Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T17:15:59.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2023

Stephen Darwall
Stephen Darwall
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Modern Moral Philosophy
From Grotius to Kant
 , pp. 343 - 362
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Abizadeh, Arash (2018). Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Kate (2002). “Two Portraits of the Humean Moral Agent,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83: 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Kate (2007). “Hume’s Distinction between Philosophical Anatomy and Painting,” Philosophy Compass 2: 680–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albee, Ernest (1957). A History of English Utilitarianism. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry and Moore, Michael (2016). “Deontological Ethics,” Stanford Encyclopedia. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/Google Scholar
Allais, Lucy (2016). “Kant’s Racism,” Philosophical Papers 45: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (1991). “On a Presumed Gap in Kant’s Derivation of the Categorical Imperative,” Philosophical Topics 19: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth (1999). “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109: 187–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth (2010). The Imperative of Integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth (2012). “The Fundamental Disagreement between Luck Egalitarians and Relational Egalitarians,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (Supp.): 1–23.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth (2014). “Social Movements, Experiments in Living, and Moral Progress: Case Studies from Britain’s Abolition of Slavery.” The Lindley Lecture, The University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth (forthcoming). The Great Reversal: How Neoliberalism Turned the Work Ethic against Workers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia (1993). The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). “Modern Moral Philosophy,” Philosophy 33: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1997). “Summa Theologica,” in Basic Writings of Thomas Aquinas, v. II, ed. Pegis, Anton C.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company. Originally published in 1265–1273.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1999). Nicomachean Ethics, ed. and trans. Irwin, Terence. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2000). Nicomachean Ethics, ed. and trans. Crisp, Roger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpaly, Nomy (2004). Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry into Moral Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Atherton, Margaret (1994). Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1990). Homilies on the First Epistle of John, in The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century, intro., trans., and notes Boniface Ramsay. New Hyde Park, NY: New City Press.Google Scholar
Aune, Bruce (1979). Kant’s Theory of Morals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1957). “A Plea for Excuses,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette (1985). Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette (1993). “Moralism and Cruelty: Reflections on Hume and Kant,” Ethics 103: 436–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balguy, John (1976). The Foundation of Moral Goodness, 2 vol. in one. New York: Garland Publishing Co., Inc. Originally published in 1728, 1729.Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, Jean (1718). Jugement d’un anonyme … avec dex reflexions du traducteur … in Pufendorf (1718).Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, Jean (1749). “An Historical and Critical Account of the Science of Morality,” in The Law of Nature and Nations, eds. Pufendorf, Samuel, trans. Basil Kennett, ed. Barbeyrac, Jean, 5th ed. London, pp. 1–73.Google Scholar
Batson, C. Daniel and Shaw, Laura L. (1991). “Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives,” Psychological Inquiry 2: 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy (1838). The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Bowring, John. Edinburgh: William Tait.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. (2001). “Who Invented the Concept of Race? Kant’s Role in the Enlightenment Construction of Race,” in Race: Readings in Continental Philosophy, ed. Bernasconi, Robert. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 11–36.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert (2002). “Kant as an Unfamiliar Source of Racism,” in Philosophers on Race: Critical Essays, eds. Ward, Julia K. and Lott, Tommy L.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert (2003). “Will the Real Kant Please Stand Up: The Challenge of Enlightenment Racism to the Study of the History of Philosophy,” Radical Philosophy 117: 13–22.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon (1984). Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean (2004). On Sovereignty, ed. and trans. John H. Franklin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boxill, Bernard (1984). Blacks and Social Justice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Boxill, Bernard (2003). “A Lockean Argument for Black Reparations,” The Journal of Ethics 7: 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Richard (1979). A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael (1981). “Intention and Means-End Reasoning,” The Philosophical Review 90: 252–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael (1987). Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel S. (1997). Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1962). Five Types of Ethical Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Broad, Jacqueline (2006). “A Woman’s Influence? John Locke and Damaris Masham on Moral Accountability,” Journal of the History of Ideas 67: 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John (2013). Rationality through Reasoning. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Charlotte (1988). “Is Hume an Internalist,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26: 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lesley (2007). “Glaucon’s Challenge, Rational Egoism, and Ordinary Morality,” in Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato’s Republic, eds. Cairns, Douglas and Herrmann, Fritz-Gregor. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
Brunero, John and Kolodny, Niko (2018). “Instrumental Rationality,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen and Powell, Russell (2018). The Evolution of Moral Progress: A Biocultural Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukoski, Michael (2018). “Korsgaard’s Argument for the Value of Humanity,” The Philosophical Review 127: 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler (1993). “Content Preservation,” Philosophical Review 102: 457–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Joseph (2017). Fifteen Sermons and Other Writings on Ethics, ed. McNaughton, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Originally published in 1726. Reference to sermon and paragraph numbers.Google Scholar
