Aquinas to Finnis, by P.C. Westerman’, 4980 Times Literary Supplement, 11 September 1998, 26.Google Scholar

‘Introduction’, in Artosi, A., Atienza, M. and Yoshino, H. (eds.), From Practical Reason to Legal Computer Science. IVR 17th World Congress Bologna, 16–21 June, 1995, Proceedings (Bologna: CLUEB), 7–12.Google Scholar

‘Time for a Rethink about Ferries’, Herald Scotland, 10 July 1998.Google Scholar

‘Independence has to be Transformed from Abstract Ideal to Concrete Proposal’, Herald Scotland, 14 November 1998.Google Scholar

‘Obituary: Allan Macartney’, The Independent, 27 August 1998.Google Scholar

‘Right of Reply: The SNP’s constitutional affairs spokesman counters David Aaronovitch’s attack on the Scots’, The Independent, 4 September 1998.Google Scholar

Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

‘Subsidiarity and Academic Governance’, Speech delivered at the University of Iceland, 1 March 1999 (Edinburgh University Archives).Google Scholar

‘Laws, Facts and Values’ (ed.), Law and Philosophy, 18(5), 443–577 (Special Issue).Google Scholar

‘My Philosophy of Law’, in Wintgens, L. (ed.), The Law in Philosophical Perspective: My Philosophy of Law (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 121–145 (also published with modification as part of chapter 1 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Nation and Nationalism’, in Beiner, R. (ed.), Theorizing Nationalism (Albany: SUNY Press), 189–204 (also published, in an earlier version, by the Scottish Academic Press, in 1979, and with modification as chapter 13 in Legal Right and Social Democracy, 1982).Google Scholar

‘Does a Nation Need a State? Reflections on Liberal Nationalism’, in Mortimer, E. and Fine, R. (eds.), People, Nation and State: The Meaning of Ethnicity and Nationalism (London: I.B. Tauris), 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Rhetoric and the Rule of Law’, in Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), Recrafting the Rule of Law: the Limits of Legal Order (Oxford: Hart Publishing), 163–177 (also published by the Philosophy Documentation Center in 2001, and with modification as chapter 2 of Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005) (presented at the Perelman Symposium, 20th World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, 1998).Google Scholar

‘Can Judges Make Mistakes?’, in Jung, H. and Neumann, E. (eds.), Rechtsbegründung – Rechtsbegründungen (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlaggeselsschaft), 76–89 (presented as the Annual Lecture of the Centre for Law and Society, University of Edinburgh, 1986) (also published with modification as chapter 13 in Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, 2005).Google Scholar

‘Powers and Power-Conferring Norms’, in Paulson, S. (ed.), Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 493–506 (an earlier and narrower version was presented at the 5th Siena Kelsen Symposium, June 1993) (also published with modification as chapter 9 in Institutions of Law, 2007).Google Scholar

‘Decentralisation, Devolution and Confederal Independence’, in Bort, E. and Keat, R. (eds.), The Boundaries of Understanding (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 197–208.Google Scholar

‘The Impact of Information Technology on Legal Scholarship: Commentary’ (comment on paper by R. Susskind), in Coppock, T. (ed.), Information Technology and Scholarship: Applications in the Humanities and Social Sciences (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 186–188.Google Scholar

‘The English Constitution, the British State, and the Scottish Anomaly’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 101, 289–306 (also published in Scottish Affairs in 1998, and with modification as chapter 4 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘Institutions and Laws Again’, Texas Law Review, 77(6), 1429–1441.Google Scholar

‘Democracy and Subsidiarity’, Diritto Pubblico, 1, 49–60 (also published by Law and Philosophy in 1997, by Kluwer Academic Publishing in 1997, and with modification as chapter 9 in Questioning Sovereignty, 1999).Google Scholar

‘Editor’s Preface’, Law and Philosophy, 18(5), 443–445 (Special Issue on ‘Laws, Facts and Values’).Google Scholar

‘Untitled [describing Adam Smith and John MacCormick]’, The Scottish Review, 20, 62–64 (A contribution to a symposium on ‘The Greatest Scot of the 20th Century and the Greatest Scot in History’).Google Scholar

‘Law Is the New World Order. Review of Crimes Against Humanity, by G. Robertson’, The Sunday Herald, 15 August 1999, 9.Google Scholar

Review of Institutional Theory of Law by Peter Morton’, Law Quarterly Review, 1999, 145–148.Google Scholar