Cambridge Platonists Project, www.cambridge-platonism.divinity.cam.ac.uk/view/texts/normalised/indexGoogle Scholar
Carter, Benjamin (2010). “The Standing of Ralph Cudworth as a Philosophy,” in Insiders and Outsiders in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, eds. Rogers, G. A. J., Sorrell, Tom, and Kraye, Jill. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1951). The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, trans. Fritz C. A. Koelln and James P. Pettegrove. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1953). The Platonic Renaissance in England, trans. James Pettegrove. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Richard Yetter (2012). “Fittingness: The Sole Normative Primitive,” Philosophical Quarterly 62: 684–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Samuel (1978a). A Discourse Concerning the Being and Attributes of God, in Works, v. ii. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc. Originally published in 1704.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel (1978b). A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelation, in Works, v. ii. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc. Originally published in 1705.Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. (1992). Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohon, Rachel (2000). “The Roots of Reasons,” The Philosophical Review 109: 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, John (1983). John Locke’s Moral Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin (2003). Principles of Politics Applicable to All Governments. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1810.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M. (1996). “Justice and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics,” Review of Metaphysics 49: 859–872.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger, Sacrifice Regained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph (1969). “A Sermon Preached before the House of Commons,” in The Cambridge Platonists, ed. Patrides, C. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–127.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph (~1670). Manuscripts on freedom of the will. British Library, Additional Manuscripts, nos. 4978–4982.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph (1678). The True Intellectual System of the Universe. London: Richard Royston.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph (1996a). A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality, ed. Hutton, Sarah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph (1996b). “A Treatise of Freewill,” in Cudworth 1996.Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard (1683). De legibus naturae disquisitio philosophica, 2nd ed. Lubeck and Frankfurt: S. Otto & J. Wiedemeyer. (First edition published in 1672.)Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard (2005). A Treatise of the Laws of Nature, trans., with an intro. and appendix, John Maxwell, ed., with a foreword, John Parkin. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. (Based on 1727 edition.)Google Scholar
Daniel, Dafydd Mills (2020). Ethical Rationalism and Secularisation in the British Enlightenment: Conscience and the Age of Reason. Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Arms, Justin and Jacobson, Daniel (2000a). “The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Arms, Justin and Jacobson, Daniel (2000b). “Sentiment and Value,” Ethics 110: 722–748.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1977). “Two Kinds of Respect,” Ethics 88: 36–49.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1980). “Is There a Kantian Foundation for Rawlsian Justice?” in John Rawls’ Theory of Social Justice, ed. Blocker, H. G. and Smith, E.. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1983). Impartial Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1994). “Hume and the Invention of Utilitarianism,” in Hume and Hume’s Connexions, eds. Stewart, M. A. and Wright, J.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1995). The British Moralists and the Internal “Ought”: 1640–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1997). “Reasons, Motives, and the Demands of Morality: An Introduction,” in Moral Discourse and Practice, eds. Darwall, S., Gibbard, A., and Railton, P.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1998). Philosophical Ethics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1999a). “The Inventions of Autonomy,” European Journal of Philosophy 7: 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1999b). “Sympathetic Liberalism: Recent Work on Adam Smith,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 28: 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2000). “Normativity and Projection in Hobbes’s Leviathan,” The Philosophical Review 109: 313–347.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2002). Welfare and Rational Care. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2003). “Autonomy in Modern Natural Law,” in New Essays on the History of Autonomy, eds. Krasnoff, Larry and Brender, Natalie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2004). “Equal Dignity in Adam Smith,” Adam Smith Review 1: xxx.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2008). “Kant on Respect, Dignity, and the Duty of Respect,” in Kant’s Virtue, ed. Betzler, Monika. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 175–200. Reprinted in Darwall 2013c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2012a). “Grotius at the Creation of Modern Moral Philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94: 296–325. Reprinted in Darwall 2013c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2012b). “Pufendorf on Morality, Sociability, and Moral Powers,” The Journal of the History of Philosophy 50: 213–238. Reprinted in Darwall 2013c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2013a). “Bipolar Obligation,” in Morality, Authority, and Law: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics I, ed. Darwall, Stephen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2013b). Morality, Authority, and Law: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2013c). Honor, History, and Relationship: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2013d). “Respect as Honor and as Accountability,” in Darwall 2013c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2013e). “Kant on Respect, Dignity, and the Duty of Respect,” in Darwall 2013c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2013f). “Authority and Second-Personal Reasons for Acting,” in Darwall 2013b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2013g). “The Value of Autonomy and Autonomy of the Will,” in Darwall 2013a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2013h). “Forcing Freedom” (critical review of Arthur Ripstein’s Force and Freedom), Legal Theory 19: 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2013i). “Demystifying Promises,” in Darwall 2013c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2014a). “Agreement Matters” (critical Notice of Derek Parfit’s On What Matters), The Philosophical Review 123: 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2014b). “Review of Richard Sorabji’s Moral Conscience, Its History through the Ages: 5th Century BCE to the Present.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/56313-moral-conscience-through-the-ages-fifth-century-bce-to-the-present/Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2014c). “The Social and the Sociable,” Philosophical Topics, special issue, eds. Conant, James and Rödl, Sebastian 42: 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2016). “Making the Hard Problem of Moral Normativity Easier,” in Weighing Reasons, eds. Lord, Errol and Maguire, Barry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2018). “Contempt as an Other-Characterizing, ‘Hierarchizing’ Attitude,” in The Moral Psychology of Contempt, ed. Mason, Michelle. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2022). “Hutcheson in the History of Rights,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 20: 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen, Gibbard, Allan, and Railton, Peter (1997). “Toward Fin de Siècle Ethics: Some Trends,” in Moral Discourse and Practice, eds. Darwall, S., Gibbard, A., and Railton, P.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dean, Richard (2006). The Value of Humanity in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debes, Remy (2012). “Adam Smith on Dignity and Equality,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20: 109–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grouchy, Sophie (2019). Sophie de Grochie’s Letters on Sympathy, trans Sandrine Bergès, introduction, glossary, and commentary, Eric Schliesser and Sandrine Bergès. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Kenessey, Brendan (2017). Joint Practical Deliberation. Diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (2008). Spinoza. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René (2017). Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dorsey, Dale (2010). “Hutcheson’s Deceptive Hedonism,” The Journal of the History of Philosophy 48: 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreier, James (1990). “Internalism and Speaker Relativism,” Ethics 101: 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (1986). An Introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, Jan and Tomasello, Michael (2019). “Children’s Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect,” Trends in Cognitive Science 23: 454–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engels, Friedrich (1975). “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific,” in Collected Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, v. 24. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (2012a). The Definition of Good. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (2012b). Second Thoughts in Moral Philosophy. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge. Reprints. Originally published in 1959.Google Scholar
Eze, Emanuel Chukwudi 1997. “The Color of Reason: The Idea of ‘Race’ in Kant’s Anthropology,” in Postcolonial African Philosophy: A Critical Reader, ed. Chukwudi Eze, Emanuel. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Falk, W. D. (1948). “‘Ought’ and Motivation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 48: 113–138.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel (1980). “The Nature and Value of Rights,” in Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (2000). Foundations of Natural Right, ed. Neuhouser, Frederick, trans. Michael Bauer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel (1991). “Philosophy in Moral Practice: Kant and Adam Smith,” Kant-Studien 82: 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel (2004). A Short History of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel (2005). A Short History of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel (2013). “Adam Smith,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/smith-moral-politicalGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa (1958). “Moral Arguments,” Mind 67: 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa (1959). “Moral Beliefs,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59: 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa (1972). “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives,” The Philosophical Review 81: 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa (1978). Virtues and Vices, and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa (2002). “Nietzsche’s Immoralism,” in Moral Dilemmas, and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, David (2003). The Elements of Moral Philosophy, in Three Books with a Brief Account of the Nature, Progress, and Origin of Philosophy, ed. with an intro. by Kennedy, Thomas. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1754.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Murray (1982). “The Place of Richard Cumberland in the History of Natural Law Doctrine,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20: 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankena, William (1942). “Obligation and Value in the Ethics of G. E. Moore,” in The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, ed. Schilpp, Paul A.. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Frankena, William (1955). “Hutcheson’s Moral Sense Theory,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16: 356–375.Google Scholar
Frankena, William (1963). Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Frankena, William (1992). “Sidgwick and the History of Ethical Dualism,” in Essays on Henry Sidgwick, ed. Schultz, Bart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda (2007). Epistemic Injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Aaron (2004). “Hume’s ‘Original Difference’: Race, National Character and the Human Sciences,” Eighteenth-Century Thought 2: 127–152.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David P. (1967). “Morality and Advantage,” The Philosophical Review 76: 460–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David P. (1969). The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David P. (1979). “Thomas Hobbes: Moral Theorist,” Journal of Philosophy 76: 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, Allan (1990). Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Michael (2006). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. (1992). “In Defense of the Simulation Theory,” Mind and Language 7: 104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert M. (1992). “The Simulation Theory: Objections and Misconceptions,” Mind and Language 7: 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grean, Stanley (1967). Shaftesbury’s Philosophy of Religion and Ethics: A Study in Enthusiasm. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie (2003). “Legal Positivism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-positivism/Google Scholar