‘Scotland and Europe Membership Would Continue’, Herald Scotland, 1 June 1999.Google Scholar

‘Negotiation on Several Fronts’, Herald Scotland, 5 June 1999.Google Scholar

‘Plight of Arran Aromatics’, Herald Scotland, 17 June 1999.Google Scholar

‘Action to End the ‘Banana War’’, Herald Scotland, 23 September 1999.Google Scholar

Stands Scotland Where She Did? New Unions for Old in these Islands, presented as the 6th John Maurice Kelly Memorial Lecture, 21 October 1999, Dublin: Faculty of Law, University College Dublin, 27 pages.Google Scholar

‘Legality Without Legalism’, with Bańkowski, Z., in Krawietz, W., Summers, R. S., Weinberger, O., and von Wright, G. H. (eds.), The Reasonable as Rational? On Legal Argumentation and Justification, Festschrift for Aulis Aarnio (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot), 181–195.Google Scholar

‘Ethical Positivism and the Practical Force of Legal Rules’, in Campbell, T. and Goldsworthy, J. (eds.), Judicial Power, Democracy and Legal Positivism (Aldershot: Ashgate), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Wrongs and Duties’, in Friedman, M., May, L., Parsons, K. and Stiff, J. (eds.), Rights and Reason: Essays in Honour of Carl Wellman (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 139–155 (also published with modification as chapter 6 in Institutions of Law, 2007).Google Scholar

‘Devolved Lands: 1. “Independence in Europe”: A Liberal Road for the Scottish National Party’, in Prest, J. (ed.), Balliol College Annual Record 2000 (Oxford: Oxuniprint: Oxford University Press), 11–14.Google Scholar

‘Is There a Constitutional Path to Scottish Independence?’, Parliamentary, 53(4), Affairs, 721–736.Google Scholar

‘Problems of Democracy and Subsidiarity’, European Public Law, 6(4), 531–542 (presented as a lecture at the University of Hull on 11 December 1999).Google Scholar

‘SNP on Europe’, The Sunday Herald, Letter, 20 August 2000.Google Scholar

‘SNP Follows Logic of Independence in Europe’, Herald Scotland, 9 October 2000.Google Scholar

‘Maximum Benefits of Glasgow’s Grand Watercourse’, Herald Scotland, Letter, 25 September 2000.Google Scholar

‘The Republic and Religion’, The Guardian, Letters, 9 December 2000.Google Scholar

A Special Conception of Juvenile Justice: Kilbrandon’s Legacy, presented as the 5th Kilbrandon Child Care Lecture, University of Glasgow, 1 November 2001, Publisher unknown, Pamphlet held by Law and Europa Library, School of Law, University of Edinburgh, 27 pages.Google Scholar

‘Can Europe Be Democratic?’, Ledingham Chalmers Lecture, University of Aberdeen, 10 May 2001 (Edinburgh University Archives).Google Scholar

‘De Iurisprudentia’, in Cairns, J. and Robinson, O. (eds.), Critical Studies in Ancient Law, Comparative Law and Legal History: Essays in Honour of Alan Watson (Oxford: Hart Publishing), 79–82.Google Scholar

‘Integration and Integrity in the Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice’, with Bengotxea, J. and Moral Soriano, L., in De Burca, G. and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds.), The European Court of Justice, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 43–86.Google Scholar

‘Rhetoric and the Rule of Law’, in Rasmussen, D. M. (ed.), Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy (Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center), Vol. 11, 51–67 (also published by Hart Publishing in 1999).Google Scholar

‘Some Observations about Sovereignty’, in European Law Students’ Association – International (ed.), International Law as We Enter the 21st Century (Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH), 15–23.Google Scholar

‘Foreword’, in Moore, J. and Munro, K., Scottish Official Publications: An Introduction and Guide (Edinburgh: The Stationary Office), vii–ix.Google Scholar

‘On the Very Idea of a European Constitution: Jurisprudential Reflections from the European Parliament’, Juridisk Tidskrift vid Stockholms universitet, 3, 529–541 (2001–2002) (presented as the Cassel lecture at the University of Stockholm on 1 June 2001).Google Scholar

‘A Comment on the Governance Paper’, in C. Joerges, Y. Meny and J. H. H. Weiler (eds.), Symposium: Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance, a contribution to the Jean Monnet Working Paper No.6/01.Google Scholar

‘Inserting Safeguards in European Arrest Warrants’, The Scotsman, 21 December 2001.Google Scholar