Griswold, Charles (1999). Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1724). Le Droit de La Guerre et de la Paix, trans. Jean Barbeyrac. Amsterdam: Pierre de Coup.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1925). On the Law of War and Peace, trans. Francis W. Kelsey, intro James Brown Scott. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1950). De Iure Praedae Commentarius; Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, trans. Gwladys L. Williams with the collaboration of Walter H. Zeydel. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Original manuscript of 1604.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (2005). The Rights of War and Peace, 3 vols., ed. Tuck, Richard. From the 1738 English translation by John Morrice of Jean Barbeyrac’s French translation, with Barbeyrac’s notes. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1625.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2006). Kant. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (1996). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (1998). “Divine/Natural Law Theories of Ethics,” in Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, vol. 2, 2 vols., eds. Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1317–1357.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (2001). “The Character and Obligation of Natural Law According to Richard Cumberland,” in English Philosophy in the Age of Locke, ed. Stewart, M. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1990a). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean (1986). Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hannay, Alastair (2021). “Kierkegaard against the Herd,” iai News. https://iai.tv/articles/kierkegaard-against-the-herd-auid-1826?_auid=2020Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. (1982). Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods, and Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1955). “Are There Any Natural Rights?” The Philosophical Review 64: 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The Concept of Law. 3rd ed., ed. Green, Leslie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Carol (2013). Kantianism, Liberalism, and Feminism: Resisting Oppression. New York: Palgrave-McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right, eds. Wood, Allen W. and Nisbett, Hugh B., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Originally published in 1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara (1993). “Could It Be Worth Thinking about Kant on Sex and Marriage?” In A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, eds. Anthony, Louise M and Witt, Charlotte. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Heydt, Colin (2014). “Utilitarianism before Bentham,” in The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism, eds. Eggleston, Ben and Miller, Dale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieronymi, Pamela (2005). “The Wrong Kind of Reason,” The Journal of Philosophy 102: 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieronymi, Pamela (2013). “The Use of Reasons in Thought (and the Use of Earmarks in Argument),” Ethics 124: 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E., Jr. (1973). “The Hypothetical Imperative,” The Philosophical Review 82: 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. and Boxill, Bernard. (2001). “Kant on Race,” in Race and Racism, ed. Boxill, Bernard. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1839). The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, 11 vols., ed. Sir Molesworth, William. London: J. Bohn.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1983). De Cive, the English Version, Entitled in the First Edition, Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society, ed. and trans. Howard Warrender. Oxford: Clarendon Press. References are to chapter and paragraph number.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1994a). Leviathan, ed. Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co., Inc. Originally published in 1651. References are to chapter and paragraph number.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1994b). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Gaskin, J. C. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (2014). Behemoth, v. x of Clarendon Edition of the Works of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Adam (2005). Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire’s Slaves. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Hockett, Robert and James, Aaron (2020). Money from Nothing: Or, Why We Should Stop Worrying about Debt and Learn to Love the Federal Reserve. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch (1997). “Hobbes and the Foole,” Political Theory 25: 620–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb (1923). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Legal Essays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hostler, John (1975). Leibniz’s Moral Philosophy. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Howard, Christopher (2019). “The Fundamentality of Fit,” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 14: 216–236.Google Scholar
Hruschka, Joachim (1991). “The Greatest Happiness Principle and Other Early German Anticipations of Utilitarian Theory,” Utilitas 3: 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, W. D. (1970). Modern Moral Philosophy. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1932). The Letters of David Hume, ed. Grieg, J. Y. T.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., 2nd ed., with rev. P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Originally published in 1739, 1740.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1975a). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., 3rd. ed., rev. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Originally published in 1748.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1975b). “An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals,” in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., 3rd. ed., rev. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Originally published in 1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, Thomas (2014). British Ethical Theorists from Sidgwick to Ewing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huseyinzadegan, Dilek (2018). “For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon,” Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4.1: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (1755). A System of Moral Philosophy, 2 vols. Glasgow: R. A. Foulis. Facsimile edition in Collected Works, vols. 5 and 6. Hildesheim: Olms, 1969–1971.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (2002). An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, ed. with an intro., Garrett, Aaron. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1728, 2nd ed., 1730, 3rd ed., 1742. This edition is based on the first edition but also includes passages from later editions.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (2004). An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue in Two Treatises, ed. with an intro., Leidhold, Wolfgang. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. (Based on the 2nd edition, 1726; 1st edition published in 1725.) This edition also includes passages from the revised 5th edition 1753.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (2007). A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy, ed. with an intro., Turco, Luigi. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1747.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah (1993). “Damaris Cudworth, Lady Masham: Between Platonism and Enlightenment,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1: 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immerwahr, John (1991). “The Anatomist and the Painter: The Continuity of Hume’s Treatise and Essays,” Hume Studies 1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (2003). “Stoic Naturalism and Its Critics,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Terence (2007). The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, Volume I: From Socrates to the Reformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Terence (2008). The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, Volume II: From Suarez to Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Terence (2009). The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, Volume III: From Kant to Rawls. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank (1998). From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johns, Christopher (2013). The Science of Right in Leibniz’s Moral and Political Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert (2016). “Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos (1982). “The Simulation Heuristic,” in Judgment Under Uncertainty, eds. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kail, P. J. E. (2001). “Hutcheson’s Moral Sense: Skepticism, Realism, and Secondary Qualities,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 18: 57–77.Google Scholar
Kames, Lord (Henry Home) (2005). Essays on Morality and Principles of Natural Religion, 3rd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1776.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1904). Educational Theory of Immanuel Kant, trans. and ed. Buchner, Edward Franklin. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a). “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals,” in Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. References are to page numbers of the Preussische Akademie edition. Originally published in 1785.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b). “Critique of Practical Reason,” in Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Page references are to page numbers of the Preussische Akademie edition.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996c). “Metaphysics of Morals,” in Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Page references are to page numbers of the Preussische Akademie edition.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998). Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Originally published in 1781. Page references are to page numbers of the Preussische Akademie edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007). Anthropology, History, and Education, ed. Louden, Robert and Zöller, Günther. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Page references are to page numbers of the Preussische Akademie edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2009). Idea for a University History with a Cosmopolitan Aim (1784), trans. Allen Wood, eds. Rorty, Amelie O. , James Schmidt, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2013a). “Of the Different Human Races,” in Kant and the Concept of Race: Eighteenth-Century Writings, trans. and ed. Jon M. Mikkelsen. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2013b). “Determination of the Concept of Human Race,” in Kant and the Concept of Race: Eighteenth-Century Writings, trans. and ed. Jon M. Mikkelsen. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2018). Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, eds. Wood, Allen W. and Di Giovanni, George, foreword Robert Merrihew Adams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory (1986). Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory (1995). “The Rationality of Rule-Following: Hobbes’s Dispute with the Foole,” Law and Philosophy 4: 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Peter (1830). The Life of John Locke, with Extracts from His Correspondence, Journals, and Common-Place Books, 2 vols. London: Henry Colburn & Richard Bentley.Google Scholar
Kirk, Linda (1987). Richard Cumberland and Natural Law: Secularisation of Thought in Seventeenth-Century England. Cambridge: James Clarke.Google Scholar
Köhler, Wolfgang (1938). The Place of Value in a World of Facts. New York: Liverlight Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996a). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996b). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996c). “Morality as Freedom,” in Korsgaard 1996b.Google Scholar
Kosch, Michelle (2006). Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosch, Michelle (2018). Fichte’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1981). Naming and Necessity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae (1992). “Duty and Desolation,” Philosophy 67: 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Edmund (1824). “A Defence of Mr. Locke’s Opinion Concerning Personal Identity,” in Locke (1824), III, 179–198.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, Michael (2003). “Hobbes on the Origin of Obligation,” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 11: 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfied Wilhelm (1969). Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Philosophical Papers and Letters, 2nd ed., ed. and trans. L. E. Loemker. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1985a). Textes inédits, ed. Grua, Gaston. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1985b). Theodicy, trans. E. M. Huggard. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1988). Political Writings, ed. Riley, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leisinger, Matthew A. (2019). “The Inner Work of Liberty: Cudworth on Desire and Attention,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27: 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leisinger, Matthew A. (2021). “Cudworth on Freewill,” Philosophers’ Imprint, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/phimp/3521354.0021.001/1/--cudworth-on-freewill?rgn=full+text;view=imageGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian (2015). Nietzsche on Morality, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lerner, Adam (unpublished). “Empathy as Evidence.”Google Scholar