‘Untitled’, in Devine, T. and Logue, P. (eds.), Being Scottish: Personal Reflections on Scottish Identity Today (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 152–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Prólogo’, with Bańkowski, Z., in Moral Soriano, L., El Precedente Judicial (Madrid: Marcial Pons), 9–10.Google Scholar

‘On the Very Idea of Intellectual Property: An Essay according to the Institutionalist Theory of Law’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 3, 228–239 (presented as the SCRIPT Presidential Lecture, School of Law, University of Edinburgh, 11 February 2002) (also published with modification as parts of chapters 8 and 13 in Institutions of Law, 2007).Google Scholar

‘EU Update on Legal Aid; Trade in Services; Single Market; Employment Law; Company Law; and a Note on the Convention on the Future of Europe’, 1 December, The Journal Online: The Members’ Magazine of the Law Society of Scotland.Google Scholar

‘The Real Financial Priorities for MEPs’, Herald Scotland, 16 September 2002.Google Scholar

‘Scotland and the Future of Europe’, Herald Scotland, 5 November 2002.Google Scholar

‘A European Vote on Media Concentration’, Herald Scotland, 21 November 2002.Google Scholar

Scotland in the European Parliament: A View of Scotland’s Potential in Europe, presented with I. Hudghton, 15 minute film, Edinburgh: Picture Perfect Production for the G/EFA Group in the European Parliament.Google Scholar

Why a European Parliament: A Guide to European Decision-Making, presented with I. Hudghton, 15 minute film, Edinburgh: Picture Perfect Production for the G/EFA Group in the European Parliament.Google Scholar

The New European Constitution: Legal and Philosophical Perspective (Warszawa: Biuro Trybunału Konstytucyjnego) (originally presented as the Leon Petrażycki lecture, at the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, 11 June 2003, translated into Polish by W. Mleczko).Google Scholar

Law and Legal Interpretation, with Atria, F. (eds.) (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar

‘Introduction’, with Atria, F., in Atria, F. and MacCormick, N. (eds.), Law and Legal Interpretation, xi–xxxiii.Google Scholar

‘Republicanism, Fletcher and Ferguson’, in Scott, P. H. (ed.), The Saltoun Papers: Reflections on Andrew Fletcher (Edinburgh: Saltire Society), 31–39.Google Scholar

‘How to Have a Healthy Constitution? Reviewing Allott’s Health of Nations’, Common Market Law Review, 40(6), 1537–1549.Google Scholar

‘Fishing Industry will be Key Election Issue’, The Scotsman, 4 January 2003.Google Scholar

‘SNP’s reckoning on benefits of the EU’, Letter, The Scotsman, 10 January 2003.Google Scholar

‘SNP Not Behind the New EU Draft’, The Scotsman, Letter, 14 February 2003.Google Scholar

‘Open-Door Approach’, The Scotsman, Letter, 20 February 2003.Google Scholar

‘A Strengthened Definition of Subsidiarity’, The Scotsman, 14 March 2003.Google Scholar

‘Extension of Powers is Implicit in Scotland Act’, The Scotsman, 25 April 2003.Google Scholar

‘Europe…The Devil will be in the Detail’, The Scotsman, 16 May 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘First Step on the Road to Ruin for Scotland’, Scotland on Sunday (Supplement), 8 June 2003, 8.Google Scholar

‘EU Constitution and Democracy’, The Times, 11 July 2003.Google Scholar

‘We Must Fly our Flag to Keep Funds’, The Scotsman, 14 July 2003.Google Scholar

‘Europe’s Beleaguered Nations’, The Scotsman, 12 December 2003 [A Review of C. Booker and R. North, The Great Deception.]Google Scholar

‘Obituary: Archie Turnbull: Publisher whose scholarly press helped launch the Scottish renaissance’, The Guardian, 8 April 2003.Google Scholar

A Union of Its Own Kind? Reflections on the European Convention and the Proposed Constitution of the European Union. Edinburgh: Neil MacCormick (personal publication), 40 pages.Google Scholar

‘Questioning Post-Sovereignty’, European Law Review, 29(6), 852–863.Google Scholar

‘The European Constitutional Convention and the Stateless Nations’, International Relations, 18(3), 331–344 (presented as the Inaugural Lecture marking the establishment of the Wales in Regional Europe (WiRE) project at the University of Wales, Aberystwyth, 3 November 2003).Google Scholar