Lipscomb, Benjamin J. B. (2021). The Women Are Up to Something. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. (2009). Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: Cases in the Law of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1824). The Works of John Locke, 12th ed., 9 vols. London: C. and J. Rivington.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First edition, 1690; final, fourth edition, 1700,Google Scholar
Locke, John (1988). Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Originally published in 1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1990). Drafts for the Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Other Philosophical Writings, eds. Nidditch, Peter H. and Rogers, G. A. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1997). Political Essays, ed. Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (2002). Essays on the Law of Nature: The Latin Text with a Translation, Introduction and Notes, Together with Transcripts of Locke’s Shorthand in His Journal for 1676, ed. von Leyden, W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Løgstrup, K. E. (2007). Beyond the Ethical Demand, trans. Susan Dew and Heidi Flegal, intro. Kees van Kooten Niekerk. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Løgstrup, K. E. (2020). The Ethical Demand, trans., intro., notes Bjørn Rabjerg and Robert Stern. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986). Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics. 2nd ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. (1908). “Kant and the English Platonists,” in Essays Philosophical and Psychological in Honor of Williams James, ed. members of the Columbia University Philosophy Department. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping (2022a). “Kant and Slavery: Or Why He Never Became a Radical Egalitarian,” Critical Philosophy of Race 10.2: 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping (2022b). “Kant on Lazy Savagery: Racialized,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 60: 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard (1988). The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, 2 vols. with a commentary critical, historical, and explanatory by F. B. Kaye. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, (1988). Originally published in 1714.Google Scholar
Martineau, James (1901). Types of Ethical Theory, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas (1999). “Pufendorf and the Correlativity Theory of Rights,” in Grotius, Pufendorf and Modern Natural Law, ed. Haakonssen, Knud. Ashgate Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 159–181.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Jane (1994). “Hume: Second Newton of the Moral Sciences,” Hume Studies 20: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1924). Autobiography. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (2002). Utilitarianism, ed. Sher, George. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co., Inc. References to chapter and paragraph numbers.Google Scholar
Miller, Fred D., Jr. (1995). Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. (1997). The Racial Contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. (2005a). “Ideal Theory as Ideology,” Hypatia 20: 165–184.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. (2005b). “Kant’s Üntermenschen,” in Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy, ed. Walls, Andrew. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. (2017). “Black Radical Kantianism,” Res Philosophia 95.1: 1–33.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1993). Principia Ethica, rev. ed. with the preface to the (projected) 2nd ed. and other papers, ed. with an intro. Thomas Baldwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, R. (2005). “Getting Told and Being Believed,” Philosophers' Imprint 5: 1–29.Google Scholar
Muller, Jerry Z. (1995). Adam Smith in His Time and Ours: Designing the Decent Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris (2001). The Sovereignty of the Good. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven (2006). Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven (2018). Spinoza: A Life, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (2022). “What Is Rude?” London Review of Books. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v44/n03/thomas-nagel/what-is-rudeGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2008). Roussesau’s Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (2007). On the Genealogy of Morality, rev. student ed., ed. Ansell-Pearson, Keith, trans. Carol Diethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard (2018). Culture of Honor. New York: Routlege.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, David Fate (1982). David Hume: Common-Sense Moralist, Sceptical Metaphysician. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis (2005). Natural Law, Laws of Nature, Natural Rights: Continuity and Discontinuity in the History of Ideas. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
OED (2021). Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. www-oed-comGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1971). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek (1986). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek (2011). On What Matters, 2 vol. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pashukanis, Evgeny (2003). The General Theory of Law and Marxism, intro. by Dragan Milovanovic. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Passmore, John (1951). Ralph Cudworth: An Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Passmore, John (1968). Hume’s Intentions, 2nd rev. ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Paul, Joanne (2020). Counsel and Command in Early Modern English Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip (1993). The Common Mind: An Essay on Society, Psychology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2009). Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind, and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip and Smith, Michael (1990). “Backgrounding Desire,” The Philosophical Review 99: 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip and Smith, Michael (1996). “Freedom in Belief and Desire,” Journal of Philosophy 93: 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pink, Thomas (2007). “Normativity and Reason,” Journal of Moral Philosophy 4: 406–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, (2001). The Republic, ed. Ferrari, G. R. F., trans. Tom Griffin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Platts, Mark (1979). Ways of Meaning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Price, Richard (1974). A Review of the Principal Questions in Morals (1758), et. Raphael, D. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. (2002). “Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?,” in Moral Writings, ed. MacAdam, Jim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1672). De Jure Naturae et Gentium. Lund: Adam Junghans.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1710). On the Law of Nature and Nations (De Jure Naturae et Gentium), trans. Basil Kennett. Oxford: A. and J. Churchill.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1718). Les devoirs du citoien, trans. Jean Barbeyrac, 4th ed. Amsterdam: Chez P. de Coup.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1934). On the Law of Nature and Nations, trans. C. H. Oldfather and W. A. Oldfather. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Originally published in 1672.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1991). On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law. trans. Michael Silverthorne, ed. Tulley, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (2009). Two Books of the Elements of Universal Jurisprudence, ed. Behne, Thomas and trans. W. A. Oldfather, with revisions by Thomas Behne. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1660.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter (1986). “Moral Realism,” The Philosophical Review 95: 163–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, D. D. (1969). British Moralists: 1650–1800. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1955). “Two Concepts of Rules,” The Philosophical Review 64: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1980). “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” The Journal of Philosophy 77: 515–572.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, ed. Herman, Barbara. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2007). Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1972). “Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46: 79-101.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1977). “Promises and Obligations,” in Law, Morality, and Society: Essays in Honor of H. L. A. Hart, eds. Hacker, P. M. S. and Raz, Joseph. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 210–228.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (2002a). Practical Reason and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (2002b). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (1969). Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press. Originally published in 1788.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2007). Thomas Reid on Practical Ethics: Lectures and Papers on Natural Religion, Self-Government, Natural Jurisprudence, and the Law of Nations, ed. Haakonssen, Knud. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur (2009). Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R. (unpublished). “Virtue Has No Master: Cudworth’s Metaphysics of Free Will.”Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert (2003). Emotions: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkoetter, Timothy (2003). “A Semantic Approach to Kant’s Practical Philosophy,” presented at the APA Central Division 2003 meetings in Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (2003). The Right and the Good, 2nd ed., ed. Stratton-Lake, Philip. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (2003). The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (2019). The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, ed. and trans. Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul (1992). Being and Nothingness, trans. Hazel Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (2014). Being Realistic about Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, Tamar (2021). Feeling Like It: A Theory of Inclination and Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffman, Kelley (2015). Rethinking Reason and Right: Moral Rationalism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Ph.D. Diss., Yale University.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Eric (2019). “Sophie de Grouchy, Adam Smith, and the Politics of Sympathy,” in Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought, eds. O’Neill, Eileen and Lascano, Marcy P.. Springer: Springer Nature, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1977). Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1990). Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant, v. i. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1998). The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Mark (2005a). “Cudworth and Normative Explanations,” Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 1.3: 1–27.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Mark (2005b). “The Hypothetical Imperative?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83: 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selby-Bigge, L. A. (1964). British Moralists, Being Selections from Writers Principally of the Eighteenth Century, 2 vols. Reprinted in one volume with a new introduction by Bernard H. Baumrin. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid (1956). “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,” in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1: 253–329.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2011). Kant on Human Dignity. Berlin: DeGruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer-Landau, Russ (2003). Moral Realism: A Defense. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl of (1698). “Preface,” in Select Sermons of Dr. Whichcot, ed. Ashley Cooper, Anthony, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury. London: A. & J. Churchill.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl of (1900). The Life, Unpublished Letters, and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury, ed. Rand, Benjamin. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl of (2001). Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, 3 vols., ed. Den Uyl, Douglas J.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. (Based on 1732 edition; first edition, 1711.) References are to volume and page number from the 1732 edition.Google Scholar