‘Doubts about the “Supreme Court” and Reflections on MacCormick v. Lord Advocate’, Juridical Review, 3, 237–250.Google Scholar

Rhetoric and the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Who’s Afraid of a European Constitution? (Exeter: Imprint Academic).Google Scholar

‘New Unions for Old’, in Miller, W. L. (ed.), Anglo-Scottish Relations from 1900 to Devolution and Beyond, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 128 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Legislative Deliberation: Notes from the European Parliament’, in Wintgens, L. (ed.), The Theory and Practice of Legislation: Essays on Legisprudence (Aldershot: Ashgate), 285–296 (originally delivered as the Ledingham Chalmers Lecture, University of Aberdeen, 10 May 2001).Google Scholar

‘The Sovereignty Issue in the EU Constitution’, in Specchia, M. C. and Suppa, S. (eds.), Quaderni del Dottorato 2003 (Torino: Giappichelli Editore), 69–76 (presented at a workshop at Bari, 30 October 2003).Google Scholar

‘Enduring Foundations’, in Alexander, W. (ed.), Donald Dewar: Scotland’s First Minister (Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing), 139–145.Google Scholar

‘The European Constitutional Process: A Theoretical View’, Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez, 39, 289–313 (Special issue, ‘Derecho y justicia en una sociedad global’, ed. by M. E. Castillo and M.S. L López) (published earlier, in a non-authoritative version for the IVR Congress, in Scarmilla, M. and Saavedra, M. (eds.), Law & Justice in a Global Society (Spain: Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez), 299–319 (and in Spanish at 275–297)).Google Scholar

‘Adam Ferguson: How Civil Will Future Society Be?’, in Shimshon, B. (ed.), Enlightenment Lectures 2002 (Glasgow: Smith Institute), 17–24 (delivered on 25 February 2002).Google Scholar

‘The Health of Nations and the Health of Europe’, The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 7, 1–16 (presented as the Mackenzie Stuart Lecture at the Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 11 November 2004).Google Scholar

‘Taking Responsibility Seriously’, Edinburgh Law Review, 9(1), 168–175 (review essay of Responsibility in Law and Morality by P. Cane) (also published with modification as parts of chapters 6, 12, and 13 in Institutions of Law, 2007).Google Scholar

‘Hohfeld, W. N.’, in Craig, E. (ed.), The Shorter Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 388–389 [Reprint from 1998].Google Scholar

‘Hart, H. L. A.’, in Craig, E. (ed.), The Shorter Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 333 [Reprint from 1998].Google Scholar

‘Philosophy of Law’, with Brown, B., in Craig, E. (ed.), The Shorter Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge), 546–550 [Reprint from 1998].Google Scholar

‘Review of A Life of H.L.A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream, by Nicola Lacey’, Social & Legal Studies, 14(3), 433–435.Google Scholar

The European Union and the Idea of a Perfect Commonwealth, presented as the 2006 Hume Lecture on 1 March 2006, Hume Occasional Paper No. 68, Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute, 29 pages.Google Scholar

‘Particulars and Universals’ in Bańkowski, Z. and MacLean, J. (eds.), The Universal and the Particular in Legal Reasoning (Aldershot: Ashgate), 1–20.Google Scholar

‘An Attempted Response’, in Bańkowski, Z. and MacLean, J. (eds.), The Universal and the Particular in Legal Reasoning (Aldershot: Ashgate), 251–262.Google Scholar

‘Does Law Really Matter?’, in Leskiewicz, M. (ed.), Australian Legal Philosophy Students Association Annual Publication (Brisbane: U. Q. Vanguard), 5–23 (presented as the Inaugural Lecture of the Australian Legal Philosophy Students Association, Brisbane, 2005) (also published with modification as part of chapter 4 in Institutions of Law, 2007).Google Scholar

‘Review of John Smith: A Life by M. Stuart’, Scottish Affairs, 56, 142–145.Google Scholar

‘Entrevista a Neil MacCormick’, with M. Atienza, translated into Spanish by M. Atienza, Doxa: Cuadernos de filosofía del derecho, 29, 479–489.Google Scholar

‘Founding Principles’, The Scotsman, Letter, 15 August 2006.Google Scholar

Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

‘Why Law Makes No Claims’, in Pavlakos, G. (ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Oxford: Hart Publishing), 59–68.Google Scholar

‘Sir Neil MacCormick’, in Nielson, M. E. J. (ed.), Legal Philosophy: 5 Questions (New York: Automatic/VIP Press), 171–186.Google Scholar