Sharp, Franc Chapman (1912). “The Ethical System of Richard Cumberland and Its Place in the History of British Ethics,” Mind 21: 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelby, Tommie (2005). We Who Are Dark: The Philosophical Foundations of Black Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelby, Tommie (2016). Dark Ghettos: Injustice, Dissent, and Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Patricia (2007). “Pirates, Kings, and Reasons to Act: Moral Motivation and the Role of Sanctions in Locke’s Moral Theory,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37: 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1964). Outlines of the History of Ethics for English Readers, 6th ed. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1967). The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Silk, Alex (2015). “Nietzschean Constructivism: Ethics and Metaethics for All and None,” Inquiry 58: 244–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skorupski, John (1999). Ethical Explorations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael (1992). From Morality to Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (1976). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, eds. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Originally published in 1776.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (1982). The Theory of Moral Sentiments, eds. Raphael, D. D. and MacFie, A. L.. Indianapolis: LibertyClassics. Originally published in 1759.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael (1989). “Dispositional Theories of Value,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 63: 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael (1994). The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (2014). Moral Conscience through the Ages: Fifth Century BCE to the Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict (1985a). Short Treatise on God, Man, and His Well-Being, in Collected Works, v. i, ed. Curley, Edwin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict (1985b). “Ethics,” in Collected Works, v. i, ed. Curley, Edwin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict (2016). “Theological-Political Treatise,” in Collected Works, v. ii, ed. Curley, Edwin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict (2007). Theological-Political Treatise, ed. with intro. Jonathan Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward A History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Charles (1937). “The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms,” Mind 46: 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1968). “Freedom and Resentment,” in Studies in the Philosophy of Thought and Action. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon (2008). “Constructivism about Reasons,” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 3: 207–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez, Francisco (1944). A Treatise on Laws and God the Lawgiver, in Selections from Three Works of Francisco Suarez, S.J., v. 2, trans. Gwladys L. Williams, Ammi Brown, and John Waldron, rev. Henry Davis, S.J., intro. James Brown Scott. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1944. Originally published in 1612.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael (2004). “What Is It to Wrong Someone? A Puzzle about Justice,” in Reason and Value: Themes from the Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Jay Wallace, R., Pettit, Philip, Scheffler, Samuel, and Smith, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian (1997). The Idea of Natural Rights. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael (2018). A Natural History of Human Morality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trianosky, Gregory (1978). “On the Obligation to Be Virtuous: Shaftesbury and the Question, Why Be Moral?” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16: 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschentscher, Axel (2012). The Basic Law (Grundgesetz) 2012: The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1501131Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1981). Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1993). Philosophy and Government: 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard (2001). The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Robert C. (1969). The Marxian Revolutionary Idea. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Varden, Helga (2020). Sex, Love, and Gender: A Kantian Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villey, Michel (1982). Philosophie du Droit: 1. Definitions et fins du droit, 3rd ed. Paris: Galloz.Google Scholar
Villey, Michel (1984). Philosophie du Droit: 2. Les moyens du droit, 2nd ed. Paris: Galloz.Google Scholar
Voitle, Robert (1984). The Third Earl of Shaftesbury. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Wahrman, Dror (2006). The Making of the Modern Self: Identity and Culture in Eighteenth-Century England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Gary (1975). “Free Agency,” Journal of Philosophy 72: 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary (1996). “Two Faces of Responsibility,” Philosophical Topics 24: 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary (2009). “Promises, Reasons, and Normative Powers,” in Reasons for Action, eds. Sobel, David and Wall, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1981a). Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1981b). “Internal and External Reasons,” in Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1995). “Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame,” in Making Sense of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Kenneth P. (1985). “Hutcheson’s Alleged Moral Realism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 23: 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisdom, John (1948). “Things and Persons,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 22: 202–215.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan (1987). “Sanity and Moral Responsibility,” in Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology, ed. Schoeman, F. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul (1970). In Defense of Anarchism. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Wollaston, William (1978). The Religion of Nature Delineated. New York: Garland Publishing Co., Inc. Originally published in 1722.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (1990). Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (1999). Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (2016). Fichte’s Ethical Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolhouse, Richard (2007). Locke: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Worsnip, Alex (2015). “Hobbes and Normative Egoism,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 97: 481–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaffe, Gideon (2000). Liberty Worth the Name: Locke on Free Agency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Julian (2010). Friedrich Nietzsche: A Philosophical Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu (1992). Spinoza and Other Heretics, Volume 1: The Marrano of Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×