‘A Common Approach to Crime? Observations on the European Arrest Warrant and the Democratic Deficit’ in Müller-Dietz, H., Müller, E., Kunz, K-L., Radtke, H., Britz, G., Momsen, C. and Koriath, H. (eds.), Festschrift für Heike Jung zum 65. Geburtstag am 23. April 2007 (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 535–541.Google Scholar

‘Judicial Independence: Who Cares?’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 151, 195–212 (presented as the 2006 British Academy Law Lecture).Google Scholar

‘On Public Law and the Law of Nature and Nations’, Edinburgh Law Review, 11(2), 149–161.Google Scholar

‘The Law School of the University of Edinburgh: Tercentenary Address held in the McEwan Hall, February 2007’, University of Edinburgh Journal, 53(2), 84–87.Google Scholar

‘Ronald Dworkin: Mr Justice. Review of Exploring Law’s Empire, by S. Hershovitz (ed.), Is Democracy Possible Here?, by R. Dworkin; Justice in Robes, by R. Dworkin; and Ronald Dworkin, by A. Ripstein (ed.)’, Times Literary Supplement, 5462, 5 December 2007, 3–5.Google Scholar

‘SNP Minority’, The Scotsman, Letter, 5 November 2007.Google Scholar

‘Legality of a referendum on the future of the Union and the right of the people to decide’, The Herald (Glasgow), Letter, 10 May 2007.Google Scholar

Practical Reason in Law and Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

H.L.A. Hart, 2nd ed. (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar

‘MacCormick on MacCormick’, in Menéndez, A. J. and Fossum, J. E. (eds.), The Post-Sovereign Constellation: Law and Democracy in Neil D. [sic] MacCormick’s Legal and Political Theory, Report 04/08 (Oslo: Arena), 11–20 (also published in 2011 by Springer).Google Scholar

‘The Convention and Its Constitution: All a Great Mistake?’, in Petersen, H., Kjær, A. L., Krunke, H. and Madsen, M. R. (eds.), Paradoxes of European Legal Integration (Aldershot: Ashgate), 17–27.Google Scholar

‘Church of Scotland’, in Cane, P. and Conaghan, J. (eds.), The New Oxford Companion to Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Revolution’, in Cane, P. and Conaghan, J. (eds.), The New Oxford Companion to Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1020–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Scottish Parliament’, in Cane, P. and Conaghan, J. (eds.), The New Oxford Companion to Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1059–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Treaty of Union’, in Cane, P. and Conaghan, J. (eds.), The New Oxford Companion to Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Introduction’, in MacCormick, J., The Flag in the Wind: The Story of the National Movement in Scotland (Edinburgh: Berlinn), ix–xvii.Google Scholar

‘A Reply to Comments on Rhetoric and the Rule of Law’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 59(1), 43–48.Google Scholar

‘Review of Our Knowledge of the Law, by G. Pavlakos and Law as a Moral Idea, by N. Simmonds’, Edinburgh Law Review, 12(1), 150–153.Google Scholar

‘Stair and the Natural Law Tradition: Still Relevant?’, in MacQueen, H. (ed.), Miscellany Six (Edinburgh: The Stair Society), 1–10 (presented as a lecture at the Annual General Meeting of the Stair Society, Edinburgh, 3 November 2007).Google Scholar

‘Concluding for Institutionalism’, in Del Mar, M. and Bańkowski, Z. (eds.), Law as Institutional Normative Order (Surrey: Ashgate), 187–200.Google Scholar

‘1968 and All That’, in Balliol College Annual Record, 13–15.Google Scholar

‘Sovereignty and After’, in Kalmo, H. and Skinner, Q. (eds.), Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory’, in Kuenssberg, N. (ed.), Argument Amongst Friends: Twenty Five Years of Sceptical Enquiry (Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute), 28–34 [Republication of Introduction from Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, 1978/1994].Google Scholar

‘MacCormick on MacCormick’, in Menéndez, A. J. and Fossum, J. E. (eds.), Law and Democracy in Neil MacCormick’s Legal and Political Theory: The Post-Sovereign Constellation (Dordrecht: Springer), 17–24 (also published by Arena in 2008).Google Scholar

‘Direito, Interpretação e Razoabilidade’, in Porto Macedo, R. Jr (ed.), Direito e Interpretação: Racionalidade e Instituições (São Paulo: Editora Saraiva), 31–62.Google Scholar